Hi All,
I have one question about many "or" operation make system choose
incorrect index
There is one table TT (
C1 VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL,
C2 VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL,
C3 VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL,
C4 VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL
C5 VARCHAR2(200),
)
Primary Key TT_PK (C1, C2, C3, C4)
SELECT C1, C2, C3, C4 FROM TT WHERE C1 = 'TEST' AND ((C2 =
'07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02383') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND
C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02382') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000'
AND C4 = '02381') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 =
'02380') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02379') OR
(C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02378') OR (C2 = '07RES'
AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02377') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 =
'00000' AND C4 = '02376') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND
C4 = '02375') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 =
'02374') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02373') OR
(C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02372')
.... about 100 or operations
OR (C2 = '07COM' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '00618') OR (C2 =
'07COM' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '00617') OR (C2 = '07COM' AND
C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '00616') OR (C2 = '07COM' AND C3 = '00000'
AND C4 = '00608') )
The system choose index prefix, and query all index leaf with
C1='TEST'
Prefix: [dbo].[TT].C1 = 'TEST'
After I reduce the OR operators to 50, it use choose
Prefix: [dbo].[TT].C1, [dbo].[TT].C2,[dbo].[TT].C3,[dbo].[TT].C4=
'TEST, '07RES', '00000', '02383'
Then Merge Join, it is very quick,
Can anyone help on this, do I have to reduce the OR operator to 50?
Thanks in advance!
5  2110 
lsllcm,
Is there a join in the query? I get the feeling you did not post all
relevant parts of the query. Why would you get a merge join? And what
does "The system choose index prefix" mean?
There is no hard or fast rule for this. Although I could imagine that
too many predicates would disqualify index seeks, in general it is all
about selectivity. During compilation the optimizer will try to
determine whether index seeks (followed by bookmark lookups) are faster
than (partially) scanning the (clustered) index, based on the estimate
of the number of qualifying rows.
Please note that there is a certain point at which the compilation time
grows a lot for each addition predicate you add to the WHERE clause. If
the compilation time exceeds the estimated gains, the optimizer will
stop compilation and simply choose a "good enough" plan.
If the performance of this query is very important to you, and the
structure of the predicates is as "simple" and predictable as your
example, then you could consider rewriting the query as below:
SELECT C1, C2, C3, C4
FROM TT
WHERE C1 = 'TEST'
AND C2 = '07RES'
AND C3 = '00000'
AND C4 IN ('02383','02382 ','02381','0238 0','02379', ...)
UNION ALL
SELECT C1, C2, C3, C4
FROM TT
WHERE C1 = 'TEST'
AND C2 = '07COM'
AND C3 = '00000'
AND C4 IN ('00618','00617 ','00616', ...)
--
Gert-Jan
lsllcm wrote:
>
Hi All,
I have one question about many "or" operation make system choose
incorrect index
There is one table TT (
C1 VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL,
C2 VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL,
C3 VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL,
C4 VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL
C5 VARCHAR2(200),
)
Primary Key TT_PK (C1, C2, C3, C4)
SELECT C1, C2, C3, C4 FROM TT WHERE C1 = 'TEST' AND ((C2 =
'07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02383') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND
C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02382') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000'
AND C4 = '02381') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 =
'02380') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02379') OR
(C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02378') OR (C2 = '07RES'
AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02377') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 =
'00000' AND C4 = '02376') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND
C4 = '02375') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 =
'02374') OR (C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02373') OR
(C2 = '07RES' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '02372')
... about 100 or operations
OR (C2 = '07COM' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '00618') OR (C2 =
'07COM' AND C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '00617') OR (C2 = '07COM' AND
C3 = '00000' AND C4 = '00616') OR (C2 = '07COM' AND C3 = '00000'
AND C4 = '00608') )
The system choose index prefix, and query all index leaf with
C1='TEST'
Prefix: [dbo].[TT].C1 = 'TEST'
After I reduce the OR operators to 50, it use choose
Prefix: [dbo].[TT].C1, [dbo].[TT].C2,[dbo].[TT].C3,[dbo].[TT].C4=
'TEST, '07RES', '00000', '02383'
Then Merge Join, it is very quick,
Can anyone help on this, do I have to reduce the OR operator to 50?
Thanks in advance!
Gert-Jan Strik (so***@toomuchs pamalready.nl) writes:
Please note that there is a certain point at which the compilation time
grows a lot for each addition predicate you add to the WHERE clause. If
the compilation time exceeds the estimated gains, the optimizer will
stop compilation and simply choose a "good enough" plan.
Indeed. Many OR clauses, or many values in IN can result in horrendeous
compilation times. SQL 2005 fare a lot better than SQL 2000, but the cost
is still high.
One thing I've notice that when there are more than 63 values (I think
that was the value), SQL Server stashes all the constants into a work
table, and you get the same result as you had the values in a temp table.
At least that was what I saw in a test that I ran.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, es****@sommarsk og.se
Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx
Hi Gert-Jan,
Is there a join in the query? I get the feeling you did not post all
relevant parts of the query. Why would you get a merge join? And what
does "The system choose index prefix" mean?
There is no join in the query, I think the merge join is to merge the
results of different OR.
The system choose run the partial index of beginning "SERV_PROV_CODE ".
Thanks
Jacky
The version mssql 2005 sp1
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Sean |
last post by:
I received this error when a trigger attempted to perform an update to
its own table with a where clause that did not guarantee a single row.
I believe this results in the iterative firing of this same trigger
for every row that matches the where clause, which again fires off the
triggers, and so on. Or at least that's what could theoretically
happen but I'm fairly convinced that the error "Key column information
is insufficient or...
|
by: Mark Richards |
last post by:
The solutions for the following problems seems to be simple but I did not found a (convenient) solution:
Assume we have a number of elements of the same type under a common parent e.g.
<person ... myattr="aaa">Paul</person>
<person ... myattr="bbb">Peter</person>
<person ... myattr="ccc">Karl</person>
.....
<person ... myattr="ddd">Stan</person>
|
by: Steve Juranich |
last post by:
I know that this topic has the potential for blowing up in my face,
but I can't help asking. I've been using Python since 1.5.1, so I'm
not what you'd call a "n00b". I dutifully evangelize on the goodness
of Python whenever I talk with fellow developers, but I always hit a
snag when it comes to discussing the finer points of the execution
model (specifically, exceptions).
Without fail, when I start talking with some of the "old-timers"...
|
by: Alan |
last post by:
I have many OR in the if statement, any method to simplify?
if (val == 5 | val == 9 | val == 34 | val == 111 | val == 131 | .......)
// ....
thank you
|
by: John |
last post by:
Hi all:
Is there a C function to make a procedure sleep or delay for a few
seconds/minutes on Linux and Sun OS platform?
Thanks
| | |
by: John Devereux |
last post by:
Hi,
I would like some advice on whether I should be using plain "chars"
for strings. I have instead been using "unsigned char" in my code (for
embedded systems). In general the strings contain ASCII characters in
the 0-127 range, although I had thought that I might want to use the
128-255 range for special symbols or foreign character codes.
This all worked OK for a long time, but a recent update to the
compiler on my system has...
|
by: dinu |
last post by:
Dear Friends,
I have table contain 2000 out of those some are
duplicate when i select duplicate records by using Enterprise Manager
and make modification to one of those duplicate records the following
message flashes/display.
key columen information is insufficient or incorrect.Too many rows were
affected by update
pls suggest what is this and how to solve this problem
|
by: Umesh |
last post by:
please help. thanks.
|
by: manish2007 |
last post by:
I have edit sql server 2000 table record by vb or direct enterprise mangafer and i have recived one message "Key column information is insufficient or incorrect. Too many rows were affected by update." any guys know this problem pl send the solution
Manish jain
Thanks
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| | |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
