Serge Rielau wrote:
gn*****@rcn.com wrote: V7.1/390
logically, the answer should be NO. the question: does the act of
creating a trigger on a table invalidate a SP which doesn't
reference the table? or, more generally, at what level does a
SP go invalid?? the database(schema), tablespace, etc.? looked
in the on-line docs, but couldn't track down an answer to the
question. rather be able to warn the folks that they'll need
to re-bind than have them surprised.
thanks,
robert
Could it be that the trigger subject table is affected indirectly
through an RI relationship in the proc?
Cheers
Serge
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 SQL Compiler Development
IBM Toronto Lab
no, it's a new table. as i say, i can't think of a logical reason for
the the SP to get invalidated, except that this SP (COBOL) seems to
go south with some regularity. any change seems to do it; what i
haven't been able to find in the docs is a simple list of actions which
invalidate. or to ask another way: do SPs always bind to a schema
identity? that's the level the bind utility runs at, IIRC; so SPs may
invalidate at that level. if the answer is yes, then adding a trigger
will invalidate. just don't know.
thanks,
robert
the SP. on the other hand, if only changing
