473,725 Members | 2,032 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Is F1 in VS2005 really dumb?

CMM
Is it me or has anyone noticed that F1 is really dumb in VS2005. Since VB3 I
have been able to click F1 on an ambiguous method in code and the IDE
automatically determines the type based on the code itself and shows the
right help topic. This even worked more or less in VS2003.

But in VS2005, if I highlight the "Host" method below and hit F1 I get a
help topic on the "UriBuilder.Hos t" property. Huh????? That's dumb.

Dim o as New System.Net.Mail .SmtpClient
o.Host = ...


Jan 21 '06 #1
16 1647
CMM
Oh I see said the blind man. If you DON'T *highlight* the method call but
just put the cursor on it, then F1 behaves as it should. If you instead
highlight the whole word, it does a generic (and pretty much always
innacurate) search.

"CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:e5******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP09.phx.gbl.. .
Is it me or has anyone noticed that F1 is really dumb in VS2005. Since VB3
I have been able to click F1 on an ambiguous method in code and the IDE
automatically determines the type based on the code itself and shows the
right help topic. This even worked more or less in VS2003.

But in VS2005, if I highlight the "Host" method below and hit F1 I get a
help topic on the "UriBuilder.Hos t" property. Huh????? That's dumb.

Dim o as New System.Net.Mail .SmtpClient
o.Host = ...

Jan 21 '06 #2
The important thing to remember is that Microsoft is constantly evolving their help systems so that just about the time a developer is comfortable with the
current system they change it - often for the worse.

You'd think that after 20 some years we would have a help system that:

A. Worked
B. Was consistent

but heh another half-assed wiz bang RAD tool is what we really need!!

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:03:53 -0500, "CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote:
Oh I see said the blind man. If you DON'T *highlight* the method call but
just put the cursor on it, then F1 behaves as it should. If you instead
highlight the whole word, it does a generic (and pretty much always
innacurate) search.

"CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:e5******* ********@TK2MSF TNGP09.phx.gbl. ..
Is it me or has anyone noticed that F1 is really dumb in VS2005. Since VB3
I have been able to click F1 on an ambiguous method in code and the IDE
automatically determines the type based on the code itself and shows the
right help topic. This even worked more or less in VS2003.

But in VS2005, if I highlight the "Host" method below and hit F1 I get a
help topic on the "UriBuilder.Hos t" property. Huh????? That's dumb.

Dim o as New System.Net.Mail .SmtpClient
o.Host = ...


Jan 21 '06 #3
If you don't like the IDE then use the command line SDK and see how
productive you are...
"Jay Pondy" <jp****@bellsou th.net> wrote in message
news:lm******** *************** *********@4ax.c om...
The important thing to remember is that Microsoft is constantly evolving
their help systems so that just about the time a developer is comfortable
with the
current system they change it - often for the worse.

You'd think that after 20 some years we would have a help system that:

A. Worked
B. Was consistent

but heh another half-assed wiz bang RAD tool is what we really need!!

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:03:53 -0500, "CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote:
Oh I see said the blind man. If you DON'T *highlight* the method call but
just put the cursor on it, then F1 behaves as it should. If you instead
highlight the whole word, it does a generic (and pretty much always
innacurate) search.

"CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:e5****** *********@TK2MS FTNGP09.phx.gbl ...
Is it me or has anyone noticed that F1 is really dumb in VS2005. Since
VB3
I have been able to click F1 on an ambiguous method in code and the IDE
automatically determines the type based on the code itself and shows the
right help topic. This even worked more or less in VS2003.

But in VS2005, if I highlight the "Host" method below and hit F1 I get a
help topic on the "UriBuilder.Hos t" property. Huh????? That's dumb.

Dim o as New System.Net.Mail .SmtpClient
o.Host = ...

Jan 21 '06 #4
CMM
"Brooke" <tb******@hotma il.com> wrote in message
news:e%******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP15.phx.gbl.. .
If you don't like the IDE then use the command line SDK and see how
productive you are...


I've always hated comments such as these. They're argumentative and
pointless. Why can't users gripe?

Yes, I think the VS2005 IDE SUCKS!. Yes, it's still better than nothing. I
like the language changes and the new framework features... they're great!
But the IDE was "improved" by monkeys.

