Hi,
Somebody recently asked me to implement the sizeof operator, i.e. to
write a function that accepts a parameter of any type, and without
using the sizeof operator, should be able to return the size occupied
by that datatype in memory in bytes. Thanks :)
Abhishek Srivastava 32 2564
* Abhishek Srivastava:
>
Somebody recently asked me to implement the sizeof operator, i.e. to
write a function that accepts a parameter of any type, and without
using the sizeof operator, should be able to return the size occupied
by that datatype in memory in bytes. Thanks :)
This sounds like HOMEWORK.
One must hope that nobody provides source code for you (although they
invariably do, to show off their ability to code trivial things).
Hint: array.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Abhishek Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Somebody recently asked me to implement the sizeof operator, i.e. to
write a function that accepts a parameter of any type, and without
using the sizeof operator, should be able to return the size occupied
by that datatype in memory in bytes. Thanks :)
Note that the difference in address between two adjacent elements of an
array is equal to the size of an element.
Tom
Hi Alf P. Steinbach :)
This is not homework. Just wanted to know because I couldn't think of
the solution. Hmmmm.... your hint is to use an array, still pondering
over that. Thanks anyway.
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* Abhishek Srivastava:
Somebody recently asked me to implement the sizeof operator, i.e. to
write a function that accepts a parameter of any type, and without
using the sizeof operator, should be able to return the size occupied
by that datatype in memory in bytes. Thanks :)
This sounds like HOMEWORK.
One must hope that nobody provides source code for you (although they
invariably do, to show off their ability to code trivial things).
Hint: array.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Abhishek Srivastava posted:
Hi,
Somebody recently asked me to implement the sizeof operator, i.e. to
write a function that accepts a parameter of any type, and without
using the sizeof operator, should be able to return the size occupied
by that datatype in memory in bytes. Thanks :)
Abhishek Srivastava
#include <cstddef>
template<class T>
struct SizeOfHelper {
T array[2];
};
#define SizeOf(T) offsetof(SizeOf Helper<T>, array[1])
I don't mind doing this homework question for people, because it's
utterly pointless.
--
Frederick Gotham
Frederick Gotham wrote:
Abhishek Srivastava posted:
>>Hi,
Somebody recently asked me to implement the sizeof operator, i.e. to write a function that accepts a parameter of any type, and without using the sizeof operator, should be able to return the size occupied by that datatype in memory in bytes. Thanks :)
Abhishek Srivastava
#include <cstddef>
template<class T>
struct SizeOfHelper {
T array[2];
};
#define SizeOf(T) offsetof(SizeOf Helper<T>, array[1])
I don't mind doing this homework question for people, because it's
utterly pointless.
Your implementation is incorrect in any case. offsetof is only defined
for POD types.
Tom
Abhishek Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Somebody recently asked me to implement the sizeof operator, i.e. to
write a function that accepts a parameter of any type, and without
using the sizeof operator, should be able to return the size occupied
by that datatype in memory in bytes.
Interesting story.
Thanks :)
What for?
Tom Widmer posted:
Your implementation is incorrect in any case. offsetof is only defined
for POD types.
Yes, and thankfully, my type is a POD.
--
Frederick Gotham
Frederick Gotham wrote:
Tom Widmer posted:
>Your implementation is incorrect in any case. offsetof is only defined for POD types.
Yes, and thankfully, my type is a POD.
There's a second problem too; offsetof is defined for
member-designators, and "array[1]" isn't a member-designator.
Tom
Frederick Gotham wrote:
Tom Widmer posted:
>Your implementation is incorrect in any case. offsetof is only defined for POD types.
Yes, and thankfully, my type is a POD.
Do you mean SizeOfHelper<Ti s a POD type? It is a POD type if and
only if T is a POD type.
Tom This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Roy Yao |
last post by:
Does it mean "(sizeof(int))* (p)" or "sizeof( (int)(*p) )" ?
According to my analysis, operator sizeof, (type) and * have the same
precedence, and they combine from right to left. Then this expression should
equal to "sizeof( (int)(*p) )", but the compiler does NOT think so. Why?
Can anyone help me? Thanks.
Best regards.
Roy
|
by: Anjali M |
last post by:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int number = 10;
printf("Number is: %d\n", number);
printf("Sizeof of number is: %d\n", sizeof(number++));
printf("Number now is: %d\n", number);
|
by: dam_fool_2003 |
last post by:
#include<stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
unsigned int a=20,b=50, c = sizeof b+a;
printf("%d\n",c);
return 0;
}
out put:
24
|
by: Rajan |
last post by:
Hi,
I am trying to simulate a memcpy like this
void* mem_cpy(void* dest, void* src, int bytes)
{
dest = malloc(bytes);
}
Now if I want to copy the bytes from src to dest, how do I copy these
bytes.
I am stuck here.
|
by: cogno_byte |
last post by:
Hi all !!
I need to know that in C how to implement sizeof() without using the
keyword?
The implementation should be generic.
e.g
malloc(sizeof(struct));
Here the sizeof() returns the number of bytes reserved and is a
reserved keyword which calls a function through the library function.
But i want to implement the working of sizeof() without using the
| |
by: k04jg02 |
last post by:
I was thinking that it would be cool if a programming language could
implement an array type in its standard library rather than depending
on arrays being a builtin type. I wondered if C++ could do this.
Obviously, writing a class that just used a C array under the hood
would be cheating. As would simply allocating a big chunk of memory on
the heap -- for it to be a true equivalent of a C array it should be
allocate memory on the stack.
...
|
by: Howard Bryce |
last post by:
I have come across code containing things like
sizeof int
How come that one can invoke sizeof without any parentheses surrounding
its argument? Is this admissible within the standard? Can it in general be
done with one argument functions? Why would one want to do it anyway,
other than showing that one knows and to save two characters?
|
by: junky_fellow |
last post by:
Hi,
Is it possible to implement sizeof as a C function ?
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| |
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |