473,795 Members | 3,157 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Sign your macros?

For software you build for others, do most of you sign your macros and
if so how or do you set macro security to low?

Bob
Jun 27 '08 #1
14 1595
Bob Alston <bo********@yah oo.comwrote:
>For software you build for others, do most of you sign your macros and
if so how or do you set macro security to low?
I set the macro security low. However I'm seriously consider moving to signing the
code as I need the same capability for the Auto FE Updater exe.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
Jun 27 '08 #2
"Tony Toews [MVP]" <tt****@teluspl anet.netwrote in
news:s5******** *************** *********@4ax.c om:
Bob Alston <bo********@yah oo.comwrote:
>>For software you build for others, do most of you sign your macros and
if so how or do you set macro security to low?

I set the macro security low. However I'm seriously consider moving to
signing the code as I need the same capability for the Auto FE Updater
exe.

Tony
Just to clarify - this involves purchasing a digital certificate, right? One
that needs to be renewed yearly?

I looked into this a while ago and it seemed like the least expensive digital
certificate was around $700 US a year.

Or are there less epxensive alternatives to signing your code (in my case,
MDE and MDB)?
Jun 27 '08 #3
On Sat, 03 May 2008 17:02:13 GMT, diogenes <li***@dark.com wrote:

More like $300/year:
https://www.thawte.com/ssl-digital-c...dTo-SecureCode

Or you can create a free one using selfcert.exe

-Tom.
>"Tony Toews [MVP]" <tt****@teluspl anet.netwrote in
news:s5******* *************** **********@4ax. com:
>Bob Alston <bo********@yah oo.comwrote:
>>>For software you build for others, do most of you sign your macros and
if so how or do you set macro security to low?

I set the macro security low. However I'm seriously consider moving to
signing the code as I need the same capability for the Auto FE Updater
exe.

Tony

Just to clarify - this involves purchasing a digital certificate, right? One
that needs to be renewed yearly?

I looked into this a while ago and it seemed like the least expensive digital
certificate was around $700 US a year.

Or are there less epxensive alternatives to signing your code (in my case,
MDE and MDB)?
Jun 27 '08 #4

"Tom van Stiphout" <no************ *@cox.netschree f in bericht news:oe******** *************** *********@4ax.c om...
On Sat, 03 May 2008 17:02:13 GMT, diogenes <li***@dark.com wrote:

More like $300/year:
https://www.thawte.com/ssl-digital-c...dTo-SecureCode

Or you can create a free one using selfcert.exe

-Tom.
Selfcert.exe only works on your own PC...
So this is of no use for distributing apps.

==I tell my users to set macro security to low, and also tell them to make sure their anti-virus software is updated.

Arno R

Jun 27 '08 #5
On Sun, 4 May 2008 12:21:38 +0200, "Arno R"
<ar************ ****@planet.nlw rote:

I think it can be used on other PCs, but since it's not real one it
would not have the desired behavior of getting rid of the security
warning. See also: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/206637/

-Tom.

>
"Tom van Stiphout" <no************ *@cox.netschree f in bericht news:oe******** *************** *********@4ax.c om...
>On Sat, 03 May 2008 17:02:13 GMT, diogenes <li***@dark.com wrote:

More like $300/year:
https://www.thawte.com/ssl-digital-c...dTo-SecureCode

Or you can create a free one using selfcert.exe

-Tom.

Selfcert.exe only works on your own PC...
So this is of no use for distributing apps.

==I tell my users to set macro security to low, and also tell them to make sure their anti-virus software is updated.

Arno R
Jun 27 '08 #6
Tom van Stiphout <no************ *@cox.netwrote in
news:2d******** *************** *********@4ax.c om:
On Sun, 4 May 2008 12:21:38 +0200, "Arno R"
<ar************ ****@planet.nlw rote:

I think it can be used on other PCs, but since it's not real one it
would not have the desired behavior of getting rid of the security
warning. See also: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/206637/

-Tom.

>>
"Tom van Stiphout" <no************ *@cox.netschree f in bericht
news:oe****** *************** ***********@4ax .com...
>>On Sat, 03 May 2008 17:02:13 GMT, diogenes <li***@dark.com wrote:

More like $300/year:
https://www.thawte.com/ssl-digital-c...ing/index.html
?click=DoYouN eedTo-SecureCode

Or you can create a free one using selfcert.exe

-Tom.

Selfcert.ex e only works on your own PC...
So this is of no use for distributing apps.

==I tell my users to set macro security to low, and also tell them to
make sure their anti-virus software is updated.

Arno R
Does all this apply to applications that use the runtime? Can I
programmaticall y set macro security to low just for the runtime app without
disturbing any retail installation of Access? (I am using the Sage scripts so
my runtime is pretty well isolated from any retail installations.)


Jun 27 '08 #7

"diogenes" <li***@dark.com schreef in bericht news:MrnTj.2359 $cD3.2238@trndn y02...
Tom van Stiphout <no************ *@cox.netwrote in
news:2d******** *************** *********@4ax.c om:
>On Sun, 4 May 2008 12:21:38 +0200, "Arno R"
<ar*********** *****@planet.nl wrote:

I think it can be used on other PCs, but since it's not real one it
would not have the desired behavior of getting rid of the security
warning. See also: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/206637/

-Tom.

>>>
"Tom van Stiphout" <no************ *@cox.netschree f in bericht
news:oe***** *************** ************@4a x.com...
On Sat, 03 May 2008 17:02:13 GMT, diogenes <li***@dark.com wrote:

More like $300/year:
https://www.thawte.com/ssl-digital-c...ing/index.html
?click=DoYou NeedTo-SecureCode

Or you can create a free one using selfcert.exe

-Tom.
Selfcert.e xe only works on your own PC...
So this is of no use for distributing apps.

==I tell my users to set macro security to low, and also tell them to
make sure their anti-virus software is updated.

Arno R
Does all this apply to applications that use the runtime? Can I
programmaticall y set macro security to low just for the runtime app without
disturbing any retail installation of Access? (I am using the Sage scripts so
my runtime is pretty well isolated from any retail installations.)

No-one in this thread has stated that you can programmaticall y set macro security to low...
(I guess some virusses try to do so ...)

Arno R
Jun 27 '08 #8
"Arno R" <ar************ ****@planet.nlw rote in
news:48******** **************@ text.nova.plane t.nl:
>
"diogenes" <li***@dark.com schreef in bericht
news:MrnTj.2359 $cD3.2238@trndn y02...
>>>>==I tell my users to set macro security to low, and also tell
them to
>>>>make sure their anti-virus software is updated.

Arno R

Does all this apply to applications that use the runtime? Can I
programmatical ly set macro security to low just for the runtime app
without
>disturbing any retail installation of Access? (I am using the Sage
scripts so
>my runtime is pretty well isolated from any retail installations.)


No-one in this thread has stated that you can programmaticall y set macro
security to low... (I guess some virusses try to do so ...)

Arno R
If I set macro security to low when developing my application, then create an
MDE and distribute it with a runtime, will the runtime "pick up" the macro
security setting from the MDE?

I don't distribute ANYTHING that requires anyone to run it under their own
retail Access installation. I'm hoping there is a way to have macro security
low only on my app, but not disturb any settings the user may have for any
other Access apps.

Jun 27 '08 #9
On Sun, 04 May 2008 20:24:07 GMT, diogenes <li***@dark.com wrote:

<clip>
>
If I set macro security to low when developing my application, then create an
MDE and distribute it with a runtime, will the runtime "pick up" the macro
security setting from the MDE?
Learn to think as a hacker. So: of course not.
>
I don't distribute ANYTHING that requires anyone to run it under their own
retail Access installation. I'm hoping there is a way to have macro security
low only on my app, but not disturb any settings the user may have for any
other Access apps.
You may have to add to your manual how people set security to low.
In A2007 we have a new option named Trust Center.

-Tom.

Jun 27 '08 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

21
2992
by: Chris Reedy | last post by:
For everyone - Apologies for the length of this message. If you don't want to look at the long example, you can skip to the end of the message. And for the Python gurus among you, if you can spare the time, I would appreciate any comments (including words like evil and disgusting, if you think they are applicable :-}) on the example here. Kenny -
699
34260
by: mike420 | last post by:
I think everyone who used Python will agree that its syntax is the best thing going for it. It is very readable and easy for everyone to learn. But, Python does not a have very good macro capabilities, unfortunately. I'd like to know if it may be possible to add a powerful macro system to Python, while keeping its amazing syntax, and if it could be possible to add Pythonistic syntax to Lisp or Scheme, while keeping all of the...
16
2425
by: mike420 | last post by:
Tayss wrote: > > app = wxPySimpleApp() > frame = MainWindow(None, -1, "A window") > frame.Show(True) > app.MainLoop() > Why do you need a macro for that? Why don't you just write
37
2814
by: michele.simionato | last post by:
Paul Rubin wrote: > How about macros? Some pretty horrible things have been done in C > programs with the C preprocessor. But there's a movememnt afloat to > add hygienic macros to Python. Got any thoughts about that? "Movement" seems quite an exaggeration. Maybe 2-3 people made some experiments, but nobody within the core Python developers seems to be willing to advocate the introduction of macros. > Why should you care whether the...
3
2666
by: Stephen Sprunk | last post by:
On a project I'm working on, I ran across the following macros: /* assume s is struct stream *, s->p is char, v is unit16_t or uint32_t */ #define in_uint16_le(s,v) { v = *((s)->p++); v += *((s)->p++) << 8; } #define in_uint32_le(s,v) { in_uint16_le(s,v) \ v += *((s)->p++) << 16; v += *((s)->p++) << 24; } I'm personally not fond of function-like macros and wanted to turn these into static inline functions, but I'm having trouble doing...
47
32926
by: Emil | last post by:
Is there any hope that new versions of PHP will support macros similar to C or C++? I've searched manual and didn't find anything except define directive, but it can be used to define constant values only. Of course it is not THAT neccessary functionality, but it could be very useful. greetz Emil
33
8903
by: Robert Seacord | last post by:
When writing C99 code is a reasonable recommendation to use inline functions instead of macros? What sort of things is it still reasonable to do using macros? For example, is it reasonable to write type generic functions macros? #define CUBE(I) ( (I) * (I) * (I) ) Is there some more concise set of things where inline functions should be used instead of macros? Multi-statement macros, for example?
17
10388
by: Digital Puer | last post by:
I've inherited some code where the coder placed dollar signs in his preprocessor macros. What is the significance of the dollar signs ($) ? Example: #define ALLOCATE(task,pointer) \ { \ long task$; \ if (task == FOO) { \ task$ = ZERO); \
27
6080
by: artifact.one | last post by:
Hello. I want to be able to portably determine whether or not a given double value is negative. Under C99, I do: if (signbit(d)) negative = 1; Or, if the implementation doesn't provide signbit(), I do:
0
9519
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
10437
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
1
10164
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
10001
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
1
7538
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
6780
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
5437
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
0
5563
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
3
2920
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.