Multi-dimensional array initialization

[Grumble]

Hello,

Is it not legal in C90 to initialize a multi-dimensional array with a
one-dimensional initializer as done below?

int a[2][2][2] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };

My compiler complains:
example.c:1: warning: missing braces around initializer
example.c:1: warning: (near initialization for `a[0]')

On a somewhat related note, are compilers free to emit warnings, even
if the program is correct?

Nudge

[Tom St Denis]

"Grumble" <in*****@kma.eu .org> wrote in message
news:bv******** **@news-rocq.inria.fr.. .

Hello,

Is it not legal in C90 to initialize a multi-dimensional array with a
one-dimensional initializer as done below?

int a[2][2][2] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };

My compiler complains:
example.c:1: warning: missing braces around initializer
example.c:1: warning: (near initialization for `a[0]')
I'd just write that as

int a[2][2][2] =
{
{
{1, 2},
{3, 4},
},
{
{5, 6},
{7, 8}
}
};

As such a[0][0] points to {1, 2} and a[1][1] points to {7, 8}.
On a somewhat related note, are compilers free to emit warnings, even
if the program is correct?

As I understand it the compiler is free to emit any warnings it wants. Just
useless warnings will deter users which is a bad thing.

Tom

[Mark McIntyre]

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:53:22 +0100, in comp.lang.c , Grumble
<in*****@kma.eu .org> wrote:

Hello,

Is it not legal in C90 to initialize a multi-dimensional array with a
one-dimensional initializer as done below?

int a[2][2][2] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
When initialising multidimensiona l arrays, you need braces round each
level of initialisers.
int a[2][2][2] = { {{1, 2}, {3, 4}},{{ 5, 6}, {7, 8}} };

--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ <http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>
CLC readme: <http://www.angelfire.c om/ms3/bchambless0/welcome_to_clc. html>
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Jack Klein]

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:28:02 +0000, Mark McIntyre
<ma**********@s pamcop.net> wrote in comp.lang.c:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:53:22 +0100, in comp.lang.c , Grumble
<in*****@kma.eu .org> wrote:

Hello,

Is it not legal in C90 to initialize a multi-dimensional array with a
one-dimensional initializer as done below?

int a[2][2][2] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };

When initialising multidimensiona l arrays, you need braces round each
level of initialisers.

No, you don't NEED them. They are recommended as good programming
practice, but the OP's code is perfectly legal in all versions of C
from K&R through C99.

int a[2][2][2] = { {{1, 2}, {3, 4}},{{ 5, 6}, {7, 8}} };

--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.l earn.c-c++
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html

[Jack Klein]

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:53:22 +0100, Grumble <in*****@kma.eu .org> wrote
in comp.lang.c:

Hello,

Is it not legal in C90 to initialize a multi-dimensional array with a
one-dimensional initializer as done below?

int a[2][2][2] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
It is perfectly legal in all versions of C to do this.
My compiler complains:
example.c:1: warning: missing braces around initializer
example.c:1: warning: (near initialization for `a[0]')
Did it produce a correct executable? If it did, it is conforming.
On a somewhat related note, are compilers free to emit warnings, even
if the program is correct?

Nudge

So long as they emit at least one diagnostic if a translation unit
contains one or more constraint violations or syntax errors, they are
allowed to do pretty much anything. As far as the standard is
concerned, there is no such thing as a "warning" or "error" message,
that is a particular compiler's distinction.

A compiler which output this to the stdout stream for every
compilation:

"Translatio n unit might contain an error"

....would be perfectly conforming to the letter of the standard as far
as I can tell, whether the translation unit had any errors or not.

If it always added a second message:

"And you're ugly"

....it would only be a QOI (Quality Of Implementation) issue, not a
standard one.

--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.l earn.c-c++
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html