473,509 Members | 7,333 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

.NET version 2.0

Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question seems appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET currently available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version 1.1.4322...something like that. How far behind the times am I?
Jul 21 '05 #1
11 1608

"KnuckleHead" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:56**********************************@microsof t.com...
Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question seems
appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET currently
available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version 1.1.4322...something
like that. How far behind the times am I?


1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or
something. I can't say specifically
Jul 21 '05 #2

"Daniel O'Connell [C# MVP]" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in
message news:Oy*************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

"KnuckleHead" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:56**********************************@microsof t.com...
Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question seems
appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET currently
available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version 1.1.4322...something like that. How far behind the times am I?


1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or
something. I can't say specifically

.... because then you'd have to kill us?
Jul 21 '05 #3

"Steve McLellan" <sjm.NOSPAM AT fixerlabs DOT com> wrote in message
news:OE*************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...

"Daniel O'Connell [C# MVP]" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in
message news:Oy*************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

"KnuckleHead" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:56**********************************@microsof t.com...
> Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question seems
> appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET
> currently
> available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version 1.1.4322...something > like that. How far behind the times am I?
1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or
something. I can't say specifically

... because then you'd have to kill us?

....because I don't know offhand!

Bad wording, sorry about that.

Jul 21 '05 #4
> >
"Daniel O'Connell [C# MVP]" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in
message news:Oy*************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

"KnuckleHead" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:56**********************************@microsof t.com...
> Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question seems
> appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET
> currently
> available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version

1.1.4322...something
> like that. How far behind the times am I?

1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or
something. I can't say specifically

... because then you'd have to kill us?

...because I don't know offhand!

Bad wording, sorry about that.


:-)
Yeah, I guessed - it'd be kind of funny if there was some Whidbey NDA
enforcement team prowling about though :-)
Jul 21 '05 #5

"Steve McLellan" <sjm.NOSPAM AT fixerlabs DOT com> wrote in message
news:uZ**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "Daniel O'Connell [C# MVP]" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in
> message news:Oy*************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>
>> "KnuckleHead" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:56**********************************@microsof t.com...
>> > Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question seems
>> > appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET
>> > currently
>> > available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version
> 1.1.4322...something
>> > like that. How far behind the times am I?
>>
>> 1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or
>> something. I can't say specifically
>>
> ... because then you'd have to kill us? ...because I don't know offhand!

Bad wording, sorry about that.
>


:-)
Yeah, I guessed - it'd be kind of funny if there was some Whidbey NDA
enforcement team prowling about though :-)

LOL, that it would(and, frankly, this is the last place I'd violate NDA).
However, AFAICT, Whidbey is not covered by any NDA. The whidby newsgroups
are publically accessible and the CTP is released to MSDN subscribers and
TechEd attendees.

Jul 21 '05 #6
> "Steve McLellan" <sjm.NOSPAM AT fixerlabs DOT com> wrote in message
news:uZ**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "Daniel O'Connell [C# MVP]" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in
> message news:Oy*************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>
>> "KnuckleHead" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:56**********************************@microsof t.com...
>> > Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question seems
>> > appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET
>> > currently
>> > available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version
> 1.1.4322...something
>> > like that. How far behind the times am I?
>>
>> 1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or
>> something. I can't say specifically
>>
> ... because then you'd have to kill us?
...because I don't know offhand!

Bad wording, sorry about that.
>


:-)
Yeah, I guessed - it'd be kind of funny if there was some Whidbey NDA
enforcement team prowling about though :-)

LOL, that it would(and, frankly, this is the last place I'd violate NDA).
However, AFAICT, Whidbey is not covered by any NDA. The whidby newsgroups
are publically accessible and the CTP is released to MSDN subscribers and
TechEd attendees.


Ah, I'm neither of those - I learn from hiding under tables in wealthier
companies' canteens. I dream of a day when someone gives me some beans worth
spilling... Whidbey does sound splendid, not least because as a C++
developer, all the bug fixes we submit are replied with 'Fixed in Whidbey'
:-)
Jul 21 '05 #7

"Steve McLellan" <sjm.NOSPAM AT fixerlabs DOT com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
"Steve McLellan" <sjm.NOSPAM AT fixerlabs DOT com> wrote in message
news:uZ**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> >
>> > "Daniel O'Connell [C# MVP]" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote
>> > in
>> > message news:Oy*************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> >>
>> >> "KnuckleHead" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
>> >> message
>> >> news:56**********************************@microsof t.com...
>> >> > Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question
>> >> > seems
>> >> > appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET
>> >> > currently
>> >> > available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version
>> > 1.1.4322...something
>> >> > like that. How far behind the times am I?
>> >>
>> >> 1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or
>> >> something. I can't say specifically
>> >>
>> > ... because then you'd have to kill us?
>> ...because I don't know offhand!
>>
>> Bad wording, sorry about that.
>> >
>
> :-)
> Yeah, I guessed - it'd be kind of funny if there was some Whidbey NDA
> enforcement team prowling about though :-) LOL, that it would(and, frankly, this is the last place I'd violate NDA).
However, AFAICT, Whidbey is not covered by any NDA. The whidby newsgroups
are publically accessible and the CTP is released to MSDN subscribers and
TechEd attendees.


Ah, I'm neither of those - I learn from hiding under tables in wealthier
companies' canteens. I dream of a day when someone gives me some beans
worth
spilling... Whidbey does sound splendid, not least because as a C++
developer, all the bug fixes we submit are replied with 'Fixed in Whidbey'
:-)


Plus you get that new managed syntax to play with! If you care about that
sort of thing, anyway.

Jul 21 '05 #8
> >> >> >> > Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question
>> >> > seems
>> >> > appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET
>> >> > currently
>> >> > available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version
>> > 1.1.4322...something
>> >> > like that. How far behind the times am I?
>> >>
>> >> 1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or >> >> something. I can't say specifically
>> >>
>> > ... because then you'd have to kill us?
>> ...because I don't know offhand!
>>
>> Bad wording, sorry about that.
>> >
>
> :-)
> Yeah, I guessed - it'd be kind of funny if there was some Whidbey NDA
> enforcement team prowling about though :-)
LOL, that it would(and, frankly, this is the last place I'd violate NDA). However, AFAICT, Whidbey is not covered by any NDA. The whidby newsgroups are publically accessible and the CTP is released to MSDN subscribers and TechEd attendees.


Ah, I'm neither of those - I learn from hiding under tables in wealthier
companies' canteens. I dream of a day when someone gives me some beans
worth
spilling... Whidbey does sound splendid, not least because as a C++
developer, all the bug fixes we submit are replied with 'Fixed in Whidbey' :-)


Plus you get that new managed syntax to play with! If you care about that
sort of thing, anyway.


That all looks a bit terrifying. It seems to be all hats and carrots. Still,
even our Mac guys have admitted .NET's pretty good and that's something. Be
really nice when Mono gets more mature and everything gets properly cross
platform.
Jul 21 '05 #9

"Steve McLellan" <sjm.NOSPAM AT fixerlabs DOT com> wrote in message
news:uL**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> >> >> > Okay, I've been out of the loop for a bit, and this question
>> >> >> > seems
>> >> >> > appropriate for this forum. What is the latest version of .NET
>> >> >> > currently
>> >> >> > available? Version 2.0? I think I am running version
>> >> > 1.1.4322...something
>> >> >> > like that. How far behind the times am I?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1.1.4322 is the newest, the 2.0 framework is in beta or prebeta or >> >> >> something. I can't say specifically
>> >> >>
>> >> > ... because then you'd have to kill us?
>> >> ...because I don't know offhand!
>> >>
>> >> Bad wording, sorry about that.
>> >> >
>> >
>> > :-)
>> > Yeah, I guessed - it'd be kind of funny if there was some Whidbey
>> > NDA
>> > enforcement team prowling about though :-)
>> LOL, that it would(and, frankly, this is the last place I'd violate NDA). >> However, AFAICT, Whidbey is not covered by any NDA. The whidby newsgroups >> are publically accessible and the CTP is released to MSDN subscribers and >> TechEd attendees.
>
> Ah, I'm neither of those - I learn from hiding under tables in
> wealthier
> companies' canteens. I dream of a day when someone gives me some beans
> worth
> spilling... Whidbey does sound splendid, not least because as a C++
> developer, all the bug fixes we submit are replied with 'Fixed in Whidbey' > :-)
Plus you get that new managed syntax to play with! If you care about that
sort of thing, anyway.
>


