Is a PHP variable supposed to be seen in a .js file included into a .php file

[aa]

Is a PHP variable supposed to be seen in a .js file included into a .php
file?

I have a client side javascript code stored in a .js file which is included
into a PHP file using
<script src="filename.j s></script>

This code initialises a Javascript variable
var u="string";

The string is supposed to be the value of $HTTP_HOST

So, when initialise this variable like

var u=<? echo $HTTP_HOST;?>;

I sterted getting a javascript message Syntax Error

Am I doing something wrong, or PHP variables are not seen in included js
files?

[Justin Koivisto]

aa wrote:

Is a PHP variable supposed to be seen in a .js file included into a .php
file?

I have a client side javascript code stored in a .js file which is included
into a PHP file using
<script src="filename.j s></script>

This code initialises a Javascript variable
var u="string";

The string is supposed to be the value of $HTTP_HOST

So, when initialise this variable like

var u=<? echo $HTTP_HOST;?>;

I sterted getting a javascript message Syntax Error

Am I doing something wrong, or PHP variables are not seen in included js
files?

js files are not parsed for PHP code unless you specifically tell the
webserver to do so. Therefore, "var u=<? echo $HTTP_HOST;?>;" in the .js
will error since the browser doesn't know what to do.

--
Justin Koivisto - sp**@koivi.com
http://www.koivi.com

[Kelvin Mackay]

You need to modify your web server configuration so that .js files are
parsed by PHP.
For Apache, use something like the following:

AddType application/x-httpd-php .js

Kelvin

"aa" <[e-mail] t> wrote in message
news:41******** *************** @ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.n et:

Is a PHP variable supposed to be seen in a .js file included into a .php
file?

I have a client side javascript code stored in a .js file which is
included
into a PHP file using
<script src="filename.j s></script>

This code initialises a Javascript variable
var u="string";

The string is supposed to be the value of $HTTP_HOST

So, when initialise this variable like

var u=<? echo $HTTP_HOST;?>;

I sterted getting a javascript message Syntax Error

Am I doing something wrong, or PHP variables are not seen in included js
files?

---
Mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.773 / Virus Database: 520 - Release Date: 05/10/2004

[aa]

[Daniel Tryba]

Kelvin Mackay <no************ ********@remove .nospam.parts.g mail.com> wrote:

You need to modify your web server configuration so that .js files are
parsed by PHP.
For Apache, use something like the following:

AddType application/x-httpd-php .js

Why not simply point the src to a php file, that way php isnt executed
for every other static js file. Just don't forget to set the correct
mimetype (application/x-javascript).

BTW TOFU is bad practice.

--

Daniel Tryba

[Ehtor]

At the extreme risk of going way off topic...

I believe that TOFU actually makes much more sense.

When you convince google-groups to preview the BOTTOM 30 lines of a
message, I'll switch over..

I find it hard to understand how anyone who uses a modern, message
threading news reader can tolerate bottom postings... I'm sure someone
will let me know.. :-)

R


Daniel Tryba <ne************ ****@canopus.nl > wrote in
news:ck******** **@news.tue.nl:

Kelvin Mackay <no************ ********@remove .nospam.parts.g mail.com>
wrote:

You need to modify your web server configuration so that .js files
are parsed by PHP.
For Apache, use something like the following:

AddType application/x-httpd-php .js

Why not simply point the src to a php file, that way php isnt executed
for every other static js file. Just don't forget to set the correct
mimetype (application/x-javascript).

BTW TOFU is bad practice.

[Default User]

Ehtor wrote:

At the extreme risk of going way off topic...

I believe that TOFU actually makes much more sense.

When you convince google-groups to preview the BOTTOM 30 lines of a
message, I'll switch over..

The fact that some people don't know how to snip when using the correct
form of posting doesn't justify you using an incorrect form.


Brian

[Kelvin Mackay]

You're right, that would work better :-)

However, you could also put the directive in a .htaccess file in the
directory with the dynamic js files.
I personally prefer to give files their correct extensions so I don't
lose syntax highlighting (etc) in editors that don't allow you to
manually specify a file's type.

Forgive my ignorance, what does TOFU stand for?

--

Kelvin

"Daniel Tryba" <ne************ ****@canopus.nl > wrote in message
news:ck******** **@news.tue.nl:

Kelvin Mackay <no************ ********@remove .nospam.parts.g mail.com>
wrote:

You need to modify your web server configuration so that .js files are
parsed by PHP.
For Apache, use something like the following:

AddType application/x-httpd-php .js

Why not simply point the src to a php file, that way php isnt executed
for every other static js file. Just don't forget to set the correct
mimetype (application/x-javascript).

BTW TOFU is bad practice.

---
Mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.773 / Virus Database: 520 - Release Date: 05/10/2004

[Daniel Tryba]

Ehtor <no****@nomail. com> wrote:

At the extreme risk of going way off topic...

I believe that TOFU actually makes much more sense.

When you convince google-groups to preview the BOTTOM 30 lines of a
message, I'll switch over..
30 lines under a full overquote is just as bad (at least), if you write
a posting you should take the time to make a readable posting, it should
be short and summarize for readability (just in case some messages don't
make it or get delivered out of order). TOFU or bottom posting are for
lazy people who write for themselves.
I find it hard to understand how anyone who uses a modern, message
threading news reader can tolerate bottom postings... I'm sure
someone will let me know.. :-)

So whats the reason for the full underquote? Modern threaded readers
make it easy for the user to get the full message if they want it to!
TOFU makes no sense in this case, so just don't resend the same old
article so people don't have to scan in just in case there is something
added.

--

Daniel Tryba

[Michael Fesser]

.oO(Ehtor)

I find it hard to understand how anyone who uses a modern, message
threading news reader can tolerate bottom postings...
Saves time, because you don't have to endlessly scroll down or look up
in another posting what the author is referring to.
I'm sure someone
will let me know.. :-)
The usual (and for many people most readable) way is:
question
answer
question

answer

Like in any other discussion. Or do you wait until you got 5 questions
and then answer them all at once? If yes - how would you do this? Always
say something like "And now to your question about this and that"? Why
not simply answer/comment one question at a time?

Another thing that people writing top postings (BTW: what's TOFU in
English? I only know it in German ... *g*) seem to forget is the length
of the posting. With just adding an answer on top of another posting the
articles get longer and longer, hundreds of lines for just a handful of
new text. This wastes bandwidth and space on hundreds of newsservers.

Micha