template related question

[Mohammad]

Hi,

Is it possible to disable a method of a template class depending on
the typename at compile time?

thanks!

[Jonathan Turkanis]

"Mohammad" <mj*******@hotm ail.com> wrote in message
news:3d******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com...

Hi,

Is it possible to disable a method of a template class depending on
the typename at compile time?

In many cases it is possible to keep certain templated functions from
being considered during overload resolution, depending on properties
of the candidate template arguments. This uses the enable_if utility,
now part of boost:

http://www.boost.org/libs/utility/enable_if.html

Note that it requires compiler support for the SFINAE principle, and
therefore will not work on many old compilers, and some new ones.

Jonathan

[Jonathan Turkanis]

"Jonathan Turkanis" <te******@kanga roologic.com> wrote in message:

"Mohammad" <mj*******@hotm ail.com> wrote in message
news:3d******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com...

Hi,

Is it possible to disable a method of a template class depending on the typename at compile time?

Sorry to reply to myself. I noticed that in your question the class is
a template, but not necessarily the member function. In this case, you
often don't need SFINAE, or even partial specialization.

Example:

struct base_with_f {
void f() { }
};

struct base_without_f { };

template<typena me T>
struct derived
: mpl::if_<
is_pointer<T>,
base_with_f,
base_without_f::type

{ };

Now, derived<T> has a member function 'f' only if T is a pointer type.
I have used the compile-time 'if' construct mpl::if_ from the Boost
Metaprogramming Library (MPL), and the traits template is_pointer from
Boost Type Traits.

Jonathan

[Rob Williscroft]

Mohammad wrote in news:3d******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com:

Hi,

Is it possible to disable a method of a template class depending on
the typename at compile time?

thanks!

Yes, look for restrict_to (and enable_if)

Google groups:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=...oe=UTF-8&hl=en

boost:
http://boost-consulting.com/boost/li...enable_if.html

The other simpler way is just to intrudce an error.

template < typename > struct helper;

tempate <> struct helper< int > { typedef int type; };
tempate <> struct helper< double > { typedef int type; };
template < typename T >
struct example
{
T method()
{
typedef typename helper< T >::type T_is_wrong_type ;
return T();
}
};

any call to example< T >::method() should genarate a compile error
unless T is an int or a double.

Rob.
--
http://www.victim-prime.dsl.pipex.com/

[Mohammad]

"Jonathan Turkanis" <te******@kanga roologic.com> wrote in message news:<c0******* ******@ID-216073.news.uni-berlin.de>...

"Jonathan Turkanis" <te******@kanga roologic.com> wrote in message:

"Mohammad" <mj*******@hotm ail.com> wrote in message
news:3d******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com...

Hi,

Is it possible to disable a method of a template class depending on the typename at compile time?

Now, derived<T> has a member function 'f' only if T is a pointer type.
I have used the compile-time 'if' construct mpl::if_ from the Boost
Metaprogramming Library (MPL), and the traits template is_pointer from
Boost Type Traits.

Jonathan

Thanks Jonathan!

What does the metaprogramming stand for? Can someone explain briefly.

[Victor Bazarov]

"Mohammad" <mj*******@hotm ail.com> wrote...

"Jonathan Turkanis" <te******@kanga roologic.com> wrote in message

news:<c0******* ******@ID-216073.news.uni-berlin.de>...

"Jonathan Turkanis" <te******@kanga roologic.com> wrote in message:

"Mohammad" <mj*******@hotm ail.com> wrote in message
news:3d******** *************** ***@posting.goo gle.com...
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to disable a method of a template class depending

on

> the typename at compile time?

Now, derived<T> has a member function 'f' only if T is a pointer type.
I have used the compile-time 'if' construct mpl::if_ from the Boost
Metaprogramming Library (MPL), and the traits template is_pointer from
Boost Type Traits.

Jonathan

Thanks Jonathan!

What does the metaprogramming stand for? Can someone explain briefly.

Metaprogramming is not something that can be explained briefly. Search
the web for it.

"Meta" means "in the vicinity of". If programming is making a computer
behave in a certain way based on input data, metaprogramming is making
compiler do something based on source code (as its input data). Well,
not limited to that of course...

Compile-time calculation of certain things can be given as an example
of metaprogramming . For instance, instead of making computer calculate,
say, factorials of some numbers (which can be needed often) and instead
of precalculating them yourself and putting in a table, you could write
a metaprogram using templates to calculate it:

template<unsign ed i> struct factorial {
enum { value = i * factorial<i-1>::value }; // recursive
};

// to stop the recursion from becoming infinite
template<> struct factorial<0> { enum { value = 1 }; };
template<> struct factorial<1> { enum { value = 1 }; };

int main() {
int fact10 = factorial<10>:: value; // compiler will calculate
return 0;
}

In the example above 'value' enumerator is calculated based on recursive
instantiation of templates required and utilisation of given template
specialisations for i==1 and i==0 (just in case somebody needs it). The
compiler has to precalculate the value initialisers by instantiating all
the intermediate templates but it won't have to do that during run-time,
and there is no enormous table to type (and make a mistake in).

Victor