That all looks a bit terrifying. It seems to be all hats and carrots.
Still,

Its got to be better than the current stuff. I wrote a few thousand line dll
in it...I spent quite abit of time throwing various keywords together hoping
that that particular combonation would work. even our Mac guys have admitted .NET's pretty good and that's something.
Be
really nice when Mono gets more mature and everything gets properly cross
platform.
It is pretty nice. The only issue I have with cross platform support is
UI's. No matter what everyone says and all the work put into it, I've yet to
see a cross platform GUI lib that doesn't have some issue or another on one
platform. Even if you use a lib that uses underlying platform controls, you
still have the issue of expected behaviour, which varies per platform per
control. Even layout is subject to this, IMHO.


Jul 21 '05 #10
> >>> >> >
> Ah, I'm neither of those - I learn from hiding under tables in
> wealthier
> companies' canteens. I dream of a day when someone gives me some beans > worth
> spilling... Whidbey does sound splendid, not least because as a C++
> developer, all the bug fixes we submit are replied with 'Fixed in Whidbey'
> :-)

Plus you get that new managed syntax to play with! If you care about that sort of thing, anyway.
>


That all looks a bit terrifying. It seems to be all hats and carrots.
Still,

Its got to be better than the current stuff. I wrote a few thousand line

dll in it...I spent quite abit of time throwing various keywords together hoping that that particular combonation would work.
even our Mac guys have admitted .NET's pretty good and that's something.
Be
really nice when Mono gets more mature and everything gets properly cross platform.
It is pretty nice. The only issue I have with cross platform support is
UI's. No matter what everyone says and all the work put into it, I've yet

to see a cross platform GUI lib that doesn't have some issue or another on one platform. Even if you use a lib that uses underlying platform controls, you still have the issue of expected behaviour, which varies per platform per
control. Even layout is subject to this, IMHO.


But surely you're forgetting Java's AWT and Swing! Oh, wait... point taken.
That's true, and maybe there's no way around that (although I've got my
suspicion that OS X and Windows will become the same thing within a cople of
years - they keep stealing features and behaviour from each other at the
moment). But we need to write algorithms in C++ for execution speed (plus
one of our guys is seemingly obsessed by templates) and .NET has been a
great way of implenting all the other bits and pieces of an application that
traditionally take forever. I now face doing the same in Objective C, when
it'd be really good just to be able to tweak the UI layout and code a little
and have everything else working well.

Jul 21 '05 #11
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 04:29:50 +0100, Steve McLellan wrote:

Ah, I'm neither of those - I learn from hiding under tables in wealthier
companies' canteens. I dream of a day when someone gives me some beans worth
spilling... Whidbey does sound splendid, not least because as a C++
developer, all the bug fixes we submit are replied with 'Fixed in Whidbey'
:-)


You can get it without being a subscriber. I think you can call MS and
they will send it to you. They may charge you shipping.

--
Chris

To send me an E-mail, remove the "[", "]", underscores ,lunchmeat, and
replace certain words in my E-Mail address.
Jul 21 '05 #12

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

16
2727
by: Manlio Perillo | last post by:
Hi. I'm a new user of Python but I have noted a little problem. Python is a very good language but it is evolving, in particular its library is evolving. This can be a problem when, ad example,...
2
630
by: j.b.messina | last post by:
This has not yet been published by Microsoft. It will be published within the next few weeks, mainly because I asked them to. I felt this was information badly needed, and I think this is the...
3
3054
by: Shadow Lynx | last post by:
At the bottom of the default Error page that appears when Unhandled Exceptions occur, what exactly is the difference between the "Microsoft ..Net Framework Version" and the "ASP.NET Version"? I...
0
1898
by: ev951 | last post by:
I am not that familiar with XML or XSL and I am trying to sort application version number strings in an XML file that my team uses for application installations on our Linux servers. I have tried...
8
3486
by: schaf | last post by:
Hi Ng! My application (version 1 a1) communicates with a service (version 1 s1). Now I would like to update the service and create a service version 2 (s2). The new function calls within s2 are...
0
7137
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
7416
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
7506
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
1
5062
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
0
3218
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The...
0
3207
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
0
1571
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated ...
1
779
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
0
443
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.