Moving from VB6 straight to VS2003 several years ago, I found the new IDE to
be my-god incredible. I loved it. But, with this release. I think they've
been hit with the "Dilbert Syndrome." For instance, they change the whole
"feel" of the IDE, spend weeks on the toolbox tabs and suppossedly taking
user input (probably the same kiddie users/developers whose apps look
nothing like Windows apps and have orange backgrounds and oversized
obnoxious buttons)... and they end up with really kiddie looking tabs that
don't even look like tabs. Then they can't manage to put icons on the tabs
that do matter, the document tabs!!!.. switching between open documents in
VS2005 is still ANNOYING- I usually click two or three times to find the
right document (myform.aspx.vb , myform.aspx, myform.... which one is it!!!?
Oh I see it now!). An icon in the tabs to indicate
"code/designer/resource/etc" would be sooooooooo helpful. But spending time
on the gee-whiz flying toolboxes I'm sure was may more interesting.

Then they move the View Code/View Designer buttons in Solution Explorer to
the middle of the bar. My god.... these buttons had been in the same exact
location (first and front all the way on the right--- super easy to get to)
since VB3 (and before that I think)!!! Hitting them was like second nature
and reflexive. Then, they can't give us the option to at least put them
back!!! This is BAD!

I could go on.
Jan 21 '06 #5
Of course users can gripe.

But, if you have a gripe with Microsoft, (as it appears from your epistle),
why gripe to us.

I always find that the best way to vent a gripe with a vendor/supplier is to
take the matter up with the vendor/supplier concerned.

If there's one thing that life has taught me, it is that Tom doesn't really
care a fig about a gripe that I might have with Harry.

"CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:%2******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP14.phx.gbl.. .
"Brooke" <tb******@hotma il.com> wrote in message
news:e%******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP15.phx.gbl.. .
If you don't like the IDE then use the command line SDK and see how
productive you are...


I've always hated comments such as these. They're argumentative and
pointless. Why can't users gripe?

Yes, I think the VS2005 IDE SUCKS!. Yes, it's still better than nothing. I
like the language changes and the new framework features... they're great!
But the IDE was "improved" by monkeys.

Moving from VB6 straight to VS2003 several years ago, I found the new IDE
to be my-god incredible. I loved it. But, with this release. I think
they've been hit with the "Dilbert Syndrome." For instance, they change
the whole "feel" of the IDE, spend weeks on the toolbox tabs and
suppossedly taking user input (probably the same kiddie users/developers
whose apps look nothing like Windows apps and have orange backgrounds and
oversized obnoxious buttons)... and they end up with really kiddie looking
tabs that don't even look like tabs. Then they can't manage to put icons
on the tabs that do matter, the document tabs!!!.. switching between open
documents in VS2005 is still ANNOYING- I usually click two or three times
to find the right document (myform.aspx.vb , myform.aspx, myform.... which
one is it!!!? Oh I see it now!). An icon in the tabs to indicate
"code/designer/resource/etc" would be sooooooooo helpful. But spending
time on the gee-whiz flying toolboxes I'm sure was may more interesting.

Then they move the View Code/View Designer buttons in Solution Explorer to
the middle of the bar. My god.... these buttons had been in the same exact
location (first and front all the way on the right--- super easy to get
to) since VB3 (and before that I think)!!! Hitting them was like second
nature and reflexive. Then, they can't give us the option to at least put
them back!!! This is BAD!

I could go on.

Jan 21 '06 #6
CMM wrote:
Yes, I think the VS2005 IDE SUCKS!. Yes, it's still better than
nothing. I like the language changes and the new framework
features... they're great! But the IDE was "improved" by monkeys.


Really? I very much like the VS2005 IDE, more so than the VS2003 IDE (which
was itself a lot better than VB6)...

--

(O)enone
Jan 21 '06 #7
CMM
What's better about the VS2005 IDE?
And, I mean the IDE itself not the framework improvments or project model
changes.

One things I will say is that it's a lot faster. VS2005 loads up about 10
times faster on my machine than VS2003 and it seems a lot more optimized.

I also like the new Intellisense and "Grammer Warnings" in VB ("This
variable is not used", etc.). But the IDE itself- toolboxes, code windows,
designers (the wysiwyg HTML/ASP designer still sucks!), are not much
improved at all. The Property Editor is still uninspired and cumbersome. In
short.... after 3 years I expected a lot more.

"Oenone" <oe****@nowhere .com> wrote in message
news:wO******** ***********@new sfe3-gui.ntli.net...
CMM wrote:
Yes, I think the VS2005 IDE SUCKS!. Yes, it's still better than
nothing. I like the language changes and the new framework
features... they're great! But the IDE was "improved" by monkeys.


Really? I very much like the VS2005 IDE, more so than the VS2003 IDE
(which was itself a lot better than VB6)...

--

(O)enone

Jan 21 '06 #8
CMM
Well, a forum like this is a perfect place to gripe. People can discuss
workarounds, reasonings for things, user interface theories, and change each
other's minds. This is how ideas happen. It's like a symposium. Microsoft
looks at these forums. We know they do. And, "buzz" in places like this is
sometimes a lot more educational to the developers of the product than the
mechanized, antiseptic bug-tracking computer at labs.microsoft. com.

"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uD******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...
Of course users can gripe.

But, if you have a gripe with Microsoft, (as it appears from your
epistle), why gripe to us.

I always find that the best way to vent a gripe with a vendor/supplier is
to take the matter up with the vendor/supplier concerned.

If there's one thing that life has taught me, it is that Tom doesn't
really care a fig about a gripe that I might have with Harry.

"CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:%2******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP14.phx.gbl.. .
"Brooke" <tb******@hotma il.com> wrote in message
news:e%******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP15.phx.gbl.. .
If you don't like the IDE then use the command line SDK and see how
productive you are...


I've always hated comments such as these. They're argumentative and
pointless. Why can't users gripe?

Yes, I think the VS2005 IDE SUCKS!. Yes, it's still better than nothing.
I like the language changes and the new framework features... they're
great! But the IDE was "improved" by monkeys.

Moving from VB6 straight to VS2003 several years ago, I found the new IDE
to be my-god incredible. I loved it. But, with this release. I think
they've been hit with the "Dilbert Syndrome." For instance, they change
the whole "feel" of the IDE, spend weeks on the toolbox tabs and
suppossedly taking user input (probably the same kiddie users/developers
whose apps look nothing like Windows apps and have orange backgrounds and
oversized obnoxious buttons)... and they end up with really kiddie
looking tabs that don't even look like tabs. Then they can't manage to
put icons on the tabs that do matter, the document tabs!!!.. switching
between open documents in VS2005 is still ANNOYING- I usually click two
or three times to find the right document (myform.aspx.vb , myform.aspx,
myform.... which one is it!!!? Oh I see it now!). An icon in the tabs to
indicate "code/designer/resource/etc" would be sooooooooo helpful. But
spending time on the gee-whiz flying toolboxes I'm sure was may more
interesting.

Then they move the View Code/View Designer buttons in Solution Explorer
to the middle of the bar. My god.... these buttons had been in the same
exact location (first and front all the way on the right--- super easy to
get to) since VB3 (and before that I think)!!! Hitting them was like
second nature and reflexive. Then, they can't give us the option to at
least put them back!!! This is BAD!

I could go on.


Jan 21 '06 #9
I'm in the process of transferring from VB6 to VB2005 and let me begin by
telling, I really like the language and the IDE. Of course it takes some
getting used to, after years and years using the VB6 IDE I was pretty much
"at home" there. I could operate the thing more or less blindfolded.

But the thing is.... The help system gets worse with every new version. Imho
the VB 5.0 help system was perfect. Straight to the point + properties +
methods + events + related topics + clear and consise examples.
The VB6 Help information itself was still ok... although not as good as the
VB5.0. The biggest disadvantage of the VB6 help system was that you had to
go through a lot of garbage that didn't apply, but once you found what you
were looking for it still told you what you needed to know.

I skipped the first 2 releases of VB.Net and went straight from VB6 to
VB2005, so I am not really sure how it evolved to the current chaos, but I
have to say: their help system is absolutely useless! If you try to find how
to fill a treeview (something that has significantly changed from VB6) then
you get buried in all kinds of webclasses, constructors, index pages... up
to a hundred of them. After 45 minutes (not joking, my internet isn't that
fast) I finally found a page with a few lines of information and a
"example". The problem was that the guy who wrote the example wanted to show
off how good he was in VB so he buried the actual example in all kinds of
acrobatics with listarrays and what not. Like I said, I'm a beginner in
VB.NET/2005 and I don't have a clue (yet) what listarrays are. By the time I
want to learn about those, I will try to find the subject 'ListArrays'.
Today however I wanted to learn about the treeview, so they should not
obscure the treeview example with listarray acrobatics.

Really, this help system is the biggest collection of garbage I have ever
seen, and after struggling with it for a while I decided this afternoon to
close it for the last time and buy me a book....

So, let's all ask Microsoft to give the guys who wrote the VB5.0 helpfile
their job back!

Martin

"Jay Pondy" <jp****@bellsou th.net> wrote in message
news:lm******** *************** *********@4ax.c om...
The important thing to remember is that Microsoft is constantly evolving
their help systems so that just about the time a developer is comfortable
with the
current system they change it - often for the worse.

You'd think that after 20 some years we would have a help system that:

A. Worked
B. Was consistent

but heh another half-assed wiz bang RAD tool is what we really need!!

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:03:53 -0500, "CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote:
Oh I see said the blind man. If you DON'T *highlight* the method call but
just put the cursor on it, then F1 behaves as it should. If you instead
highlight the whole word, it does a generic (and pretty much always
innacurate) search.

"CMM" <cm*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:e5****** *********@TK2MS FTNGP09.phx.gbl ...
Is it me or has anyone noticed that F1 is really dumb in VS2005. Since
VB3
I have been able to click F1 on an ambiguous method in code and the IDE
automatically determines the type based on the code itself and shows the
right help topic. This even worked more or less in VS2003.

But in VS2005, if I highlight the "Host" method below and hit F1 I get a
help topic on the "UriBuilder.Hos t" property. Huh????? That's dumb.

Dim o as New System.Net.Mail .SmtpClient
o.Host = ...

Jan 22 '06 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
1089
by: Russell Mangel | last post by:
Thanks for making such an awesome programming environment, it's truly amazing. I really like C#, but C++ .net is so powerful, (The Interop capabilities are mind boggling.) Here are the things that I personally like the most: (The improvements in VS2005 framework). 1. The new System.DirectoryServices.Protocols. LDAP classes are truly
49
1981
by: CMM | last post by:
Let me preface by saying that I like VS2005. It improves on many things lacking in VS 2003 and takes pretty much nothing away. Having said that, I am a little underwhelmed by it. Despite a couple of some new controls, there is still a dearth of quality controls to build even a rudimentary "Windows" app. For instance, MDI is a technology that was deemed passe in 1995 by Microsoft itself (11 years ago!!!)... yet we have to build tons of...
10
2536
by: musosdev | last post by:
Hi guys I'm trying to migrate to VS2005... I've managed to do that, but realised I'd opened my web projects as file projects, and I'm getting the error about network BIOS command limit. Anyway, I decided to have a go at loading them as web projects from our Win2k3 server. It gets so far and then says "The web server does not appear to have FrontPage server extensions installed".
7
1712
by: Frank Rizzo | last post by:
Is it me or is the speed of VS2005 actually slower than VS2003? The startup is pretty bad - even though I changed VS to display an empty environment. When I create a new form and want to change its size: while I am resizing, an hour glass comes up for a few seconds. There a lot of other slowdowns all over the system. It seems like it the hard drive kicks in really hard. Now I did have the VS2005 beta installed, but I uninstalled it...
4
1308
by: pamelafluente | last post by:
Don't know if this is a common or dumb question (just playing with the 2005)... When one imports a project in VS2005, I noticed that for the existing controls the code generated by the Designer remains in the main file, while the *new* controls, created with the new IDE, use an external file (along with resx). Is there a simple way to tell the IDE to process the controls and put the Designer code in an external file *for each* control...
9
1984
by: yevvi | last post by:
Hi, We have a product with bunch of dlls which are now built with Visual Studio 2003. We want to switch the build to use VS2005. I have read that in VS2005 runtime libraries come as side-by-side assemblies and that application has to have a manifest binding it to those assemblies. My question is, can previously built apps use my new dlls build with vs2005? It would be really important to make it work, because otherwise we would...
15
4226
by: Joseph Geretz | last post by:
OK, I'll admit it up front - I just don't get it. Here's our previous VS2003 development model. Developers develop the WS solution on their own workstations, using their own IIS web servers mapped to the local devleopment folder. Project compiles to a subfolder .\bin. To deploy, the asmx page and bin subfolder are copied to the production server. So now I upgrade to VS2005. OK, so except for the name, everything is changed. No more...
2
1182
by: ajryan | last post by:
When I build my native/unmanaged C++ ATL+MFC app with /analyze I receive several errors like this: Error 1 _com_issue_error (SY_FUNCTION), offset: 0 symbol The project builds fine without /analyze It looks like a dumb output parser is just looking for the substring "error" in the /analyze output. Is that the case? Or are these real errors?
1
1665
by: bdtmike | last post by:
This is a newbie question: I've got VS2005 installed on my PC. This is the premier development environment for the latest & greatest application. Dumb Question: How come it comes with no graphic libraries, icons, backgrounds, gradients, etc, etc? Is it somewhere hiding that I didn't see? Right now I've got plain grey forms, buttons, etc...just like good ol' VB6. I want to make my app look a little more appealing. I know it's...
0
8888
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
8752
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
9401
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
1
9174
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
9111
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
6011
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
4517
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
0
4782
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
3
2157
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.