This version includes the input from various and sundry people. Thanks
to everyone who contributed.
<mike
PEP: XXX
Title: A rational number module for Python
Version: $Revision: 1.4 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/09/22 04:51:50 $
Author: Mike Meyer <mw*@mired.or g>
Status: Draft
Type: Staqndards
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 16-Dec-2004
Python-Version: 2.5
Post-History: 15-Dec-2004, 25-Dec-2004
Contents
========
* Abstract
* Motivation
* Rationale
+ Conversions
+ Python usability
* Specification
+ Explicit Construction
+ Implicit Construction
+ Operations
+ Exceptions
* Open Issues
* Implementation
* References
Abstract
========
This PEP proposes a rational number module to add to the Python
standard library.
Motivation
=========
Rationals are a standard mathematical concept, included in a variety
of programming languages already. Python, which comes with 'batteries
included' should not be deficient in this area. When the subject was
brought up on comp.lang.pytho n several people mentioned having
implemented a rational number module, one person more than once. In
fact, there is a rational number module distributed with Python as an
example module. Such repetition shows the need for such a class in the
standard library.
n
There are currently two PEPs dealing with rational numbers - 'Adding a
Rational Type to Python' [#PEP-239] and 'Adding a Rational Literal to
Python' [#PEP-240], both by Craig and Zadka. This PEP competes with
those PEPs, but does not change the Python language as those two PEPs
do [#PEP-239-implicit]. As such, it should be easier for it to gain
acceptance. At some future time, PEP's 239 and 240 may replace the
``rational`` module.
Rationale
=========
Conversions
-----------
The purpose of a rational type is to provide an exact representation
of rational numbers, without the imprecistion of floating point
numbers or the limited precision of decimal numbers.
Converting an int or a long to a rational can be done without loss of
precision, and will be done as such.
Converting a decimal to a rational can also be done without loss of
precision, and will be done as such.
A floating point number generally represents a number that is an
approximation to the value as a literal string. For example, the
literal 1.1 actually represents the value 1.1000000000000 001 on an x86
one platform. To avoid this imprecision, floating point numbers
cannot be translated to rationals directly. Instead, a string
representation of the float must be used: ''Rational("%.2 f" % flt)''
so that the user can specify the precision they want for the floating
point number. This lack of precision is also why floating point
numbers will not combine with rationals using numeric operations.
Decimal numbers do not have the representation problems that floating
point numbers have. However, they are rounded to the current context
when used in operations, and thus represent an approximation.
Therefore, a decimal can be used to explicitly construct a rational,
but will not be allowed to implicitly construct a rational by use in a
mixed arithmetic expression.
Python Usability
-----------------
* Rational should support the basic arithmetic (+, -, *, /, //, **, %,
divmod) and comparison (==, !=, <, >, <=, >=, cmp) operators in the
following cases (check Implicit Construction to see what types could
OtherType be, and what happens in each case):
+ Rational op Rational
+ Rational op otherType
+ otherType op Rational
+ Rational op= Rational
+ Rational op= otherType
* Rational should support unary operators (-, +, abs).
* repr() should round trip, meaning that:
m = Rational(...)
m == eval(repr(m))
* Rational should be immutable.
* Rational should support the built-in methods:
+ min, max
+ float, int, long
+ str, repr
+ hash
+ bool (0 is false, otherwise true)
When it comes to hashes, it is true that Rational(25) == 25 is True, so
hash(Rational (25)) should be equal to hash(25).
The detail is that you can NOT compare Rational to floats, strings or
decimals, so we do not worry about them giving the same hashes. In
short:
hash(n) == hash(Rational(n )) # Only if n is int, long or Rational
Regarding str() and repr() behaviour, Ka-Ping Yee proposes that repr() have
the same behaviour as str() and Tim Peters proposes that str() behave like the
to-scientific-string operation from the Spec.
Specification
=============
Explicit Construction
---------------------
The module shall be ``rational``, and the class ``Rational``, to
follow the example of the decimal [#PEP-327] module. The class
creation method shall accept as arguments a numerator, and an optional
denominator, which defaults to one. Both the numerator and
denominator - if present - must be of integer or decimal type, or a
string representation of a floating point number. The string
representation of a floating point number will be converted to
rational without being converted to float to preserve the accuracy of
the number. Since all other numeric types in Python are immutable,
Rational objects will be immutable. Internally, the representation
will insure that the numerator and denominator have a greatest common
divisor of 1, and that the sign of the denominator is positive.
Implicit Construction
---------------------
Rationals will mix with integer types. If the other operand is not
rational, it will be converted to rational before the opeation is
performed.
When combined with a floating type - either complex or float - or a
decimal type, the result will be a TypeError. The reason for this is
that floating point numbers - including complex - and decimals are
already imprecise. To convert them to rational would give an
incorrect impression that the results of the operation are
precise. The proper way to add a rational to one of these types is to
convert the rational to that type explicitly before doing the
operation.
Operations
----------
The ``Rational`` class shall define all the standard mathematical
operations mentioned in the ''Python Usability'' section.
Rationals can be converted to floats by float(rational) , and to
integers by int(rational). int(rational) will just do an integer
division of the numerator by the denominator.
If there is not a __decimal__ feature for objects in Python 2.5, the
rational type will provide a decimal() method that returns the value
of self converted to a decimal in the current context.
Exceptions
----------
The module will define and at times raise the following exceptions:
- DivisionByZero: divide by zero.
- OverflowError: overflow attempting to convert to a float.
- TypeError: trying to create a rational from a non-integer or
non-string type, or trying to perform an operation
with a float, complex or decimal.
- ValueError: trying to create a rational from a string value that is
not a valid represetnation of an integer or floating
point number.
Note that the decimal initializer will have to be modified to handle
rationals.
Open Issues
===========
- Should raising a rational to a non-integer rational silently produce
a float, or raise an InvalidOperatio n exception?
Implementation
==============
There is currently a rational module distributed with Python, and a
second rational module in the Python cvs source tree that is not
distributed. While one of these could be chosen and made to conform
to the specification, I am hoping that several people will volunteer
implementatins so that a ''best of breed'' implementation may be
chosen.
References
==========
... [#PEP-239] Adding a Rational Type to Python, Craig, Zadka
(http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0239.html)
... [#PEP-240] Adding a Rational Literal to Python, Craig, Zadka
(http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0240.html)
... [#PEP-327] Decimal Data Type, Batista
(http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0327.html)
... [#PEP-239-implicit] PEP 240 adds a new literal type to Pytbon,
PEP 239 implies that division of integers would
change to return rationals.
Copyright
=========
This document has been placed in the public domain.
...
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
sentence-end-double-space: t
fill-column: 70
End:
--
Mike Meyer <mw*@mired.or g> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
