Hi all, lets get start.
i have a few questions to ask perhaps someone can help me.
i´m doing a simple aplication. some thing like this
i have a form with a button that opens another form in dialog mode.
' button code ...
Dim frm As New frmAbout
frm.ShowDialog( Me)
frm.Dispose()
first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory see using
the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it uses even
more memory.
is there any sample that shows how realy gc works, i need to save memory not
spend an waiting for a stupid function todo his job.
second. when i use a form and open inside a function , the finaliza method
is never called. why ? see below ..
private sub Button1_click (...... )
Dim frm As New frmAbout
frm.ShowDialog( Me)
frm.Dispose()
end sub
i think it is suposed after the end sub, it calls the finalise of the
frmAbout ??? or It is'nt ?? the finalise is never called in this situation.
:(
what is microsoft thinking when they do the GC.
thks
JSB 8 1705
Hello, first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory see using the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it uses even more memory.
Don't trust the taskmanager. Instead use either a CLR Profiler or check the
performance counter. second. when i use a form and open inside a function , the finaliza method is never called. why ? see below ..
By Finalizer you mean the destructor? That is not called when you call
dispose yourself.
Finalizers are very expensive, because the GC has to promote objects to
finalize to the next generation on the heap and run the finalizer. The
memory can only be reclaimed until the GC has run the next time.
Greetings,
Henning
"João Santa Bárbara" <jo****@i24port ugal.com> wrote in message
news:OC******** ********@tk2msf tngp13.phx.gbl. .. Hi all, lets get start.
i have a few questions to ask perhaps someone can help me. i´m doing a simple aplication. some thing like this i have a form with a button that opens another form in dialog mode.
' button code ... Dim frm As New frmAbout frm.ShowDialog( Me) frm.Dispose()
first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory see using the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it uses even more memory. is there any sample that shows how realy gc works, i need to save memory not spend an waiting for a stupid function todo his job.
' button code ...
Dim frm As New frmAbout
frm.ShowDialog( Me)
frm.Dispose()
frm = nothing
gc.Collect()
This will reduce the memory. In a fat client application, when you _know_
that the managed heap is mostly garbage, and you want to keep it from
getting any bigger, feel free to force a garbage collection.
David
check out Rico's blog, this guy knows what he is talking about.... http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/...29/271829.aspx
HTH
Ollie Riches
"João Santa Bárbara" <jo****@i24port ugal.com> wrote in message
news:OC******** ******@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl... Hi all, lets get start.
i have a few questions to ask perhaps someone can help me. i´m doing a simple aplication. some thing like this i have a form with a button that opens another form in dialog mode.
' button code ... Dim frm As New frmAbout frm.ShowDialog( Me) frm.Dispose()
first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory see using the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it uses even more memory. is there any sample that shows how realy gc works, i need to save memory
not spend an waiting for a stupid function todo his job.
second. when i use a form and open inside a function , the finaliza method is never called. why ? see below ..
private sub Button1_click (...... ) Dim frm As New frmAbout frm.ShowDialog( Me) frm.Dispose() end sub
i think it is suposed after the end sub, it calls the finalise of the frmAbout ??? or It is'nt ?? the finalise is never called in this
situation. :( what is microsoft thinking when they do the GC.
thks JSB
Henning,
Are you sure that destructors are not called when you call a Dispose
yourself. I think this is done only when you GC.SuppressFina lize() from the
Dispose method that this happens.
-- http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/dotnut
"Henning Krause [MVP]" <ne**********@s pam.infinitec.d e> wrote in message
news:Ov******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl... Hello,
first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory see
using the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it uses
even more memory. Don't trust the taskmanager. Instead use either a CLR Profiler or check
the performance counter.
second. when i use a form and open inside a function , the finaliza
method is never called. why ? see below ..
By Finalizer you mean the destructor? That is not called when you call dispose yourself.
Finalizers are very expensive, because the GC has to promote objects to finalize to the next generation on the heap and run the finalizer. The memory can only be reclaimed until the GC has run the next time.
Greetings, Henning
"Ranjan" <ra************ *@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:O2******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP14.phx.gbl... Henning, Are you sure that destructors are not called when you call a Dispose yourself. I think this is done only when you GC.SuppressFina lize() from the Dispose method that this happens.
A destructor is not called when a Dispose method is called - internally in
..NET they have nothing to do with each other.
When an object is no longer reachable via a root and a garbage collection
cycle occurs, the GC determines that the object has a finalizer and puts the
object on a special finalizer queue. This is serviced by a thread that runs
in the background. After the finalizer for the object has run and the next
GC cycle has occurred the memory is reclaimed.
When a Dispose method is called all that happens is that a method (called
Dispose) is invoked on the object; the intent of this method is to cleanup
the object (whatever that means). It does not involve the finalizer at all.
Typically after an object has been disposed it should not be used again -
however, this is not a requirement, it is a convention.
Quite often the Dispose method also calls GC.SuppressFina lize(). This has
the effect of removing the object from the list of objects that require
finalization so that the extra GC cycle to reclaim the memory does not
occur. However, calling GC.SuppressFina lize() from the Dispose method is not
done by the CLR, nor is it a requirement, it is only a convention that most
programmers follow.
For example, if a Dispose is called on an object but GC.SuppressFina lize()
is not called, and the object remains reachable, then the Finalizer is never
called and the memory is never reclaimed. Conversely, if the object is no
longer reachable then at the next GC cycle the Finalizer gets queued, and on
the following GC it is called, even if the Dispose method is never called.
This proves that the two operations are unrelated unless specifically tied
together via user logic.
-- http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/dotnut "Henning Krause [MVP]" <ne**********@s pam.infinitec.d e> wrote in message news:Ov******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl... Hello,
> first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory see using > the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it uses even > more memory.
Don't trust the taskmanager. Instead use either a CLR Profiler or check the performance counter.
> > second. when i use a form and open inside a function , the finaliza method > is never called. why ? see below .. >
By Finalizer you mean the destructor? That is not called when you call dispose yourself.
Finalizers are very expensive, because the GC has to promote objects to finalize to the next generation on the heap and run the finalizer. The memory can only be reclaimed until the GC has run the next time.
Greetings, Henning
Exactly my thoughts
-- http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/dotnut
"David Levine" <no************ ******@wi.rr.co m> wrote in message
news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl... "Ranjan" <ra************ *@gmail.com> wrote in message news:O2******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP14.phx.gbl... Henning, Are you sure that destructors are not called when you call a Dispose yourself. I think this is done only when you GC.SuppressFina lize() from the Dispose method that this happens. A destructor is not called when a Dispose method is called - internally in .NET they have nothing to do with each other.
When an object is no longer reachable via a root and a garbage collection cycle occurs, the GC determines that the object has a finalizer and puts
the object on a special finalizer queue. This is serviced by a thread that
runs in the background. After the finalizer for the object has run and the next GC cycle has occurred the memory is reclaimed.
When a Dispose method is called all that happens is that a method (called Dispose) is invoked on the object; the intent of this method is to cleanup the object (whatever that means). It does not involve the finalizer at
all. Typically after an object has been disposed it should not be used again - however, this is not a requirement, it is a convention.
Quite often the Dispose method also calls GC.SuppressFina lize(). This has the effect of removing the object from the list of objects that require finalization so that the extra GC cycle to reclaim the memory does not occur. However, calling GC.SuppressFina lize() from the Dispose method is
not done by the CLR, nor is it a requirement, it is only a convention that
most programmers follow.
For example, if a Dispose is called on an object but GC.SuppressFina lize() is not called, and the object remains reachable, then the Finalizer is
never called and the memory is never reclaimed. Conversely, if the object is no longer reachable then at the next GC cycle the Finalizer gets queued, and
on the following GC it is called, even if the Dispose method is never called.
This proves that the two operations are unrelated unless specifically tied together via user logic.
-- http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/dotnut "Henning Krause [MVP]" <ne**********@s pam.infinitec.d e> wrote in message news:Ov******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl... Hello,
> first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory see using > the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it uses even > more memory.
Don't trust the taskmanager. Instead use either a CLR Profiler or check the performance counter.
> > second. when i use a form and open inside a function , the finaliza method > is never called. why ? see below .. >
By Finalizer you mean the destructor? That is not called when you call dispose yourself.
Finalizers are very expensive, because the GC has to promote objects to finalize to the next generation on the heap and run the finalizer. The memory can only be reclaimed until the GC has run the next time.
Greetings, Henning
I got the context wrong it think.
What Henning wrote was it is not inherent that a destructor is called when a
Dispose is called.
I misunderstood, misread the "not" part. Sorry.
--
"Ranjan" <ra************ *@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Og******** ******@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl... Exactly my thoughts
-- http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/dotnut
"David Levine" <no************ ******@wi.rr.co m> wrote in message news:uh******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl... "Ranjan" <ra************ *@gmail.com> wrote in message news:O2******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP14.phx.gbl... Henning, Are you sure that destructors are not called when you call a
Dispose yourself. I think this is done only when you GC.SuppressFina lize()
from the Dispose method that this happens. A destructor is not called when a Dispose method is called - internally
in .NET they have nothing to do with each other.
When an object is no longer reachable via a root and a garbage
collection cycle occurs, the GC determines that the object has a finalizer and puts the object on a special finalizer queue. This is serviced by a thread that runs in the background. After the finalizer for the object has run and the
next GC cycle has occurred the memory is reclaimed.
When a Dispose method is called all that happens is that a method
(called Dispose) is invoked on the object; the intent of this method is to
cleanup the object (whatever that means). It does not involve the finalizer at all. Typically after an object has been disposed it should not be used
again - however, this is not a requirement, it is a convention.
Quite often the Dispose method also calls GC.SuppressFina lize(). This
has the effect of removing the object from the list of objects that require finalization so that the extra GC cycle to reclaim the memory does not occur. However, calling GC.SuppressFina lize() from the Dispose method is not done by the CLR, nor is it a requirement, it is only a convention that most programmers follow.
For example, if a Dispose is called on an object but
GC.SuppressFina lize() is not called, and the object remains reachable, then the Finalizer is never called and the memory is never reclaimed. Conversely, if the object is
no longer reachable then at the next GC cycle the Finalizer gets queued,
and on the following GC it is called, even if the Dispose method is never
called. This proves that the two operations are unrelated unless specifically
tied together via user logic.
-- http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/dotnut "Henning Krause [MVP]" <ne**********@s pam.infinitec.d e> wrote in
message news:Ov******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl... > Hello, > > > first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory
see using > > the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it
uses even > > more memory. > > Don't trust the taskmanager. Instead use either a CLR Profiler or
check the > performance counter. > > > > > second. when i use a form and open inside a function , the finaliza method > > is never called. why ? see below .. > > > > By Finalizer you mean the destructor? That is not called when you
call> dispose yourself. > > Finalizers are very expensive, because the GC has to promote objects
to> finalize to the next generation on the heap and run the finalizer.
The> memory can only be reclaimed until the GC has run the next time. > > > Greetings, > Henning > >
Yes, thats right. But most Dipose() method make a call to
SuppressFinaliz e().
Greetings,
Henning Krause [MVP]
=============== ===========
Visit my website: http://www.infinitec.de
Try my free Exchange Explorer: Mistaya
( http://www.infinitec.de/software/mistaya.aspx)
"Ranjan" <ra************ *@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:O2******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP14.phx.gbl... Henning, Are you sure that destructors are not called when you call a Dispose yourself. I think this is done only when you GC.SuppressFina lize() from
the Dispose method that this happens. -- http://dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/dotnut "Henning Krause [MVP]" <ne**********@s pam.infinitec.d e> wrote in message news:Ov******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl... Hello,
first , when the application start, it uses (ex 17 mb of memory see using the windows taskmanager), and after i close the dialog form, it uses even more memory.
Don't trust the taskmanager. Instead use either a CLR Profiler or check the performance counter.
second. when i use a form and open inside a function , the finaliza method is never called. why ? see below ..
By Finalizer you mean the destructor? That is not called when you call dispose yourself.
Finalizers are very expensive, because the GC has to promote objects to finalize to the next generation on the heap and run the finalizer. The memory can only be reclaimed until the GC has run the next time.
Greetings, Henning
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Bob |
last post by:
Are there any known applications out there used to test the performance of the .NET garbage collector over a long period of time? Basically I need an application that creates objects, uses them, and then throws them away and then monitors the garbage collection and store statistics on it, preferably in C#. I want to know what is the longest period of time that an application may lock up while garbage collection is processing. Thanks!
|
by: Ganesh |
last post by:
Is there a utility by microsoft (or anyone) to force garbage collection in a
process without have access to the process code.
regards
Ganesh
|
by: Rick |
last post by:
Hi,
My question is.. if Lisp, a 40 year old language supports garbage
collection, why didn't the authors of C++ choose garbage collection for
this language? Are there fundamental reasons behind this? Is it because
C is generally a 'low level' language and they didn't want garbage
collection to creep into C++ and ruin everything?
Just wondering :)
|
by: Ville Voipio |
last post by:
I would need to make some high-reliability software
running on Linux in an embedded system. Performance
(or lack of it) is not an issue, reliability is.
The piece of software is rather simple, probably a
few hundred lines of code in Python. There is a need
to interact with network using the socket module,
and then probably a need to do something hardware-
related which will get its own driver written in
C.
|
by: Bob lazarchik |
last post by:
Hello:
We are considering developing a time critical system in C#. Our tool used in
Semiconductor production and we need to be able to take meaurements at
precise 10.0 ms intervals( 1000 measurement exactly 10 ms apart. In the
future this may decrease to 5ms ). I am concerned that if garbage
collection invokes during this time it may interfere with our measurement
results. I have looked over the garbage collection mechanism and see no...
| |
by: mike2036 |
last post by:
For some reason it appears that garbage collection is releasing an object
that I'm still using. The object is declared in a module and instantiated
within a class that is in turn instantiated by the mainline. The class that
instantiated the object in question is definitely still in existence at the
point garbage collection swoops in and yanks it out from under my processing.
Is there a way to ensure an instantiated object cannot be freed...
|
by: Goalie_Ca |
last post by:
I have been reading (or at least googling) about the potential addition
of optional garbage collection to C++0x. There are numerous myths and
whatnot with very little detailed information.
Will this work be library based or language based and will it be based
on that of managed C++? Then of course there are the finer technical
questions raised (especially due to pointer abuse). Is a GC for C++
just a pipe dream or is there a lot of work...
|
by: Johnny E. Jensen |
last post by:
Hellow
I'am not sure what to think about the Garbage Collector.
I have a Class OutlookObject, It have two private variables.
Private Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Application _Application = null;
Private Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.NameSpace _Namespace = null;
The Constructor:
public OutlookObject()
|
by: Lloyd Bonafide |
last post by:
I followed a link to James Kanze's web site in another thread and was
surprised to read this comment by a link to a GC:
"I can't imagine writing C++ without it"
How many of you c.l.c++'ers use one, and in what percentage of your
projects is one used? I have never used one in personal or professional
C++ programming. Am I a holdover to days gone by?
|
by: pushpakulkar |
last post by:
Hi all,
Is garbage collection possible in C++. It doesn't come as part of
language support. Is there any specific reason for the same due to the
way the language is designed. Or it is discouraged due to
some specific reason. If someone can give inputs on the same, it will
be of great help.
Regards,
Pushpa
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
| |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
|
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |