473,413 Members | 1,727 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,413 software developers and data experts.

Visual Studio 6.0 excrutiatingly slow under XP SP2

I have Visual Studio 6.0 stand-alone (with C++) and as part of Compaq
Visual Fortran 6.6c.

I am moving my development from a Win 98 SE machine w/2x 10 Gb HDD (each
w/ 1Gb free), 768 Mb RAM to a 3.2 MHz Win XP Pro machine w/147 Gb HDD
(121 Gb free) and 2 Gb RAM.

Loading a particular project with Fortran code only with about 80 files
and 750 Mb of source code on Win 98 takes 15 seconds until the editor is
ready to use.

Loading the same project on the Win XP Pro machine takes 10-20 minutes.
Also takes forever on my wife's 2.4 GHz Dell machine with 640 Mb.

I have searched and destroyed with SpyBot and Ad-Aware, removed the
ctfmon.exe using MS approved procedures, uninstalled Office 2003
completely with no success.

If I boot in safe mode, or if I do a clean boot (really clean, bare
minimum), the project loads in 40 seconds.

Compilation and linking are very fast. Everything else I run on this
machine is very fast. Loading and editing files is very slow. Inserting
a linen of code at line 235 of a 130 line file takes minutes. Takes 18
seconds in clean boot mode.

Opening a new file in the project for editing allows for plenty of time
to make a cup of coffee or get a beer and a snack.

I need to develop under XP because some of the bugs encountered by my
users do not show up running under Win 98 SE.

Does anyone have any suggestions as to what is causing this problem and
what to do about it? Is there a service pack?

This is very frustrating. I can't be the only one having this problem.

Thanks in advance,

Charles.
Nov 17 '05 #1
7 1704
Not sure why you are posting this on a C++ language NG, anyway, 2GB RAM and
640MB RAM is quite a difference isn't it?
I would suggest you contact HP (the actual owner of Visual Fortran) for such
things like memory requirement and related performance issues.
Willy.

"Charles" <cs*****@interpex.com> wrote in message
news:6f********************@wispertel.com...
I have Visual Studio 6.0 stand-alone (with C++) and as part of Compaq
Visual Fortran 6.6c.

I am moving my development from a Win 98 SE machine w/2x 10 Gb HDD (each
w/ 1Gb free), 768 Mb RAM to a 3.2 MHz Win XP Pro machine w/147 Gb HDD
(121 Gb free) and 2 Gb RAM.

Loading a particular project with Fortran code only with about 80 files
and 750 Mb of source code on Win 98 takes 15 seconds until the editor is
ready to use.

Loading the same project on the Win XP Pro machine takes 10-20 minutes.
Also takes forever on my wife's 2.4 GHz Dell machine with 640 Mb.

I have searched and destroyed with SpyBot and Ad-Aware, removed the
ctfmon.exe using MS approved procedures, uninstalled Office 2003
completely with no success.

If I boot in safe mode, or if I do a clean boot (really clean, bare
minimum), the project loads in 40 seconds.

Compilation and linking are very fast. Everything else I run on this
machine is very fast. Loading and editing files is very slow. Inserting
a linen of code at line 235 of a 130 line file takes minutes. Takes 18
seconds in clean boot mode.

Opening a new file in the project for editing allows for plenty of time
to make a cup of coffee or get a beer and a snack.

I need to develop under XP because some of the bugs encountered by my
users do not show up running under Win 98 SE.

Does anyone have any suggestions as to what is causing this problem and
what to do about it? Is there a service pack?

This is very frustrating. I can't be the only one having this problem.

Thanks in advance,

Charles.

Nov 17 '05 #2
Willy Denoyette [MVP] wrote:
Not sure why you are posting this on a C++ language NG, anyway, 2GB RAM and
640MB RAM is quite a difference isn't it?
Sure is. I would expect new machine to be twice as fast, maybe faster.
Instead it is almost 100 times slower. But only for loading source files
into Visual Studio. Everything else is much faster.

I am looking for others who may have had problems with MSVS running slow
on XP.
I would suggest you contact HP (the actual owner of Visual Fortran) for such
things like memory requirement and related performance issues.
Willy.
Been there, done that. No satisfaction. Problem is with MS Visual
Studio, not Fortran, per se. I have VC++ as it comes with the package.

