It seems to me that in python, generators are not truly coroutines. I
do not understand why. What I see is that generators are used almost
exclusively for generation of lists just-in-time. Side effects are
frowned upon. Coroutines, in contrast, are like split functions where
side effects are often as important or more important than return
values. I am currently writing a real time strategy game where I have
visual effects and use generators as coroutines which yield after
processing a single frame of the effect. I can easily make an object
rotate indefinitely with a scant four or five lines of code, all of
which is in one place. So knowing that the difference between a
generator and a coroutine is minor, I come (in a very roundabout way)
to my issue. Why can I use "return" without an expression and it
implicitly returns None but I can't do the same thing with "yield" ? 8 2252
[Timothy Fitz] It seems to me that in python, generators are not truly coroutines.
Yes, formally speaking Python generators are semi-coroutines.
I do not understand why.
Please read the PEP: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0255.html
What I see is that generators are used almost exclusively for generation of lists just-in-time. Side effects are frowned upon.
Simple uses are naturally most common.
Coroutines, in contrast, are like split functions where side effects are often as important or more important than return values. I am currently writing a real time strategy game where I have visual effects and use generators as coroutines which yield after processing a single frame of the effect. I can easily make an object rotate indefinitely with a scant four or five lines of code, all of which is in one place. So knowing that the difference between a generator and a coroutine is minor, I come (in a very roundabout way) to my issue. Why can I use "return" without an expression and it implicitly returns None
If you explicitly intend to return None as a value, it's terrible
practice to spell that as
return
instead of as
return None
It's equally terrible practice to rely on that "falling off the end"
of a Python function returns None, when you expliclty intend to return
a None value.
Plain "return" is intended to be used in Python only when
*conceptually* no value is being returned, as in "a subroutine" as
opposed to "a function". The language doesn't enforce the latter
distinction, but it's intended all the same.
but I can't do the same thing with "yield" ?
It's the purpose of "yield" to deliver a value. There was no intent
that it be possible to yield without delivering a value. If you want
to deliver the value None, then say
yield None
If you want a concept of yielding without delivering a value, that's
simply not a use case Python's generators intended to address. If you
wish, you can adhere to a *convention* that "yield None" (or "yield
False", or "yield 42", ...) means "I'm not really delivering a value".
Tim Peters <ti********@gma il.com> wrote in message Coroutines, in contrast, are like split functions where side effects are often as important or more important than return values. I am currently writing a real time strategy game where I have visual effects and use generators as coroutines which yield after processing a single frame of the effect. I can easily make an object rotate indefinitely with a scant four or five lines of code, all of which is in one place. So knowing that the difference between a generator and a coroutine is minor, I come (in a very roundabout way) to my issue. Why can I use "return" without an expression and it implicitly returns None If you explicitly intend to return None as a value, it's terrible practice to spell that as
return
instead of as
return None
It's equally terrible practice to rely on that "falling off the end" of a Python function returns None, when you expliclty intend to return a None value.
It was not that I want to explicitly return None, I specifically don't
want to return anything, it's just that None happens to be the default
for return so it seems like a convention to adhere to.
If you want a concept of yielding without delivering a value, that's simply not a use case Python's generators intended to address. If you wish, you can adhere to a *convention* that "yield None" (or "yield False", or "yield 42", ...) means "I'm not really delivering a value".
It's not a use case, but why not? And should it be? I know generators
are semi-coroutines, but the fact is that their useage outside of
value generation is just as useful and should be adressed as such. I
do not see how accepting a plain yield would break anything at all.
I have read the PEP, twice, and I don't see why it -wasn't- addressed.
Seems to me to be a fairly large arbitrary decision.
> values. I am currently writing a real time strategy game where I have
I have written a simple 2D-real-time vehicle simulator in Python
(+ graphics library Allegro), using chained generators
which works well enough.
If your game is more ambitious, spend some time designing
a good architecture and specify your components' interfaces.
Then you could generate your code-skeleton from that;
simple generators should be sufficient to implement
your methods which are then driven by your architectures
"execution model".
ciao,
Dominic
[Tim Peters] If you want a concept of yielding without delivering a value, that's simply not a use case Python's generators intended to address. If you wish, you can adhere to a *convention* that "yield None" (or "yield False", or "yield 42", ...) means "I'm not really delivering a value".
[Timothy Fitz] It's not a use case, but why not?
In the years generators were discussed before they were implemented,
nobody asked for that.
And should it be?
Not by my lights, no.
I know generators are semi-coroutines, but the fact is that their useage outside of value generation is just as useful and should be adressed as such. I do not see how accepting a plain yield would break anything at all.
The vast majority of generator applications (as you said
before,"generat ors are used almost exclusively for generation of lists
just-in-time", so you already know this) have no use for that; so, for
the vast majority of generator applications, allowing it anyway would
offer nothing of value, but would reduce the quality of compile-time
error-checking.
I have read the PEP, twice, and I don't see why it -wasn't- addressed.
If someone asked for a thing, it got into the PEP. Nobody wanted it.
Seems to me to be a fairly large arbitrary decision.
For general coroutines it would have been. For Simple Generators (the
PEP's title) I think it was the right decision -- "simple" isn't
consistent with piling on gimmicks.
If you want to change it, write a new PEP.
Dominic <no****@nospam. no> wrote in message news:<cf******* ***@news.uni-kl.de>... values. I am currently writing a real time strategy game where I have I have written a simple 2D-real-time vehicle simulator in Python (+ graphics library Allegro), using chained generators which works well enough.
If your game is more ambitious, spend some time designing a good architecture and specify your components' interfaces. Then you could generate your code-skeleton from that; simple generators should be sufficient to implement your methods which are then driven by your architectures "execution model".
ciao, Dominic
It really was never an issue of "Python can't handle this." it was
more of an issue of "Python should more openly support this." I am
championing generators because they make programming SO much easier in
cases, and people really just don't use them outside if list
generation, which saddens me.
> For general coroutines it would have been. For Simple Generators (the PEP's title) I think it was the right decision -- "simple" isn't consistent with piling on gimmicks.
If you want to change it, write a new PEP.
Hmm, I do agree in the context of "Simple Generators" yield implying
None would not make sense and (as shown by the fact that nobody else
seems to care) is a good parse-time error facility.
Is there, then, demand for full on Coroutines? I will live having to
type those extra four letters, or maybe I'll cop out and yield 0 (hah)
but it seems other people are used to coroutines in other languages
(python is my first and only) and there might be demand.
(Also, my first post on Usenet, ever, and in under two hours I get a
respond from someone whose name I recognize on sight... I am
impressed!)
"Timothy Fitz" <fi******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:97******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... Dominic <no****@nospam. no> wrote in message
news:<cf******* ***@news.uni-kl.de>... values. I am currently writing a real time strategy game where I have I have written a simple 2D-real-time vehicle simulator in Python (+ graphics library Allegro), using chained generators which works well enough.
If your game is more ambitious, spend some time designing a good architecture and specify your components' interfaces. Then you could generate your code-skeleton from that; simple generators should be sufficient to implement your methods which are then driven by your architectures "execution model".
ciao, Dominic
It really was never an issue of "Python can't handle this." it was more of an issue of "Python should more openly support this." I am championing generators because they make programming SO much easier in cases, and people really just don't use them outside if list generation, which saddens me.
Have you looked at SimPy? This is a discrete event simulation package in
pure Python, using generators in simulation objects to implement the
objects' behavior, while managing state, blocking on waits between objects,
etc. I think this may be more in the realm you are thinking, beyond simple
"list generation."
-- Paul It really was never an issue of "Python can't handle this." it was more of an issue of "Python should more openly support this." I am championing generators because they make programming SO much easier in cases, and people really just don't use them outside if list generation, which saddens me.
Coroutines are much more powerful than Python's generators and
they can be easily abused to create unstructured
"goto"-like programs thus I assume it would still be a good idea
to put most effort into your architecture and it's
underlying execution model regardless of what you finally
use to keep state: coroutines, threads, (nested) generators.
