Which C libraries (current and historical) interpret a null pointer as
a pointer to a null (that is, empty) string?
11  2102 
Dennis Allison wrote: Which C libraries (current and historical) interpret a null pointer as
a pointer to a null (that is, empty) string?
There was at least one implementation (pre C-89), which
took great pains into putting 0x0 at location zero
in the data segment.
Thus, the NULL pointer (on that implemenation a zero)
would always point to a location with the contents '\0'
for a char *, and all zero bits for other pointers to
that location.
Needless to say, things broke in myriad ways when
code was ported to another implementation.
--
Ñ
"It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so
ingenious" - A. Bloch
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:13:35 GMT, Nick Landsberg <hu*****@NOSPAM .att.net>
wrote:
Dennis Allison wrote:
Which C libraries (current and historical) interpret a null pointer as
a pointer to a null (that is, empty) string?
There was at least one implementation (pre C-89), which
took great pains into putting 0x0 at location zero
in the data segment.
Thus, the NULL pointer (on that implemenation a zero)
would always point to a location with the contents '\0'
for a char *, and all zero bits for other pointers to
that location.
Needless to say, things broke in myriad ways when
code was ported to another implementation.
And even /that/ is more to the tune of "the platform tries to minimize the
potential damage in the case when a C program (user code or lib function)
mistakenly treats a null pointer as if it were a valid pointer to
something".
I get the feeling the OP was asking if there are/were any string-handling
libraries that always check for a special-case of 0 when handed a char *,
and do some reasonable thing in that case.
I don't know, but if there were then that would have to be considered some
sort of non-standard extension, and it might even be offensive to folks
using the string lib functions because it implies extra special-case
overhead that proper use of those pointers would have rendered unnecessary.
Anyway, as a postscript to Nick's remarks, I'm compelled to give out kudos
to the early MSVC team for establishing what I think was an excellent
little "hack" in their runtime system in debug mode: They place a magic
value at location zero, and after program execution check to see if it has
changed. If so, a nice diagnostic ("NULL pointer assignment...") is
emitted. This has probably saved me countless hours of head-scratching over
runtime meltdowns...
-leor
Leor Zolman
BD Software le**@bdsoft.com www.bdsoft.com -- On-Site Training in C/C++, Java, Perl & Unix
C++ users: Download BD Software's free STL Error Message
Decryptor at www.bdsoft.com/tools/stlfilt.html
Leor Zolman <le**@bdsoft.co m> writes: Anyway, as a postscript to Nick's remarks, I'm compelled to give out kudos
to the early MSVC team for establishing what I think was an excellent
little "hack" in their runtime system in debug mode: They place a magic
value at location zero, and after program execution check to see if it has
changed. If so, a nice diagnostic ("NULL pointer assignment...") is
emitted. This has probably saved me countless hours of head-scratching over
runtime meltdowns...
This has a much older history than MSVC. It was definitely in
even fairly early versions of Turbo C for DOS, and I don't
remember any claims that they invented the idea.
--
"To get the best out of this book, I strongly recommend that you read it."
--Richard Heathfield
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:14:06 -0800, Ben Pfaff <bl*@cs.stanfor d.edu> wrote: Leor Zolman <le**@bdsoft.co m> writes:
Anyway, as a postscript to Nick's remarks, I'm compelled to give out kudos
to the early MSVC team for establishing what I think was an excellent
little "hack" in their runtime system in debug mode: They place a magic
value at location zero, and after program execution check to see if it has
changed. If so, a nice diagnostic ("NULL pointer assignment...") is
emitted. This has probably saved me countless hours of head-scratching over
runtime meltdowns...
This has a much older history than MSVC. It was definitely in
even fairly early versions of Turbo C for DOS, and I don't
remember any claims that they invented the idea.
I didn't mean to imply they invented it, or even claimed they did. I'm just
happy the have it. Perhaps they're even due a few kudos just for being
willing to implement it even though they didn't "have" to, and/or in spite
of the fact someone might have chosen to come along and use it against them
(you know, MS-as-thief-of-other-people's-good-ideas and all that...)
