Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org 10  3523 
After the stored procedure is run, call requery on the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
After the stored procedure is run, call requery on the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
Hi Sim,
Thanks for the advice. The problem persists when I close and reopen
any of the objects, or even the database client. I suspect it has
something to do with how Access determines the uniqueID of the row, but
that's only because that seems to be the major issue with Access and
ODBC. Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Eric
Sim Zacks wrote: After the stored procedure is run, call requery on the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Hi Sim,
Thanks for the advice. The problem persists when I close and reopen
any of the objects, or even the database client. I suspect it has
something to do with how Access determines the uniqueID of the row, but
that's only because that seems to be the major issue with Access and
ODBC. Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Eric
Sim Zacks wrote: After the stored procedure is run, call requery on the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--- Sim Zacks <si*@compulab.co.il> wrote: After the stored procedure is run, call requery on
the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access
implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
I hope that you do it on the list, so that the rest of
us can profit from your experience.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4
server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows
into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure
does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these
records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict:
another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any
other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the
stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify
these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and
how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a
known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the
unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to
ma*******@postgresql.org)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
--- Sim Zacks <si*@compulab.co.il> wrote: After the stored procedure is run, call requery on
the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access
implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
I hope that you do it on the list, so that the rest of
us can profit from your experience.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4
server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows
into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure
does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these
records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict:
another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any
other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the
stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify
these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and
how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a
known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the
unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to
ma*******@postgresql.org)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
Maybe you need some ODBC settings reconfigured:
Here's what I have, I read a couple of these settings on various lists
and websites and others were the defaults. I would guess if you don't
have row versioning checked, that is the problem.
Also, if you change ODBC settings you have to delete(unlink) the table
and relink it. Just going to Linked Table Manager and refreshing
doesn't do it. Access stores the ODBC settings in each table and does
not really refresh it. So anytime you change the ODBC settings you
have to delete all tables and relink them before it will catch. I
would recommend deleting one table and testing, if possible, and when
you find a setting that works then redo all the tables.
Also I'm using 8.0beta1, so that might also be a difference.
I'm using psqlODBC
Page 1: The only checks I have are Disable Genetic Optimizer, KSQO
and Recognize Unique Indexes. Unknown Sizes is set to Maximum.
Max Varchar and LongVarchar are 4094.
Page 2:
The ones I have checked are LF<>CR?LF conversion, Updateable Cursors
and Row Versioning. (If you don't have row versioning, that might be
the problem, I'm pretty sure it's not a default)
I tested both True is -1 on and off and it didn't make a difference,
now I have it off.
Int8 is Default and I'm not showing OID. Protocol is 7.X,6.4+
Let us know how it goes.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi Sim,
Thanks for the advice. The problem persists when I close and reopen
any of the objects, or even the database client. I suspect it has
something to do with how Access determines the uniqueID of the row, but
that's only because that seems to be the major issue with Access and
ODBC. Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Eric
Sim Zacks wrote: After the stored procedure is run, call requery on the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Maybe you need some ODBC settings reconfigured:
Here's what I have, I read a couple of these settings on various lists
and websites and others were the defaults. I would guess if you don't
have row versioning checked, that is the problem.
Also, if you change ODBC settings you have to delete(unlink) the table
and relink it. Just going to Linked Table Manager and refreshing
doesn't do it. Access stores the ODBC settings in each table and does
not really refresh it. So anytime you change the ODBC settings you
have to delete all tables and relink them before it will catch. I
would recommend deleting one table and testing, if possible, and when
you find a setting that works then redo all the tables.
Also I'm using 8.0beta1, so that might also be a difference.
I'm using psqlODBC
Page 1: The only checks I have are Disable Genetic Optimizer, KSQO
and Recognize Unique Indexes. Unknown Sizes is set to Maximum.
Max Varchar and LongVarchar are 4094.
Page 2:
The ones I have checked are LF<>CR?LF conversion, Updateable Cursors
and Row Versioning. (If you don't have row versioning, that might be
the problem, I'm pretty sure it's not a default)
I tested both True is -1 on and off and it didn't make a difference,
now I have it off.
Int8 is Default and I'm not showing OID. Protocol is 7.X,6.4+
Let us know how it goes.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi Sim,
Thanks for the advice. The problem persists when I close and reopen
any of the objects, or even the database client. I suspect it has
something to do with how Access determines the uniqueID of the row, but
that's only because that seems to be the major issue with Access and
ODBC. Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Eric
Sim Zacks wrote: After the stored procedure is run, call requery on the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Hi Sim,
Got it! Set the Row Versioning Box in Page 2 of the DSN to checked and
the problem no longer occurs. Many thanks for helping me along.
Cheers,
Eric
Sim Zacks wrote: Maybe you need some ODBC settings reconfigured:
Here's what I have, I read a couple of these settings on various lists
and websites and others were the defaults. I would guess if you don't
have row versioning checked, that is the problem.
Also, if you change ODBC settings you have to delete(unlink) the table
and relink it. Just going to Linked Table Manager and refreshing
doesn't do it. Access stores the ODBC settings in each table and does
not really refresh it. So anytime you change the ODBC settings you
have to delete all tables and relink them before it will catch. I
would recommend deleting one table and testing, if possible, and when
you find a setting that works then redo all the tables.
Also I'm using 8.0beta1, so that might also be a difference.
I'm using psqlODBC
Page 1: The only checks I have are Disable Genetic Optimizer, KSQO
and Recognize Unique Indexes. Unknown Sizes is set to Maximum.
Max Varchar and LongVarchar are 4094.
Page 2:
The ones I have checked are LF<>CR?LF conversion, Updateable Cursors
and Row Versioning. (If you don't have row versioning, that might be
the problem, I'm pretty sure it's not a default)
I tested both True is -1 on and off and it didn't make a difference,
now I have it off.
Int8 is Default and I'm not showing OID. Protocol is 7.X,6.4+
Let us know how it goes.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi Sim,
Thanks for the advice. The problem persists when I close and reopen
any of the objects, or even the database client. I suspect it has
something to do with how Access determines the uniqueID of the row, but
that's only because that seems to be the major issue with Access and
ODBC. Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Eric
Sim Zacks wrote:
After the stored procedure is run, call requery on the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
________________________________________________ ________________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Hi Sim,
Got it! Set the Row Versioning Box in Page 2 of the DSN to checked and
the problem no longer occurs. Many thanks for helping me along.
Cheers,
Eric
Sim Zacks wrote: Maybe you need some ODBC settings reconfigured:
Here's what I have, I read a couple of these settings on various lists
and websites and others were the defaults. I would guess if you don't
have row versioning checked, that is the problem.
Also, if you change ODBC settings you have to delete(unlink) the table
and relink it. Just going to Linked Table Manager and refreshing
doesn't do it. Access stores the ODBC settings in each table and does
not really refresh it. So anytime you change the ODBC settings you
have to delete all tables and relink them before it will catch. I
would recommend deleting one table and testing, if possible, and when
you find a setting that works then redo all the tables.
Also I'm using 8.0beta1, so that might also be a difference.
I'm using psqlODBC
Page 1: The only checks I have are Disable Genetic Optimizer, KSQO
and Recognize Unique Indexes. Unknown Sizes is set to Maximum.
Max Varchar and LongVarchar are 4094.
Page 2:
The ones I have checked are LF<>CR?LF conversion, Updateable Cursors
and Row Versioning. (If you don't have row versioning, that might be
the problem, I'm pretty sure it's not a default)
I tested both True is -1 on and off and it didn't make a difference,
now I have it off.
Int8 is Default and I'm not showing OID. Protocol is 7.X,6.4+
Let us know how it goes.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
__________________________________________________ ______________________________
Hi Sim,
Thanks for the advice. The problem persists when I close and reopen
any of the objects, or even the database client. I suspect it has
something to do with how Access determines the uniqueID of the row, but
that's only because that seems to be the major issue with Access and
ODBC. Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Eric
Sim Zacks wrote:
After the stored procedure is run, call requery on the form that was
updated.
We are in the middle of moving Access implementations to PostGreSQL.
I'd be happy to trade war stories, if you'd like.
Thank You
Sim Zacks
IT Manager
CompuLab
04-829-0145 - Office
04-832-5251 - Fax
________________________________________________ ________________________________
Hi all,
I am using an Access client linked to a PG 7.4 server via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an INSERT
within the body of the stored proc. The procedure does not explicitly
commit this data, as no transactions are invoked.
The problem is that Access will not modify these records via table or
form view, giving its generic "Write conflict: another user has modified
this record" message. It does just fine for any other records in the
table, but it will not modify those created by the stored proc. It will
also execute an UPDATE OR DELETE query to modify these records This
stored procedure is pretty key for us to go forward.
Does anyone have any ideas of what's going on and how to fix it? I can
post more details, but I wanted to see if this was a known problem
before doing so.
Many thanks,
Eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Mark Richards |
last post by:
The solutions for the following problems seems to be simple but I did not found a (convenient) solution:
Assume we have a number of elements of the same type under a common parent e.g.
<person...
|
by: bissatch |
last post by:
Hi,
I am trying to use JavaScript to write a table column on a web page.
The code is as follows:
<html>
<head>
<script>
function displaycount() {
|
by: Eric E |
last post by:
Hi all,
I am using an Access 2000 client linked to a Postgresql 7.4 server
via ODBC.
I have a stored proc on the server that inserts rows into a
table.particular table, accomplished via an...
|
by: bennett |
last post by:
How can I do a loop from 1 to 5, where on line 1 I print 1 space
followed by a button, on line 2 I print 2 spaces followed by a button,
on line 3 I print 3 spaces followed by a button, etc.?
I...
|
by: Jacek Dziedzic |
last post by:
Hi!
<OT, background>
I am in a situation where I use two compilers from different
vendors to compile my program. It seems that recently, due to
a misconfiguration, library conflict or my...
|
by: Steven Prasil |
last post by:
When I run/debug a program with Console.out.write statements inside and the program
execution reaches this statement then a new console/command prompt window (this with black background)
is opened...
|
by: PRLIT |
last post by:
I'm using Access to create forms with a SQLExpress backend.
My form is for logging purchases. I have a date ordered and a date delivered. (I know the write issue comes from the date)
I've tried...
|
by: duli |
last post by:
Hi:
I would like recommendations for books (in any language, not
necessarily C++, C, python) which have walkthroughs for developing
a big software project ? So starting from inception, problem...
|
by: Miles |
last post by:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Harish K Vishwanath
<harish.shastry@gmail.comwrote:
"built-in type" generally means "implemented in C", also sometimes
called "extension type".
Both the...
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
| |
