How Can I init array m_obj in class MyContainer?

[recover]

class Obj
{
public:
Obj(int a){}
}

class MyContainer
{
private:
Obj m_obj[10];
public:
MyContainer(){}
}

How Can I init array m_obj in class MyContainer? (not use std::vector).
What I have to do can make these code pass complied?

----------------------------
Co.:beijing lingtu Co.
Ad.: beijing haidian
ZIP£º 100094
Tel.: [phone]£*8006
Mobile:
Mail£ºzh******* ***@lingtu.com
MSN: re********@hotm ail.com
comp£º http://www.lingtu.com/
lingtu online:http://www.51ditu.com/
--------------------------

[Ondra Holub]

recover napsal:

class Obj
{
public:
Obj(int a){}
}

class MyContainer
{
private:
Obj m_obj[10];
public:
MyContainer(){}
}

How Can I init array m_obj in class MyContainer? (not use std::vector).
What I have to do can make these code pass complied?

----------------------------
Co.:beijing lingtu Co.
Ad.: beijing haidian
ZIP£º 100094
Tel.: [phone]£*8006
Mobile:
Mail£ºzh******* ***@lingtu.com
MSN: re********@hotm ail.com
comp£º http://www.lingtu.com/
lingtu online:http://www.51ditu.com/
--------------------------

Items in array are initiated with default constructor. You can provide
some function (let's say Create) which performs same initialization as
would be in ordinary constructor. Or you can assign to every array item
new instance created with your own non-default constructor. Or you can
use std::vector.

[Salt_Peter]

recover wrote:

class Obj
{
public:
Obj(int a){}
}

;

>
class MyContainer
{
private:
Obj m_obj[10];
public:
MyContainer(){}
}

;

>
How Can I init array m_obj in class MyContainer? (not use std::vector).
What I have to do can make these code pass complied?

Why not std::vector? It would simplify, enhance and empower your code.

A primitive array invokes the default constructor of each element. So
if you write class Obj properly, the elements of the array will be
initialized by its def ctor.

class Obj
{
int a;
public:
Obj() : a(0) { } // def ctor
};

template< typename T, const size_t Size >
class Container
{
T m_array[Size];
public:
Container() { }
};

int main()
{
Container< Obj, 5 container;
}

With a std::vector, the above container would be dynamic (resizeable)
and you could use any ctor, not just a def ctor. In release mode, that
vector is most likely to outperform the array as well.

[Grizlyk]

recover wrote:

How Can I init array m_obj in class MyContainer? (not use std::vector).
What I have to do can make these code pass complied?

You need provide default ctor, and it seems to me, that it is not
useful property of C++. It can be better, if one can init C-style array
with any concrete ctor
concrete_class ptr=new concrete_class( params)[size];
or
concrete_class ptr=new[size] concrete_class( params);

[recover]

"recover" <zh**********@l ingtu.comsaid

class Obj
{
public:
Obj(int a){}
}

class MyContainer
{
private:
Obj m_obj[10];
public:
MyContainer(){}
}

"Ondra Holub" <on*********@po st.czsaid

>>Items in array are initiated with default constructor.

In some case,Obj must not have default constructor,or the default
constructor has other use.

>>You can provide some function (let's say Create) which performs same

initialization as
would be in ordinary constructor.
this may be a good idea,if I can modify the class Obj. But if I dont't have
the code of "class Obj",I import it from some lib or dll .Or the code of
"clas Obj" is borrowed from others,I havn't right change these code.

>>Or you can assign to every array item new instance created with your own

non-default constructor.
I cant't full understand this line. Can you give me some example?

>>Or you can use std::vector.

some complier doesn't support stl, may be in embeded equipment.So I can't
use std::vector.

Thanks a lot.

[recover]

"Salt_Peter " <pj*****@yahoo. comwrote

>
Why not std::vector? It would simplify, enhance and empower your code.

With a std::vector, the above container would be dynamic (resizeable)
and you could use any ctor, not just a def ctor. In release mode, that
vector is most likely to outperform the array as well.

some complier doesn't support stl, may be in embeded equipment.So I can't
use std::vector.

[recover]

"Grizlyk" wrote

You need provide default ctor, and it seems to me, that it is not
useful property of C++. It can be better, if one can init C-style array
with any concrete ctor
concrete_class ptr=new concrete_class( params)[size];
or
concrete_class ptr=new[size] concrete_class( params);

Yes ,I like write like this.
class Obj
{
public:
Obj(int a){}
}

class MyContainer
{
private:
//Init in here is better??Why c++ can't support this?
Obj m_obj[3]={?Obj(3), Obj(7), Obj(4)?};
public:
MyContainer(){}
}

[Grizlyk]

recover wrote:

You need provide default ctor, and it seems to me, that it is not
useful property of C++. It can be better, if one can init C-style array
with any concrete ctor
concrete_class ptr=new concrete_class( params)[size];

Obj m_obj[3]={?Obj(3), Obj(7), Obj(4)?};

No, I was speaking about calling during "new[]" (after memory
allocation has been done) for each member of array concrete ctor (equal
for each member), instead of default ctor.