473,587 Members | 2,490 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Strongly Typed ArrayLists

NOTE: This is a COMMENT...not a QUESTION:

For the newbies, I've been messing around with strongly typed ArrayLists so
I don't have to type so many "DirectCast ". The following works great where
"myClass" is the classs that each ArrayList Element will contain:

dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList
Public Class typedArrayList
Inherits ArrayList
Default Public Shadows Property Item(ByVal Index As Integer) As myClass
Get
Return DirectCast(MyBa se.Item(Index), myClass)
End Get
Set(ByVal Value As myclass)
MyBase.Item(Ind ex) = Value
End Set
End Property
End Class

You can then reference any property in myclass in your code instead of using
direct cast to cast the arraylist element to myClass:

myPropertyValue = myarraylist(0). myProperty

--
Dennis in Houston
Nov 21 '05 #1
5 1591
Dennis,
Of course the danger of doing this is:
dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList
Dim al As ArrayList = typedArrayList

al.Item is no longer typed! Which is a major danger of using Shadows! Two
major places where Shadows are useful are Version Control & overriding
Attributes on non Overridable methods. (Post if you would like more
information on these uses of Shadows).

I would recommend starting with CollectionBase to create a strongly typed
ArrayList. To absolutely ensure a strongly typed CollectionBase derived
class you may need to override CollectionBase. OnValidate & the other On*
methods of CollectionBase.

NOTE: This is a comment on your comment ;-)

Hope this helps
Jay

"Dennis" <De****@discuss ions.microsoft. com> wrote in message
news:8F******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... NOTE: This is a COMMENT...not a QUESTION:

For the newbies, I've been messing around with strongly typed ArrayLists
so
I don't have to type so many "DirectCast ". The following works great where
"myClass" is the classs that each ArrayList Element will contain:

dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList
Public Class typedArrayList
Inherits ArrayList
Default Public Shadows Property Item(ByVal Index As Integer) As myClass
Get
Return DirectCast(MyBa se.Item(Index), myClass)
End Get
Set(ByVal Value As myclass)
MyBase.Item(Ind ex) = Value
End Set
End Property
End Class

You can then reference any property in myclass in your code instead of
using
direct cast to cast the arraylist element to myClass:

myPropertyValue = myarraylist(0). myProperty

--
Dennis in Houston

Nov 21 '05 #2
Understand your comments but I'm using this in my own program and I can avoid
the "dim al as arraylist = TypedArrayList. My method is quick, dirty and
works well for my internal programming.

"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" wrote:
Dennis,
Of course the danger of doing this is:
dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList


Dim al As ArrayList = typedArrayList

al.Item is no longer typed! Which is a major danger of using Shadows! Two
major places where Shadows are useful are Version Control & overriding
Attributes on non Overridable methods. (Post if you would like more
information on these uses of Shadows).

I would recommend starting with CollectionBase to create a strongly typed
ArrayList. To absolutely ensure a strongly typed CollectionBase derived
class you may need to override CollectionBase. OnValidate & the other On*
methods of CollectionBase.

NOTE: This is a comment on your comment ;-)

Hope this helps
Jay

"Dennis" <De****@discuss ions.microsoft. com> wrote in message
news:8F******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
NOTE: This is a COMMENT...not a QUESTION:

For the newbies, I've been messing around with strongly typed ArrayLists
so
I don't have to type so many "DirectCast ". The following works great where
"myClass" is the classs that each ArrayList Element will contain:

dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList
Public Class typedArrayList
Inherits ArrayList
Default Public Shadows Property Item(ByVal Index As Integer) As myClass
Get
Return DirectCast(MyBa se.Item(Index), myClass)
End Get
Set(ByVal Value As myclass)
MyBase.Item(Ind ex) = Value
End Set
End Property
End Class

You can then reference any property in myclass in your code instead of
using
direct cast to cast the arraylist element to myClass:

myPropertyValue = myarraylist(0). myProperty

--
Dennis in Houston


Nov 21 '05 #3
Dennis,
My method is quick, dirty and Is my point ;-)
works well for my internal programming. As long as your programming is truly "internal" to you only. As soon as
someone inherits your "internal" code (such as a reader of this thread) and
uses the statement I showed....

Also I hope you understand why it can be dangerous. I would consider adding
a TODO on usages of Shadows such as yours, so anyone inheriting the code
realizes the risk...

Just a thought
Jay
"Dennis" <De****@discuss ions.microsoft. com> wrote in message
news:09******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... Understand your comments but I'm using this in my own program and I can
avoid
the "dim al as arraylist = TypedArrayList. My method is quick, dirty and
works well for my internal programming.

"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" wrote:
Dennis,
Of course the danger of doing this is:
> dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList


Dim al As ArrayList = typedArrayList

al.Item is no longer typed! Which is a major danger of using Shadows! Two
major places where Shadows are useful are Version Control & overriding
Attributes on non Overridable methods. (Post if you would like more
information on these uses of Shadows).

I would recommend starting with CollectionBase to create a strongly typed
ArrayList. To absolutely ensure a strongly typed CollectionBase derived
class you may need to override CollectionBase. OnValidate & the other On*
methods of CollectionBase.

NOTE: This is a comment on your comment ;-)

Hope this helps
Jay

"Dennis" <De****@discuss ions.microsoft. com> wrote in message
news:8F******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
> NOTE: This is a COMMENT...not a QUESTION:
>
> For the newbies, I've been messing around with strongly typed
> ArrayLists
> so
> I don't have to type so many "DirectCast ". The following works great
> where
> "myClass" is the classs that each ArrayList Element will contain:
>
> dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList
> Public Class typedArrayList
> Inherits ArrayList
> Default Public Shadows Property Item(ByVal Index As Integer) As
> myClass
> Get
> Return DirectCast(MyBa se.Item(Index), myClass)
> End Get
> Set(ByVal Value As myclass)
> MyBase.Item(Ind ex) = Value
> End Set
> End Property
> End Class
>
> You can then reference any property in myclass in your code instead of
> using
> direct cast to cast the arraylist element to myClass:
>
> myPropertyValue = myarraylist(0). myProperty
>
> --
> Dennis in Houston


Nov 21 '05 #4
I'm with Jay on this as well. Even though your code is "internal" and only
being used by you, wouldn't you much rather grow as a developer and learn a
far better way to do what you are trying to do? After all, your code is
suffering the hit (all be it negligeable) of doing a Direct Cast every
single time you extract a value from the list, it's just hidden away out of
sight.
--
Pete Wright
Author of ADO.NET Novice to Pro for Apress
www.petewright.org

"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" <Ja************ @msn.com> wrote in message
news:uH******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...
Dennis,
My method is quick, dirty and

Is my point ;-)
works well for my internal programming.

As long as your programming is truly "internal" to you only. As soon as
someone inherits your "internal" code (such as a reader of this thread)
and uses the statement I showed....

Also I hope you understand why it can be dangerous. I would consider
adding a TODO on usages of Shadows such as yours, so anyone inheriting the
code realizes the risk...

Just a thought
Jay
"Dennis" <De****@discuss ions.microsoft. com> wrote in message
news:09******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
Understand your comments but I'm using this in my own program and I can
avoid
the "dim al as arraylist = TypedArrayList. My method is quick, dirty and
works well for my internal programming.

"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" wrote:
Dennis,
Of course the danger of doing this is:

> dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList

Dim al As ArrayList = typedArrayList

al.Item is no longer typed! Which is a major danger of using Shadows!
Two
major places where Shadows are useful are Version Control & overriding
Attributes on non Overridable methods. (Post if you would like more
information on these uses of Shadows).

I would recommend starting with CollectionBase to create a strongly
typed
ArrayList. To absolutely ensure a strongly typed CollectionBase derived
class you may need to override CollectionBase. OnValidate & the other On*
methods of CollectionBase.

NOTE: This is a comment on your comment ;-)

Hope this helps
Jay

"Dennis" <De****@discuss ions.microsoft. com> wrote in message
news:8F******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
> NOTE: This is a COMMENT...not a QUESTION:
>
> For the newbies, I've been messing around with strongly typed
> ArrayLists
> so
> I don't have to type so many "DirectCast ". The following works great
> where
> "myClass" is the classs that each ArrayList Element will contain:
>
> dim myarraylist as typedArrayList = new typedArrayList
> Public Class typedArrayList
> Inherits ArrayList
> Default Public Shadows Property Item(ByVal Index As Integer) As
> myClass
> Get
> Return DirectCast(MyBa se.Item(Index), myClass)
> End Get
> Set(ByVal Value As myclass)
> MyBase.Item(Ind ex) = Value
> End Set
> End Property
> End Class
>
> You can then reference any property in myclass in your code instead of
> using
> direct cast to cast the arraylist element to myClass:
>
> myPropertyValue = myarraylist(0). myProperty
>
> --
> Dennis in Houston


Nov 21 '05 #5
Dennis,

In my opinion is the biggest problem that you want cout a cout use a list
where a collection is the properiate way to go.

What you now in the same opinion are trying to do is making from a list
class a collection class, where there are so many built in classes for that.

Just my thought,

Cor
Nov 21 '05 #6

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

4
5725
by: Bill Cohagan | last post by:
I'm trying to figure out the "best" way to implement a strongly typed ArrayList. Using inheritance is one approach. It has the advantage that I only have to write overrides for the Add method and indexer. There are problems with this however. First the indexer "override" has a different return type. This doesn't cause a compile time error,...
1
6072
by: Job Lot | last post by:
I am confused how strongly typed dataset is different from un-typed dataset. Is there any good link explaining pros and cons of both? Which one should be used preferably?
2
2369
by: Mark | last post by:
Just wanted to confirm that my understanding of a strongly typed language is correct: 1. .NET is a strongly typed language because each variable / field must be declared a specific type (String, Int, Float, etc...) 2. VB 6 and VBScript were not strongly typed because both allowed you to ... dim blah .... which creates a variant.
2
4368
by: David | last post by:
I have been developing applications with Java for quite a while but I am new to .NET development. I am trying to learn the ".NET way" of creating Strongly Typed Objects from a database. The Enterprise Library seems pretty close to what I am used to in Java but I am not sure how to create strongly-typed DataSets. I see that I can use the...
1
2176
by: HardBap | last post by:
I've created a strongly typed DataSet (Customers.xsd) using the xsd.exe tool. I want to be able to access fields using ds.Customer.CompanyName. The problem is when I return this DataSet from a Web Service it adds another Table to the DataSet that contains the data. I have to access the data using ds.Tables.Rows.ToString(). This defeats the...
2
3715
by: Ian Gore | last post by:
Hi, I'm relatively new to VB.NET so I'd be grateful if someone could point out what I don't understand here... 1) Creating a strongly typed collection by inheriting CollectionBase. This is covered in most of the books I've read. Basically you inherit CollectionBase and then add methods (say Add) that takes your types as a parameter and...
20
5958
by: Dennis | last post by:
I use the following code for a strongly typed arraylist and it works great. However, I was wondering if this is the proper way to do it. I realize that if I want to implement sorting of the arraylist then I have to handle this with a sort method that uses comparer. I can reference the properties of the Arraylist directly such as dim...
1
3555
by: Code Monkey | last post by:
Silly question maybe, but I've been doing the following for far too long now: public static DataTable myDataTable() { string sql = @"SELECT column1, column2, column3, column4 FROM myTable"; using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(websqlconn)) { SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(sql, conn);
4
3100
by: Rachana | last post by:
Hi, I have understood Data Sets but what is meant by typed/untyped/ strongly typed datasets. Can any one explain me or suggest any site/ article, to get these concepts (and their comparisions) cleared? Thanks, Rachana
0
8216
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. ...
0
8349
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that...
1
7974
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For...
0
8221
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the...
0
6629
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then...
1
5719
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes...
0
3845
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in...
0
3882
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
0
1192
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.