Also have MSDN copies of Visual Studio 6.0, same slowness there.

I would appear I need to go to Visual Studio.NET, Intel Fortran 8.1
Compiler, new GUI library, etc. Or reformat my hard drive and install
Win 98 SE?

Charles.

"Charles" <cs*****@interpex.com> wrote in message
news:6f********************@wispertel.com...
I have Visual Studio 6.0 stand-alone (with C++) and as part of Compaq
Visual Fortran 6.6c.

I am moving my development from a Win 98 SE machine w/2x 10 Gb HDD (each
w/ 1Gb free), 768 Mb RAM to a 3.2 MHz Win XP Pro machine w/147 Gb HDD
(121 Gb free) and 2 Gb RAM.

Loading a particular project with Fortran code only with about 80 files
and 750 Mb of source code on Win 98 takes 15 seconds until the editor is
ready to use.

Loading the same project on the Win XP Pro machine takes 10-20 minutes.
Also takes forever on my wife's 2.4 GHz Dell machine with 640 Mb.

I have searched and destroyed with SpyBot and Ad-Aware, removed the
ctfmon.exe using MS approved procedures, uninstalled Office 2003
completely with no success.

If I boot in safe mode, or if I do a clean boot (really clean, bare
minimum), the project loads in 40 seconds.

Compilation and linking are very fast. Everything else I run on this
machine is very fast. Loading and editing files is very slow. Inserting
a linen of code at line 235 of a 130 line file takes minutes. Takes 18
seconds in clean boot mode.

Opening a new file in the project for editing allows for plenty of time
to make a cup of coffee or get a beer and a snack.

I need to develop under XP because some of the bugs encountered by my
users do not show up running under Win 98 SE.

Does anyone have any suggestions as to what is causing this problem and
what to do about it? Is there a service pack?

This is very frustrating. I can't be the only one having this problem.

Thanks in advance,

Charles.



Nov 17 '05 #3
Charles wrote:
I have Visual Studio 6.0 stand-alone (with C++) and as part of Compaq
Visual Fortran 6.6c.

I am moving my development from a Win 98 SE machine w/2x 10 Gb HDD
(each w/ 1Gb free), 768 Mb RAM to a 3.2 MHz Win XP Pro machine w/147
Gb HDD (121 Gb free) and 2 Gb RAM.

Loading a particular project with Fortran code only with about 80
files and 750 Mb of source code on Win 98 takes 15 seconds until the
editor is ready to use.

Loading the same project on the Win XP Pro machine takes 10-20
minutes. Also takes forever on my wife's 2.4 GHz Dell machine with
640 Mb.


Have you got an anti-virus? If so, configure it so that it doesn't scan your
source and intermediate files. Also, use a tool like Process Explorer
(www.sysinternals.com) or perfmon to actually see what is taking so much
time (either a process, either disk access, either...) while your project is
loading.

Arnaud
MVP - VC
Nov 17 '05 #4
Loading 750 MB of source code files when you only have 640 MB of TOTAL RAM
will make your system trash, that is it will constantly swap RAM memory
pages to the paging file on disk, a process which is more than thousands
time slower than direct memory access . A ten fold faster CPU will not help
you here as the whole system is IO bound. If you don't believe this, just
install 640MB RAM into your Win98 SE system, and hear your disk scream.
Second your problem is in no way related to .NET C++ the language, that's
what this NG is aiming at.

Willy.

"Charles" <cs*****@interpex.com> wrote in message
news:x8********************@wispertel.com...
Willy Denoyette [MVP] wrote:
Not sure why you are posting this on a C++ language NG, anyway, 2GB RAM
and
640MB RAM is quite a difference isn't it?


Sure is. I would expect new machine to be twice as fast, maybe faster.
Instead it is almost 100 times slower. But only for loading source files
into Visual Studio. Everything else is much faster.

I am looking for others who may have had problems with MSVS running slow
on XP.
I would suggest you contact HP (the actual owner of Visual Fortran) for
such
things like memory requirement and related performance issues.
Willy.


