Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have
to support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
21  1611 
On Sep 2, 4:00*pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
Better yet, don't. That's miatake #1. See Prototype, jQuery, etc.
"Stevo" <no@mail.invalidwrote in message
news:g9*************@news.t-online.com...
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have to
support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
Looks okay to me, V8 (it Javascript interpreter) is about 7 times faster
than FF and about 20 times faster than IE.
Looks like a nice browser to me.
Aaron
On Sep 2, 6:27 pm, "Aaron Gray" <ang.use...@gmail.comwrote:
"Stevo" <n...@mail.invalidwrote in message
news:g9*************@news.t-online.com...
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have to
support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
Looks okay to me, V8 (it Javascript interpreter) is about 7 times faster
than FF and about 20 times faster than IE.
Looks like a nice browser to me.
It looks like Safari to me, which is not necessarily a bad thing.
"David Mark" <dm***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:9a**********************************@e53g2000 hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 2, 6:27 pm, "Aaron Gray" <ang.use...@gmail.comwrote:
>"Stevo" <n...@mail.invalidwrote in message
news:g9*************@news.t-online.com...
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have
to
support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
Looks okay to me, V8 (it Javascript interpreter) is about 7 times faster
than FF and about 20 times faster than IE.
Looks like a nice browser to me.
It looks like Safari to me, which is not necessarily a bad thing.
Yep, it has SVG and weighs in at 620KBytes, and loads over 20 times faster
than Safari !
Aaron
David Mark wrote:
On Sep 2, 4:00 pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
>Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
Better yet, don't. That's miatake #1. See Prototype, jQuery, etc.
Not sure what you're talking about. What have Prototype and jQuery got
to do with Chrome being based on Safari and therefore sucking?
"Aaron Gray" <an********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:6i************@mid.individual.net...
"David Mark" <dm***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:9a**********************************@e53g2000 hsa.googlegroups.com...
>On Sep 2, 6:27 pm, "Aaron Gray" <ang.use...@gmail.comwrote:
>>"Stevo" <n...@mail.invalidwrote in message
news:g9*************@news.t-online.com...
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't
have to
support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
Looks okay to me, V8 (it Javascript interpreter) is about 7 times faster
than FF and about 20 times faster than IE.
Looks like a nice browser to me.
It looks like Safari to me, which is not necessarily a bad thing.
Yep, it has SVG and weighs in at 620KBytes, and loads over 20 times faster
than Safari !
Ah theres a 8MByte DLL too !
Althought the installer is only 475KBytes, so presumably the installer
downloads the essentials.
Aaron
On Sep 2, 6:57*pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
David Mark wrote:
On Sep 2, 4:00 pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
Better yet, don't. *That's miatake #1. *See Prototype, jQuery, etc.
Not sure what you're talking about. What have Prototype and jQuery got
to do with Chrome being based on Safari and therefore sucking?
I did not comment on the Safari -sucking issue in that post.
The point is that brain-dead libraries, such as Prototype and the
like, branch based on the userAgent property and therefore will be
thrown for a loop by this (or virtually any) new browser.
BTW, the browser in question looks and acts like Safari. Provided
your scripts do not branch on browser names, you will be fine.
On Sep 2, 4:09*pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 6:57*pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
David Mark wrote:
On Sep 2, 4:00 pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
>Look at the userAgent string:
>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
>(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
Better yet, don't. *That's miatake #1. *See Prototype, jQuery, etc.
Not sure what you're talking about. What have Prototype and jQuery got
to do with Chrome being based on Safari and therefore sucking?
I did not comment on the Safari -sucking issue in that post.
The point is that brain-dead libraries, such as Prototype and the
like, branch based on the userAgent property and therefore will be
thrown for a loop by this (or virtually any) new browser.
BTW, the browser in question looks and acts like Safari. *Provided
your scripts do not branch on browser names, you will be fine.
jQuery isn't thrown for a loop by Chrome, as far as I can tell. I have
a very jQuery-intensive app that works wonderfully in Chrome. From
reading Google's comic book, it sounds like they've been testing this
on all the big sites, including jQuery sites.
On Sep 2, 7:22*pm, timothytoe <timothy...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 4:09*pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 6:57*pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
David Mark wrote:
On Sep 2, 4:00 pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
Better yet, don't. *That's miatake #1. *See Prototype, jQuery, etc.
Not sure what you're talking about. What have Prototype and jQuery got
to do with Chrome being based on Safari and therefore sucking?
I did not comment on the Safari -sucking issue in that post.
The point is that brain-dead libraries, such as Prototype and the
like, branch based on the userAgent property and therefore will be
thrown for a loop by this (or virtually any) new browser.
BTW, the browser in question looks and acts like Safari. *Provided
your scripts do not branch on browser names, you will be fine.
jQuery isn't thrown for a loop by Chrome, as far as I can tell. I have
Are you sure? Can anyone really be sure?
a very jQuery-intensive app that works wonderfully in Chrome. From
By coincidence.
reading Google's comic book, it sounds like they've been testing this
on all the big sites, including jQuery sites.- Hide quoted text -
Testing a browser against jQuery. Now there's a concept.
On Sep 2, 4:47*pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 7:22*pm, timothytoe <timothy...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 4:09*pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 6:57*pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
David Mark wrote:
On Sep 2, 4:00 pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
>Look at the userAgent string:
>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
>(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
Better yet, don't. *That's miatake #1. *See Prototype, jQuery, etc.
Not sure what you're talking about. What have Prototype and jQuery got
to do with Chrome being based on Safari and therefore sucking?
I did not comment on the Safari -sucking issue in that post.
The point is that brain-dead libraries, such as Prototype and the
like, branch based on the userAgent property and therefore will be
thrown for a loop by this (or virtually any) new browser.
BTW, the browser in question looks and acts like Safari. *Provided
your scripts do not branch on browser names, you will be fine.
jQuery isn't thrown for a loop by Chrome, as far as I can tell. I have
Are you sure? *Can anyone really be sure?
a very jQuery-intensive app that works wonderfully in Chrome. From
By coincidence.
reading Google's comic book, it sounds like they've been testing this
on all the big sites, including jQuery sites.- Hide quoted text -
Testing a browser against jQuery. *Now there's a concept.
I can't be sure that all jQuery sites will work, of course. But I've
visited many that work just fine, and none that seem to have failed.
I'm eager for someone to show me a website that uses jQuery that fails
in Chrome.
When someone predicts doom, I'd love the prediction to be followed up
by an actual case of doom.
The conjecture of doom was a reasonable one, but it looks as if Google
has addressed it reasonably well.
Stevo wrote:
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have
to support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
It is a great product. I suppose, that it will be the biggest killer of
Opera and Safari (on Windows) very soon.
--
Xu, Qian (stanleyxu) http://stanleyxu2005.blogspot.com
On Sep 2, 8:19 pm, timothytoe <timothy...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 4:47 pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 7:22 pm, timothytoe <timothy...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 4:09 pm, David Mark <dmark.cins...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sep 2, 6:57 pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
David Mark wrote:
On Sep 2, 4:00 pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
Better yet, don't. That's miatake #1. See Prototype, jQuery, etc.
Not sure what you're talking about. What have Prototype and jQuery got
to do with Chrome being based on Safari and therefore sucking?
I did not comment on the Safari -sucking issue in that post.
The point is that brain-dead libraries, such as Prototype and the
like, branch based on the userAgent property and therefore will be
thrown for a loop by this (or virtually any) new browser.
BTW, the browser in question looks and acts like Safari. Provided
your scripts do not branch on browser names, you will be fine.
jQuery isn't thrown for a loop by Chrome, as far as I can tell. I have
Are you sure? Can anyone really be sure?
a very jQuery-intensive app that works wonderfully in Chrome. From
By coincidence.
reading Google's comic book, it sounds like they've been testing this
on all the big sites, including jQuery sites.- Hide quoted text -
Testing a browser against jQuery. Now there's a concept.
I can't be sure that all jQuery sites will work, of course. But I've
Of course.
visited many that work just fine, and none that seem to have failed.
And how many browsers did you visit these sites with?
I'm eager for someone to show me a website that uses jQuery that fails
in Chrome.
Why? Isn't it enough that it branches on the name of the browser.
How many browsers are there now?
>
When someone predicts doom, I'd love the prediction to be followed up
by an actual case of doom.
Have you read the jQuery source? That's all you really need to know.
>
The conjecture of doom was a reasonable one, but it looks as if Google
has addressed it reasonably well.
Google has nothing to do with it. You missed my point.
On Sep 2, 4:00*pm, Stevo <n...@mail.invalidwrote:
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have
It's actually based on WebKit (rev. 525.13) - the same engine Safari
is built upon (though Safari uses different build in latest version).
Why will something "based on Safari" suck is beyond my understanding.
Could you elaborate?
to support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
--
kangax
In comp.lang.javascript message <g9*************@news.t-online.com>,
Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:00:41, Stevo <no@mail.invalidposted:
>Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have
to support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
What does the yellow column in <URL: http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-
datex.htm#Autoshow in Chrome? Any other Date funnies?
What do the test forms in <URL: http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-
randm.htm#MRshow? Only the Numbers are of interest.
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/TP/BP/Delphi/&c., FAQqy topics & links;
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/clpb-faq.txt RAH Prins : c.l.p.b mFAQ;
<URL:ftp://garbo.uwasa.fi/pc/link/tsfaqp.zipTimo Salmi's Turbo Pascal FAQ.
Dr J R Stockton wrote:
In comp.lang.javascript message <g9*************@news.t-online.com>,
Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:00:41, Stevo <no@mail.invalidposted:
>Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have
to support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
What does the yellow column in <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-
datex.htm#Autoshow in Chrome? Any other Date funnies?
Same as Firefox 3 except rows 5, 6 and N are false instead of true.
>
What do the test forms in <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-
randm.htm#MRshow? Only the Numbers are of interest.
Clicking ? for the Loops 100000, I get 100000 OK
Clicking ResolB I get General resolution is at least 30 bits.
Clicking ResolC I get Range resolution is at least 30 bits.
Is that what you wanted?
Chris Riesbeck wrote:
Dr J R Stockton wrote:
>In comp.lang.javascript message <g9*************@news.t-online.com>,
Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:00:41, Stevo <no@mail.invalidposted:
>>Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have
to support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
What does the yellow column in <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-
datex.htm#Autoshow in Chrome? Any other Date funnies?
Same as Firefox 3 except rows 5, 6 and N are false instead of true.
>>
What do the test forms in <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-
randm.htm#MRshow? Only the Numbers are of interest.
Clicking ? for the Loops 100000, I get 100000 OK
Clicking ResolB I get General resolution is at least 30 bits.
Clicking ResolC I get Range resolution is at least 30 bits.
Is that what you wanted?
Oops -- overlooked ResolA
Clicking ResolA I get Maximum resolution is 2^-30 or better.
I'd closed Chrome, then saw ResolA in Firefox. I reopened Chrome and the
default tab showed my recent pages and one click took me back to your
test page. I'm not ready to use Chrome till the carpet bombing bug is
fixed, at the least, but I've liked playing with it so far, and it's
been happy with some of my more complicated scripts.
On Sep 3, 9:03*pm, Chris Riesbeck <Chris.Riesb...@gmail.comwrote:
>
I'd closed Chrome, then saw ResolA in Firefox. I reopened Chrome and the
default tab showed my recent pages and one click took me back to your
test page. I'm not ready to use Chrome till the carpet bombing bug is
fixed, at the least, but I've liked playing with it so far, and it's
been happy with some of my more complicated scripts.
Does it run on squirrelfish as well, I mean, as it's based on webkit
then maybe...
--
Jorge.
Stevo <no@mail.invalidwrites:
Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't
have to support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
What's so bad about Safari - or rather, about WebKit?
It's DOM standards compliance is fairly good (first to Acid 2 and best
at Acid 3 so far).
The Javascript engine was rewritten, so whatever flaws it may have
(it's still in beta, so I bet there are some) won't be related to
Safari.
/L
--
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen
DHTML Death Colors: <URL:http://www.infimum.dk/HTML/rasterTriangleDOM.html>
'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine.'
On Sep 4, 6:08 am, Jorge <jo...@jorgechamorro.comwrote:
On Sep 3, 9:03 pm, Chris Riesbeck <Chris.Riesb...@gmail.comwrote:
I'd closed Chrome, then saw ResolA in Firefox. I reopened Chrome and the
default tab showed my recent pages and one click took me back to your
test page. I'm not ready to use Chrome till the carpet bombing bug is
fixed, at the least, but I've liked playing with it so far, and it's
been happy with some of my more complicated scripts.
Does it run on squirrelfish as well, I mean, as it's based on webkit
then maybe...
It doesn't run squirrelfish but something a bit better: it runs V8: http://code.google.com/p/v8/
It's a JIT compiler for javascript. No, not a bytecode compiler like
squirrelfish but direct-to-native-instructions javascript.
On Sep 4, 7:53*am, slebetman <slebet...@gmail.comwrote:
>
It doesn't run squirrelfish but something a bit better: it runs V8:
http://code.google.com/p/v8/
It's a JIT compiler for javascript. No, not a bytecode compiler like
squirrelfish but direct-to-native-instructions javascript.
You mean not squirrelfish but something still faster ?
Thumbs up !
I love to see that the browsers keep changing for the better.
--
Jorge.
In comp.lang.javascript message <6i************@mid.individual.net>,
Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:59:52, Chris Riesbeck <Ch************@gmail.com>
posted:
>Dr J R Stockton wrote:
>In comp.lang.javascript message <g9*************@news.t-online.com>,
Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:00:41, Stevo <no@mail.invalidposted:
>>Look at the userAgent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
It's based on a Safari so it'll suck. Time we all quit so we don't have
to support this thing, because there's no doubt it'll be popular.
What does the yellow column in <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js
-
datex.htm#Autoshow in Chrome? Any other Date funnies?
Same as Firefox 3 except rows 5, 6 and N are false instead of true.
One wonders whether it is possible to indicate to Chrome, in a date/time
string, the offset from GMT numerically? That is to say, by a suffix
like +0800 ?
> What do the test forms in <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-
randm.htm#MRshow? Only the Numbers are of interest.
Clicking ? for the Loops 100000, I get 100000 OK
Clicking ResolB I get General resolution is at least 30 bits.
Clicking ResolC I get Range resolution is at least 30 bits.
plus
>Clicking ResolA I get Maximum resolution is 2^-30 or better.
>Is that what you wanted?
Yes, thanks.
You could try more loops, but the error for which that tests is not
expected, though Opera used to have it.
For resolution, 30 bits is dismal, even despicable. 32 would be
excusable. The source code needs looking at. They ought to read Knuth;
but my pages js-randm.htm & pas-rand.htm should provide core
information.
I assume that this Google Chrome has a major version number of 1.
Apologies, Chris, I had not intended to mail this.
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/- FAQqish topics, acronyms & links;
Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: gimme_this_gimme_that |
last post by:
This isn't a javascript question ...
On the other hand, there are a lot of people on this newsgroup who seem
to know a lot about building nice user interfaces.
Anyway, I'd like to add chrome...
|
by: Brian Henry |
last post by:
How do you create a "chrome" window in asp.net? thoes kind of windows that
look like a normal winform type window with no toolbars or stuff... I know
it's possible, i've seen it... thanks!
|
by: broli85 |
last post by:
I am writing an extension for Firefox 1.5.
I would like to know if there is a way to write and read data to and from a file which is in the location of the extension (or somewhere in the user's...
|
by: Oriane |
last post by:
"Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)" <NoSpamMgbworld@comcast.netNoSpamMa écrit
dans le message de news:ukszReE4IHA.1428@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
I didn't find anything about the "minimal mode" of IE on...
|
by: Gregor Kofler |
last post by:
I've augmented string objects (not the prototype) and none of the
popular browsers ever complained. Until Chrome came along. Chrome won't
accept something like
String.prototype.foo = function()...
| | |
by: Guy Macon |
last post by:
SRWare's new Iron browser is based on Chrome's source code but,
unlike Chrome, Iron does not create unique user IDs, nor does it
send URIs to Google for generating search hints or tell Google
when...
|
by: npm |
last post by:
Hi
I've checked out this page (and it works fine) in FF, IE, Opera, Chrome and Safari:
http://www.w3schools.com/dom/tryit.asp?filename=try_dom_list_loop
But when I try and tweak it for a site...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| | |
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated ...
|
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence...
| | |
