I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was mildly
shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the code/settings
required to replicate the UI components shown in the screenshot galleries on
their website.
Did I miss something?
10  1827 
Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et... I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was mildly
shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the code/settings
required to replicate the UI components shown in the screenshot galleries
on their website.
Did I miss something?
Yeah.....I dropped a couple of questions on their newsgroup
servers.......b ut I'm not holding my breath.
It seems unethical to charge someone about $700 for the tools then another
$800-$1500 for training on how to use them. But, it looks like exactly what
they do. Had I known there were no code source examples included, I never
would have bought NetAdvantage to begin with.
Unfortunately, I believe that the lack actual code samples is meant to
"entice" people into spending more money to be trained in the use of the
tools. Why else would you not show simple examples (in code) of how each
tool is used?
It would seem to me that happy customers (ones that can buy and immediately
use) your toolset would be an asset and may send more customers your way.
But, if you don't provide code samples, and the customer has to pay out the
nose to learn how to use what s/he has just bought......wel l that's just
plain stupid - not to mention bad marketing.
Admittedly, I am new to .Net. I have resisted it for quite some time. It
is not as RAD as VB6 was. The toolsets given to use by 3rd party vendors
are not as user-friendly nor do they allow the customization of the UI as
much as the toolsets for VB6 did.
Microsoft has screwed us with this .Net crap. RAD is DEAD. Innovation in
software (which mostly came from school kids and part-time programmers) is
all but gone. (How many new and exciting .Net apps have you seen lately?)
Fewer college entrants are taking classes to become programmers year after
year. Soon, outsourcing will be the only option for many companies.
Why? IMHO, programming used to be fun. .Net is not. Part-time programmers
came up with new apps for fun and profit continually in VB. Not with .Net.
Anyway....I don't want this to become an "I hate .Net" rant. I do, but that
is beside the point.
I have never purchased a suite of tools for more than $100 that did not come
with source code examples that showed the components in use.
I am surprised that a company like Infragistics would pull such a scam on
it's customers.
Of course, the source code for examples of all of the controls could be here
somewhere. But, if it was, wouldn't there be a link to it in the
NetAdvantage start menu folders....or even in the Help files that accompany
the tools?
This is why people hate software and PCs. Perfectly brilliant people write
massively powerful things that nobody can use quickly and simply.
Great job guys!
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl... Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et...I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was mildly
shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the code/settings
required to replicate the UI components shown in the screenshot galleries
on their website.
Did I miss something?
A simple yes or no would have sufficed.
I just visited their web site and found the samples with 4 mouse clicks.
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:wl******** ********@bignew s5.bellsouth.ne t... Yeah.....I dropped a couple of questions on their newsgroup
servers.......b ut I'm not holding my breath.
It seems unethical to charge someone about $700 for the tools then another
$800-$1500 for training on how to use them. But, it looks like exactly
what they do. Had I known there were no code source examples included, I
never would have bought NetAdvantage to begin with.
Unfortunately, I believe that the lack actual code samples is meant to
"entice" people into spending more money to be trained in the use of the
tools. Why else would you not show simple examples (in code) of how each
tool is used?
It would seem to me that happy customers (ones that can buy and
immediately use) your toolset would be an asset and may send more
customers your way. But, if you don't provide code samples, and the
customer has to pay out the nose to learn how to use what s/he has just
bought......wel l that's just plain stupid - not to mention bad marketing.
Admittedly, I am new to .Net. I have resisted it for quite some time. It
is not as RAD as VB6 was. The toolsets given to use by 3rd party vendors
are not as user-friendly nor do they allow the customization of the UI as
much as the toolsets for VB6 did.
Microsoft has screwed us with this .Net crap. RAD is DEAD. Innovation in
software (which mostly came from school kids and part-time programmers) is
all but gone. (How many new and exciting .Net apps have you seen lately?)
Fewer college entrants are taking classes to become programmers year after
year. Soon, outsourcing will be the only option for many companies.
Why? IMHO, programming used to be fun. .Net is not. Part-time
programmers came up with new apps for fun and profit continually in VB.
Not with .Net.
Anyway....I don't want this to become an "I hate .Net" rant. I do, but
that is beside the point.
I have never purchased a suite of tools for more than $100 that did not
come with source code examples that showed the components in use.
I am surprised that a company like Infragistics would pull such a scam on
it's customers.
Of course, the source code for examples of all of the controls could be
here somewhere. But, if it was, wouldn't there be a link to it in the
NetAdvantage start menu folders....or even in the Help files that
accompany the tools?
This is why people hate software and PCs. Perfectly brilliant people
write massively powerful things that nobody can use quickly and simply.
Great job guys!
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl... Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et...I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was
mildly shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the
code/settings required to replicate the UI components shown in the
screenshot galleries on their website.
Did I miss something?
You lie.
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP04.phx.gbl. .. A simple yes or no would have sufficed.
I just visited their web site and found the samples with 4 mouse clicks.
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:wl******** ********@bignew s5.bellsouth.ne t... Yeah.....I dropped a couple of questions on their newsgroup
servers.......b ut I'm not holding my breath.
It seems unethical to charge someone about $700 for the tools then
another $800-$1500 for training on how to use them. But, it looks like
exactly what they do. Had I known there were no code source examples
included, I never would have bought NetAdvantage to begin with.
Unfortunately, I believe that the lack actual code samples is meant to
"entice" people into spending more money to be trained in the use of the
tools. Why else would you not show simple examples (in code) of how each
tool is used?
It would seem to me that happy customers (ones that can buy and
immediately use) your toolset would be an asset and may send more
customers your way. But, if you don't provide code samples, and the
customer has to pay out the nose to learn how to use what s/he has just
bought......wel l that's just plain stupid - not to mention bad marketing.
Admittedly, I am new to .Net. I have resisted it for quite some time.
It is not as RAD as VB6 was. The toolsets given to use by 3rd party
vendors are not as user-friendly nor do they allow the customization of
the UI as much as the toolsets for VB6 did.
Microsoft has screwed us with this .Net crap. RAD is DEAD. Innovation
in software (which mostly came from school kids and part-time
programmers) is all but gone. (How many new and exciting .Net apps have
you seen lately?)
Fewer college entrants are taking classes to become programmers year
after year. Soon, outsourcing will be the only option for many
companies.
Why? IMHO, programming used to be fun. .Net is not. Part-time
programmers came up with new apps for fun and profit continually in VB.
Not with .Net.
Anyway....I don't want this to become an "I hate .Net" rant. I do, but
that is beside the point.
I have never purchased a suite of tools for more than $100 that did not
come with source code examples that showed the components in use.
I am surprised that a company like Infragistics would pull such a scam on
it's customers.
Of course, the source code for examples of all of the controls could be
here somewhere. But, if it was, wouldn't there be a link to it in the
NetAdvantage start menu folders....or even in the Help files that
accompany the tools?
This is why people hate software and PCs. Perfectly brilliant people
write massively powerful things that nobody can use quickly and simply.
Great job guys!
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl... Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et...
I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was
mildly shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the
code/settings required to replicate the UI components shown in the
screensho t galleries on their website.
Did I miss something?
You are right. I did lie. It was only 3 mouse clicks: http://www.infragistics.com/
Click the 'Downloads' hyperlink
Click the 'Reference Applications' hyperlink in the third column of the
table
Click the 'Download' button on the same row as 'Infragistics Styling Samples
for CLR 2.0'
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:eo******** *********@bigne ws5.bellsouth.n et... You lie.
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP04.phx.gbl. ..A simple yes or no would have sufficed.
I just visited their web site and found the samples with 4 mouse clicks.
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:wl******** ********@bignew s5.bellsouth.ne t... Yeah.....I dropped a couple of questions on their newsgroup
servers.......b ut I'm not holding my breath.
It seems unethical to charge someone about $700 for the tools then
another $800-$1500 for training on how to use them. But, it looks like
exactly what they do. Had I known there were no code source examples
included, I never would have bought NetAdvantage to begin with.
Unfortunately, I believe that the lack actual code samples is meant to
"entice" people into spending more money to be trained in the use of the
tools. Why else would you not show simple examples (in code) of how
each tool is used?
It would seem to me that happy customers (ones that can buy and
immediately use) your toolset would be an asset and may send more
customers your way. But, if you don't provide code samples, and the
customer has to pay out the nose to learn how to use what s/he has just
bought......wel l that's just plain stupid - not to mention bad
marketing.
Admittedly, I am new to .Net. I have resisted it for quite some time.
It is not as RAD as VB6 was. The toolsets given to use by 3rd party
vendors are not as user-friendly nor do they allow the customization of
the UI as much as the toolsets for VB6 did.
Microsoft has screwed us with this .Net crap. RAD is DEAD. Innovation
in software (which mostly came from school kids and part-time
programmers) is all but gone. (How many new and exciting .Net apps have
you seen lately?)
Fewer college entrants are taking classes to become programmers year
after year. Soon, outsourcing will be the only option for many
companies.
Why? IMHO, programming used to be fun. .Net is not. Part-time
programmers came up with new apps for fun and profit continually in VB.
Not with .Net.
Anyway....I don't want this to become an "I hate .Net" rant. I do, but
that is beside the point.
I have never purchased a suite of tools for more than $100 that did not
come with source code examples that showed the components in use.
I am surprised that a company like Infragistics would pull such a scam
on it's customers.
Of course, the source code for examples of all of the controls could be
here somewhere. But, if it was, wouldn't there be a link to it in the
NetAdvantage start menu folders....or even in the Help files that
accompany the tools?
This is why people hate software and PCs. Perfectly brilliant people
write massively powerful things that nobody can use quickly and simply.
Great job guys!
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...
Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et...
>I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was
>mildly shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the
>code/settings required to replicate the UI components shown in the
>screensh ot galleries on their website.
>
> Did I miss something?
>
Jim,
Like cars have software packages every year more possibilities. Did you
already have a look at Microsoft Office Access if that has already the size
you are expecting..
My first thought I had when I was reading your message
Cor
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> schreef in bericht
news:wl******** ********@bignew s5.bellsouth.ne t... Yeah.....I dropped a couple of questions on their newsgroup
servers.......b ut I'm not holding my breath.
It seems unethical to charge someone about $700 for the tools then another
$800-$1500 for training on how to use them. But, it looks like exactly
what they do. Had I known there were no code source examples included, I
never would have bought NetAdvantage to begin with.
Unfortunately, I believe that the lack actual code samples is meant to
"entice" people into spending more money to be trained in the use of the
tools. Why else would you not show simple examples (in code) of how each
tool is used?
It would seem to me that happy customers (ones that can buy and
immediately use) your toolset would be an asset and may send more
customers your way. But, if you don't provide code samples, and the
customer has to pay out the nose to learn how to use what s/he has just
bought......wel l that's just plain stupid - not to mention bad marketing.
Admittedly, I am new to .Net. I have resisted it for quite some time. It
is not as RAD as VB6 was. The toolsets given to use by 3rd party vendors
are not as user-friendly nor do they allow the customization of the UI as
much as the toolsets for VB6 did.
Microsoft has screwed us with this .Net crap. RAD is DEAD. Innovation in
software (which mostly came from school kids and part-time programmers) is
all but gone. (How many new and exciting .Net apps have you seen lately?)
Fewer college entrants are taking classes to become programmers year after
year. Soon, outsourcing will be the only option for many companies.
Why? IMHO, programming used to be fun. .Net is not. Part-time
programmers came up with new apps for fun and profit continually in VB.
Not with .Net.
Anyway....I don't want this to become an "I hate .Net" rant. I do, but
that is beside the point.
I have never purchased a suite of tools for more than $100 that did not
come with source code examples that showed the components in use.
I am surprised that a company like Infragistics would pull such a scam on
it's customers.
Of course, the source code for examples of all of the controls could be
here somewhere. But, if it was, wouldn't there be a link to it in the
NetAdvantage start menu folders....or even in the Help files that
accompany the tools?
This is why people hate software and PCs. Perfectly brilliant people
write massively powerful things that nobody can use quickly and simply.
Great job guys!
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl... Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et...I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was
mildly shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the
code/settings required to replicate the UI components shown in the
screenshot galleries on their website.
Did I miss something?
Obviously, you did not download this package and take a look for yourself.
If you had, you would have noted that is not a collection of code
illustrating the use of the NetAdvantage components. It is a .Net Web app.
