Using JNI to access C++ class member functions

[jthep]

Hi I'm trying to write a JNI for a linkedlist class I wrote in C++. Basically I have a header file with the class definition and a C++ file with the definition of the class member functions.

I have a record file llist.h

class llist
{
    private:
        record        *start;
        char          filename[16];
        int           readfile();
        int           writefile();
        record *      reverse(record *);
        void          cleanup();
 
    public:
        llist();
        llist(char[]);
        ~llist();
        int addRecord(char[], char[], int, char[]);
        int printRecord(char[]);
        int modifyRecord(char[], char[], int, char[]);
        void printAllRecords();
        int deleteRecord(char[]);
        void reverse();
};

then the C++ code:

int llist::readfile()
{
 
}
 
int llist::writefile()
{
 
}
 
llist::llist()
{
 
}
 
llist::llist(char name[])
{
 
}
 
llist::~llist()
{
 
}
 
int llist::addRecord(char name[], char address[], int yearofbirth, char telno[])
{
;
}
 
int llist::deleteRecord(char name[])
{
 
}
 
int llist::modifyRecord(char name[], char address[], char telno[])
{
 
}
 
void llist::printAll()
{
 
}
 
 
record::record()
{
}

Then I need a Java Code. For the JNI, I will create a method to display a menu that allows a user to add, delete, modify, and display records. The JNI will call the functions written in C++. But what is the code I put in the Java file to access the class functions? Normally, if it's just a regular function and not part of a class member, it would go something like:

class UserInterface {
    public native int addRecord(char [] name, char [] address, ....etc);
    ...
    ....
    and so on
 
   static {
        System.loadLibrary("UserInterface");
    }
 
    code....
    .................
}

[JosAH]

That's exactly how it's done. The javah tool generates the necessary header file
given your compiled .class file that contains the 'native' definitions. The generated
.h file contains the prototypes of the C/C++ functions you have to create yourself.

Those functions normally act as wrappers for your real functions. Compile and
link the stuff into a .dll (or .so file if you're on unix) and off you go.

kind regards,

Jos

[jthep]

So what if I wanted to call the constructor llist() to create a list and initialize all members of the class definition? public native Ilist(); gives me a syntax error since I have no return type. Since both are declared as private, I wrote the constructor and destructor so that it calls the readfile() and writefile() respectively. I'm not directly calling those two functions in the java file, do I still need a native line in there?

As for the header file would it resemble a class? From the steps I read on how to use the JNI was to create the java class first, then the header file with the function definition and it would be something like this for the addRecord...

class llist_H{
 
JNIEXPORT jint JNICALL Java_UserInterface_addRecord(..............)
  (JNIEnv *, jobject, jint);
...
....
}

[JosAH]

So what if I wanted to call the constructor llist() to create a list and initialize all members of the class definition? public native Ilist(); gives me a syntax error since I have no return type. Since both are declared as private, I wrote the constructor and destructor so that it calls the readfile() and writefile() respectively. I'm not directly calling those two functions in the java file, do I still need a native line in there?

You cannot call a C++ ctor from Java directly; you have to craft another native
method (in C++) that creates your C++ object for you. Java and C++ are two
separate worlds; even a pointer to a C++ object doesn't mean anything to Java
(and vice versa). You need a native 'initialize()' method in Java to set up your
C++ list object.

kind regards,

Jos

[jthep]

Thanks Jos! Okay....so something like the void initializer(); method in C++ would call the constructor and same thing with the destructor.

void initializer()
{
    llist();
}

and

void initializer(char [] filename)
{
    llist(filename);
}

Then call the function in java by public native void initializer(); Since the constructor is public, I can declare it anywhere.

Regards,
Jthep

[JosAH]

Thanks Jos! Okay....so something like the void initializer(); method in C++ would call the constructor and same thing with the destructor.

void initializer()
{
    llist();
}

and

void initializer(char [] filename)
{
    llist(filename);
}

Then call the function in java by public native void initializer(); Since the constructor is public, I can declare it anywhere.

Regards,
Jthep

Yep, true. I normally use the Java class as a real wrapper around a C++ class.
You need to convert a C++ pointer to a, say, Java long (or small byte[]) and
vice versa.

When your Java code creates the Java wrapper, it creates a C++ object (using
that initializitatio n native method) and stores the C++ pointer to the object as a
long (or byte[]). It's up to you to implement an explicit 'delete()' method in Java
or let it go with the flow and get rid of the wrapped C++ object when/if the Java
object is finalized and its finalize() method is called (that's where you destroy
the wrapped C++ object then).

That way the rest of your Java code doesn't even 'know' that its talking to a C++
object. Internally your Java class just passes that secret pointer back and forth.

kind regards,

Jos

[jthep]

Thanks. Btw, when compiling and running this code on UNIX, is there a way to run javax.swing.JOp tionPane on UNIX? I had some old java projects that I did on eclipse using JOptionPane, I could compile and run in eclipse but I can only compile in UNIX. I couldn't run it without it giving me the UnsatisfiedLink edError.

Regards,
Jthep