I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but it should
be working with Oracle as weel.
At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return incremented
identity columns.
Oralce however returns null or zero.
How can this be fixed easily?
Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
mConn.Open
rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
rs.Update
MsgBox rs("id")
mConn.Close
9  8091 
"Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>... I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but it should
be working with Oracle as weel.
At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return incremented
identity columns.
Oralce however returns null or zero.
How can this be fixed easily?
Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
mConn.Open
rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
rs.Update
MsgBox rs("id")
mConn.Close
It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It is a
MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this to
work right.
The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique numbers
serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the select
list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
Decent discussion around this is available in Thomas Kyte's "Expert
One on One Oracle" book.
HTH
/Hans
BTW: newsgroup comp.databases. oracle is officially defunct and fewer
ISPs are carrying it. The replacement is the heirarchy
'comp.databases .oracle.*' as discussed at http://orafaq.com
"Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>... I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but it
should
be working with Oracle as weel.
At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return incremented
identity columns.
Oralce however returns null or zero.
How can this be fixed easily?
Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
mConn.Open
rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
rs.Update
MsgBox rs("id")
mConn.Close
It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It is a
MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this to
work right.
The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique numbers
serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the select
list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
I already have implemented sequences and triggers in the database.
I have seen this working because I looked into the database right after the
Addnew function.
Problem is still that it is not returned in the recordset.
"Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:41******** *************** @news.xs4all.nl ...
"Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>... I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but it
should
be working with Oracle as weel.
At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return incremented
identity columns.
Oralce however returns null or zero.
How can this be fixed easily?
Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
mConn.Open
rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
rs.Update
MsgBox rs("id")
mConn.Close
It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It is a
MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this to
work right.
The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique numbers
serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the select
list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
I already have implemented sequences and triggers in the database.
I have seen this working because I looked into the database right after
the Addnew function.
Problem is still that it is not returned in the recordset.
Use the returning clause to get the values back out.
Jim
"Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>... "Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>... I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but it
should
be working with Oracle as weel.
At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return incremented
identity columns.
Oralce however returns null or zero.
How can this be fixed easily?
Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
mConn.Open
rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
rs.Update
MsgBox rs("id")
mConn.Close
It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It is a
MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this to
work right.
The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique numbers
serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the select
list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
I already have implemented sequences and triggers in the database.
I have seen this working because I looked into the database right after the
Addnew function.
Problem is still that it is not returned in the recordset.
1) This should be discussed in comp.databases. oracle.server, not
comp.database.o racle (AFAIK, no charter, not an official group)
comp.databases. oracle (defunct - see http://orafaq.com)
I have added cdo.server and hopefully we will get more people looking
at this. In your reply PLEASE remove the two bad groups from the
distribution.
2) I'm not sure I understand the problem. You say you have created
sequences and triggers - how are you using them? Suggest you post the
trigger code.
/Hans
"Jim Kennedy" <ke************ *************** *@attbi.net> wrote in message
news:JEb9d.2163 86$3l3.87609@at tbi_s03...
"Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:41******** *************** @news.xs4all.nl ...
"Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... > "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
> news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>...
>> I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but it
>> should
>> be working with Oracle as weel.
>> At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return
>> incremented
>> identity columns.
>> Oralce however returns null or zero.
>> How can this be fixed easily?
>>
>>
>> Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
>> Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
>>
>> mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
>> ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
>> mConn.Open
>>
>> rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
>> adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
>> rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
>> rs.Update
>> MsgBox rs("id")
>>
>> mConn.Close
>
> It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It is a
> MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this to
> work right.
>
> The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
> 'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique numbers
> serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
> accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the select
> list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
>
I already have implemented sequences and triggers in the database.
I have seen this working because I looked into the database right after
the Addnew function.
Problem is still that it is not returned in the recordset.
Use the returning clause to get the values back out.
Jim
The returning clause is used with the INSERT statement. I use the ADO Addnew
function.
Hans,
The problem is NOT the trigger.
The insert trigger does properly increment the sequence and puts the value
in the desired column.
That's exactly what I want to be happen.
The problem is: the ADO Recordset does not immediately return the new value
after the Addnew method.
The same source runs perfectly with SqlServer, because then the Addnew
really return the new identity value (as it is claad in MSSQL)
I've seen a few postings about this issue in several forums, but no one
seems te have found a solution....:-(
"Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>... "Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>...
> I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but it
> should
> be working with Oracle as weel.
> At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return
incremented> identity columns.
> Oralce however returns null or zero.
> How can this be fixed easily?
>
>
> Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
> Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
>
> mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
> ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
> mConn.Open
>
> rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
> adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
> rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
> rs.Update
> MsgBox rs("id")
>
> mConn.Close
It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It is a
MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this to
work right.
The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique numbers
serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the select
list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
I already have implemented sequences and triggers in the database.
I have seen this working because I looked into the database right after
the Addnew function.
Problem is still that it is not returned in the recordset.
1) This should be discussed in comp.databases. oracle.server, not
comp.database.o racle (AFAIK, no charter, not an official group)
comp.databases. oracle (defunct - see http://orafaq.com)
I have added cdo.server and hopefully we will get more people looking
at this. In your reply PLEASE remove the two bad groups from the
distribution.
2) I'm not sure I understand the problem. You say you have created
sequences and triggers - how are you using them? Suggest you post the
trigger code.
/Hans
"Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:41******** *************** @news.xs4all.nl ... Hans,
The problem is NOT the trigger.
The insert trigger does properly increment the sequence and puts the value
in the desired column.
That's exactly what I want to be happen.
The problem is: the ADO Recordset does not immediately return the new
value after the Addnew method.
The same source runs perfectly with SqlServer, because then the Addnew
really return the new identity value (as it is claad in MSSQL)
I've seen a few postings about this issue in several forums, but no one
seems te have found a solution....:-(
"Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>... "Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com...
> "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
> news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>...
>> I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but
it >> should
>> be working with Oracle as weel.
>> At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return incremented >> identity columns.
>> Oralce however returns null or zero.
>> How can this be fixed easily?
>>
>>
>> Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
>> Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
>>
>> mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
>> ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
>> mConn.Open
>>
>> rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
>> adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
>> rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
>> rs.Update
>> MsgBox rs("id")
>>
>> mConn.Close
>
> It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It is
a > MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this to
> work right.
>
> The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
> 'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique
numbers > serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
> accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the select
> list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
>
I already have implemented sequences and triggers in the database.
I have seen this working because I looked into the database right
after the Addnew function.
Problem is still that it is not returned in the recordset.
1) This should be discussed in comp.databases. oracle.server, not
comp.database.o racle (AFAIK, no charter, not an official group)
comp.databases. oracle (defunct - see http://orafaq.com)
I have added cdo.server and hopefully we will get more people looking
at this. In your reply PLEASE remove the two bad groups from the
distribution.
2) I'm not sure I understand the problem. You say you have created
sequences and triggers - how are you using them? Suggest you post the
trigger code.
/Hans
What about the returning clause?
Jim
"Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:41******** *************** @news.xs4all.nl ...
"Jim Kennedy" <ke************ *************** *@attbi.net> wrote in message
news:JEb9d.2163 86$3l3.87609@at tbi_s03...
"Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:41******** *************** @news.xs4all.nl ...
"Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com...
> "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
> news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>...
>> I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but
it >> should
>> be working with Oracle as weel.
>> At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return
>> incremented
>> identity columns.
>> Oralce however returns null or zero.
>> How can this be fixed easily?
>>
>>
>> Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
>> Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
>>
>> mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
>> ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
>> mConn.Open
>>
>> rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
>> adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
>> rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
>> rs.Update
>> MsgBox rs("id")
>>
>> mConn.Close
>
> It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It is a
> MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this to
> work right.
>
> The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
> 'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique numbers
> serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
> accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the select
> list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
>
I already have implemented sequences and triggers in the database.
I have seen this working because I looked into the database right after the Addnew function.
Problem is still that it is not returned in the recordset.
Use the returning clause to get the values back out.
Jim
The returning clause is used with the INSERT statement. I use the ADO
Addnew function.
Add new is an insert statement; it is just a proprietary API to do an
insert.
Jim
Jim,
You're still recommending the 'returning clause'. I do not know how to use
that in an Addnew method.
There's no place to specify the insert-statement that is built-in into that
method.
It's not a .Net project, but VB6. (The ADO.Net data provider allows you to
customize all sql command behind the insert, update and delete actions)
However, finally I found something which points me in the right direction: http://www.tju.cn/docs/odb10.1.0.2/w...0115/using.htm
Scroll to the paragraph about the 'Server Data on Insert Property'. I think
that's exactly what I need.
Unfortunetaly the machine with my oracle db crashed. I am going to reinstall
everything tomorrow.
In the mean time I am going to look for code examples using this property.
Jan
"Jim Kennedy" <ke************ *************** *@attbi.net> wrote in message
news:I00ad.2199 70$D%.30457@att bi_s51...
"Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:41******** *************** @news.xs4all.nl ... Hans,
The problem is NOT the trigger.
The insert trigger does properly increment the sequence and puts the
value in the desired column.
That's exactly what I want to be happen.
The problem is: the ADO Recordset does not immediately return the new value after the Addnew method.
The same source runs perfectly with SqlServer, because then the Addnew
really return the new identity value (as it is claad in MSSQL)
I've seen a few postings about this issue in several forums, but no one
seems te have found a solution....:-(
"Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com... "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>... > "Hans" <fo******@gmail .com> wrote in message
> news:bd******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com...
> > "Jan van Veldhuizen" <ja*@van-veldhuizen.nl> wrote in message
> > news:<41******* *************** *@news.xs4all.n l>...
> >> I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer,
but it > >> should
> >> be working with Oracle as weel.
> >> At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return incremented > >> identity columns.
> >> Oralce however returns null or zero.
> >> How can this be fixed easily?
> >>
> >>
> >> Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connectio n
> >> Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
> >>
> >> mConn.Connectio nString = "Provider=OraOL EDB.Oracle;User
> >> ID=user;Passwor d=pwd;Data Source=dbname;"
> >> mConn.Open
> >>
> >> rs.Open "select * from testidentity where id < -1", mConn,
> >> adOpenForwardOn ly, adLockPessimist ic
> >> rs.AddNew "name", "peter"
> >> rs.Update
> >> MsgBox rs("id")
> >>
> >> mConn.Close
> >
> > It can not easily be fixed - identity is not a SQL standard. It
is a > > MS SQLServer peculiarity and you will need to 'port' to get this
to > > work right.
> >
> > The closest you come to a quick solution is to use Oracle's
> > 'sequences' which serve a similar purpose (handing out unique
numbers > > serially) but are implemented quite differently. A sequence is
> > accessed as part of a SQL statement, generally as part of the
select > > list, using either CURR_VAL or NEXT_VAL 'methods'.
> >
> I already have implemented sequences and triggers in the database.
> I have seen this working because I looked into the database right
after the > Addnew function.
> Problem is still that it is not returned in the recordset.
1) This should be discussed in comp.databases. oracle.server, not
comp.database.o racle (AFAIK, no charter, not an official group)
comp.databases. oracle (defunct - see http://orafaq.com)
I have added cdo.server and hopefully we will get more people looking
at this. In your reply PLEASE remove the two bad groups from the
distribution.
2) I'm not sure I understand the problem. You say you have created
sequences and triggers - how are you using them? Suggest you post the
trigger code.
/Hans
What about the returning clause?
Jim
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Roger Withnell |
last post by:
I'm inserting a new record into an MS SQL database table
and I want to obtain the new records autonumber
immediately afterwards, as follows:
MadminRS.CursorLocation = adUseServer
MadminRS.CursorType = adOpenKeyset
MadminRS.LockType = adLockOptimistic
MadminRS.Open "NavBar", objConn, , , adCmdTable
MadminRS.AddNew
MadminRS("Url") = Request.Form("Website")
MadminRS("ParentRecNo") = 0
|
by: baskar |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a table with 90 fields. When I try to use the recordset with
addnew and set all the 90 fields and then update the record set it
fails the following error seen in the log,
SQL0117N The number of values assigned is not
the same as the number of specified or implied columns.
SQLSTATE=42802
|
by: dixie |
last post by:
I have some code that adds new records into a table for each ID in a list
box when a button on a form is clicked. This works fine. My problem now is
that I wish to be able to edit all the records for people whose ID is in the
list box. I made minor changes to the code (mainly replacing rs.AddNew with
rs.Edit)and it appears to be updating only the first record and then
overwriting that record with the next, etc until it runs out of ID's...
|
by: Trevor Best |
last post by:
I don't know if this has been reported before but it appears to be a
bug with Access.
If I create two tables both with an identity column then create an
insert trigger on table1 that inserts a related record into table2, now
create a form on table1 with a subform on table2. Insert records into
the main form to your heart's content and everything's fine, each main
record automatically gets a child record and so far the identity
columns...
|
by: Omavlana Omav |
last post by:
Hi,
I have created a datatable, dataadapter, added the table to a dataset
and filling the table.
Here I want to add an identity column to the above datatable and Later I
will use this identity colum for printing the records using print
document.
How to create an identity column that increments its value when each row
| | |
by: Leonardo |
last post by:
Hi. I'm trying to build my first application with database access using VB
2005. I'm a VB 6 programmer and learning everything again has been
challenging. I managed to write a code using some tips from a book I
recently bought. The navigation works fine. My problem starts when it comes
to adding new registers. I have three tables: clients, addresses and
telephones, so the client can have multiple address and telephones. The
client data is...
|
by: pb648174 |
last post by:
In a multi-user environment, I would like to get a list of Ids
generated, similar to:
declare @LastId int
select @LastId = Max(Id) From TableMania
INSERT INTO TableMania (ColumnA, ColumnB)
SELECT ColumnA, ColumnB From OtherTable Where ColumnC > 15
--get entries just added
|
by: Jan van Veldhuizen |
last post by:
I have an application which is running fine with MS SqlServer, but it should
be working with Oracle as weel.
At a lot of places we rely upon the ADO Recordset to return incremented
identity columns.
Oralce however returns null or zero.
How can this be fixed easily?
Dim mConn As New ADODB.Connection
Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset
|
by: stegze |
last post by:
Hi All,
I have a problem with a DB2 server of my customer. It is a Debian
Linux running DB2 Express-C. I have an IDENTITY field as PK in a table
and I use this value as FK in another table. Two weeks ago the FK
values got corrupted or mixed up somehow. I also got some warnings
about system temporary table spaces so I created a 16K page size
system temporary table space to be sure. All seemed to be okay until
today. Something happened an...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
| | |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
