473,245 Members | 1,553 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,245 software developers and data experts.

Historical Turbo C 1.5 (1987)

I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some historical
research I'm doing into computing from that time period.

Oct 18 '06 #1
16 3437

sc***@skwc.com wrote:
I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some historical
research I'm doing into computing from that time period.
Might be at:

http://community.borland.com/museum/

Oct 18 '06 #2
Ancient_Hacker wrote:
sc***@skwc.com wrote:
I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some historical
research I'm doing into computing from that time period.

Might be at:

http://community.borland.com/museum/
No :(

The earliest version they have is 2.x. The museum seems to have been
abandoned - a posting said 1.0 and 1.5 were "soon" to be added, but
then the museum was closed.

Oct 18 '06 #3
Turbo C 1.0 and 1.5 were different from 2.0 -- by the time 2.0 came
out, Borland was switching to its "classic" blue window that was seen
from that point onward. Version 1 had the black background in Turbo
Basic 1.1 and Turbo Prolog 2, which were contemporaries. By the time
Turbo C 2 came out, the black background products were gone - the main
Turbo C and Turbo Pascal got the "classic" look in their next releases.
For historical accuracy in screen grabs and something I'm writing, I
would like to be able to do screen captures of 1.5. I have been unable
to find it at the Borland museum, Vetusware.com, eMule, etc although
almost all other versions are available; I haven't even seen it for
sale. (Note: The museum has Turbo *C++* 1.0, which is OFTEN mislabeled
as "Turbo C 1.0". The Turbo C labelled as 1.0 at Vetusware.com is
actually 2.0.) The only hope I have is if someone has a copy...

I am also not sure if 1.5 implements the then-draft ANSI standard. I am
eager to look into the header files and see if it does. 2.0, which was
released in 1988, seems to adhere to what was still (I think) a draft
standard at the time it came out. The 1.5 release may still have been a
K&R compiler. (The 1.0 release is said to be extremely buggy - 1.5 was
a release that apparently was more a bug fix than anything else.)

Oct 18 '06 #4
On 18 Oct 2006 04:02:18 -0700, sc***@skwc.com wrote:
>I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some historical
research I'm doing into computing from that time period.
Ask in alt.folklore.computers. They can probably help with the
research, too.

--
Al Balmer
Sun City, AZ
Oct 18 '06 #5

sc***@skwc.com wrote:
I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some historical
research I'm doing into computing from that time period.
If the state of things in 1987 counts as "historical research" I don't
know what that makes many of us ...

Oct 18 '06 #6
"J. J. Farrell" <jj*@bcs.org.ukwrites:
sc***@skwc.com wrote:
>I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some historical
research I'm doing into computing from that time period.

If the state of things in 1987 counts as "historical research" I don't
know what that makes many of us ...
Old.

(Sorry.)

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
Oct 18 '06 #7
Keith Thompson wrote:
"J. J. Farrell" <jj*@bcs.org.ukwrites:
>>sc***@skwc.com wrote:
>>>I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some historical
research I'm doing into computing from that time period.

If the state of things in 1987 counts as "historical research" I don't
know what that makes many of us ...


Old.

(Sorry.)
almost fossilized (why be sorry?, be gratefull)
Oct 19 '06 #8
"J. J. Farrell" wrote:
sc***@skwc.com wrote:
>I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some
historical research I'm doing into computing from that time period.

If the state of things in 1987 counts as "historical research" I
don't know what that makes many of us ...
I've found out every time I looked for a job in the past 20 years.

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Oct 19 '06 #9

J. J. Farrell wrote:
If the state of things in 1987 counts as "historical research" I don't
know what that makes many of us ...
Anything in the past is historical research :) I'm waiting until I
finish this to start on future research :)

Oct 19 '06 #10
J. J. Farrell <jj*@bcs.org.ukwrote:
If the state of things in 1987 counts as "historical research" I don't
know what that makes many of us ...
I was watching "Gumby" in 1987, so I wouldn't know :-)

--
C. Benson Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
cbmanica(at)gmail.com | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.
Oct 19 '06 #11
Sjouke Burry wrote:
>
Keith Thompson wrote:
"J. J. Farrell" <jj*@bcs.org.ukwrites:
>sc***@skwc.com wrote:

I am looking for a copy of Turbo C 1.5 from 1987 for some historical
research I'm doing into computing from that time period.

If the state of things in 1987 counts as "historical research" I don't
know what that makes many of us ...

Old.

(Sorry.)
almost fossilized (why be sorry?, be gratefull)
ITYM "FOSSILized".

--
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | #include |
| kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | <std_disclaimer.h|
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------+
Don't e-mail me at: <mailto:Th*************@gmail.com>
Oct 19 '06 #12
Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
>
J. J. Farrell <jj*@bcs.org.ukwrote:
If the state of things in 1987 counts as "historical research" I don't
know what that makes many of us ...

I was watching "Gumby" in 1987, so I wouldn't know :-)
I wrote my first computer program when the Apollo 16 astronauts
were still in training.

--
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | #include |
| kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | <std_disclaimer.h|
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------+
Don't e-mail me at: <mailto:Th*************@gmail.com>
Oct 19 '06 #13

sc***@skwc.com 写道:
Turbo C 1.0 and 1.5 were different from 2.0 -- by the time 2.0 came
out, Borland was switching to its "classic" blue window that was seen
from that point onward. Version 1 had the black background in Turbo
Basic 1.1 and Turbo Prolog 2, which were contemporaries. By the time
Turbo C 2 came out, the black background products were gone - the main
Turbo C and Turbo Pascal got the "classic" look in their next releases.
For historical accuracy in screen grabs and something I'm writing, I
would like to be able to do screen captures of 1.5. I have been unable
to find it at the Borland museum, Vetusware.com, eMule, etc although
almost all other versions are available; I haven't even seen it for
sale. (Note: The museum has Turbo *C++* 1.0, which is OFTEN mislabeled
as "Turbo C 1.0". The Turbo C labelled as 1.0 at Vetusware.com is
actually 2.0.) The only hope I have is if someone has a copy...

I am also not sure if 1.5 implements the then-draft ANSI standard. I am
eager to look into the header files and see if it does. 2.0, which was
released in 1988, seems to adhere to what was still (I think) a draft
standard at the time it came out. The 1.5 release may still have been a
K&R compiler. (The 1.0 release is said to be extremely buggy - 1.5 was
a release that apparently was more a bug fix than anything else.)

Could you tell me what is a K&R compiler?(I know them, but what is the
compiler?)

Oct 19 '06 #14
ne**********@gmail.com wrote:
Could you tell me what is a K&R compiler?(I know them, but what is the
compiler?)
A compiler which implements the pre-ANSI C language as described in the
original K&R 1978 book. The most noticeable difference is the lack of
function prototypes. By 1987, the ANSI C standard was well into draft
format, and the function prototypes had been borrowed from C++. Turbo C
1.0 and 1.5 seem to both implement the standard as much as possible.

I have found several compilers which predate ANSI C for the IBM PC. One
is the original MIX C (not Power C, which they still sell, it
implements the ANSI standard). I contacted MIX, who are still in
business, and they no longer have copies (!) of their original C
compiler. If anyone has it, I'd be very interested in trying it, too.
There is something called C88 which is a K&R C compiler which was NOT
released in 88, but much earlier - don't know where the 88 comes from.
There is a Digital Research C (and PL/I! wild!) compiler for DOS which
is also K&R. Many "small c" dialects and interpreters are also K&R. I
don't know about Microsoft, since I've never found any of their early C
compilers. The only one I have ever had was C/C++ 7 which was very late
(mid-90s). There are many other C compilers, of course. I've just found
a few.

I'm also looking for Zortech C++ 1.0 from 1988. It was the first native
DOS C++ compiler and is historically extremely important, but the
earliest version on the net is 3.1 from the mid 90s. An epoch-marking
release like this needs to be someplace accessible before it is totally
forgotten.

Scott

PS: I never used an IBM PC until I got out of college - I had a high
school programming class in 1987 that used BASICA on IBM PCs for
programming - it was a Pascal class, but they got rid of the Apple II e
computers with Apple Instant Pascal during the Christmas break, and had
new IBM PCs with no software! So I missed a lot of the era I am
researching. I learned C on DEC Ultrix and SPARC machines in college.

Oct 19 '06 #15
Op 19 Oct 2006 09:49:44 -0700 schreef sc***@skwc.com:

<snip>
There is something called C88 which is a K&R C compiler which was NOT
released in 88, but much earlier - don't know where the 88 comes from.
I think it refers to the 8088, the first CPU used in the PC.
Possibly a development of a hypothetical(?) C80 for the 8080, if that would
have existed.
--
Coos
Oct 19 '06 #16
To conclude the thread, I have found copies of the software in question
(early Turbo C) and a longer thread about it is in
alt.folklore.computers if anyone is interested in the details.

Oct 23 '06 #17

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

6
by: Developwebsites | last post by:
I am taking advanced C++ at college and we use Borland Turbo C++ 4.5 compiler. How different is Turbo C++ from the standard C++? I know Borland used to call their versions of C++ and Pascal Turbo,...
3
by: Erwin | last post by:
I have a work assignment in which I have to put a historical archive within access which can be used for trendlines etc. It contains data about month, service percentages and numbers. Within a...
7
by: marek | last post by:
Dear colleagues, for one project, I need to link Turbo (or Borland) Pascal with (Turbo) C code. I would strongly like to avoid rewriting (my) C routines to Pascal (other part of project is under...
3
by: riku | last post by:
Does any1 know a site where i can download Turbo Pascal for free and is not a trial version. If you do, can u please tell me?
1
by: anonymous | last post by:
i wrote a graphical program in turbo c 3.0 ,it runs safe on turbo 3.0,(however i'm using xp) so when i wanted to run it for my teacher,both turbo c & program crashed; so i decided to compile it in...
0
by: anonymous | last post by:
i wrote a graphical program in turbo c 3.0 ,it runs safe on turbo 3.0,(however i'm using xp) so when i wanted to run it for my teacher,both turbo c & program crashed; so i decided to compile it in...
4
by: Herhor | last post by:
Recently Borland has been hyping its new line of RADs called "Turbo" as an ultimate tool for beginning programmers. Are these products really match for Microsoft's "Visual Studio"?
3
by: postrishi | last post by:
Hello Everybody , I am a new user. I am currently using Turbo C++ 3.0 editor in my engg.Can you tell me or post me a ebook on turbo c++ and NOT on c or C++.MInd it I want a book on TURBO C++ editor...
4
by: Abe Kobei | last post by:
Hello. Is there an official website to obtain Turbo C 1.0? I know that I can download Turbo C 2.0 from Borland, but I want a smaller version, because I expect that older is smaller. I want...
0
by: abbasky | last post by:
### Vandf component communication method one: data sharing ​ Vandf components can achieve data exchange through data sharing, state sharing, events, and other methods. Vandf's data exchange method...
2
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 7 Feb 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:30 (7.30PM). In this month's session, the creator of the excellent VBE...
0
by: fareedcanada | last post by:
Hello I am trying to split number on their count. suppose i have 121314151617 (12cnt) then number should be split like 12,13,14,15,16,17 and if 11314151617 (11cnt) then should be split like...
0
by: stefan129 | last post by:
Hey forum members, I'm exploring options for SSL certificates for multiple domains. Has anyone had experience with multi-domain SSL certificates? Any recommendations on reliable providers or specific...
0
Git
by: egorbl4 | last post by:
Скачал я git, хотел начать настройку, а там вылезло вот это Что это? Что мне с этим делать? ...
1
by: davi5007 | last post by:
Hi, Basically, I am trying to automate a field named TraceabilityNo into a web page from an access form. I've got the serial held in the variable strSearchString. How can I get this into the...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
Hello Experts! I have written a code in MS Access for a cmd called "WhatsApp Message" to open WhatsApp using that very code but the problem is that it gives a popup message everytime I clicked on...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
So, I have written a code for a cmd called "Send WhatsApp Message" to open and send WhatsApp messaage. The code is given below. Dim IE As Object Set IE =...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.