Initializing multidimensiona l arrays in constructor

[Allan A.]

Hi all. Is there any way to initialize an entire array in the constructor.
The code below does not work. Thanks.

class x {
public:
int array[2][2];
x();

};

x::x() {
array = {{1,2},{3,4}};
}

[Ivan Vecerina]

"Allan A." <AA@alphaville. com> wrote in message
news:dt******** *@news4.newsguy .com...
: Hi all. Is there any way to initialize an entire array in the
constructor.

No, unfortunately, not in the current version of the C++ standard.
[ it is being proposed to allow this in the next revision of
the standard, but this is still years away. See for example
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...2005/n1919.pdf ]

: The code below does not work. Thanks.
:
: class x {
: public:
: int array[2][2];
: x();
:
: };
:
: x::x() {
: array = {{1,2},{3,4}};
: }

The actual (proposed) syntax for an initialization would
look like:
x::x()
: array( {{1,2},{3,4}} )
{ }

The example your provided uses assignment, not initialization,
to set the contents of the array. It could become legal as
well if(/once) the above proposal is integrated in the standard.
Equivalent code can (and has) be written today as individual
assignments to each element of the array.
Ivan
--
http://ivan.vecerina.com/contact/?subject=NG_POST <- email contact form
Brainbench MVP for C++ <> http://www.brainbench.com

[Jay_Nabonne]

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:37:53 +0000, Allan A. wrote:

Hi all. Is there any way to initialize an entire array in the constructor.
The code below does not work. Thanks.

class x {
public:
int array[2][2];
x();

};

x::x() {
array = {{1,2},{3,4}};
}

You could do this:

x::x() {
static int initData[2][2] = {{1,2},{3,4}};
memcpy(array, initData, sizeof(array));
}

- Jay

[mlimber]

Allan A. wrote:

Hi all. Is there any way to initialize an entire array in the constructor.
The code below does not work. Thanks.

class x {
public:
int array[2][2];
x();

};

x::x() {
array = {{1,2},{3,4}};
}

You could use vector< vector<int> > and do something similar to this:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....75a9bd905b06c0

Then the member could even be const if desired.

Cheers! --M