My personal K&R (3rd edition) wish list:
1. That a 3rd edition is actually published!
2. Make any and all corrections from earlier editions.
3. Update to comply with the c99 Standard.
4. A reference to other C books to aid the programmer.
5. A listing of C related web sites.
6. For ease of use, an appendix of tables used in the text.
7. Make an appendix with the full ascii table.
8. Make an appendix that includes a C Programming FAQ.
9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple).
10. Even with the additions proposed, BREVITY must be maintained. 83 3099
"newby2c" <se******@juno. com> writes: My personal K&R (3rd edition) wish list:
1. That a 3rd edition is actually published! 2. Make any and all corrections from earlier editions. 3. Update to comply with the c99 Standard. 4. A reference to other C books to aid the programmer.
Umm, ok.
5. A listing of C related web sites.
I don't think a hardcopy book is the best place for a list of web
sites. There's already a web page for the book.
6. For ease of use, an appendix of tables used in the text. 7. Make an appendix with the full ascii table.
That's not really C, but it has a chapter on Unix so I guess I
wouldn't mind.
8. Make an appendix that includes a C Programming FAQ. 9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple).
Then instructors couldn't assign questions from the book as class
exercises. I've seen a "C Answer Book"; putting the anwers in a
separate book seems like a good compromise.
10. Even with the additions proposed, BREVITY must be maintained.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
newby2c wrote: My personal K&R (3rd edition) wish list:
1. That a 3rd edition is actually published! 2. Make any and all corrections from earlier editions. 3. Update to comply with the c99 Standard. 4. A reference to other C books to aid the programmer. 5. A listing of C related web sites. 6. For ease of use, an appendix of tables used in the text. 7. Make an appendix with the full ascii table. 8. Make an appendix that includes a C Programming FAQ. 9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple). 10. Even with the additions proposed, BREVITY must be maintained.
Sounds wonderful. After Mr. K. and Mr. R. have done all
the work to produce this marvelous new thing, please tell me
where I can download it for free. In Urdu, if possible.
--
Eric Sosman es*****@acm-dot-org.invalid
In article <11************ **********@g47g 2000cwa.googleg roups.com>,
newby2c <se******@juno. com> writes My personal K&R (3rd edition) wish list:
1. That a 3rd edition is actually published!
There are other books out there already.
When K&R did V 1 it was their language.
When they did V2 they were major players in the panel that did it.
Now C99 is produced by a world wide group of panels... so a K&R3 would
be no more authoritative than many other books.
2. Make any and all corrections from earlier editions. 3. Update to comply with the c99 Standard.
OK but there are no widely used compilers working to this.
4. A reference to other C books to aid the programmer.
Here is the competition, buy these? Besides new books come put all the
time and other go out of print all the time.
5. A listing of C related web sites.
These change daily. As do their content and accuracy
6. For ease of use, an appendix of tables used in the text.
OK
7. Make an appendix with the full ascii table.
Why? A waste of paper. This is available "everywhere "
8. Make an appendix that includes a C Programming FAQ.
That is already a separate book by some one else.
9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple).
No thanks. It is a reference book No questions let alone answers.
10. Even with the additions proposed, BREVITY must be maintained.
"Everything " in half the size.
Don't want much do you?
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ ch***@phaedsys. org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Keith Thompson wrote: 9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple).
Then instructors couldn't assign questions from the book as class exercises.
That's a good point.
newby2c
Chris Hills wrote: 1. That a 3rd edition is actually published! There are other books out there already.
And this is why a 3rd edition should not be published? According to
your statement then, you think the 2nd edition should not have been
published.
When K&R did V 1 it was their language.
When they did V2 they were major players in the panel that did it.
Now C99 is produced by a world wide group of panels... so a K&R3 would be no more authoritative than many other books.
That may be true, but I still don't see why a 3rd edition could not be
done. 4. A reference to other C books to aid the programmer. Here is the competition, buy these? Besides new books come put all the time and other go out of print all the time.
This is a joke, right? 99.9% of the books I own, have references to
other texts within them. 5. A listing of C related web sites. These change daily. As do their content and accuracy
Good point. 7. Make an appendix with the full ascii table.
Why? A waste of paper. This is available "everywhere "
Yes. However, it would be nice if the information needed could be found
in one source. Remember, this is *my* wishlist. Yours would, quite
naturally, be different. 8. Make an appendix that includes a C Programming FAQ.
That is already a separate book by some one else.
Again, it would be nice to have the info in *one* text. 9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple). No thanks. It is a reference book No questions let alone answers.
Ok, that's a personal preference. But if a book has questions (like K&R
does), then there should be answers. 10. Even with the additions proposed, BREVITY must be maintained. "Everything " in half the size.
Don't want much do you?
Again, this is *my* personal wishlist.
newby2c
In article <11************ **********@g49g 2000cwa.googleg roups.com>,
newby2c <se******@juno. com> writes Chris Hills wrote:
> > 1. That a 3rd edition is actually published! There are other books out there already.
And this is why a 3rd edition should not be published? According to your statement then, you think the 2nd edition should not have been published.
No. The second edition came out before the standard and was the first
book on C90. Now there are many books on C. When K&R did V 1 it was their language.
When they did V2 they were major players in the panel that did it.
Now C99 is produced by a world wide group of panels... so a K&R3 would be no more authoritative than many other books. That may be true, but I still don't see why a 3rd edition could not be done.
> 4. A reference to other C books to aid the programmer. Here is the competition, buy these? Besides new books come put all the time and other go out of print all the time.
This is a joke, right? 99.9% of the books I own, have references to other texts within them.
Not a joke. The references are just that. Reference the text make to
other books. Usually to a specific edition and page. It is not a list of
"other books".
All books have references to other material they cite. If they don't
reference other works directly then they don't list them.
What are you asking for? lists of other books on c that are not
specifically referenced in the text? Then my point stands. > 5. A listing of C related web sites. These change daily. As do their content and accuracy
Good point.
> 7. Make an appendix with the full ascii table.
Why? A waste of paper. This is available "everywhere "
Yes. However, it would be nice if the information needed could be found in one source. Remember, this is *my* wishlist. Yours would, quite naturally, be different.
OK. > 8. Make an appendix that includes a C Programming FAQ.
That is already a separate book by some one else.
Again, it would be nice to have the info in *one* text.
Then you want two books in one volume? > 9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple). No thanks. It is a reference book No questions let alone answers.
Ok, that's a personal preference. But if a book has questions (like K&R does), then there should be answers.
Agreed.
Though I prefer not questions at all. >10. Even with the additions proposed, BREVITY must be maintained. "Everything " in half the size.
Don't want much do you?
Again, this is *my* personal wishlist.
newby2c
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ ch***@phaedsys. org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Keith Thompson wrote: "newby2c" <se******@juno. com> writes: 9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple).
Then instructors couldn't assign questions from the book as class exercises. I've seen a "C Answer Book"; putting the anwers in a separate book seems like a good compromise.
The instructors should come up with their own damn problems for students
to solve!
Stan Milam wrote
(in article <ox************ ****@newssvr11. news.prodigy.co m>): Keith Thompson wrote: "newby2c" <se******@juno. com> writes:
9. Appendix of answers to questions (ala Tondo & Gimple).
Then instructors couldn't assign questions from the book as class exercises. I've seen a "C Answer Book"; putting the anwers in a separate book seems like a good compromise.
The instructors should come up with their own damn problems for students to solve!
We've seen plenty of examples of what happens when instructors
make up their own questions. They get posted here, then railed
on for being completely in violation of the holy C standard.
Given the quality of what is being taught today, they should
just stop bothering altogether.
--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"Randy Howard" <ra*********@FO OverizonBAR.net > wrote in message
news:00******** *************** ******@news.ver izon.net... We've seen plenty of examples of what happens when instructors make up their own questions. They get posted here, then railed on for being completely in violation of the holy C standard. Given the quality of what is being taught today, they should just stop bothering altogether.
"They should just stop bothering."
Perhaps we need to create a fund to pay people who can teach, the money
it is worth to do it. I would call it "taxes", but that has already been
taken.
Maybe Keith, Thomp's son, could spend less time criticizing humor (a
topic he is less than apt at) and teach a college course on "Dead Sea
Linguistics" at a local Community College.
--
Mabden This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: DrTebi |
last post by:
Hello,
I have the following problem:
I used to "encode" my email address within links, in order to avoid (most)
email spiders. So I had a link like this:
<a
href="mailto:DrTebi@yahoo.com">DrTebi</a>
This would work like a regular mailto link in any browser, but wouldn't be
visible to spiders if they don't have a function to decode it.
|
by: Thomas Scheffler |
last post by:
Hi,
I runned in trouble using XALAN for XSL-Transformation.
The following snipplet show what I mean:
<a href="http://blah.com/?test=test&test2=test2">Test1&</a>
<a href="http://blah.com/?test=test&amp;test2=test2">Test2&amp;</a>
This results in the following HTML Code:
|
by: johkar |
last post by:
When the output method is set to xml, even though I have CDATA around
my JavaScript, the operaters of && and < are converted to XML character
entities which causes errors in my JavaScript. I know that I could
externalize my JavaScript, but that will not be practical throughout
this application. Is there any way to get around this issue? Xalan
processor. Stripped down stylesheet below along with XHTML output.
<?xml version='1.0'?>...
|
by: Marco |
last post by:
Is there a wishlist for c# (or .Net) where we could
suggest changes or improvements ?
Mine is to have access to SmallChange property of Panel
scrollbars as well as access to theirs Scroll event.
Rgds.
_____
Marco
|
by: |
last post by:
I love the .NET framwework. Compared to mfc this is a dream to work with.
I would love if the C# and maybe other languages too, somehow gives more
friendly messages when executed on a machine with not .NET framework
installed.
* Some unmanaged startup stub in the generated executable would be nice.
Maybe a stub that starts up a web site telling you that this application
cannot be run and that you need to install the .NET framework in...
| |
by: Olaf Baeyens |
last post by:
Something for the C#/JIT wishlist.
I am looking at the generated IL Assembler code and the generated real x86
code and I am facinated about the quality of the generated code. It comes to
near c++ generated code without optimizing. The same type of code that you
would have if you use the VC 2003 C++ standard edition, that has no code
optimizer.
I do understand that optimizing this code in the JIT would be possible but
would also slow...
|
by: Arne |
last post by:
A lot of Firefox users I know, says they have problems with validation
where the ampersand sign has to be written as & to be valid. I don't
have Firefox my self and don't wont to install it only because of this,
so I hope some of you gurus can enlighten me with this :)
In what circumstances can the "&" in the source code be involuntary
changed to "&" by a browser when or other software, when editing and
uploading the file to the web...
|
by: InvalidLastName |
last post by:
We have been used XslTransform. .NET 1.1, for transform XML document, Dataset with xsl to HTML. Some of these html contents contain javascript and links. For example:
// javascript
if (a > b)
.....
// xsl contents
abc.aspx?p1=v1&p2=<xsl:value-of select="$v2" />
|
by: John Nagle |
last post by:
I've been parsing existing HTML with BeautifulSoup, and occasionally
hit content which has something like "Design & Advertising", that is,
an "&" instead of an "&". Is there some way I can get BeautifulSoup
to clean those up? There are various parsing options related to "&"
handling, but none of them seem to do quite the right thing.
If I write the BeautifulSoup parse tree back out with "prettify",
the loose "&" is still in there. So...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |