I have a legacy ASP application running on IIS 6.0 (Windows Server 2003 Web
Edition) that is throwing an error when processesing a certain asp page that
has about 200 or so include directives.
We've checked the spelling, paths, include directives, and files
individually and all of them work.
We have also commented out random ones (4 or so at a time) and then the page
works. It doesn't matter which ones we comment out, just so long as we reduce
the number of pages by 3 or 4, sometimes 5.
The page worked just fine before one of our developers had to add a few new
include files. Now it seems we've reached some sort of ceiling on the number
of include files or the response / processing buffer that IIS will allow for
the asp page.
We've checked pretty much all of the IIS MetaBase property settings for
cache control and buffer limits and so forth but to no avail.
Is there some hidden or conveluded setting in IIS to allow more than a
certain number of include files or preprocessing directive that limits the
amount of memory a page may take up after combining all of its include files?
This is a very frustrating problem and I have not been able to find any
documentation on it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
--
- Chad 7 3283
> a certain asp page that has about 200 or so include directives.
Wow!
Anyway, maybe you could include the actual error, or else we could guess all
day what the error is...
That's the problem. The only error returned is the IIS 500 Internal Server
Error. We checked the logs, the avtivity logs, and the InetSrv logs for that
site, and could not get an actual error code other than that.
We also tried running the site from IE on the actual server machine with
friendly errors off and it did not return anything (blank page).
I don't know where else to look for logs or error codes as far as IIS goes
with ASP.
"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" wrote: a certain asp page that has about 200 or so include directives.
Wow!
Anyway, maybe you could include the actual error, or else we could guess all day what the error is... http://www.aspfaq.com/2109
-- http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"Chad Scharf" <ch**@ccponline .us> wrote in message
news:6E******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... That's the problem. The only error returned is the IIS 500 Internal Server Error. We checked the logs, the avtivity logs, and the InetSrv logs for
that site, and could not get an actual error code other than that.
We also tried running the site from IE on the actual server machine with friendly errors off and it did not return anything (blank page).
I don't know where else to look for logs or error codes as far as IIS goes with ASP.
"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" wrote:
a certain asp page that has about 200 or so include directives.
Wow!
Anyway, maybe you could include the actual error, or else we could guess
all day what the error is...
You can always "hard code" include files inline....as a last resort possibly
I've NEVER seen more than 5-6 includes in my years of ASP coding though.
Jeff
"Chad Scharf" <ch**@ccponline .us> wrote in message
news:1F******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... I have a legacy ASP application running on IIS 6.0 (Windows Server 2003
Web Edition) that is throwing an error when processesing a certain asp page
that has about 200 or so include directives.
We've checked the spelling, paths, include directives, and files individually and all of them work.
We have also commented out random ones (4 or so at a time) and then the
page works. It doesn't matter which ones we comment out, just so long as we
reduce the number of pages by 3 or 4, sometimes 5.
The page worked just fine before one of our developers had to add a few
new include files. Now it seems we've reached some sort of ceiling on the
number of include files or the response / processing buffer that IIS will allow
for the asp page.
We've checked pretty much all of the IIS MetaBase property settings for cache control and buffer limits and so forth but to no avail.
Is there some hidden or conveluded setting in IIS to allow more than a certain number of include files or preprocessing directive that limits the amount of memory a page may take up after combining all of its include
files? This is a very frustrating problem and I have not been able to find any documentation on it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks -- - Chad
By inline I assume that you mean all on one line:
<%#include "file.asp", "file2.asp" , "file3.asp" %>
or
<%#include "file.asp" #include "file2.asp" %>
or
<%#include "file.asp"%><%# include "file2.asp" %>
none of these work in the fashion expected (less lines of code = correct
processing)
- Chad
"Jeff Dillon" wrote: You can always "hard code" include files inline....as a last resort possibly
I've NEVER seen more than 5-6 includes in my years of ASP coding though.
Jeff
"Chad Scharf" <ch**@ccponline .us> wrote in message news:1F******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... I have a legacy ASP application running on IIS 6.0 (Windows Server 2003 Web Edition) that is throwing an error when processesing a certain asp page that has about 200 or so include directives.
We've checked the spelling, paths, include directives, and files individually and all of them work.
We have also commented out random ones (4 or so at a time) and then the page works. It doesn't matter which ones we comment out, just so long as we reduce the number of pages by 3 or 4, sometimes 5.
The page worked just fine before one of our developers had to add a few new include files. Now it seems we've reached some sort of ceiling on the number of include files or the response / processing buffer that IIS will allow for the asp page.
We've checked pretty much all of the IIS MetaBase property settings for cache control and buffer limits and so forth but to no avail.
Is there some hidden or conveluded setting in IIS to allow more than a certain number of include files or preprocessing directive that limits the amount of memory a page may take up after combining all of its include files? This is a very frustrating problem and I have not been able to find any documentation on it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks -- - Chad
I think he meant taking the code out of 5 include files and combining them
into one.
What possible use could you have for 200 distinct #include files, other than
making anyone [who maintains it] want to quit?
-- http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"Chad Scharf" <ch**@ccponline .us> wrote in message
news:09******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... By inline I assume that you mean all on one line: <%#include "file.asp", "file2.asp" , "file3.asp" %> or <%#include "file.asp" #include "file2.asp" %> or <%#include "file.asp"%><%# include "file2.asp" %>
none of these work in the fashion expected (less lines of code = correct processing)
- Chad
"Jeff Dillon" wrote:
You can always "hard code" include files inline....as a last resort
possibly I've NEVER seen more than 5-6 includes in my years of ASP coding though.
Jeff
"Chad Scharf" <ch**@ccponline .us> wrote in message news:1F******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... I have a legacy ASP application running on IIS 6.0 (Windows Server
2003 Web Edition) that is throwing an error when processesing a certain asp
page that has about 200 or so include directives.
We've checked the spelling, paths, include directives, and files individually and all of them work.
We have also commented out random ones (4 or so at a time) and then
the page works. It doesn't matter which ones we comment out, just so long as we reduce the number of pages by 3 or 4, sometimes 5.
The page worked just fine before one of our developers had to add a
few new include files. Now it seems we've reached some sort of ceiling on the number of include files or the response / processing buffer that IIS will
allow for the asp page.
We've checked pretty much all of the IIS MetaBase property settings
for cache control and buffer limits and so forth but to no avail.
Is there some hidden or conveluded setting in IIS to allow more than a certain number of include files or preprocessing directive that limits
the amount of memory a page may take up after combining all of its include files? This is a very frustrating problem and I have not been able to find
any documentation on it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks -- - Chad
Almost what Aaron said...I meant not using a few include files altogether,
but put the code they contain inline
Jeff
"Chad Scharf" <ch**@ccponline .us> wrote in message
news:09******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... By inline I assume that you mean all on one line: <%#include "file.asp", "file2.asp" , "file3.asp" %> or <%#include "file.asp" #include "file2.asp" %> or <%#include "file.asp"%><%# include "file2.asp" %>
none of these work in the fashion expected (less lines of code = correct processing)
- Chad
"Jeff Dillon" wrote:
You can always "hard code" include files inline....as a last resort
possibly I've NEVER seen more than 5-6 includes in my years of ASP coding though.
Jeff
"Chad Scharf" <ch**@ccponline .us> wrote in message news:1F******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... I have a legacy ASP application running on IIS 6.0 (Windows Server
2003 Web Edition) that is throwing an error when processesing a certain asp
page that has about 200 or so include directives.
We've checked the spelling, paths, include directives, and files individually and all of them work.
We have also commented out random ones (4 or so at a time) and then
the page works. It doesn't matter which ones we comment out, just so long as we reduce the number of pages by 3 or 4, sometimes 5.
The page worked just fine before one of our developers had to add a
few new include files. Now it seems we've reached some sort of ceiling on the number of include files or the response / processing buffer that IIS will
allow for the asp page.
We've checked pretty much all of the IIS MetaBase property settings
for cache control and buffer limits and so forth but to no avail.
Is there some hidden or conveluded setting in IIS to allow more than a certain number of include files or preprocessing directive that limits
the amount of memory a page may take up after combining all of its include files? This is a very frustrating problem and I have not been able to find
any documentation on it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks -- - Chad This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Tom Cat |
last post by:
Is there anything wrong with using a lot of include files?
On one part of my website, I have a form. The page it posts data to,
includes a different file based on some of the values. The include
files also include other pages based on different values. All of
these work together to select the right information from the database
and display it in the correct format.
I'm just wondering if it is better to put all the code in one file...
|
by: Tom Lee |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm new to .NET 2003 compiler. When I tried to compile my
program using DEBUG mode, I got the following errors in the
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\Vc7
\include\xdebug file as folows. I need help to resolve
them ASAP:
cl /c /nologo /MDd /W3 /Od /GR /GM /Zi /GX /D "_DEBUG" /D "
WIN32" /D "_W
INDOWS" /D "_WINDLL" /D "_AFXDLL" /D "_MBCS" /D "_USRDLL" /
|
by: Sarath |
last post by:
I am working with an application using ASP, getting below error when i am
trying to include new asp include file.
_____________________________________________________________________
Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a0006'
Overflow: ''
____________________________________________________________________
I am sure that there is no error in the new asp file as if i delete any
existing include file then no issues.
|
by: Ramesh |
last post by:
Hi,
I am currently maintaining a legacy code with a very very large code base.
I am facing problems with C/C++ files having a lot of un-necessary #includes.
On an average every C/C++ file has around 150+ .h files included. I find 75%
of the files unnecessary and could be removed. Considering the fact that I
have a huge code base, I can't manually fix it.
Are there any tools that would report un wanted .h files?
|
by: clusardi2k |
last post by:
Hello,
I'm trying to understand someone else code.
The below compiles and works fine and dandy.
#include <sys/types.h>
#include "unistd.h"
#include "stdio.h"
| |
by: Puzzled |
last post by:
This is a weird problem, but perhaps someone else has seen it before
(I hope!)
If I use a fully qualified include call
include ( 'http://localhost/subtree/filename.php')
I get an 'undefined function' error when calling a routine that's
defined in that file.
|
by: Minh |
last post by:
I've just installed VS.NET 2003 on my Athlon XP 1800+. However I couldn't
get any project with STL includes to compile even if I create a new empty
project (and added #include <string>). It gave me a bunch of "missing ;"
errors. I did reinstall the whole thing a few times but it didn't work.
Anyone have any idea?
Thanks
c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET\Vc7\include\xutility(862) :
|
by: ya man |
last post by:
when i use #include <iostream.h> in some files
i get lots of error messages of the kind 'ambiguous symbol
this is solved when i use #include <iostream
why is that ? and can i use #include <iostream.h> in some way
examples to the error messages
c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET\Vc7\include\streamb.h(90): error C2872: 'ios' : ambiguous symbo
c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET\Vc7\include\streamb.h(90): error C2872:...
|
by: key9 |
last post by:
Hi all
look at the organize tree
main.c
------
#include lib_adapter.c
main()
{
foo();
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |