Hi,
I don't know if I missed anything. I have 2 member tables and one
partition view in SQL 2000 defined as following
CREATE VIEW Server1.dbo.UTa ble
AS
SELECT *
FROM Server1..pTable 1
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM Server2..pTable 2
CREATE TABLE pTable1 (
[ID1] [int] IDENTITY (1000, 2) NOT NULL ,
[ID2] [int] NOT NULL ,
...<other columns>....... ..
CONSTRAINT [PK_tblLot] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ID1],
[ID2]
) ON [PRIMARY] ,
CHECK ([ID2] = 1015)
) ON [PRIMARY]
CREATE TABLE [pTable2] (
[ID1] [int] IDENTITY (1001, 2) NOT NULL ,
[ID2] [int] NOT NULL ,
...<other columns>....... ..
CONSTRAINT [PK_tblLot] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[ID1],
[ID2]
) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY] ,
CHECK ([ID2] <1015)
) ON [PRIMARY]
SELECT is working fine. However, I got error message if I issue an
update command such as
UPDATE UTable
SET somecol = someval
Where somecol2 = somecond
Server: Msg 4436, Level 16, State 12, Line 1
UNION ALL view 'UTable' is not updatable because a partitioning column
was not found.
Anyone have any idea? ID2 is my partition column, why the SQL 2K
doesn't see it. It is a part of primary key, having checking
constrain, and no other constrain on it. Am I missing something?
Thanks a lot.
8  11326 
You cannot have identity columns in an updatable partitioned view.
--
Tom
----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
"Sonny" <So******@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ g37g2000prf.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hi,
I don't know if I missed anything. I have 2 member tables and one
partition view in SQL 2000 defined as following
CREATE VIEW Server1.dbo.UTa ble
AS
SELECT *
FROM Server1..pTable 1
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM Server2..pTable 2
CREATE TABLE pTable1 (
[ID1] [int] IDENTITY (1000, 2) NOT NULL ,
[ID2] [int] NOT NULL ,
....<other columns>....... ..
CONSTRAINT [PK_tblLot] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ID1],
[ID2]
) ON [PRIMARY] ,
CHECK ([ID2] = 1015)
) ON [PRIMARY]
CREATE TABLE [pTable2] (
[ID1] [int] IDENTITY (1001, 2) NOT NULL ,
[ID2] [int] NOT NULL ,
....<other columns>....... ..
CONSTRAINT [PK_tblLot] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[ID1],
[ID2]
) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY] ,
CHECK ([ID2] <1015)
) ON [PRIMARY]
SELECT is working fine. However, I got error message if I issue an
update command such as
UPDATE UTable
SET somecol = someval
Where somecol2 = somecond
Server: Msg 4436, Level 16, State 12, Line 1
UNION ALL view 'UTable' is not updatable because a partitioning column
was not found.
Anyone have any idea? ID2 is my partition column, why the SQL 2K
doesn't see it. It is a part of primary key, having checking
constrain, and no other constrain on it. Am I missing something?
Thanks a lot.
On May 31, 4:17 pm, "Tom Moreau" <t...@dont.spam .me.cips.cawrot e:
You cannot have identity columns in an updatable partitioned view.
--
Tom
----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canadahttps://mvp.support.mic rosoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
In that case, how should I deal with the ID1? I need that column to
be an identity column. Thanks.
Consider putting an INSTEAD OF trigger on the partitioned view.
--
Tom
----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
"Sonny" <So******@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ a26g2000pre.goo glegroups.com.. .
On May 31, 4:17 pm, "Tom Moreau" <t...@dont.spam .me.cips.cawrot e:
You cannot have identity columns in an updatable partitioned view.
--
Tom
----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canadahttps://mvp.support.mic rosoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
In that case, how should I deal with the ID1? I need that column to
be an identity column. Thanks.
Sonny (So******@gmail .com) writes:
Anyone have any idea? ID2 is my partition column, why the SQL 2K
doesn't see it. It is a part of primary key, having checking
constrain, and no other constrain on it. Am I missing something?
Yes, <is not a permitted operator. You need to rewrite
CHECK ([ID2] <1015)
to
CHECK ([ID2] < 1015 OR [ID2] 1015)
Another story is whether this view will be very efficient. You should
probably add an index on ID2, or put it first in the primary key.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, es****@sommarsk og.se
Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx
On May 31, 4:58 pm, Erland Sommarskog <esq...@sommars kog.sewrote:
Sonny (Sonny...@gmail .com) writes:
In that case, how should I deal with the ID1? I need that column to
be an identity column. Thanks.
Oh, I should have added the the IDENTITY appears to work fine, as soon
as I had changed the CHECK constraint.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esq...@sommarsk og.se
Books Online for SQL Server 2005 athttp://www.microsoft.c om/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books...
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 athttp://www.microsoft.c om/sql/prodinfo/previousversion s/books.mspx
Thanks for all your help. I changed CHECK constraint, and now it is
not complaining about missing partition column anymore, however, when
do the Update or Insert it gives out Server: Msg 4450, Level 16, State
1, Line 1
Cannot update partitioned view 'UTable' because the definition of the
view column 'ID1' in table '[pTable1]' has a IDENTITY constraint. So
I think IDENTITY is the another issue. As Tom mentioned in his post,
using INSTEAD OF trigger, would anyone please give me an example,
never used before.
Again, thank you very much for your help.
Check out: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...8(SQL.80).aspx
--
Tom
----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
"Sonny" <So******@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ a26g2000pre.goo glegroups.com.. .
On May 31, 4:58 pm, Erland Sommarskog <esq...@sommars kog.sewrote:
Sonny (Sonny...@gmail .com) writes:
In that case, how should I deal with the ID1? I need that column to
be an identity column. Thanks.
Oh, I should have added the the IDENTITY appears to work fine, as soon
as I had changed the CHECK constraint.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esq...@sommarsk og.se
Books Online for SQL Server 2005
athttp://www.microsoft.c om/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books...
Books Online for SQL Server 2000
athttp://www.microsoft.c om/sql/prodinfo/previousversion s/books.mspx
Thanks for all your help. I changed CHECK constraint, and now it is
not complaining about missing partition column anymore, however, when
do the Update or Insert it gives out Server: Msg 4450, Level 16, State
1, Line 1
Cannot update partitioned view 'UTable' because the definition of the
view column 'ID1' in table '[pTable1]' has a IDENTITY constraint. So
I think IDENTITY is the another issue. As Tom mentioned in his post,
using INSTEAD OF trigger, would anyone please give me an example,
never used before.
Again, thank you very much for your help.
On Jun 1, 8:12 am, "Tom Moreau" <t...@dont.spam .me.cips.cawrot e:
Check out:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...8(SQL.80).aspx
--
Tom
----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canadahttps://mvp.support.mic rosoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
"Sonny" <Sonny...@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ a26g2000pre.goo glegroups.com.. .
On May 31, 4:58 pm, Erland Sommarskog <esq...@sommars kog.sewrote:
Sonny (Sonny...@gmail .com) writes:
In that case, how should I deal with the ID1? I need that column to
be an identity column. Thanks.
Oh, I should have added the the IDENTITY appears to work fine, as soon
as I had changed the CHECK constraint.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esq...@sommarsk og.se
Books Online for SQL Server 2005
athttp://www.microsoft.c om/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books...
Books Online for SQL Server 2000
athttp://www.microsoft.c om/sql/prodinfo/previousversion s/books.mspx
Thanks for all your help. I changed CHECK constraint, and now it is
not complaining about missing partition column anymore, however, when
do the Update or Insert it gives out Server: Msg 4450, Level 16, State
1, Line 1
Cannot update partitioned view 'UTable' because the definition of the
view column 'ID1' in table '[pTable1]' has a IDENTITY constraint. So
I think IDENTITY is the another issue. As Tom mentioned in his post,
using INSTEAD OF trigger, would anyone please give me an example,
never used before.
Again, thank you very much for your help.
Thank you so much!! This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Jeff Boes |
last post by:
I'm sure this is a concept that's been explored here. I have a table
(fairly simple, just two columns, one of which is a 32-digit checksum)
with several million rows (currently, about 7 million). About a million
times a day we do
select * from my_table where md5 = ?
to verify presence or absence of the row, and base further processing on
that information.
|
by: Jane |
last post by:
In Oracle we can partition a table as follows. What is the equivalent in DB2?
CREATE TABLE sales_list
(salesman_id NUMBER(5),
salesman_name VARCHAR2(30),
sales_state VARCHAR2(20),
sales_amount NUMBER(10),
sales_date DATE)
PARTITION BY LIST(sales_state)
(
|
by: Rajesh.............................. |
last post by:
What is the impact of using a nullable column vs a not nullable column
for partitioning a Union ALL View? I have a Union ALL View with ten
underlying tables unioned based on different values for a column
partition_id in these tables. Now, if I define this column as NOT NULL,
I notice that the loading this view is almost twice fast as if I had
defined it NULLABLE. Can anyone explain? What exactly is DB2 doing in
each of the case when...
|
by: db2admin |
last post by:
hi,
does cost of SQL include broadcasting etc. as additional cost ?
cost of SQL doing join on partitioning key is less than cost of same
SQL doing join on cluster index which has column other than
partitioning key
regards,
db2admin
|
by: Robert Klemme |
last post by:
Hi,
this is just to verify: I checked the documentation and it seems that
SQL 2005 does not support hash partitioning on a number of columns. As
far as I can see only range partitioning is supported. Also, it seems
SQL 2005 only supports partitioning on a single column. Is that true or
did I miss something?
Kind regards
| | |
by: shsandeep |
last post by:
DB2 V8.2 (not Viper yet and no range partitioning!!)
I have created a table T1 (col1, col2) with col1 as the primary key.
When I try to create a partitioning key on col2, it gives me error that it
should have all primary keys included.
So, I created table T1 again with col2 as the partitioning key.
Now, I do not have col1 as the primary key.
When I try to create col1 as the primary key, I get the following error:
1 The primary key, each...
|
by: mitek |
last post by:
Hi, All
I have strange situation with table design for DB2 9.1 on Windows
I have 3 tables with same structure :
1 table - is MDC
2 table - is partitioned MDC table
3 table - is compressed partitioned MDC table
Each table in separate DMS tablespace
|
by: Ivory056mt |
last post by:
In SQL 2000, can you use a GUID as a partitioning column?
The query
select * from table
where b_id between '00000000-0000-0000-0000-600000000000' and
'FFFFFFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-6FFFFFFFFFFF'
sorts the values in the uniqueid column B_ID as you would expect. And when you set up the same where clause as a constraint, it works as expected. But when you create 16 tables with the appropriate constraints, a partitioned query will not insert...
|
by: Piero 'Giops' Giorgi |
last post by:
Hi!
I have a question:
I already have a DB that uses partitions to divide data in US
Counties, partitioned by state.
Can I use TWO levels of partitioning?
I mean... 3077 filegroups and 50 partition functions that address
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| | |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