Try to hide the implementation if you can.
Nesting generators works, but I have to admit
it's (probably) not very elegant.
I would also prefer coroutines for simulation and games as
a module similar to thread/threading.
I think Michael Jackson wrote a converter for COBOL
in the 70s, which would "invert" active entities into
ordinary functions keeping their state in ordinary data structures.
This can certainly be done in Python too.
Maybe this helps.
Ciao,
Dominic
P.S. Many programming languages do not even have
support for "generators ", e.g. Java
Ha! Maybe @decorators are the solution ! ;-) This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Dave Benjamin |
last post by:
Hey all,
I was just reflecting upon the old code block debate, and the thought
occurred to me that Python really does have a form of code blocks in its
implementation of generators. It was a pretty natural conclusion, and I'm
not sure why I didn't think of it before. For instance, compare Python's
generator-style iteration versus Ruby's codeblock-style iteration:
Python:
for item in seq:
|
by: Robert Oschler |
last post by:
Preamble:
- I know this is the Python forum
- I know about (and have used) Jython
I already posted this question in comp.lang.java. But after a week I have
still not received a single reply.
One of my favorite Python features is generators. I have to use Java for
one particular project (it happens). I would like to have something at
|
by: Jordan Rastrick |
last post by:
First, a disclaimer. I am a second year Maths and Computer Science
undergraduate, and this is my first time ever on Usenet (I guess I'm
part of the http generation). On top of that, I have been using Python
for a grand total of about a fortnight now. Hence, I apologise if what
follows is a stupid suggestion, or if its already been made somewhere
else, or if this is not the appropriate place to make it, etc. But I
did honestly do some...
|
by: Deiter |
last post by:
State Machines and Coroutines
The other thread on goto: Lead me to want to ask... In the spirit of
state machines and coroutines, This n00b to C would like to know if
setjmp/longjmp are the only way to break out of a routine; leave the
function and re-enter the stack state.
I ask this because I've only briefly, as yet, reviewed these functions
and I believe longjmp will only return a designated int. Therefore I
would naively assume...
|
by: Wolfgang Keller |
last post by:
Hello,
in <dr86uc$8kt$1@wake.carmen.se>, Magnus Lycka <lycka@carmen.se> posts the
result of a short test that seems to indicate that resuming a generator takes
more time than calling a function.
If this is actually also true in the general case, and not due to eventual
non-representativeness of the test mentioned above, is it simply due to a
less-than-optimum implementation of generators in the current Pyython
interpreter and thus...
| |
by: Ben Sizer |
last post by:
A simple question - can anybody give a short example of how these work
and what they are good for? I've read PEP 342 and the associated bit in
the What's New section and it's still all Greek to me. The latter seems
to focus on how to do it, rather than why you'd do it, so it doesn't
aid the understanding too much.
--
Ben Sizer
|
by: Kay Schluehr |
last post by:
While this has been possible before and I guess ( from somewhat
superficial reading ) Michael Sparks Kamaelia project is all about this
kind of stuff, Python 2.5 generators can be used trivially to turn
higher order functions like reduce or map into generators producing
streams. After reading a thread here on comp.lang.python initiated by
someone who gets nervous about reduce() is going away in Py3K one might
just respond that it's not a...
|
by: rocco.rossi |
last post by:
I would really like to know more about python 2.5's new generator
characteristics that make them more powerful and analogous to
coroutines. Is it possible for instance to employ them in situations
where I would normally use a thread with a blocking I/O (or socket)
operation? If it is, could someone show me how it can be done? There
appears to be a very limited amount of documentation in this repect,
unfortunately.
Thank you.
|
by: Jean-Paul Calderone |
last post by:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:17:46 -0700 (PDT), rocco.rossi@gmail.com wrote:
They're not coroutines. The difference between generators in Python 2.4
and in Python 2.5 is that in Python 2.5, `yield´ can be used as part of
an expression. If a generator is resumed via its `send´ method, then the
`yield´ expression evaluates to the value passed to `send´.
You still can't suspend execution through arbitrary stack frames; `yield´
only...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |