Ulf Dingler (u.*******@lasartes.de) writes:
awe is enabled but i read, that awe is not important for 64bit.
That's correct. It's not supposed to have any effect at all, but it
does affect something, although I don't recall exactly what.
On 32-bit when you have AWE enabled, and look in task manager, you don't
see the true size of SQL Server, as the AWE memory is not included. Maybe
there is a similar effect on 64-bit? Could you run DBCC MEMORYSTATUS and
post the output?
the databases are very big. 7GB/9GB/70GB
Ehum, 70GB could be called mediums-sized, but it does not really
qualify as "very big". Not that it matter here. Unless the data-access
pattern is very concentrated, it seems unlikely that SQL Server would
not need more memory than 100 MB.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP,
es****@sommarskog.se
Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx