Synclock statement, no try finally emitted to IL?

[Eric Newton]

I find it curious that the Synclock...End Synclock do not emit a try finally
as well...

SyncLock Me
Me.someOperation()
End SyncLock

I would expect to see in the generated code:
try
Monitor.Enter(Me)
Me.SomeOperation()
finally
Monitor.Exit(Me)
end try

but it doesnt emit the try finally construct

anybody else find this strange? I definitely find this strange

--
Eric Newton
C#/ASP Application Developer
http://ensoft-software.com/
er**@cc.ensoft-software.com [remove the first "CC."]

[Mattias Sjögren]

Eric,

I find it curious that the Synclock...End Synclock do not emit a try finally
as well...

It does. Where/how are you viewing the generated IL code? I clearly
see the SEH stuff there. If you're using ILDASM, do you have the
"Expand try/catch" option turned on?

Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[Eric Newton]

I stand corrected.

I was using the Lutz Roeder .NET decompiler, it shows no try finally...
bizarre...

--
Eric Newton
C#/ASP Application Developer
http://ensoft-software.com/
er**@cc.ensoft-software.com [remove the first "CC."]

"Mattias Sjögren" <ma********************@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:ed*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Eric,

I find it curious that the Synclock...End Synclock do not emit a try finallyas well...

It does. Where/how are you viewing the generated IL code? I clearly
see the SEH stuff there. If you're using ILDASM, do you have the
"Expand try/catch" option turned on?

Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.