Seg fault!: passing vector<vector<i nt> > to a function

[danielhdez14142]

Some time ago, I had a segment of code like

vector<vector<i nt example;
f(example);

and inside f, I defined vector<int>'s and used push_back to get them
inside example. I got a segmentation fault which I resolved by doing

vector<vector<i nt example;
example.push_ba ck(vector<int>( ));
f(example);

I also remember that when debugging, I got the segmentation fault
right at the function call. I wonder why is it that I needed to do
this when the original code works if I had had a

vector<intexamp le
f(example)

and just pushed back integers inside f

I'm sorry because I don't have the actual code, this is a question
I'va had for a long time now and I simply don't have the code, but the
question is, can I pass vectors of vectors to a function without
initialising them and why if the answer is no?
Thanks

Daniel

[Victor Bazarov]

da************* @gmail.com wrote:

Some time ago, I had a segment of code like

vector<vector<i nt example;
f(example);

and inside f, I defined vector<int>'s and used push_back to get them
inside example. I got a segmentation fault which I resolved by doing

vector<vector<i nt example;
example.push_ba ck(vector<int>( ));
f(example);

There is no reason for this code to have undefined behaviour. The
usual UB cause is the attempted use of non-existent vector contents.
If you pushed an empty vector, that empty vector does not acquire
any 'int' elements until you push them too.

I also remember that when debugging, I got the segmentation fault
right at the function call.

Well, my memory is also known to fail me now and then. No need to
worry.

I wonder why is it that I needed to do
this when the original code works if I had had a

vector<intexamp le
f(example)

and just pushed back integers inside f

I'm sorry because I don't have the actual code, this is a question
I'va had for a long time now and I simply don't have the code, but the
question is, can I pass vectors of vectors to a function without
initialising them and why if the answer is no?

You _can_ pass vectors. They are not "without initialising". They
are *default-initialised*. They don't contain any elements, that's
true. So any attempted use of operator[] will most likely fail.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

[David Harmon]

On 9 Feb 2007 04:59:24 -0800 in comp.lang.c++,
"da************ *@gmail.com" <da************ *@gmail.comwrot e,

>and inside f, I defined vector<int>'s and used push_back to get them
inside example. I got a segmentation fault which I resolved by doing

vector<vector< int example;
example.push_b ack(vector<int> ());
f(example);

Inside f() you probably do the equivalent of
example[0].push_back(42);

This fails if example[0] hasn't been created!