I found the example code below, listed in the book described here: http://cartan.cas.suffolk.edu/moin/OopDocbookWiki
The result was a bit surprising. I guess it falls into the category
of "that's what you get for lying". Can the behavior demonstrated be
explained in standardese? Yes, I know the exact result is "undefined
behavior". I can see what happened. But what was the actual violation?
// Miles are converted to kilometers.
#include <QTextStream>
QTextStream cin(stdin, QIODevice::Read Only);
QTextStream cout(stdout, QIODevice::Writ eOnly);
QTextStream cerr(stderr, QIODevice::Writ eOnly);
const double m2k = 1.609; // conversion constant
inline double mi2km(int miles) {
return (miles * m2k);
}
int main() {
int miles;
double kilometers;
cout << "Enter distance in miles: " << flush;
cin >miles ;
kilometers = mi2km(miles);
cout << "This is approximately "
<< static_cast<int >(kilometers)
<< "km."<< endl;
cout << "Without the cast, kilometers = "
<< kilometers << endl;
double* dp = const_cast<doub le*>(&m2k);
cout << "m2k: " << m2k << endl;
cout << "&m2k: " << &m2k << " dp: " << dp << endl;
cout << "*dp: " << *dp << endl;
*dp = 1.892; /* What are we attempting to do here?*/
cout << "Can we reach this statement? " << endl;
return 0;
}
/*OUT
Enter distance in miles: 23
This is approximately 37km.
Without the cast, kilometers = 37.007
m2k: 1.609
&m2k: 0x8049048 dp: 0x8049048
*dp: 1.609
Segmentation fault
*/
--
NOUN:1. Money or property bequeathed to another by will. 2. Something handed
down from an ancestor or a predecessor or from the past: a legacy of
religious freedom. ETYMOLOGY: MidE legacie, office of a deputy, from OF,
from ML legatia, from L legare, to depute, bequeath. www.bartleby.com/61/
Dec 9 '06
15 1858
Steven T. Hatton wrote:
The authors are saying that[*] "const int is in stack storage class". I
believe that is old-timer talk meaning 'automatic variable' but I'm not
sure. I have a couple of observations about the code above, and the result
of executing it. The addresses of all the variables which were printed
prior to the segfault are the same. The segfault happened when the
variable was placed at global scope. If nothing else, it shows that
undefined behavior is undefined.
Compiler writers will take any opportunity they can for optimsiation.
If they are allowed to not provide any storage for a const then they
will try not to do so if its within the rules!. The better the compiler
the more likely it is.
regards
Andy Little
Steven T. Hatton wrote:
I know what Stroustrup had to say about mutable. He thinks it is almost
always a bad idea because it defeats the purpose of const. But the same
goes for const_cast only more so.
They are different because mutable doesnt cause undefined behaviour,
whereas const_cast is practically asking for it.
Mutable is safe whereas const is not, but it probably means that big
opportunities for optimisation are thrown away. I have used it once
IIRC, when I should probably have changed the design.
regards
Andy Little
Kai-Uwe Bux wrote:
Steven T. Hatton wrote:
>John Carson wrote:
>>"Steven T. Hatton" <ch********@ger mania.supwrote in message news:c_****** *************** *********@speak easy.net I found the example code below, listed in the book described here: http://cartan.cas.suffolk.edu/moin/OopDocbookWiki
The result was a bit surprising. I guess it falls into the category of "that's what you get for lying". Can the behavior demonstrated be explained in standardese? Yes, I know the exact result is "undefined behavior". I can see what happened. But what was the actual violation?
// Miles are converted to kilometers. #include <QTextStream>
QTextStrea m cin(stdin, QIODevice::Read Only); QTextStrea m cout(stdout, QIODevice::Writ eOnly); QTextStrea m cerr(stderr, QIODevice::Writ eOnly);
const double m2k = 1.609; // conversion constant
inline double mi2km(int miles) { return (miles * m2k); }
int main() { int miles; double kilometers; cout << "Enter distance in miles: " << flush; cin >miles ; kilometers = mi2km(miles); cout << "This is approximately " << static_cast<int >(kilometers) << "km."<< endl; cout << "Without the cast, kilometers = " << kilometers << endl; double* dp = const_cast<doub le*>(&m2k); cout << "m2k: " << m2k << endl; cout << "&m2k: " << &m2k << " dp: " << dp << endl; cout << "*dp: " << *dp << endl; *dp = 1.892; /* What are we attempting to do here?*/ cout << "Can we reach this statement? " << endl; return 0; }
/*OUT Enter distance in miles: 23 This is approximately 37km. Without the cast, kilometers = 37.007 m2k: 1.609 &m2k: 0x8049048 dp: 0x8049048 *dp: 1.609 Segmentati on fault */
Deleting the irrelevant, you have:
It's often nice to have something that actually compiles and runs. Compiling the code using the Standard Library would take a trivial amount of effort.
>>const double m2k = 1.609;
int main() { double* dp = const_cast<doub le*>(&m2k); *dp = 1.892; return 0; }
Thus dp points to a const variable
What does the Standard specify it should point to, or is that specified?
It is specified in [5.2.11/3].
"For two pointer types T1 and T2 where
T1 is cv1 , 0 pointer to cv1 , 1 pointer to . . . cv1 ,n ? 1 pointer to
cv1 ,n T
and
T2 is cv2 , 0 pointer to cv2 , 1 pointer to . . . cv2 ,n ? 1 pointer to
cv2 ,n T
where T is any object type or the void type and where cv1 ,k and cv2 ,k may
be different cv-qualifications, an rvalue of type T1 may be explicitly
converted to the type T2 using a const_cast. The result of a pointer
const_cast refers to the original object."
>
>>and you attempt to change that const variable using a dereferenced dp.
The operating system has presumably stored m2k in a read-only section of memory, so raises a segmentation fault when you attempt to write to that memory.
As I sated, I understand what happened. I'm just not sure what rule was violated.
The code has undefined behavior according to [7.1.5.1/4].
"Except that any class member declared mutable (7.1.1) can be modified, any
attempt to modify a const object during its lifetime (3.8) results in
undefined behavior."
So if an object is defined non-const,
int obj;
and passed through a const reference
void foo(const int& cobj){
//cobj is a const reference to a non-const object
}
the object in the body of the function to which it was passed was itself not
declared const. (cobj is a const reference to non-const obj) But the author
of a function who casts away constness has no a priori means of knowing
whether what will be passed will be const.
I guess all of the above means I can't complain about anything that happens
after *pL = 101;
void el() {
const int L = 99;
int * pL = const_cast<int* >(&L);
*pL = 101;
cout << L << '\t' << &L << endl;
cout << *pL << '\t' << pL << endl;
}
>I guess I go back to slogging my way through the artful prose of the formal arcana of the Standard.
Thanks!
--
NOUN:1. Money or property bequeathed to another by will. 2. Something handed
down from an ancestor or a predecessor or from the past: a legacy of
religious freedom. ETYMOLOGY: MidE legacie, office of a deputy, from OF,
from ML legatia, from L legare, to depute, bequeath. www.bartleby.com/61/
"kwikius" <an**@servocomm .freeserve.co.u kwrote in
news:11******** **************@ l12g2000cwl.goo glegroups.com:
>
Steven T. Hatton wrote:
>What does the Standard specify it should point to, or is that specified?
The only time you can use const_cast on some object reference is when
you *know* that the real object is not const. Any const cast on a
physically const object results in undefined behaviour. The better
option on stuff you *own* is to use mutable: That is my understanding
anyway:
Uh, not true. Casting away the constness of the physically const object is
fine. It's when one attempts to then modify the object is when Undefined
Behaviour occurs.
Steven T. Hatton wrote:
Kai-Uwe Bux wrote:
[snip]
>The code has undefined behavior according to [7.1.5.1/4].
"Except that any class member declared mutable (7.1.1) can be modified,
any attempt to modify a const object during its lifetime (3.8) results in
undefined behavior."
So if an object is defined non-const,
int obj;
and passed through a const reference
void foo(const int& cobj){
//cobj is a const reference to a non-const object
}
the object in the body of the function to which it was passed was itself
not declared const. (cobj is a const reference to non-const obj) But the
author of a function who casts away constness has no a priori means of
knowing whether what will be passed will be const.
It's even worse: because of 8.3.5/5 the programmer cannot even be sure that
the passed parameter object binds directly to the const reference; a
temporary copy could be created. Once you access this through const_cast,
you may just modify the temporary.
There is, as far as I can see, only one valid use of const_cast: you can use
it to define a member function returning a non-const reference / pointer to
non-const exposing a member in terms of a const member function that
exposes const access to that member. This can avoid code duplication, e.g.,
when implementing smart pointers.
[snip]
Best
Kai-Uwe Bux
Andre Kostur wrote:
Uh, not true. Casting away the constness of the physically const
object is fine. It's when one attempts to then modify the object
is when Undefined Behaviour occurs.
Of course, you are right. But what's the point of casting constness
away if you don't modify the object? (note that I'm not including
poorly written libraries or APIs that are not const-correct)
This is the very same problem as reinterpret_cas t: you can cast
anything to whatever you like as long as you cast it back to the
original type *before* trying to access the object.
IMO this is bad programming practice and should be avoided by any
means (unless you really have to cope with poorly written external
libraries).
Cheers,
--
IR This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Steven T. Hatton |
last post by:
This is something I've been looking at because it is central to a currently
broken part of the KDevelop new application wizard. I'm not complaining
about it being broken, It's a CVS images. Such things happen. The whole
subsystem is going through radical changes. I don't really want to say
what I think of the code just yet. That would influence the opinions of
others, and I really want to know how other people view these things,...
|
by: Alfonso Morra |
last post by:
I have written the following code, to test the concept of storing
objects in a vector. I encounter two run time errors:
1). myClass gets destructed when pushed onto the vector
2). Prog throws a "SEGV" when run (presumably - attempt to delete
deleted memory.
Please take a look and see if you can notice any mistakes I'm making.
Basically, I want to store classes of my objects in a vector. I also
have three further questions:
|
by: damian birchler |
last post by:
Hi
I'm wondering of what type a structure is. Of course, it is a
_structure_, but an array isn't an _array_ either. So of what type is
a structure? I'd say a pointer, am I right?
|
by: weaselboy1976 |
last post by:
Hello
How can I print a pointer's value directly (without assigning the
value to another variable)? For example:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int *zp;
|
by: Alexei A. Frounze |
last post by:
Hi all,
I have a question regarding the gcc behavior (gcc version 3.3.4).
On the following test program it emits a warning:
#include <stdio.h>
int aInt2 = {0,1,2,4,9,16};
int aInt3 = {0,1,2,4,9};
| |
by: Itay_k |
last post by:
Hello,
I want a member in my class that will save pointer to pointer to
System::Drawing::Image class.
When I write on my class code:
System::Drawing::Image **bmp;
I get this error message:
error C3160: 'bmp' : cannot declare interior __gc pointer or reference as a
|
by: David Mathog |
last post by:
I have a program for which this line:
if(! lstrtol(&atoken,length-2,(long *) &(lclparams->pad)) ||
(lclparams->pad< 0)){
generates the warning below, but ONLY if the gcc compiler is at -O2 or
-O3. I don't see any reason why optimization should change things much
in this piece of code - there's no way to optimize it out and I have
verified that this particular line does what it should no matter how the
program is compiled. Anyway,...
|
by: marvinla |
last post by:
Hello!
I'm a beginner in C, and I'm having trouble with a pointer-to-pointer
reallocation.
This piece of code works well, but Valkyrie warns some parts (pointed
below), and is
breaking my real code.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
|
by: Summercool |
last post by:
Can we confirm the following? also someone said, Java also has
"reference" like in C++, which is an "implicit pointer":
Pointer and Reference
---------------------
I am starting to see what pointer and reference are and how they
relate
to each other.
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |