Hi,
I am using tr1/unordered_map in my code.
My code compiled ok on g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu1). Now I
need to compile my code on g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
I get a messy error. Here are what I try to do:
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
....
StringHash::const_iterator word_pos;
I get the error when I create the const_iterator:
index.cc:161: error: no matching function for call to
‘Internal::hashtable_iterator<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int>, true,
false>::hashtable_iterator()’
Removing const from the iterator does not make any difference.
I tried to add const to string:
typedef unordered_map<const string, unsignedStringHash;
....
typedef set<unsignedWordLevelEntrySet;
typedef pair<StringHash::const_iterator, WordLevelEntrySetWordLevelEntry;
And the error moves to another place but is also on const_iterator:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3/tr1/hashtable:
In instantiation of ‘Internal::hash_code_base<const
std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char,
std::pair<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char, unsigned int>,
Internal::extract1st<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int,
std::equal_to<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char >, std::tr1::hash<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char >,
Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false>’:
Is probably something that has been fixed or improved between the
versions. Is there any workaround?
Thanks a lot,
Ray
6  8578 
Rares Vernica wrote:
Hi,
I am using tr1/unordered_map in my code.
My code compiled ok on g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu1). Now I
need to compile my code on g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
I get a messy error. Here are what I try to do:
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
...
StringHash::const_iterator word_pos;
I get the error when I create the const_iterator:
index.cc:161: error: no matching function for call to
‘Internal::hashtable_iterator<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int>, true,
false>::hashtable_iterator()’
Removing const from the iterator does not make any difference.
I tried to add const to string:
typedef unordered_map<const string, unsignedStringHash;
...
typedef set<unsignedWordLevelEntrySet;
typedef pair<StringHash::const_iterator, WordLevelEntrySetWordLevelEntry;
And the error moves to another place but is also on const_iterator:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3/tr1/hashtable:
In instantiation of ‘Internal::hash_code_base<const
std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char,
std::pair<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char, unsigned int>,
Internal::extract1st<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int,
std::equal_to<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char >, std::tr1::hash<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char >,
Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false>’:
Is probably something that has been fixed or improved between the
versions. Is there any workaround?
Thanks a lot,
Ray
I will need to check if I have the tr1 headers and see if I can
duplicate your errors since I am locked down on 4.0.1. It would
really suck if I cannot use them either. I'll get back to you on
this on Monday if you can wait :) BTW, do you know if G++ people
already puts the tr1 headers in the 4.0.1 dist?
As a workaround you can use ext/hash_map that the G++ folks provide.
Since it is not a widely accepted norm they namespaced it which
makes your code less portable :)
HTH
Rares Vernica wrote:
Hi,
I am using tr1/unordered_map in my code.
My code compiled ok on g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu1). Now I
need to compile my code on g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
I get a messy error. Here are what I try to do:
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
...
StringHash::const_iterator word_pos;
I get the error when I create the const_iterator:
index.cc:161: error: no matching function for call to
‘Internal::hashtable_iterator<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int>, true,
false>::hashtable_iterator()’
Removing const from the iterator does not make any difference.
I tried to add const to string:
typedef unordered_map<const string, unsignedStringHash;
...
typedef set<unsignedWordLevelEntrySet;
typedef pair<StringHash::const_iterator, WordLevelEntrySetWordLevelEntry;
And the error moves to another place but is also on const_iterator:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3/tr1/hashtable:
In instantiation of ‘Internal::hash_code_base<const
std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char,
std::pair<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char, unsigned int>,
Internal::extract1st<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int,
std::equal_to<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char >, std::tr1::hash<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char >,
Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false>’:
Is probably something that has been fixed or improved between the
versions. Is there any workaround?
Thanks a lot,
Ray
Woah this is way odd but based on my tests,
unordered_map::iterator has no default constructor.
This is what you seem to be encountering. I am not
sure if that is a bug on G++'s part or not or if
TR1 specifies that it need not be default constructible.
--------------------------------------------------------
#include <tr1/unordered_map>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
using namespace std::tr1;
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
int
main()
{
StringHash myHashTable;
// assume you added some stuff in it
StringHash::const_iterator iter( myHashTable.begin() );
}
Piyo wrote:
Rares Vernica wrote:
>Hi,
I am using tr1/unordered_map in my code.
My code compiled ok on g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu1). Now I
need to compile my code on g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
I get a messy error. Here are what I try to do:
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
...
StringHash::const_iterator word_pos;
I get the error when I create the const_iterator:
index.cc:161: error: no matching function for call to
‘Internal::hashtable_iterator<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int>, true,
false>::hashtable_iterator()’
Removing const from the iterator does not make any difference.
I tried to add const to string:
typedef unordered_map<const string, unsignedStringHash;
...
typedef set<unsignedWordLevelEntrySet;
typedef pair<StringHash::const_iterator, WordLevelEntrySet>
WordLevelEntry;
And the error moves to another place but is also on const_iterator:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3/tr1/hashtable:
In instantiation of ‘Internal::hash_code_base<const
std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>
>, std::pair<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char, unsigned int>,
Internal::extract1st<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int,
std::equal_to<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char >, std::tr1::hash<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char >,
Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false>’:
Is probably something that has been fixed or improved between the
versions. Is there any workaround?
Thanks a lot,
Ray
Woah this is way odd but based on my tests,
unordered_map::iterator has no default constructor.
This is what you seem to be encountering. I am not
sure if that is a bug on G++'s part or not or if
TR1 specifies that it need not be default constructible.
--------------------------------------------------------
#include <tr1/unordered_map>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
using namespace std::tr1;
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
int
main()
{
StringHash myHashTable;
// assume you added some stuff in it
StringHash::const_iterator iter( myHashTable.begin() );
}
Yes, it seems that the iterator does not have a default constructor.
I hope I am wrong. :)
Thanks,
Ray
On 28 fév, 00:07, Rares Vernica <rvern...@gmail.comwrote:
Piyo wrote:
Rares Vernica wrote:
Hi,
I am using tr1/unordered_map in my code.
My code compiled ok on g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu1). Now I
need to compile my code on g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
I get a messy error. Here are what I try to do:
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
...
StringHash::const_iterator word_pos;
I get the error when I create the const_iterator:
index.cc:161: error: no matching function for call to
'Internal::hashtable_iterator<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int>, true,
false>::hashtable_iterator()'
Removing const from the iterator does not make any difference.
I tried to add const to string:
typedef unordered_map<const string, unsignedStringHash;
...
typedef set<unsignedWordLevelEntrySet;
typedef pair<StringHash::const_iterator, WordLevelEntrySet>
WordLevelEntry;
And the error moves to another place but is also on const_iterator:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3/tr1/hashtable:
In instantiation of 'Internal::hash_code_base<const
std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>
, std::pair<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char, unsigned int>,
Internal::extract1st<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int,
std::equal_to<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char >, std::tr1::hash<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char >,
Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false>':
Is probably something that has been fixed or improved between the
versions. Is there any workaround?
Thanks a lot,
Ray
Woah this is way odd but based on my tests,
unordered_map::iterator has no default constructor.
This is what you seem to be encountering. I am not
sure if that is a bug on G++'s part or not or if
TR1 specifies that it need not be default constructible.
--------------------------------------------------------
#include <tr1/unordered_map>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
using namespace std::tr1;
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
int
main()
{
StringHash myHashTable;
// assume you added some stuff in it
StringHash::const_iterator iter( myHashTable.begin() );
}
Yes, it seems that the iterator does not have a default constructor.
I hope I am wrong. :)
Thanks,
Ray
The TR1 only states that the unordered_map iterators are "of at least
the forward iterator category", so I guess they have to respect the
standard requirements (which in this case means that they should have
a default constructor, as per table 74 (§24.1.3)). I'd consider this
to be a bug in the TR1 implementation that comes with g++ (but that's
not like this implementation was complete) - unless I misundertood
something.
Regards,
-- Emmanuel Deloget
Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
On 28 fév, 00:07, Rares Vernica <rvern...@gmail.comwrote:
>Piyo wrote:
>>Rares Vernica wrote:
Hi,
I am using tr1/unordered_map in my code.
My code compiled ok on g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu1). Now I
need to compile my code on g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
I get a messy error. Here are what I try to do:
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
...
StringHash::const_iterator word_pos;
I get the error when I create the const_iterator:
index.cc:161: error: no matching function for call to
'Internal::hashtable_iterator<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int>, true,
false>::hashtable_iterator()'
Removing const from the iterator does not make any difference.
I tried to add const to string:
typedef unordered_map<const string, unsignedStringHash;
...
typedef set<unsignedWordLevelEntrySet;
typedef pair<StringHash::const_iterator, WordLevelEntrySet>
WordLevelEntry;
And the error moves to another place but is also on const_iterator:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3/tr1/hashtable:
In instantiation of 'Internal::hash_code_base<const
std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>
, std::pair<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char, unsigned int>,
Internal::extract1st<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char, unsigned int,
std::equal_to<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char >, std::tr1::hash<const std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char >,
Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false>':
Is probably something that has been fixed or improved between the
versions. Is there any workaround?
Thanks a lot,
Ray
Woah this is way odd but based on my tests,
unordered_map::iterator has no default constructor.
This is what you seem to be encountering. I am not
sure if that is a bug on G++'s part or not or if
TR1 specifies that it need not be default constructible.
--------------------------------------------------------
#include <tr1/unordered_map>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
using namespace std::tr1;
typedef unordered_map<string, unsignedStringHash;
int
main()
{
StringHash myHashTable;
// assume you added some stuff in it
StringHash::const_iterator iter( myHashTable.begin() );
}
Yes, it seems that the iterator does not have a default constructor.
I hope I am wrong. :)
Thanks,
Ray
The TR1 only states that the unordered_map iterators are "of at least
the forward iterator category", so I guess they have to respect the
standard requirements (which in this case means that they should have
a default constructor, as per table 74 (§24.1.3)). I'd consider this
to be a bug in the TR1 implementation that comes with g++ (but that's
not like this implementation was complete) - unless I misundertood
something.
Regards,
-- Emmanuel Deloget
If it is a bug then this bug appears in g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu
4.0.3-1ubuntu5) and was fixed on or before g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu
4.1.2-0ubuntu1).
Any workarounds for this bug?
Thanks a lot,
Ray
Rares Vernica wrote:
>
If it is a bug then this bug appears in g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu
I used 4.0.2 to diagnose this bug. So I think it even appears earlier.
Maybe even since the inception of the 4 series?
4.0.3-1ubuntu5) and was fixed on or before g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu
4.1.2-0ubuntu1).
Any workarounds for this bug?
- upgrade to 4.1.2 :)
- use ext/hash_map
- use dynamic allocation of iterators ie. "new" your iterator
and make sure to use std::tr1::shared_ptr!! :)
- always construct your iterators with stuff?
eg. unordered_map::iterator iter( foo.begin() ); This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: John Smith |
last post by:
Hey
I have some code which I've been using on Microsoft VC++ for some time. Now
I wanted to port my application to Mac OS X which offers gcc and the build
fails.
Here is the troublesome code:...
|
by: cayblood |
last post by:
Hello,
I have a vector of pointers to a class, like so:
vector<Node*> m_parents;
I'm having trouble creating an iterator to go through the elements in
this vector. Here is my syntax:
...
|
by: Prasad |
last post by:
HI,
I am a beginner in VC++..
I am trying to write a Win32 console application in visual studio..
I am using following header files..
#include <STRING>
using namespace std;
#include...
|
by: arnuld |
last post by:
in C++ Primer 4/3 Lippman says in chapter 3, section 3.3.1:
vector<stringsvec(10);
// 10 elements, each an empty string
here is the the code output & output from my Debian box running "gcc...
|
by: antani |
last post by:
Hi,
Why I get a error ?Please help me.
template <typename InterceptType>
class InterceptSet
{
public:
typedef vector< InterceptType >::iterator iterator;
| | |
by: antani |
last post by:
VolumeType::ISetType::iterator findFirstIteratorMarked(const
VolumeType::ISetType::iterator & it,const
VolumeType::ISetType::iterator & e_it)
{
VolumeType::ISetType::iterator _it=it;
while...
|
by: Juha Nieminen |
last post by:
I'm actually not sure about this one: Does the standard guarantee
that if there's at least one element in the data container, then
"--container.end()" will work and give an iterator to the last...
|
by: utab |
last post by:
Dear all,
I was experimenting with a template taking two iterators for the range
of
a vector.(Perhaps, it is sth simple and I am missing it because it is
a
late hour.) I ran into problems in...
|
by: abir |
last post by:
Hi,
I has a vector<intand i want to have some additional data
associated with a few locations in the vector.
i.e I want to have unordered_map<vector<int>::iterator, MyClass>
so that given a...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
| | |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| | |
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