Been there, done that. No satisfaction. Problem is with MS Visual
Studio, not Fortran, per se. I have VC++ as it comes with the package.

Also have MSDN copies of Visual Studio 6.0, same slowness there.

I would appear I need to go to Visual Studio.NET, Intel Fortran 8.1
Compiler, new GUI library, etc. Or reformat my hard drive and install
Win 98 SE?

Charles.

"Charles" <cs*****@interpex.com> wrote in message
news:6f********************@wispertel.com...
>I have Visual Studio 6.0 stand-alone (with C++) and as part of Compaq
> Visual Fortran 6.6c.
>
> I am moving my development from a Win 98 SE machine w/2x 10 Gb HDD
> (each
> w/ 1Gb free), 768 Mb RAM to a 3.2 MHz Win XP Pro machine w/147 Gb HDD
> (121 Gb free) and 2 Gb RAM.
>
> Loading a particular project with Fortran code only with about 80 files
> and 750 Mb of source code on Win 98 takes 15 seconds until the editor
> is
> ready to use.
>
> Loading the same project on the Win XP Pro machine takes 10-20 minutes.
> Also takes forever on my wife's 2.4 GHz Dell machine with 640 Mb.
>
> I have searched and destroyed with SpyBot and Ad-Aware, removed the
> ctfmon.exe using MS approved procedures, uninstalled Office 2003
> completely with no success.
>
> If I boot in safe mode, or if I do a clean boot (really clean, bare
> minimum), the project loads in 40 seconds.
>
> Compilation and linking are very fast. Everything else I run on this
> machine is very fast. Loading and editing files is very slow. Inserting
> a linen of code at line 235 of a 130 line file takes minutes. Takes 18
> seconds in clean boot mode.
>
> Opening a new file in the project for editing allows for plenty of time
> to make a cup of coffee or get a beer and a snack.
>
> I need to develop under XP because some of the bugs encountered by my
> users do not show up running under Win 98 SE.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions as to what is causing this problem and
> what to do about it? Is there a service pack?
>
> This is very frustrating. I can't be the only one having this problem.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Charles.


Nov 17 '05 #5
Willy Denoyette [MVP] wrote:
Loading 750 MB of source code files when you only have 640 MB of TOTAL RAM
will make your system trash, that is it will constantly swap RAM memory
pages to the paging file on disk, a process which is more than thousands
time slower than direct memory access . A ten fold faster CPU will not help
you here as the whole system is IO bound. If you don't believe this, just
install 640MB RAM into your Win98 SE system, and hear your disk scream.
My Win 98 SE system has 768 Mb and it does not scream. I am only loading
the file I am editing into actual memory. Out of 81 files, only a few
(say, 8-12) are actually "active"
Second your problem is in no way related to .NET C++ the language, that's
what this NG is aiming at.


Well it is related to Visual Studio, which is presumably what you guys
are using. Maybe you can suggest a better newsgroup for my post?

Or just ignore my posts; your resposese have not been helpful anyway.

Charles.

Nov 17 '05 #6
Thanks a lot!

I did disable my anti-virus (same one on the Win 98 machine) with no
difference. I tried it again after your post to confirm.

I downloaded the Process Explorer and used that. It gives a bit more
info than the task manager (ctrl-alt-del) and I then became suspicious
of InCD by Ahead Software AG (now Nero) which is part of the DVD R/RW
drivers and allows your programs to write to the DVD.

After uninstalling that, I am now down to a 40 sec load time (still slow
by the Win 98 SE standards, but much better than 20 minutes). No other
software seems to be interfering now.

Still a 40 sec load and 20 sec edit (I am back to about the same as the
clean boot or safe boot) is not really satisfactory, it is workable for
a while.

Charles.

Arnaud Debaene wrote:
Charles wrote:
I have Visual Studio 6.0 stand-alone (with C++) and as part of Compaq
Visual Fortran 6.6c.

I am moving my development from a Win 98 SE machine w/2x 10 Gb HDD
(each w/ 1Gb free), 768 Mb RAM to a 3.2 MHz Win XP Pro machine w/147
Gb HDD (121 Gb free) and 2 Gb RAM.

Loading a particular project with Fortran code only with about 80
files and 750 Mb of source code on Win 98 takes 15 seconds until the
editor is ready to use.

Loading the same project on the Win XP Pro machine takes 10-20
minutes. Also takes forever on my wife's 2.4 GHz Dell machine with
640 Mb.


Have you got an anti-virus? If so, configure it so that it doesn't scan your
source and intermediate files. Also, use a tool like Process Explorer
(www.sysinternals.com) or perfmon to actually see what is taking so much
time (either a process, either disk access, either...) while your project is
loading.

Arnaud
MVP - VC


Nov 17 '05 #7
Make sure the hard drives on the new computer use DMA drive access instead of
PIO. Search the net to figure out how to do this. It made a tremendous
boost to disk performance when I changed this setting on my computer.

"Charles" wrote:
I have Visual Studio 6.0 stand-alone (with C++) and as part of Compaq
Visual Fortran 6.6c.

I am moving my development from a Win 98 SE machine w/2x 10 Gb HDD (each
w/ 1Gb free), 768 Mb RAM to a 3.2 MHz Win XP Pro machine w/147 Gb HDD
(121 Gb free) and 2 Gb RAM.

Loading a particular project with Fortran code only with about 80 files
and 750 Mb of source code on Win 98 takes 15 seconds until the editor is
ready to use.

Loading the same project on the Win XP Pro machine takes 10-20 minutes.
Also takes forever on my wife's 2.4 GHz Dell machine with 640 Mb.

I have searched and destroyed with SpyBot and Ad-Aware, removed the
ctfmon.exe using MS approved procedures, uninstalled Office 2003
completely with no success.

If I boot in safe mode, or if I do a clean boot (really clean, bare
minimum), the project loads in 40 seconds.

Compilation and linking are very fast. Everything else I run on this
machine is very fast. Loading and editing files is very slow. Inserting
a linen of code at line 235 of a 130 line file takes minutes. Takes 18
seconds in clean boot mode.

Opening a new file in the project for editing allows for plenty of time
to make a cup of coffee or get a beer and a snack.

I need to develop under XP because some of the bugs encountered by my
users do not show up running under Win 98 SE.

Does anyone have any suggestions as to what is causing this problem and
what to do about it? Is there a service pack?

This is very frustrating. I can't be the only one having this problem.

Thanks in advance,

Charles.

Nov 17 '05 #8

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

33
by: John Timbers | last post by:
I'd like to purchase Visual C# .Net for learning purposes only since it's a lot cheaper than Visual Studio (note that I'm a very experienced C++ developer). Can someone simply clarify the basic...
1
by: Kersh | last post by:
I have developed with Visual Studio .NET on the same PC for around 9 months now. I upgraded from VS.NET 2002 to VS.NET 2003 about 3 months ago no problems and since then I have continued coding,...
7
by: Bob L. | last post by:
Hi everyone, I am working on converting a VB6 project to .NET, and I am astounded at how amazingly slow Visual Studio is when loading a solution. For example, I have a solution with 11 class...
26
by: Bruno Jouhier [MVP] | last post by:
I'm currently experiencing a strange phenomenon: At my Office, Visual Studio takes a very long time to compile our solution (more than 1 minute for the first project). At home, Visual Studio...
1
by: Jeffrey Roughgarden | last post by:
I wonder if anyone has any tips to improve Visual Studio's debugging performance? I have a 20 page web app that takes 90 or more seconds to bring up the logon page after I hit F5. Start without...
8
by: jdn | last post by:
I have a root application that has various sub-applications (subdirectories set up as applications within IIS). All of the sub-applications rely on the root application for profiles, membership,...
54
by: m.roello | last post by:
In the book: "Working with Microsoft Visual Studio 2005" Craig Skibo wrote: "The power of Visual Studio 2005 lies in its ability to empower users to build, test, and debug powerful applications...
3
by: Robert Dailey | last post by:
Hi, I've gone through tons of XML editors: - XML Spy - Oxygen - UltraEdit - PSPad - Many others I can't think of...
0
jwwicks
by: jwwicks | last post by:
Introduction This tutorial describes how to use Visual Studio to create a new C++ program, compile/run a program, resume work on an existing program and debug a program. It is aimed at the...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.