C++ grammar for ANTLR & C# output

[Rami]

Hi,

I'm looking for ANTLR input file with C++ grammar which is configured for C#
output. Does anybody know where can I find it?

[Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]]

"Rami" <[e-mail] in message news:fi**********@inews.gazeta.pl...

Hi,

I'm looking for ANTLR input file with C++ grammar which is configured for
C# output. Does anybody know where can I find it?

I think that the C++ grammar is too complicated for ANTLR syntax.

[Arto Viitanen]

Ben Voigt [C++ MVP] wrote:

"Rami" <[e-mail] in message news:fi**********@inews.gazeta.pl...

>Hi,

I'm looking for ANTLR input file with C++ grammar which is configured for
C# output. Does anybody know where can I find it?

I think that the C++ grammar is too complicated for ANTLR syntax.

http://www.antlr.org/grammar/list thinks you are wrong: There is a C++
grammar made by David Wigg, but it uses C++ output. So, problem is C#,
not Antlr.

--
Arto Viitanen

[Frans Bouma [C# MVP]]

Arto Viitanen wrote:

Ben Voigt [C++ MVP] wrote:

"Rami" <[e-mail] in message

news:fi**********@inews.gazeta.pl...

Hi,
>
I'm looking for ANTLR input file with C++ grammar which is
configured for C# output. Does anybody know where can I find it?

I think that the C++ grammar is too complicated for ANTLR syntax.

http://www.antlr.org/grammar/list thinks you are wrong: There is a
C++ grammar made by David Wigg, but it uses C++ output. So, problem
is C#, not Antlr.

It's my understanding that the C++ syntaxis (similar to C) isn't
LR(n) compatible in 100% of the cases (so you WILL get shift/reduce
conflicts).

FB

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Arto Viitanen]

Frans Bouma [C# MVP] wrote:

It's my understanding that the C++ syntaxis (similar to C) isn't
LR(n) compatible in 100% of the cases (so you WILL get shift/reduce
conflicts).

But what does that have to do with ANTLR? It is LL parser, and actually
it is something they call LL(*). If I understood it right, the "*" can
be dynamic, and as long as the whole program.

--
Arto Viitanen

[Frans Bouma [C# MVP]]

Arto Viitanen wrote:

Frans Bouma [C# MVP] wrote:

It's my understanding that the C++ syntaxis (similar to C) isn't
LR(n) compatible in 100% of the cases (so you WILL get shift/reduce
conflicts).

But what does that have to do with ANTLR? It is LL parser, and
actually it is something they call LL(*). If I understood it right,
the "*" can be dynamic, and as long as the whole program.

isn't the LR in antLR stand for LR(n) parser generator? i.e. it
generates the action/goto shift/reduce tables for the generic parser
core?

It's been a while since I've looked at antlr, so I might be mistaken
in this. If AntLR is an LL parser generator, it can be done indeed.
Lookaheads longer than a couple of tokens aren't really recommended
btw. ;)

FB

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Barry Kelly]

Frans Bouma [C# MVP] wrote:

isn't the LR in antLR stand for LR(n) parser generator? i.e. it
generates the action/goto shift/reduce tables for the generic parser
core?

No, antlr generates LL(n) recursive descent parsers, for any 'n' you
like.

It's been a while since I've looked at antlr, so I might be mistaken
in this. If AntLR is an LL parser generator, it can be done indeed.
Lookaheads longer than a couple of tokens aren't really recommended
btw. ;)

Modeled as a state machine (typical for LR parsers), it results in
multiplicative (i.e. combinatorial) explosion; however, antlr uses
rather simpler if-then chaining, trading time for tractability.

-- Barry

--
http://barrkel.blogspot.com/

[Barry Kelly]

Frans Bouma [C# MVP] wrote:

Arto Viitanen wrote:

Ben Voigt [C++ MVP] wrote:

>"Rami" <[e-mail] in message

news:fi**********@inews.gazeta.pl...

Hi,

I'm looking for ANTLR input file with C++ grammar which is
configured for C# output. Does anybody know where can I find it?
>
I think that the C++ grammar is too complicated for ANTLR syntax.

http://www.antlr.org/grammar/list thinks you are wrong: There is a
C++ grammar made by David Wigg, but it uses C++ output. So, problem
is C#, not Antlr.

It's my understanding that the C++ syntaxis (similar to C) isn't
LR(n) compatible in 100% of the cases (so you WILL get shift/reduce
conflicts).

Yes, a fully validating C++ is not LR(n) or LL(n) for any n without
helping the lexer with information from the symbol table. Apart from
using lexer feedback, one can be more lenient in the syntax analysis and
use later semantic analysis to fix up the parse tree.

-- Barry

--
http://barrkel.blogspot.com/

[Frans Bouma [C# MVP]]

Barry Kelly wrote:

Frans Bouma [C# MVP] wrote:

isn't the LR in antLR stand for LR(n) parser generator? i.e. it
generates the action/goto shift/reduce tables for the generic parser
core?

No, antlr generates LL(n) recursive descent parsers, for any 'n' you
like.

ah, thanks for clearing that up.

FB
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------