URGENT HELP REQUIRED FOR SIEBEL - PLEASE

[Blackspeech]

We have Siebel running in a test environment and experiencing problems
as described below:

We receive automated trouble ticket information from a Remedy based
system that emails Siebel and expects to have a Service Request
assigmnment returned after the email is received and duly processed.

The issue is a little tricky in that if the Service Package Name in the
pre-formatted email contains more than one word the service request
(SR) is not generated within Siebel. i.e.

ABDCDE is fine

ABCDE FGHIJ is not.
I am not a techincal person, but rtaher someone who has a very big
interest in seeing this one resolved. I would appreciate any pointers
at all.

Many thanks in advance.

[Richard Heathfield]

Blackspeech said:

We have Siebel running in a test environment and experiencing problems
as described below:

<snip>

>
I am not a techincal person, but rtaher someone who has a very big
interest in seeing this one resolved. I would appreciate any pointers
at all.

Here's one: http://www.oracle.com/siebel/index.html

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: normal service will be restored as soon as possible. Please do not
adjust your email clients.

[Tor Rustad]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

Blackspeech said:

We have Siebel running in a test environment and experiencing
problems as described below:

<snip>

Here's one: http://www.oracle.com/siebel/index.html

I would like a link, showing me the connection to ISO C...!

--
Tor <torust AT online DOT no>

[Blackspeech]

Tor Rustad wrote:

Richard Heathfield wrote:

Blackspeech said:

We have Siebel running in a test environment and experiencing
problems as described below:

<snip>

Here's one: http://www.oracle.com/siebel/index.html

I would like a link, showing me the connection to ISO C...!

--
Tor <torust AT online DOT no>

Aplologies if this post is out of place.

[osmium]

"Tor Rustad" writes:

Richard Heathfield wrote:

>Blackspeech said:

We have Siebel running in a test environment and experiencing
problems as described below:

<snip>

>Here's one: http://www.oracle.com/siebel/index.html

I would like a link, showing me the connection to ISO C...!

comp.lang.c.moderated will eliminate those annoying, helpful posts so you
don't have to waste your valuable time on nonsense.

[Richard Heathfield]

Tor Rustad said:

Richard Heathfield wrote:

>Blackspeech said:

We have Siebel running in a test environment and experiencing
problems as described below:

<snip>

>Here's one: http://www.oracle.com/siebel/index.html

I would like a link, showing me the connection to ISO C...!

Since the question was OT here, I redirected the OP to a place where he is
more likely to get help. I couldn't find a relevant newsgroup, so I found a
Web site instead, but nevertheless it was a redirection. Is that not SOP?

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: normal service will be restored as soon as possible. Please do not
adjust your email clients.

[Mark McIntyre]

On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:14:25 -0800, in comp.lang.c , "osmium"
<r1********@comcast.netwrote:

>comp.lang.c.moderated will eliminate those annoying, helpful posts so you
don't have to waste your valuable time on nonsense.

You volunteering to moderate?
Et quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

[Ben Pfaff]

Mark McIntyre <ma**********@spamcop.netwrites:

On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:14:25 -0800, in comp.lang.c , "osmium"
<r1********@comcast.netwrote:

>>comp.lang.c.moderated will eliminate those annoying, helpful posts so you
don't have to waste your valuable time on nonsense.

You volunteering to moderate?
Et quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

clcm already has a moderator.
--
int main(void){char p[]="ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuv wxyz.\
\n",*q="kl BIcNBFr.NKEzjwCIxNJC";int i=sizeof p/2;char *strchr();int putchar(\
);while(*q){i+=strchr(p,*q++)-p;if(i>=(int)sizeof p)i-=sizeof p-1;putchar(p[i]\
);}return 0;}

[Mark McIntyre]

On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:51:36 -0800, in comp.lang.c , Ben Pfaff
<bl*@cs.stanford.eduwrote:

>Mark McIntyre <ma**********@spamcop.netwrites:

>On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:14:25 -0800, in comp.lang.c , "osmium"
<r1********@comcast.netwrote:

>>>comp.lang.c.moderated will eliminate those annoying, helpful posts so you
don't have to waste your valuable time on nonsense.

You volunteering to moderate?
Et quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

clcm already has a moderator.

didn't even know it really existed - don't think my newsfeed carries
it.
--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

[Keith Thompson]

Richard Heathfield <in*****@invalid.invalidwrites:

Tor Rustad said:

>Richard Heathfield wrote:

>>Blackspeech said:
We have Siebel running in a test environment and experiencing
problems as described below:

<snip>

>>Here's one: http://www.oracle.com/siebel/index.html

I would like a link, showing me the connection to ISO C...!

Since the question was OT here, I redirected the OP to a place where he is
more likely to get help. I couldn't find a relevant newsgroup, so I found a
Web site instead, but nevertheless it was a redirection. Is that not SOP?

I'd recommend mentioning that it's off-topic in addition to providing
the link. Otherwise, the OP might be left with the impression that
comp.lang.c is a good place to ask about Siebel (whatever that is).

Of course, you can always count on *someone* to make that point.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

[Richard Heathfield]

Keith Thompson said:

Richard Heathfield <in*****@invalid.invalidwrites:

<snip>

>>
Since the question was OT here, I redirected [...]

I'd recommend mentioning that it's off-topic in addition to providing
the link. Otherwise, the OP might be left with the impression that
comp.lang.c is a good place to ask about Siebel (whatever that is).

Of course, you can always count on *someone* to make that point.

And I did, and you did. :-)

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: normal service will be restored as soon as possible. Please do not
adjust your email clients.

[Blackspeech]

Moderators as this is off-topic please remove the posting that I made -
apologies to all.

On Nov 15, 12:51 am, Richard Heathfield <[e-mail]>
wrote:

Keith Thompson said:

Richard Heathfield <[e-mail]:<snip>

Since the question was OT here, I redirected [...]

I'd recommend mentioning that it's off-topic in addition to providing
the link. Otherwise, the OP might be left with the impression that
comp.lang.c is a good place to ask about Siebel (whatever that is).

Of course, you can always count on *someone* to make that point.And I did, and you did. :-)

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: normal service will be restored as soon as possible. Please do not
adjust your email clients.

[Keith Thompson]

"Blackspeech" <da***********@gmail.comwrites:

Moderators as this is off-topic please remove the posting that I made -
apologies to all.

Please don't top-post. Read the following:

http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/topposting.php

There are no moderators. comp.lang.c is an unmoderated group. (There
is a corresponding moderated group, comp.lang.c.moderated.)

Don't worry about removing the original post; it's neither possible
nor necessary. (Well, it might be possible, but not reliably.)

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

[Default User]

Blackspeech wrote:

Moderators as this is off-topic please remove the posting that I made
- apologies to all.

As Keith mentioned, there are no moderators. You can "delete" the
message from Google, but that only really removes it from their
archives.


Brian

[Tor Rustad]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

Tor Rustad said:

I would like a link, showing me the connection
to ISO C...!

<snip>

Since the question was OT here, I redirected the
OP to a place where he is more likely to get help.

Strange, once upon a time, there was a poster here
that even flamed Dennis M Ritchie for less.

;-)

--
Tor <torust AT online DOT no>

[Richard Heathfield]

Tor Rustad said:

Richard Heathfield wrote:

>Tor Rustad said:

I would like a link, showing me the connection
to ISO C...!

<snip>

>Since the question was OT here, I redirected the
OP to a place where he is more likely to get help.

Strange, once upon a time, there was a poster here
that even flamed Dennis M Ritchie for less.

;-)

Tsk, tsk...

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: normal service will be restored as soon as possible. Please do not
adjust your email clients.

[Spiros Bousbouras]

Keith Thompson wrote:

"Blackspeech" <da***********@gmail.comwrites:

Moderators as this is off-topic please remove the posting that I made -
apologies to all.

Don't worry about removing the original post; it's neither possible
nor necessary. (Well, it might be possible, but not reliably.)

Removing it from where ? Usenet posts are reproduced
on several servers , are they not ?

[Random832]

2006-11-15 <11**********************@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>,
Spiros Bousbouras wrote:

Keith Thompson wrote:

>"Blackspeech" <da***********@gmail.comwrites:

Moderators as this is off-topic please remove the posting that I made -
apologies to all.

Don't worry about removing the original post; it's neither possible
nor necessary. (Well, it might be possible, but not reliably.)

Removing it from where ? Usenet posts are reproduced
on several servers , are they not ?

It's _possible_ to send another message instructing all servers to
remove the first. This has historically been abused, so many servers
will ignore it.

[Mark McIntyre]

On 15 Nov 2006 14:04:55 -0800, in comp.lang.c , "Spiros Bousbouras"
<sp****@gmail.comwrote:

>Keith Thompson wrote:

>"Blackspeech" <da***********@gmail.comwrites:

Moderators as this is off-topic please remove the posting that I made -
apologies to all.

Don't worry about removing the original post; it's neither possible
nor necessary. (Well, it might be possible, but not reliably.)

Removing it from where ? Usenet posts are reproduced
on several servers , are they not ?

Its theoretically possible to send a cancel, this is propagated just
as the original message is and causes it to be deleted from any server
that honours the request. Not many servers do.

--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan