Own implementation of an interface

[gabriel]

Hi

Firstly i'd like to thank you for reading this and offer my appreciation
for replies in advance.

I've recently been writing a program which implements a user-defined API
(Robocode to be exact). I, however, need to create my own implementation
of an interface in order to perform some arbitary function.

My question is, how would i go about creating my own instance of this
interface so that the API utilises my methods instead of the blank,
skeleton ones already provided?

Is it simply Public interface myInterface extends APIInterfaceCLassNAMe?

or is there some other method?

As far as java goes i've always been a little hazey around the concept
of interfaces, thus my confusion.
thanks

Gabriel

[Luca Paganelli]

An interface is simply a definition of the way a class is expected to
"act". It's a collection of definition of methods each of which must be
implemented for a class to be said "implementing" that interface.

To create an implementation of an interface either you can write it
"implements" that interface and implement every single interface method,
or you can write it extends another class that implements the interface
and override those methods that must have custom implementation/behavior.

Luca.

gabriel ha scritto:

Hi

Firstly i'd like to thank you for reading this and offer my appreciation
for replies in advance.

I've recently been writing a program which implements a user-defined API
(Robocode to be exact). I, however, need to create my own implementation
of an interface in order to perform some arbitary function.

My question is, how would i go about creating my own instance of this
interface so that the API utilises my methods instead of the blank,
skeleton ones already provided?

Is it simply Public interface myInterface extends APIInterfaceCLassNAMe?

or is there some other method?

As far as java goes i've always been a little hazey around the concept
of interfaces, thus my confusion.
thanks

Gabriel

[Mark Rafn]

gabriel <pe*******@ether.netwrote:

>My question is, how would i go about creating my own instance of this
interface so that the API utilises my methods instead of the blank,
skeleton ones already provided?
Is it simply Public interface myInterface extends APIInterfaceCLassNAMe?

You probably want public myClass implements APIInterfaceName. And provide
actual implementations of all the methods. If you write an interface, you can
declare methods but not actually implement any of them.

>or is there some other method?
As far as java goes i've always been a little hazey around the concept
of interfaces, thus my confusion.

An interface is just a pure abstract class, with a slightly different syntax
for creating the subclass - you implement it rather than extending it.

Many frameworks provide both an interface and a convenience base class that
partially implements it and lets you override just the part you want to change
(like Swing's Action interface and AbstractAction class - you can implement
Action or extend AbstractAction, depending on your needs).

I haven't played with Robocode much, but I thought it did this as well - you
extend Robot (or AdvancedRobot) and override the methods that get called at
various events.
--
Mark Rafn da***@dagon.net <http://www.dagon.net/>

[Lew]

gabriel <pe*******@ether.netwrote:

>My question is, how would i go about creating my own instance of this
interface so that the API utilises my methods instead of the blank,
skeleton ones already provided?

Mark Rafn wrote:

You probably want public myClass implements APIInterfaceName.

"public MyClass ..."

Class names should start with an upper-case letter.

- Lew

[Prasad]

Lew wrote:

>gabriel <pe*******@ether.netwrote:

>>My question is, how would i go about creating my own instance of this
interface so that the API utilises my methods instead of the blank,
skeleton ones already provided?

Mark Rafn wrote:

>You probably want public myClass implements APIInterfaceName.

"public MyClass ..."

Class names should start with an upper-case letter.

- Lew

Starting class names with an upper-case letter, is a widely used (good)
convention. But I don't think it is required by the language.

The following code compiles and executes just fine.

public class sample
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println("Hello World!");
}
}
--
Prasad