please anyone tell me whether the following code works for checking the
linked list is circular or not? -
address 0 address1 address2
-
| A|address1| |B|address2| |C|address0|
-
| |
-
| |
-
ptr1 ptr2
-
-
A,B,C-are elements in list.
-
ptr1- points to first elt in list.
-
ptr2-points to last elt in list.
-
-
if(ptr2+1 == ptr1)
-
{
-
the list is circular.
-
}
12 15662 RedSon 5,000
Recognized Expert Expert
I'm going to have to go with... no.
RedSon 5,000
Recognized Expert Expert
The best way to figure out if a linked list is circular is to draw out your data structure on a piece of paper and pretend you are a computer. How can *you* tell if a list is circular?
Try drawing one that is circular and pretend you are a computer. Then draw one that is not circular and pretend you are a computer.
Usually if your last element points to your first element then it is circular. If you want to figure out if you have cycles then that is a complete separate issue.
please anyone tell me whether the following code works for checking the
linked list is circular or not? -
address 0 address1 address2
-
| A|address1| |B|address2| |C|address0|
-
| |
-
| |
-
ptr1 ptr2
-
-
A,B,C-are elements in list.
-
ptr1- points to first elt in list.
-
ptr2-points to last elt in list.
-
-
if(ptr2+1 == ptr1)
-
{
-
the list is circular.
-
}
The reason this doesn't work is because pointers are just addresses to the place where each node is located in memory.
So lets say the address of ptr1 is 0x12BC and the address of ptr2 is 0xB901. Even though they could be linked together their addresses are totally different (so the ptr1+1 will not work).
If its a small list you could store all of the pointers and then compare each pointer against the next node's pointer. This would be very tedious (lots of loops) and not very efficient but it would do the job.
Savage 1,764
Recognized Expert Top Contributor
The reason this doesn't work is because pointers are just addresses to the place where each node is located in memory.
So lets say the address of ptr1 is 0x12BC and the address of ptr2 is 0xB901. Even though they could be linked together their addresses are totally different (so the ptr1+1 will not work).
If its a small list you could store all of the pointers and then compare each pointer against the next node's pointer. This would be very tedious (lots of loops) and not very efficient but it would do the job.
And boring too.
One thing is sure OP needs to dereferance the pointers and test values that they realy point to,so:
if(ptr2->next==*ptr),should be a way more closer to the solution.
Savage
RedSon 5,000
Recognized Expert Expert
And boring too.
One thing is sure OP needs to dereferance the pointers and test values that they realy point to,so:
if(ptr2->next==*ptr),should be a way more closer to the solution.
Savage
Right but the question remains is what the OP wants is to see if the list is circular (ie. tail->next == head) or if there is a cycle (ie. node->next == visited node).
Telling if a list is circular is easy.
if (last_node->next == first_node) then its circular.
Right but the question remains is what the OP wants is to see if the list is circular (ie. tail->next == head) or if there is a cycle (ie. node->next == visited node).
Telling if a list is circular is easy.
if (last_node->next == first_node) then its circular.
keep two pointers ptr1,ptr2 -
-
ptr1(pointer) increments by one step ptr1 = HeadOfNode ;
-
ptr2(pointer) increments by 2 steps ptr2 = HeadOfNode -> NEXT;
-
-
while(ptr1 != NULL) //until it reaches EOL
-
{
-
-
if(pt1 == ptr2) //if it is circular then at some point both the pointer will be same
-
{
-
printf("VOILA ITS CIRCULAR OR HAVING LOOP");
-
return 0;
-
}
-
else
-
{
-
-
ptr1++;
-
ptr2++;
-
-
}
-
}
-
RedSon 5,000
Recognized Expert Expert
keep two pointers ptr1,ptr2 -
-
ptr1(pointer) increments by one step ptr1 = HeadOfNode ;
-
ptr2(pointer) increments by 2 steps ptr2 = HeadOfNode -> NEXT;
-
-
while(ptr1 != NULL) //until it reaches EOL
-
{
-
-
if(pt1 == ptr2) //if it is circular then at some point both the pointer will be same
-
{
-
printf("VOILA ITS CIRCULAR OR HAVING LOOP");
-
return 0;
-
}
-
else
-
{
-
-
ptr1++;
-
ptr2++;
-
-
}
-
}
-
First off, thats not going to check if there is a cycle in your linked list because a cycle can occur anywhere not just in adjacent nodes. Second, its not going to check if the linked list is circular because at no point to you check to see if the last node points to the first node. Third, incrementing a pointer is not the same as following the link to the next node. Fourth, giving code (wrong or not) is not allowed for homework questions.
Here the problem is list need not be circular such that last node point to the first node. List can be circular if last node point to any node in the list. Any other node except the last node can't make it circular, because node structure have only one next pointer. Also, here we don't know the last pointer, so can't do as lastPointer->next == firstPointer then circular.
I can think of two solutions in this case:
1) use of array which will contain the address of each node, scan the array for each node->next address, whether it's there in the array or not. if its there then list is circular and if the node->next reaches to NULL then list is not circular. Here problem is complexity of both time(O(n^2)) and of space.
2) Better solution is use of map if you are using C++(I don't know the equivalent in Java). Map will return false when key appears twice and over here key will be address of nodes.
Psudocode:
bool Fun(Struct Node* head){
Struct Node* temp=head;
while(temp!=NULL)
{
if( map.insert(temp,1) == false)
return true; //list is circular
temp=temp->next;
}
return false; //list is not circular
}
//I am not checking the code, might have some small mistake, take it as pseudocode
please anyone tell me whether the following code works for checking the
linked list is circular or not? -
address 0 address1 address2
-
| A|address1| |B|address2| |C|address0|
-
| |
-
| |
-
ptr1 ptr2
-
-
A,B,C-are elements in list.
-
ptr1- points to first elt in list.
-
ptr2-points to last elt in list.
-
-
if(ptr2+1 == ptr1)
-
{
-
the list is circular.
-
}
It is not as complex as You are assuming.
1. Have ptr1 node pointing to head node.
2. Have a ptr2 node pointing to next of ptr1 node.
3. within While Loop with condition ptr2 not null compare
ptr1 and ptr2, if they are equal then print as Circular and break
increment the loop counter ptr2 to next node.
Is this clear ???
Regards,
Girish.
It is not as complex as You are assuming.
1. Have ptr1 node pointing to head node.
2. Have a ptr2 node pointing to next of ptr1 node.
3. within While Loop with condition ptr2 not null compare
ptr1 and ptr2, if they are equal then print as Circular and break
increment the loop counter ptr2 to next node.
Is this clear ???
Regards,
Girish.
This will work only if two consecutive nodes are making list circular. if 7th node's->next is 3rd node it will not work
One more cool idea: take two pointers temp1 and temp2
initially
temp1 = head;
temp2 = head->next->next;
while(temp1!=Null && temp2!=Null)
{
if(temp1 == temp2)
return true; //list is circular
temp1=temp1->next;
temp2=temp2->next->next;
}
return false; //list is not circular
It is somewhat difficult to get it from here, but try using this algorithm on paper ..... take 8 nodes, make it circular by conecting last node with 3rd node.
Since list is circular temp2 will move to third node from 8th node. In this case temp1 == temp2 at node 5.
Complexity of this is also very less i.e. O(2n). ~ O(n)
Also, easy to implement.
If you are not clear, please get back
take a pointer on the linked list and keep incrementing this it by 1.
take the same pointer on the linked list and keep incrementing this by 2. This pointer will traverse at twice the speed and would meet the pointer which is been incremented by 1. is they meet this at one point this is a circular linked list.this same idea can be extended to find the centre point of a linked list(not necessarily circular)
Sign in to post your reply or Sign up for a free account.
Similar topics
by: surender |
last post by:
Hi,
Let us think that we have 100 nodes in the single linked list.
I have only 50th node address and i don't have the first node address
but i want to print the 49th node data. So how can we print...
|
by: RAJASEKHAR KONDABALA |
last post by:
Hi,
Does anybody know what the fastest way is to "search for a value in a
singly-linked list from its tail" as oposed to its head?
I am talking about a non-circular singly-linked list, i.e.,...
|
by: John N. |
last post by:
Hi All,
Here I have a linked list each containing a char and is double linked.
Then I have a pointer to an item in that list which is the current
insertion point.
In this funtion, the user...
|
by: Goh, Yong Kwang |
last post by:
I'm currently doing a project that has a array that supposed to be
determined only at runtime.
Originally, the prototype I did as a proof of theory (or a quick hack)
So one method is to create a...
|
by: Kieran Simkin |
last post by:
Hi all,
I'm having some trouble with a linked list function and was wondering if
anyone could shed any light on it. Basically I have a singly-linked list
which stores pid numbers of a process's...
|
by: serge calderara |
last post by:
Dear all,
What is the proper way to check if two object are equal ?
I do not mean equal on Object type only but also object value's
thnaks for help
regards
serge
|
by: sathishc58 |
last post by:
Hi
Can anyone explain me the difference between circular linked list and looped linked list?
1) In Circular linked list Next part of last node will be pointing to the first nodes starting...
|
by: Himanshu Chauhan |
last post by:
Hi!
I was wondering, In the first parse of a singly linked list of unknown
length, is it possible to know when we are at middle of the linked list?
Regards
--Himanshu
|
by: kalyan |
last post by:
Hi,
I am using Linux + SysV Shared memory (sorry, but my question is all
about offset + pointers and not about linux/IPC) and hence use
offset's instead on pointers to store the linked list in...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |