473,651 Members | 2,461 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

3 machines, same application, different speed results

I have an app on three different machines; front end on the PC, backend
on the network.

These are my results on loading the application when I press OK from the
Logon form (username/pw) to presenting the opening form and finishing
running setup routines.

On the old machine (4 yrs old). Win2000. Dell. 1 gig memory
A97 (backend A97 format) 7-8 seconds
A2003 (backend A97 format) 12-14 seconds
A2003 (backend A2003 format) 8-9 seconds

2 new machines. XP. 2 gigs ram. Dell.
A2003 (backend A97 format) 25 seconds to load on each.

A2003 is service pack 2. All computers use the same desktop icon.

Both new machines are extremely slow on opening and going into various
forms. They're on the same network, same backend file as the old
machine. They use Norton AntiVirus.

The backend resides on a Novell file server.

Any ideas on what could cause the new computer load time to almost
double in time compared to the old machine? I would think a faster
processor and more memory would make them faster.

Jun 27 '08 #1
7 1386
On May 2, 10:26 am, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:
I have an app on three different machines; front end on the PC, backend
on the network.

These are my results on loading the application when I press OK from the
Logon form (username/pw) to presenting the opening form and finishing
running setup routines.

On the old machine (4 yrs old). Win2000. Dell. 1 gig memory
A97 (backend A97 format) 7-8 seconds
A2003 (backend A97 format) 12-14 seconds
A2003 (backend A2003 format) 8-9 seconds

2 new machines. XP. 2 gigs ram. Dell.
A2003 (backend A97 format) 25 seconds to load on each.

A2003 is service pack 2. All computers use the same desktop icon.

Both new machines are extremely slow on opening and going into various
forms. They're on the same network, same backend file as the old
machine. They use Norton AntiVirus.

The backend resides on a Novell file server.

Any ideas on what could cause the new computer load time to almost
double in time compared to the old machine? I would think a faster
processor and more memory would make them faster.
All other things being equal, I'd say it's Win2000 vs. WinXP when
accessing a Netware server. It would be interesting to see if you
experience the same problem by putting the back end on one of your new
XP machines and then testing the front end on the old Win2000 versus
the front end on the second new WinXP machine (thus eliminating Novell
as the possible culprit) while connecting to the back end on the first
XP machine using simple file sharing.

Bruce
Jun 27 '08 #2
On 2 Mai, 17:26, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:
Both new machines are extremely slow on opening and going into various
forms. *They're on the same network, same *backend file as the old
machine. *They use Norton AntiVirus.
What are the load times without Norton?

Marco P
Jun 27 '08 #3
Marco Pagliero wrote:
On 2 Mai, 17:26, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:

>>Both new machines are extremely slow on opening and going into various
forms. They're on the same network, same backend file as the old
machine. They use Norton AntiVirus.

What are the load times without Norton?

Marco P
I will check.
Jun 27 '08 #4
Bruce wrote:
On May 2, 10:26 am, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:
>>I have an app on three different machines; front end on the PC, backend
on the network.

These are my results on loading the application when I press OK from the
Logon form (username/pw) to presenting the opening form and finishing
running setup routines.

On the old machine (4 yrs old). Win2000. Dell. 1 gig memory
A97 (backend A97 format) 7-8 seconds
A2003 (backend A97 format) 12-14 seconds
A2003 (backend A2003 format) 8-9 seconds

2 new machines. XP. 2 gigs ram. Dell.
A2003 (backend A97 format) 25 seconds to load on each.

A2003 is service pack 2. All computers use the same desktop icon.

Both new machines are extremely slow on opening and going into various
forms. They're on the same network, same backend file as the old
machine. They use Norton AntiVirus.

The backend resides on a Novell file server.

Any ideas on what could cause the new computer load time to almost
double in time compared to the old machine? I would think a faster
processor and more memory would make them faster.


All other things being equal, I'd say it's Win2000 vs. WinXP when
accessing a Netware server. It would be interesting to see if you
experience the same problem by putting the back end on one of your new
XP machines and then testing the front end on the old Win2000 versus
the front end on the second new WinXP machine (thus eliminating Novell
as the possible culprit) while connecting to the back end on the first
XP machine using simple file sharing.

Bruce
Thanks, Bruce. I will check this out. I definitely need to see if
there's a difference between the two. I'll post my results later.

Jun 27 '08 #5
Salad wrote:
Bruce wrote:
>On May 2, 10:26 am, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:
>>I have an app on three different machines; front end on the PC, backend
on the network.

These are my results on loading the application when I press OK from the
Logon form (username/pw) to presenting the opening form and finishing
running setup routines.

On the old machine (4 yrs old). Win2000. Dell. 1 gig memory
A97 (backend A97 format) 7-8 seconds
A2003 (backend A97 format) 12-14 seconds
A2003 (backend A2003 format) 8-9 seconds

2 new machines. XP. 2 gigs ram. Dell.
A2003 (backend A97 format) 25 seconds to load on each.

A2003 is service pack 2. All computers use the same desktop icon.

Both new machines are extremely slow on opening and going into various
forms. They're on the same network, same backend file as the old
machine. They use Norton AntiVirus.

The backend resides on a Novell file server.

Any ideas on what could cause the new computer load time to almost
double in time compared to the old machine? I would think a faster
processor and more memory would make them faster.

All other things being equal, I'd say it's Win2000 vs. WinXP when
accessing a Netware server. It would be interesting to see if you
experience the same problem by putting the back end on one of your new
XP machines and then testing the front end on the old Win2000 versus
the front end on the second new WinXP machine (thus eliminating Novell
as the possible culprit) while connecting to the back end on the first
XP machine using simple file sharing.

Bruce


Thanks, Bruce. I will check this out. I definitely need to see if
there's a difference between the two. I'll post my results later.
You could have knocked me over with a feather on Sunday. I opened the
new XP machine and the main form displayed in 3-4 seconds, all load
processes complete. Same thing on many tests. Hurray!

Then I opened the app on another machine and it went back to a typical
slow load of 25-30 seconds. Bummer.

I got in contact with their network guy and we hashed some things out.
I asked him to check on NortonAV...they have the corporate edition. He
stopped the scanning on MDB files. When he did that it dropped the load
time back to 3-4 seconds. Hurray!
Jun 27 '08 #6
Which is worse, Necrotizing Fasciitis or Norton Anythingitis?

On May 6, 10:31*am, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:
Salad wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On May 2, 10:26 am, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:
I got in contact with their network guy and we hashed some things out.
I asked him to check on NortonAV...they have the corporate edition. *He
stopped the scanning on MDB files. *When he did that it dropped the load
time back to 3-4 seconds. *Hurray!
Jun 27 '08 #7
lyle fairfield wrote:
Which is worse, Necrotizing Fasciitis or Norton Anythingitis?
:) With my luck I'd contact Dracunculiasis after drinking Symantec
kool-aide.

>
On May 6, 10:31 am, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:
>>Salad wrote:
>>>Bruce wrote:
>>>>On May 2, 10:26 am, Salad <o...@vinegar.c omwrote:

I got in contact with their network guy and we hashed some things out.
I asked him to check on NortonAV...they have the corporate edition. He
stopped the scanning on MDB files. When he did that it dropped the load
time back to 3-4 seconds. Hurray!

Jun 27 '08 #8

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

5
6326
by: sql-db2-dba | last post by:
We have DB2 UDB v8.1 fixpak3 on AIX 5. Production and Development configuarations (at least for DB2) are identical albeit production is a 2-way server while development has only one processor. Tables and indexes have the same schema. In fact, the dev database was taken from a prod backup recently. Size of the tables differ slightly. Yet, on a given query (with 4 tables joined), it took 30-50 times longer to run in prod than on development....
8
1128
by: John Bailo | last post by:
I wrote a console app that reads some fields from a database, does some string parsing and writes the fields to a text file. The slow step in loop is the string parsing. I ran my code on 4 different machines, 1 with single proc, 1 with dual, and 2 with quad. There were different memory sizes available from 0.5G to 4G. Here's the thing:
7
1696
by: muttu2244 | last post by:
Hi Everyone I want to run a python script in all the machines that are connected through local network and collect the information about that machine such as HDD size, RAM capacity(with number of slots) ,processer speed etc. But i want to run a script from just the server, so that it should start scripts in all other machines, and get their local machines information and dump the same information in some FTP.
22
6255
by: Jordan S. | last post by:
SQL Server will be used as the back-end database to a non trivial client application. In question is the choice of client application: I need to be able to speak intelligently about when one client (MS Access vs ..NET Windows Forms) would be preferred over the other. While I have some good arguments on both sides, I would appreciate your points of view on the topic.
2
2757
by: jphelan | last post by:
Ever since I successfully applied some techniques for increasing the speed of my 17 meg. Application; it has only made me hunger for more. First, let me list what I have done so far: 1. Split the application and database into front and back-ends, 2. Increased the load-time of my application by "pre-loading my heaviest forms when the database is initially opened, 3. When forms do open, under, "Filter Lookup" I use, "Never", 4. I set...
67
7352
by: Rui Maciel | last post by:
I've been delving into finite state machines and at this time it seems that the best way to implement them is through an intense use of the goto statement. Yet, everyone plus their granmother is constantly cursing at the goto statement, accusing it of being some sort of spawn of satan. So it seems we have a pickle here. The thing is, at first thought it seems that there aren't any viable alternatives which are better suited for this...
5
1516
by: nafej | last post by:
I was running some performance tests for the web application I work on, both on my desktop and laptop. I found that javascript processes MUCH slower on my desktop, even though it's a more powerful machine. The stats are as follows: Laptop: Pentium M, 1.86gHz, 1gb RAM, IE7 Desktop: Pentium 4, 2.80gHz, 1gb RAM, IE6 I have confirmed that co-workers with similar setups show the same results. Also, when I run javascript tests on both boxes...
3
1120
by: pjsrikanth | last post by:
Hi, My web application is running on 5000 different machines. For example, if i have to know who are all the clients which are using my application, what would be my appoach? Correct me if iam wrong, but I came up with an idea of installing a windows service on each of the client machines whichever are using my .net application. This way I can perform a check on all those machines having the windows service up & running. At my server, I...
5
2538
by: Christopher Brewster | last post by:
I am running the same script on the same data on two different machines (the folder is synchronised with Dropbox). I get two different results. All the script does is count words in different files and perform a simple set operation on the word lists. The laptop is a Macbook Pro (2 1/2 years old) running OS X 10.5.5 with Python 2.5.1 The desktop is an iMac (brand new) running OS X 10.5.5 also with Python 2.5.1 I have tried running the...
0
8349
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
8795
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
1
8460
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
8576
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
7296
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
0
5609
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
4143
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
0
4281
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
2
1585
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.