resolving an entity

[Dean A. Hoover]

I am writing a parser for xml that will not have
an associated DTD. I want to be able to handle
certain character references (e.g., ©) in
the program.

When I run the following against a chunk of xml
containing ©, I get the following:

org.xml.sax.SAX ParseException: Reference to undefined entity "©".
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.fatal(Parse r2.java:3182)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.fatal(Parse r2.java:3176)
at
org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.expandEntit yInContent(Pars er2.java:2513)
at
org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.maybeRefere nceInContent(Pa rser2.java:2422 )
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.content(Par ser2.java:1833)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.maybeElemen t(Parser2.java: 1507)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.content(Par ser2.java:1779)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.maybeElemen t(Parser2.java: 1507)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.content(Par ser2.java:1779)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.maybeElemen t(Parser2.java: 1507)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.parseIntern al(Parser2.java :500)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.Pars er2.parse(Parse r2.java:305)
at org.apache.crim son.parser.XMLR eaderImpl.parse (XMLReaderImpl. java:442)
at javax.xml.parse rs.SAXParser.pa rse(SAXParser.j ava:345)
at javax.xml.parse rs.SAXParser.pa rse(SAXParser.j ava:281)
at Article.main(Ar ticle.java:18)

What can I do to catch these references in my code and output replacement
text for it?

Thanks.
Dean Hoover

Here's the two java files:
---
import java.io.*;
import javax.xml.parse rs.*;
import org.xml.sax.*;
import org.xml.sax.hel pers.*;

public class Article
{
public static void main(String argv[])
{
String file = argv[0];
PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(Sys tem.out);
DefaultHandler handler = new LoadXML(pw, LoadXML.TYPE_HT ML);
SAXParserFactor y factory = SAXParserFactor y.newInstance() ;

try
{
SAXParser reader = factory.newSAXP arser();
reader.parse(ne w File(file), handler);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
e.printStackTra ce();
return;
}

pw.flush();
}
}
---
import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
import javax.xml.parse rs.*;
import org.xml.sax.*;
import org.xml.sax.hel pers.*;

public class LoadXML extends DefaultHandler
{
public static final int TYPE_HTML = 1;
public static final int TYPE_TEXT = 2;

public LoadXML
(
java.io.Writer writer,
int type
)
{
elements_ = new Stack();
writer_ = writer;
type_ = type;
}

public InputSource resolveEntity
(
String publicId,
String systemId
) throws SAXException
{
String s = "stuff";
return new InputSource(new CharArrayReader (s.toCharArray( )));
}

public void startDocument() throws SAXException
{
}

public void endDocument() throws SAXException
{
}

public void startElement
(
String uri,
String localName,
String qName,
Attributes attributes
) throws SAXException
{
String elementName = qName;
elements_.push( elementName);

try
{
if (elementName.eq uals("p"))
{
if (type_ == TYPE_HTML)
writer_.write(" <p class=\"article-text\">");
}
else if (elementName.eq uals("title"))
{
if (type_ == TYPE_HTML)
writer_.write(" <p class=\"article-title\">");
}
else if (elementName.eq uals("by"))
{
if (type_ == TYPE_HTML)
writer_.write(" <p class=\"article-by\">");
}
else if (elementName.eq uals("copyright "))
{
if (type_ == TYPE_HTML)
writer_.write(" <p class=\"article-copyright\">");
}
}
catch (IOException e)
{
throw new SAXException(e) ;
}
}

public void endElement
(
String uri,
String localName,
String qName
) throws SAXException
{
String elementName = qName;
elements_.pop() ;

try
{
if (type_ == TYPE_HTML)
{
if (elementName.eq uals("p") || elementName.equ als("title") ||
elementName.equ als("by") || elementName.equ als("copyright" ))
{
writer_.write(" </p>\n");
}
else if (elementName.eq uals("br"))
{
writer_.write(" <br/>\n");
}
}
}
catch (IOException e)
{
throw new SAXException(e) ;
}
}

public void characters
(
char[] ch,
int start,
int length
) throws SAXException
{
try
{
String content = new String(ch, start, length);
String top = (String)element s_.peek();
String text =
content.replace All("\n", " ").replaceA ll(" +", " ").trim();

if (text.length() == 0)
return;

if (type_ == TYPE_HTML)
{
if (top.equals("p" ) || top.equals("tit le") ||
top.equals("by" ) || top.equals("cop yright"))
writer_.write(t ext);
}
}
catch (IOException e)
{
throw new SAXException(e) ;
}
}

private Stack elements_;
private java.io.Writer writer_;
private int type_;
}

[Maarten Wiltink]

"Dean A. Hoover" <dh*******@yaho o.com> wrote in message
news:4q******** ************@tw ister.nyroc.rr. com...

I am writing a parser for xml that will not have
an associated DTD. I want to be able to handle
certain character references (e.g., &copy;) in
the program.

As I understand it, that's quite impossible. The case is defined
in the spec, and without a DTD you don't get to choose what
entities are defined or not.

But DTD may not mean what you think it does. Would it be permissible
for this document to have an internal DTD subset?

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE root [ <!ENTITY copy 'copy'> ]>
<root>&copy;</root>

A quick reading of the XML spec suggests (but I may have missed
something) that this is a correct construction in XML.

Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink

[Dean A. Hoover]

Maarten Wiltink wrote:

"Dean A. Hoover" <dh*******@yaho o.com> wrote in message
news:4q******** ************@tw ister.nyroc.rr. com...

I am writing a parser for xml that will not have
an associated DTD. I want to be able to handle
certain character references (e.g., &copy;) in
the program.

As I understand it, that's quite impossible. The case is defined
in the spec, and without a DTD you don't get to choose what
entities are defined or not.

But DTD may not mean what you think it does. Would it be permissible
for this document to have an internal DTD subset?

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE root [ <!ENTITY copy 'copy'> ]>
<root>&copy;</root>

A quick reading of the XML spec suggests (but I may have missed
something) that this is a correct construction in XML.

I really don't want any DTD in the document at all. I am writing
some code that will parse an xml document and output either html
or plain text depending on a parameter. In the case of HTML it
would output "&copy;", in the case of plain text it would output
"(c)". I have other similar context based entities to handle as
well.

Dean

[Martin Honnen]

Dean A. Hoover wrote:

Maarten Wiltink wrote:

"Dean A. Hoover" <dh*******@yaho o.com> wrote in message
news:4q******** ************@tw ister.nyroc.rr. com...

I am writing a parser for xml that will not have
an associated DTD. I want to be able to handle
certain character references (e.g., &copy;) in
the program.

As I understand it, that's quite impossible. The case is defined
in the spec, and without a DTD you don't get to choose what
entities are defined or not.

But DTD may not mean what you think it does. Would it be permissible
for this document to have an internal DTD subset?

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE root [ <!ENTITY copy 'copy'> ]>
<root>&copy;</root>

A quick reading of the XML spec suggests (but I may have missed
something) that this is a correct construction in XML.

I really don't want any DTD in the document at all. I am writing
some code that will parse an xml document and output either html
or plain text depending on a parameter. In the case of HTML it
would output "&copy;", in the case of plain text it would output
"(c)". I have other similar context based entities to handle as
well.

Well, if you write your own parser then you can of course parse
something alike XML but with references to undefined entities. But then
don't attempt to parse it with an XML parser which expects entities to
be defined.

--

Martin Honnen
http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

[Maarten Wiltink]

"Dean A. Hoover" <dh*******@yaho o.com> wrote in message
news:uL******** ************@tw ister.nyroc.rr. com...

Maarten Wiltink wrote:

"Dean A. Hoover" <dh*******@yaho o.com> wrote in message
news:4q******** ************@tw ister.nyroc.rr. com...

I am writing a parser for xml that will not have
an associated DTD. I want to be able to handle
certain character references (e.g., &copy;) in
the program.

[...] I really don't want any DTD in the document at all. I am writing
some code that will parse an xml document and output either html
or plain text depending on a parameter. In the case of HTML it
would output "&copy;", in the case of plain text it would output
"(c)". I have other similar context based entities to handle as
well.

That's reasonable, but entities simply aren't the solution.
Would using processing instructions instead be acceptable?

In XSLT, you could even source in the transformation itself
with document('') and switch treatment of <?copy?> based on
the output method.

I'm working under the assumption that you want the source to
be well-formed XML, valid if possible.

Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink

[Richard Tobin]

In article <4q************ ********@twiste r.nyroc.rr.com> ,
Dean A. Hoover <dh*******@yaho o.com> wrote:

I am writing a parser for xml that will not have
an associated DTD. I want to be able to handle
certain character references (e.g., &copy;) in
the program.

Well, this is not *real* XML.

The simplest thing to do would be to read the file into a string and
prepend an internal subset that declares the entities in question.
This will be easy if you know that there isn't an XML declaration or
DOCTYPE declaration in the file and you know the file's encoding.
Otherwise it will be more tedious.

-- Richard
--
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.

FreeBSD rules!