-leor
Leor Zolman
BD Software le**@bdsoft.com www.bdsoft.com -- On-Site Training in C/C++, Java, Perl & Unix
C++ users: Download BD Software's free STL Error Message
Decryptor at www.bdsoft.com/tools/stlfilt.html
Leor Zolman wrote:
.... snip ...
I get the feeling the OP was asking if there are/were any string-
handling libraries that always check for a special-case of 0 when
handed a char *, and do some reasonable thing in that case.
I don't know, but if there were then that would have to be
considered some sort of non-standard extension, and it might even
be offensive to folks using the string lib functions because it
implies extra special-case overhead that proper use of those
pointers would have rendered unnecessary.
My implementations of strlcat and strlcpy (available on my site)
do just that, and have drawn criticism for it. Thus "strlcpy(s,
NULL, size);" will create an empty string in s. My attitude is to
avoid crashes whenever I can give a NULL argument a reasonable
interpretation.
--
Chuck F (cb********@yah oo.com) (cb********@wor ldnet.att.net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net> USE worldnet address!
CBFalconer <cb********@yah oo.com> spoke thus: My implementations of strlcat and strlcpy (available on my site)
do just that, and have drawn criticism for it. Thus "strlcpy(s,
NULL, size);" will create an empty string in s. My attitude is to
avoid crashes whenever I can give a NULL argument a reasonable
interpretation.
I'm not sure why you'd get criciticism - it sounds like very
convenient behavior to me. Oh wait, that's why you're getting
criticism ;)
--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cybers pace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 21:51:28 GMT, CBFalconer <cb********@yah oo.com> wrote: Leor Zolman wrote:
... snip ...
I get the feeling the OP was asking if there are/were any string-
handling libraries that always check for a special-case of 0 when
handed a char *, and do some reasonable thing in that case.
I don't know, but if there were then that would have to be
considered some sort of non-standard extension, and it might even
be offensive to folks using the string lib functions because it
implies extra special-case overhead that proper use of those
pointers would have rendered unnecessary.
My implementations of strlcat and strlcpy (available on my site)
do just that, and have drawn criticism for it. Thus "strlcpy(s,
NULL, size);" will create an empty string in s. My attitude is to
avoid crashes whenever I can give a NULL argument a reasonable
interpretation .
That's the power -- both beautiful and terrible -- of separation between
language and library...anyon e can choose to use the standard string
functions or to use yours...or even (saints have mercy) put the standard
names on your implementations and sneak them into the library ;-)
-leor
Leor Zolman
BD Software le**@bdsoft.com www.bdsoft.com -- On-Site Training in C/C++, Java, Perl & Unix
C++ users: Download BD Software's free STL Error Message
Decryptor at www.bdsoft.com/tools/stlfilt.html
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:41:55 GMT, Leor Zolman <le**@bdsoft.co m> wrote
in comp.lang.c: On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:13:35 GMT, Nick Landsberg <hu*****@NOSPAM .att.net>
wrote:
Dennis Allison wrote:
Which C libraries (current and historical) interpret a null pointer as
a pointer to a null (that is, empty) string?
There was at least one implementation (pre C-89), which
took great pains into putting 0x0 at location zero
in the data segment.
Thus, the NULL pointer (on that implemenation a zero)
would always point to a location with the contents '\0'
for a char *, and all zero bits for other pointers to
that location.
Needless to say, things broke in myriad ways when
code was ported to another implementation.
And even /that/ is more to the tune of "the platform tries to minimize the
potential damage in the case when a C program (user code or lib function)
mistakenly treats a null pointer as if it were a valid pointer to
something".
I get the feeling the OP was asking if there are/were any string-handling
libraries that always check for a special-case of 0 when handed a char *,
and do some reasonable thing in that case.
I don't know, but if there were then that would have to be considered some
sort of non-standard extension, and it might even be offensive to folks
using the string lib functions because it implies extra special-case
overhead that proper use of those pointers would have rendered unnecessary.
Nothing non-standard about it at all. The standard no longer applies
once a program invokes undefined behavior, and passing a null pointer
to any standard library function that does not specifically state that
it accepts them (such as realloc(), free(), strto*()) is specifically
undefined behavior.
Some programmers might prefer a guaranteed unmistakeable crash to
bring a coding defect to their attention, but an implementation that
does this is no more or less than conforming than one that treats a
null pointer as pointing to a '\0' character.
At most it's a QOI issue.
--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.l earn.c-c++ http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:13:35 GMT, Nick Landsberg
<hu*****@NOSPAM .att.net> wrote: Dennis Allison wrote:
Which C libraries (current and historical) interpret a null pointer as
a pointer to a null (that is, empty) string?
There was at least one implementation (pre C-89), which
took great pains into putting 0x0 at location zero
in the data segment.
VAX/VMS C still did this in the late 80's, IIRC.
Thus, the NULL pointer (on that implemenation a zero)
would always point to a location with the contents '\0'
for a char *, and all zero bits for other pointers to
that location.
Needless to say, things broke in myriad ways when
code was ported to another implementation.
Porting others' VAX C code to Unix and OSF/1 was a real pain.
--
Sev This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: mike79 |
last post by:
Hi all,
I have a the following simple piece of code which has taken me hours
to try and sort out the problem, but still unable to find what is
wrong.
void main( void )
{
char (*string); .......................(1)
|
by: sugaray |
last post by:
Hi, I just came upon this code snippet which parses a string stored in buf
with comma(,) as delimiter and store each substring into args, the question
I'm having here is that I don't get why in the first while-statement the OP
cast the NULL to a (long), isn't *buf a char ? and another question is what's
the purpose of NULL in string manipulation, and how to test to see if an input
string is empty ? Thanx for your help.
void parse (char...
|
by: Abhishek |
last post by:
why do I see that in most C programs, pointers in functions are
accepted as:
int func(int i,(void *)p) where p is a pointer or an address which is
passed from the place where it is called. what do you mean by pointing
to a void and why is it done?
Aso, what happens when we typecast a pointer to another type. say for
example int *i=(char *)p;
under different situations? I am kind of confused..can anybody clear
this confusion by clearly...
|
by: sandy |
last post by:
I need (okay, I want) to make a dynamic array of my class 'Directory',
within my class Directory (Can you already smell disaster?)
Each Directory can have subdirectories so I thought to put these in an
array. The application compiles but aborts without giving me any useful
information.
What I suspect is happening is infinite recursion. Each Directory
object creates an array of Subdirectories each of which has an array of...
|
by: sam_cit |
last post by:
Hi Everyone,
I tried the following program unit in Microsoft Visual c++ 6.0 and the
program caused unexpected behavior,
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main()
{
| | |
by: Terry |
last post by:
I am getting the following warning for the below function. I understand what
it means but how do I handle a null reference? Then how do I pass the
resulting value?
Regards
Warning 1 Function 'Dec2hms' doesn't return a value on all code paths. A
null reference exception could occur at run time when the result is used.
|
by: db2admin |
last post by:
hello,
db2 does not recognize '' as null?
say i have T1(C1 INT,C2 CHAR(4))
and i insert (1,'') , it would not be same as (1,NULL)
what db2 consider '' as? how does it store value '' as if not as NULL
because technically is it no data just empty string.
we have application which try to update some columns to ''.
same column is a foreign key from other table and it complains because
|
by: linq936 |
last post by:
Hi,
I have the following code:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void){
char* str1 = "abc";
char* str2 = '\0';
if ( strstr(str1, str2) == NULL ){
printf("yes\n");
|
by: sanjay |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a doubt about passing values to a function accepting string.
======================================
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| | |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
