Question about the operator<<

[Yudan Yi \(OSU\)]

I have a question to define a friend operator<< for a class.
for example, I can define
friend ostream& operator<<(ostr eam& os, const TTest& x) { ...; return
(os); };

While I want to add more control to the output by an additional parameter,
can I do in the following way?
friend ostream& operator<<(ostr eam& os, const TTest& x, unsigned parameter)
{
switch (parameter)
{
case: ...
}
return (os);
};

If I can define in this way, then how can I use it? if not, how can I do it?

Thanks

[Bob Hairgrove]

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:43:42 -0500, "Yudan Yi \(OSU\)" <yi***@osu.ed u>
wrote:

I have a question to define a friend operator<< for a class.
for example, I can define
friend ostream& operator<<(ostr eam& os, const TTest& x) { ...; return
(os); };

While I want to add more control to the output by an additional parameter,
can I do in the following way?
friend ostream& operator<<(ostr eam& os, const TTest& x, unsigned parameter)
{
switch (parameter)
{
case: ...
}
return (os);
};

If I can define in this way, then how can I use it? if not, how can I do it?

You can't change the signature of the function because it won't work
otherwise. How would you call it?

Maybe you can make the parameter part of TTest's class, in which case
you can test it inside the body of the operator. Since it is a friend
of TTest, it has access to all of its private and protected members.

--
Bob Hairgrove
No**********@Ho me.com

[roberts.noah]

Yudan Yi (OSU) wrote:

I have a question to define a friend operator<< for a class.
for example, I can define
friend ostream& operator<<(ostr eam& os, const TTest& x) { ...; return
(os); };

While I want to add more control to the output by an additional parameter,
can I do in the following way?
No. << is a binary operator.
friend ostream& operator<<(ostr eam& os, const TTest& x, unsigned parameter)
{
switch (parameter)
{
case: ...
}
return (os);
};

If I can define in this way, then how can I use it? if not, how can I do it?

Define a function that takes three parameters and call it.

[Dietmar Kuehl]

Yudan Yi (OSU) wrote:

While I want to add more control to the output by an additional parameter,
can I do in the following way?

No: the 'operator<<()' is a binary function. Assuming you want to
add some form of format control for 'TTest' to your stream, you
can store the format using the 'iword()' or 'pword()' members of
the stream. This could look e.g. like this:

int key = std::ostream::x alloc();

std::ostream& mode1(std::ostr eam& out) {
out.iword(key) = 1;
return out;
}
std::ostream& mode2(std::ostr eam& out) {
out.iword(key) = 2;
return out;
}
// ...

friend ostream& operator<<(ostr eam& os, TTest const& x)
{
switch (os.iword(key))
{
case 1: // ...
case 2: // ...
case 0: // this is the initial value of 'os.iword(key)'
default: // ...
}
return out;
}

You would use it like this:

void print(TTest const& x) {
std::cout << "default format: " << x << "\n";
std::cout << "format 1: " << mode1 << x << "\n";
std::cout << "format 2: " << mode2 << x << "\n";
}
--
<mailto:di***** ******@yahoo.co m> <http://www.dietmar-kuehl.de/>
<http://www.eai-systems.com> - Efficient Artificial Intelligence