Bug in compiler?

[Daniel T.]

In my compiler, the following works and does as expected:

#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

int main()
{
using namespace std;
istream_iterator<char> inBegin(cin);
istream_iterator<char> inEnd;
vector<char> vec( inBegin, inEnd );
copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

Whereas the following doesn't compile:

#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
istream_iterator<char>() );
copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

main.cpp:11: error: request for member `begin' in
`vec(std::istream_iterator<char, char, std::char_traits<char>,
ptrdiff_t>, std::istream_iterator<char, char, std::char_traits<char>,
ptrdiff_t> (*)())', which is of non-aggregate type `std::vector<char,
std::allocator<char> > ()(std::istream_iterator<char, char,
std::char_traits<char>, ptrdiff_t>, std::istream_iterator<char, char,
std::char_traits<char>, ptrdiff_t> (*)())'

Is this a bug in the compiler, or something else?

--
Magic depends on tradition and belief. It does not welcome observation,
nor does it profit by experiment. On the other hand, science is based
on experience; it is open to correction by observation and experiment.

[Sumit Rajan]

"Daniel T." <po********@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:po******************************@news.east.ea rthlink.net...

#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
istream_iterator<char>() );
The above line changes to:
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin), (istream_iterator<char>()) );
copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}
Is this a bug in the compiler, or something else?

No, the extra set of parenthesis is required.

Regards,
Sumit.
--
Sumit Rajan <su****@msdc.hcltech.com>

[Sumit Rajan]

"Sumit Rajan" <su*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44************@individual.net...

"Daniel T." <po********@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:po******************************@news.east.ea rthlink.net...

#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
istream_iterator<char>() );

The above line changes to:
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
(istream_iterator<char>()) );

copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

Is this a bug in the compiler, or something else?

No, the extra set of parenthesis is required.

Sorry, I should have explained further.

This is because the compiler could consider vec to be a function declaration
of a function that returns a vector<char>. It would take two parameters --
the first one being an istream_iterator<char> and the second one being a
unnamed function type taking no arguments and returning an
istream_iterator<char>.

Regards,
Sumit.
--
Sumit Rajan <su****@msdc.hcltech.com>

[Daniel T.]

In article <44************@individual.net>,
"Sumit Rajan" <su*********@gmail.com> wrote:

"Daniel T." <po********@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:po******************************@news.east.ea rthlink.net...

#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
istream_iterator<char>() );

The above line changes to:
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin), (istream_iterator<char>()) );

copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

Is this a bug in the compiler, or something else?

No, the extra set of parenthesis is required.

Still doesn't work...

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
(istream_iterator<char>()) ); // extra parens
copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

main.cpp:27: error: parse error before `)' token

The error points to the vector<char> line...
--
Magic depends on tradition and belief. It does not welcome observation,
nor does it profit by experiment. On the other hand, science is based
on experience; it is open to correction by observation and experiment.

[Sumit Rajan]

"Daniel T." <po********@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:po******************************@news.east.ea rthlink.net...

Still doesn't work...

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
(istream_iterator<char>()) ); // extra parens
copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

Can you tell me which compiler you are using? I've managed to compile it
using VC++ 8.0, Comeau C++ , mingw 3.4.2 and VC++ 7.1.

Regards,
Sumit.
--
Sumit Rajan <su****@msdc.hcltech.com>

[Victor Bazarov]

Daniel T. wrote:

In article <44************@individual.net>,
"Sumit Rajan" <su*********@gmail.com> wrote:

"Daniel T." <po********@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:po******************************@news.east. earthlink.net...

#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
istream_iterator<char>() );

The above line changes to:
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin), (istream_iterator<char>()) );

copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

Is this a bug in the compiler, or something else?

No, the extra set of parenthesis is required.

Still doesn't work...

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
(istream_iterator<char>()) ); // extra parens
copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

main.cpp:27: error: parse error before `)' token

The error points to the vector<char> line...

Are you sure? I just tested your code with Comeau online and it compiles
fine. The only difference from the originally posted code is the added
parentheses around the second argument passed to construct 'vec' object.

Could it be you're using a faulty compiler?

V
--
Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail

[Daniel T.]

In article <44************@individual.net>,
"Sumit Rajan" <su*********@gmail.com> wrote:

"Daniel T." <po********@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:po******************************@news.east.ea rthlink.net...

Still doesn't work...

int main()
{
using namespace std;
vector<char> vec( istream_iterator<char>(cin),
(istream_iterator<char>()) ); // extra parens
copy( vec.begin(), vec.end(), ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", ") );
cout << '\n';
}

Can you tell me which compiler you are using? I've managed to compile it
using VC++ 8.0, Comeau C++ , mingw 3.4.2 and VC++ 7.1.

I'm using apples Xcode IDE which uses GCC 3.3 on the back-end.

--
Magic depends on tradition and belief. It does not welcome observation,
nor does it profit by experiment. On the other hand, science is based
on experience; it is open to correction by observation and experiment.

[Thomas Tutone]

Daniel T. wrote:

Can you tell me which compiler you are using? I've managed to compile it
using VC++ 8.0, Comeau C++ , mingw 3.4.2 and VC++ 7.1.

I'm using apples Xcode IDE which uses GCC 3.3 on the back-end.

<OT>

gcc's standard conformance got much better starting with gcc 3.4.

Quoting from http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html:

"G++ is now much closer to full conformance to the ISO/ANSI C++
standard. This means, among other things, that a lot of invalid
constructs which used to be accepted in previous versions will now be
rejected. It is very likely that existing C++ code will need to be
fixed. This document lists some of the most common issues. A
hand-written recursive-descent C++ parser has replaced the YACC-derived
C++ parser from previous GCC releases. The new parser contains much
improved infrastructure needed for better parsing of C++ source codes,
handling of extensions, and clean separation (where possible) between
proper semantics analysis and parsing. The new parser fixes many bugs
that were found in the old parser."

Sounds like it's time for you to upgrade.

</OT>

Best regards,

Tom