It does not offer simple examples of each component. It does not offer
examples of the Winforms components at all. It does not show example code
in VB.Net as well as C#.
I say again....you lied.
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP04.phx.gbl. .. You are right. I did lie. It was only 3 mouse clicks:
http://www.infragistics.com/
Click the 'Downloads' hyperlink
Click the 'Reference Applications' hyperlink in the third column of the
table
Click the 'Download' button on the same row as 'Infragistics Styling
Samples for CLR 2.0'
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:eo******** *********@bigne ws5.bellsouth.n et... You lie.
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP04.phx.gbl. ..A simple yes or no would have sufficed.
I just visited their web site and found the samples with 4 mouse clicks.
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:wl******** ********@bignew s5.bellsouth.ne t...
Yeah.....I dropped a couple of questions on their newsgroup
servers.......b ut I'm not holding my breath.
It seems unethical to charge someone about $700 for the tools then
another $800-$1500 for training on how to use them. But, it looks like
exactly what they do. Had I known there were no code source examples
included, I never would have bought NetAdvantage to begin with.
Unfortunately, I believe that the lack actual code samples is meant to
"entice" people into spending more money to be trained in the use of
the tools. Why else would you not show simple examples (in code) of
how each tool is used?
It would seem to me that happy customers (ones that can buy and
immediately use) your toolset would be an asset and may send more
customers your way. But, if you don't provide code samples, and the
customer has to pay out the nose to learn how to use what s/he has just
bought......wel l that's just plain stupid - not to mention bad
marketing.
Admittedly, I am new to .Net. I have resisted it for quite some time.
It is not as RAD as VB6 was. The toolsets given to use by 3rd party
vendors are not as user-friendly nor do they allow the customization of
the UI as much as the toolsets for VB6 did.
Microsoft has screwed us with this .Net crap. RAD is DEAD. Innovation
in software (which mostly came from school kids and part-time
programmers) is all but gone. (How many new and exciting .Net apps
have you seen lately?)
Fewer college entrants are taking classes to become programmers year
after year. Soon, outsourcing will be the only option for many
companies.
Why? IMHO, programming used to be fun. .Net is not. Part-time
programmers came up with new apps for fun and profit continually in VB.
Not with .Net.
Anyway....I don't want this to become an "I hate .Net" rant. I do, but
that is beside the point.
I have never purchased a suite of tools for more than $100 that did not
come with source code examples that showed the components in use.
I am surprised that a company like Infragistics would pull such a scam
on it's customers.
Of course, the source code for examples of all of the controls could be
here somewhere. But, if it was, wouldn't there be a link to it in the
NetAdvantage start menu folders....or even in the Help files that
accompany the tools?
This is why people hate software and PCs. Perfectly brilliant people
write massively powerful things that nobody can use quickly and simply.
Great job guys!
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...
> Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
>
>
> "Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
> news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et...
>>I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was
>>mildly shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the
>>code/settings required to replicate the UI components shown in the
>>screensho t galleries on their website.
>>
>> Did I miss something?
>>
>
>
I am not sure that I understand..... .
Are you asking if I have looked into using Microsoft Access 2003 to write an
application that looks professional enough to distribute?
"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <no************ @planet.nl> wrote in message
news:Om******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl... Jim,
Like cars have software packages every year more possibilities. Did you
already have a look at Microsoft Office Access if that has already the
size you are expecting..
My first thought I had when I was reading your message
Cor
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> schreef in bericht
news:wl******** ********@bignew s5.bellsouth.ne t... Yeah.....I dropped a couple of questions on their newsgroup
servers.......b ut I'm not holding my breath.
It seems unethical to charge someone about $700 for the tools then
another $800-$1500 for training on how to use them. But, it looks like
exactly what they do. Had I known there were no code source examples
included, I never would have bought NetAdvantage to begin with.
Unfortunately, I believe that the lack actual code samples is meant to
"entice" people into spending more money to be trained in the use of the
tools. Why else would you not show simple examples (in code) of how each
tool is used?
It would seem to me that happy customers (ones that can buy and
immediately use) your toolset would be an asset and may send more
customers your way. But, if you don't provide code samples, and the
customer has to pay out the nose to learn how to use what s/he has just
bought......wel l that's just plain stupid - not to mention bad marketing.
Admittedly, I am new to .Net. I have resisted it for quite some time.
It is not as RAD as VB6 was. The toolsets given to use by 3rd party
vendors are not as user-friendly nor do they allow the customization of
the UI as much as the toolsets for VB6 did.
Microsoft has screwed us with this .Net crap. RAD is DEAD. Innovation
in software (which mostly came from school kids and part-time
programmers) is all but gone. (How many new and exciting .Net apps have
you seen lately?)
Fewer college entrants are taking classes to become programmers year
after year. Soon, outsourcing will be the only option for many
companies.
Why? IMHO, programming used to be fun. .Net is not. Part-time
programmers came up with new apps for fun and profit continually in VB.
Not with .Net.
Anyway....I don't want this to become an "I hate .Net" rant. I do, but
that is beside the point.
I have never purchased a suite of tools for more than $100 that did not
come with source code examples that showed the components in use.
I am surprised that a company like Infragistics would pull such a scam on
it's customers.
Of course, the source code for examples of all of the controls could be
here somewhere. But, if it was, wouldn't there be a link to it in the
NetAdvantage start menu folders....or even in the Help files that
accompany the tools?
This is why people hate software and PCs. Perfectly brilliant people
write massively powerful things that nobody can use quickly and simply.
Great job guys!
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl... Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et...
I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was
mildly shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the
code/settings required to replicate the UI components shown in the
screensho t galleries on their website.
Did I miss something?
Jim, Are you asking if I have looked into using Microsoft Access 2003 to write
an application that looks professional enough to distribute?
Yes however, where does that last part of your sentence come from, I did not
see it earlier in your messages in this messagethread. That is than not
discussing, that is in my opinion setting the truth to your hand. (Others
use other words for that).
You are living in 2006 now, you can in my opinion not anymore distribute a
package as it was with Dbase2.
The customer is grown up, therefore keep RAD for inside an organisation and
give the client the quality you can make using the Visual Studio Net tools.
That the tool is as well sufficient for organisations which do in house
applications and have therefore a lot of handy RAD tools makes it only
better.
Just my thought,
Cor
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> schreef in bericht
news:85******** **********@bign ews6.bellsouth. net...I am not sure that I understand..... .
Are you asking if I have looked into using Microsoft Access 2003 to write
an application that looks professional enough to distribute?
"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <no************ @planet.nl> wrote in message
news:Om******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl... Jim,
Like cars have software packages every year more possibilities. Did you
already have a look at Microsoft Office Access if that has already the
size you are expecting..
My first thought I had when I was reading your message
Cor
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> schreef in bericht
news:wl******** ********@bignew s5.bellsouth.ne t... Yeah.....I dropped a couple of questions on their newsgroup
servers.......b ut I'm not holding my breath.
It seems unethical to charge someone about $700 for the tools then
another $800-$1500 for training on how to use them. But, it looks like
exactly what they do. Had I known there were no code source examples
included, I never would have bought NetAdvantage to begin with.
Unfortunately, I believe that the lack actual code samples is meant to
"entice" people into spending more money to be trained in the use of the
tools. Why else would you not show simple examples (in code) of how
each tool is used?
It would seem to me that happy customers (ones that can buy and
immediately use) your toolset would be an asset and may send more
customers your way. But, if you don't provide code samples, and the
customer has to pay out the nose to learn how to use what s/he has just
bought......wel l that's just plain stupid - not to mention bad
marketing.
Admittedly, I am new to .Net. I have resisted it for quite some time.
It is not as RAD as VB6 was. The toolsets given to use by 3rd party
vendors are not as user-friendly nor do they allow the customization of
the UI as much as the toolsets for VB6 did.
Microsoft has screwed us with this .Net crap. RAD is DEAD. Innovation
in software (which mostly came from school kids and part-time
programmers) is all but gone. (How many new and exciting .Net apps have
you seen lately?)
Fewer college entrants are taking classes to become programmers year
after year. Soon, outsourcing will be the only option for many
companies.
Why? IMHO, programming used to be fun. .Net is not. Part-time
programmers came up with new apps for fun and profit continually in VB.
Not with .Net.
Anyway....I don't want this to become an "I hate .Net" rant. I do, but
that is beside the point.
I have never purchased a suite of tools for more than $100 that did not
come with source code examples that showed the components in use.
I am surprised that a company like Infragistics would pull such a scam
on it's customers.
Of course, the source code for examples of all of the controls could be
here somewhere. But, if it was, wouldn't there be a link to it in the
NetAdvantage start menu folders....or even in the Help files that
accompany the tools?
This is why people hate software and PCs. Perfectly brilliant people
write massively powerful things that nobody can use quickly and simply.
Great job guys!
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhos t> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...
Have you made enquiries of Infragistics?
"Jim Hubbard" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:Cu******** *********@bigne ws1.bellsouth.n et...
>I purchased Infragistics NetAdvantage 2006 Volume 1 CLR 2.0 and was
>mildly shocked to see no sample apps included that showed the
>code/settings required to replicate the UI components shown in the
>screensh ot galleries on their website.
>
> Did I miss something?
>
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: I Decker |
last post by:
Hello All,
I wonder if somebody can help. When programing in dotnet (c#), I have
created an additional tab on my toolbox. I have called this tab 'Code
Samples'. Into this tab I drag lots of commonly used chunks of code. I
am then able to drag them back into my projects whereever needed. This
works kind of like the clipboard ring, however the samples do not get
removed at a restart etc, but instead always remain available. They
are also...
|
by: jm |
last post by:
I got the code below from the .NET SDK. I am still new to C# and I
don't understand how the code works. And by that I mean I don't
understand how the program knows to execute it. I can find no entry
point besides main. I cannot find an event that calls the code. It
is a simple GDI+ application. I just don't see how it ever executes.
I need nothing about the code itself, just how the thing "turns on."
I don't ever see OnPaint called...
|
by: Swaregirl |
last post by:
Hello,
I would like to build a website using ASP.NET. I would like website
visitors to be able to download code that I would like to make available to
them and that would be residing on my personal server.
Are there any code samples or books that someone can recommend so that I can
implement this. I would prefer VB.NET code, but I am willing to convert
from C# if necessary.
|
by: David Allison |
last post by:
I have written a Login page which initializes a session. I am trying to display a message to the user letting them know that the session is intializing. I would ideally like to load a page that displays while the query is running. Any ideas on how to accomplish this? I have tried to add webforms and user their page load events to launch my code but that does not work.
From...
|
by: John |
last post by:
Hi
I have this application that I am fighting with for days now. Here is the
whole project; www.infovis.biz/tasks.zip. Please run and press the new task
button to see what I mean. Much of the code is either form taskvision or
infragistics samples btw and requires netadvantage 2004 vol2.
I have the following problems with this and would appreciate any help I can
get;
| | |
by: Yavuz Bogazci |
last post by:
Hi,
i need a Component Suite. I looked at ComponentOne Enterprise Studio and for
Infragistics NetAdvantage. I need Components WinForms and for WebForms.
Especially Charting and Grid Controls, but i can't make a choice between
these two suits. Whats your opinion? Whats your recommendation?
thanks
Yavuz Bogazci
|
by: paul |
last post by:
This evening I spent $795 to purchase Infragistics' NetAdvantage 2005
product online.
My MasterCard already shows the debit; however:
(1) The confirmation email that I was promised never arrived;
(2) The link to immediately download my product that was provided on my
confirmation page didn't work;
(3) The CD-Key that was provided on my confirmation didn't work.
(4) When I tried to phone Customer Services/Sales, they were closed;
|
by: GaryDean |
last post by:
In the original post I failed so indicate that I am using framework
1.1.......
I need to be able to change the background color of a page from code. I
found an answer to this question in another forum from Peter Huang that said
that an id="bg" as follows...
<body MS_POSITIONING="GridLayout" runat="server" id="bg">
then we could do the following in our codebehind file....
|
by: tee_huipeng |
last post by:
hi:
i got the source code of autocorrelation (AC) for a frame (for
example: 600 samples out of 40000 samples) of a signal. Can anyone
show me the AC code for the whole 40000 samples which means
continuosly analyse every 600 samples up to the 40000th samples, so
that the result would be stored in an array. i need this for pitch
tracking.
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| | |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
| | |
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |
