Le Dimanche 9 Novembre 2003 19:39, Rajesh Kumar Mallah a écrit :
If so what is the process
The advantage of using a Unicode database is that UTF-8 supports/includes all
known encodings at once. Therefore, in the process of development, it can
help you save time.
When using a Unicode database, if the client does not support Unicode, it is
always possible to recode data streams on the fly with "set client_encoding =
foo_encoding". Therefore, there is no real drawback in using Unicode. It may
only be a little slower, but there is no real proof.
The process of conversion is as follows:
- dump the whole database using pg_dump:
pg_dump database_name > pg_data_dump.sql
- Do no drop the old database. Make a backup of the dump:
cp pg_data_dump.sql pg_data_dump.sql.bak
- recode the dump using the GNU recode package:
recode ..u8 pg_data_dump.sql
recode will try to guess the encoding the original ASCII database.
- Open the file in an UTF-8 editor like Kate and verify that all characters
are preserved and display well (in Hindi?). If it does not work, it may be a
problem of original encoding. Try to guess it and retry using:
cp -f source_encoding..u8.bak source_encoding..u8
recode source_encoding..u8 pg_data_dump.sql
- create an empty Unicode database:
psql template1
create database new_database with encoding=Unicode;
reload the dump: psql new_database < pg_data_dump.sql
GNU/recode is available in most GNU/Linux distributions.
By the way, as you live in India, do not hesitate to visit
http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/pgadmin3/translation.php if you can help us.
Most translations in languages for India are "stalled", do not hesitate to
take over the translation in Hindi for example.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org 
