Object Hash of Contents

[Evan Camilleri]

What is the fastest way to get the 'hash' (or CRC32 or whatever) of the
contents of an object

i don't care what's inside, I just want the 'hash' of its contents

(not to mixed with object.GetHashCode() which gives a hash code of an
instance, I want the hash of the data contents)

Evan

[Michel Posseth [MCP]]

AFAIK

MD5 Hash is fast and pretty reliable for its purpose CRC is more reliable
but also much slower

MD5 hash is often used to quickly compare 2 binary`s ( are they the same or
not , idea; for update/ file synchronization programs etc etc )
CRC is often used by compression program`s ( winzip , winrar etc etc ) to
check if they are exactly the same on byte level ( to check if the file not
has gone corrupted during deflation )

HTH

Michel

"Evan Camilleri" <ev**@holisticrd.com.nospamschreef in bericht
news:%2******************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

What is the fastest way to get the 'hash' (or CRC32 or whatever) of the
contents of an object

i don't care what's inside, I just want the 'hash' of its contents

(not to mixed with object.GetHashCode() which gives a hash code of an
instance, I want the hash of the data contents)

Evan

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Michel Posseth [MCP] <MS**@posseth.comwrote:

Strange ,,,,
Just one week ago , i was asked to create a network file synchronization
mechanism wich did not care about file versions
"file remote different as the local version , copy it local" as we are
talking about hundreds of files and a total size of + 100 MB
i needed a fast way to check these files .

So i went digging on the web wich algorythm would be the fastest and found
my previous conclusion on various websites

My project is finished and performs superb , but you are telling me now that
CRC ought to be faster but less reliable ??

It *may* be faster, depending on the exact implementation. However,
it's unlikely that the hash performance is going to be significant
compared with the IO cost. Hashing 100MB of data is likely to be very
quick with either algorithm.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Michel Posseth [MCP]]

>However,

it's unlikely that the hash performance is going to be significant
compared with the IO cost.

Yes ... that is a good one .. in my situation the cost of copying a file
that did not need replacement

However it seems that i got my implentation right as MD5 hash would be more
reliable but probably a bit slower as a CRC
and in my situation it turned out thet this is exactly what i need cause it
is more costly to copy the file over the intranet to the client

So i guess i had a lucky day when i wrote it :-)

regards

And thanks for sharing

Michel

"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.comschreef in bericht
news:MP*********************@msnews.microsoft.com. ..

Michel Posseth [MCP] <MS**@posseth.comwrote:

>Strange ,,,,
Just one week ago , i was asked to create a network file synchronization
mechanism wich did not care about file versions
"file remote different as the local version , copy it local" as we are
talking about hundreds of files and a total size of + 100 MB
i needed a fast way to check these files .

So i went digging on the web wich algorythm would be the fastest and
found
my previous conclusion on various websites

My project is finished and performs superb , but you are telling me now
that
CRC ought to be faster but less reliable ??

It *may* be faster, depending on the exact implementation. However,
it's unlikely that the hash performance is going to be significant
compared with the IO cost. Hashing 100MB of data is likely to be very
quick with either algorithm.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

On Sep 4, 3:29 pm, "Evan Camilleri" <[e-mail]>
wrote:

I actually wanted to see some code since I cannot find how to get MD5 or CRC
for the object's data

As Peter said, there's no such concept as "the object's data" that
makes taking an MD5 hash sensible in all cases.

What would the MD5 of a NetworkStream be? Would you have to read all
its contents to find out?

Jon