ICloneable and releasing memory

[ib]

ICloneable::Clone returns a new instance of the object being cloned.
However, it seems possible that the garbage collector could release this
memory before the calling function receives a reference to the memory. If
this can occur then it introduces an error that would only occur at random
times. Is this really a problem or does .NET take the necessary steps to
ensure the memory is first referenced by the calling function before the
garbage collector gets a chance to check the memory?

Thanks,

Ian

[Dave Sexton]

Hi Ian,

I don't see why returning a new object from a method named, "Clone" would be
any different, in terms of GC, from returning a new object from any other
method. What exactly is your concern here?

--
Dave Sexton

"ib" <[e-mail] in message
news:NY**********************@wagner.videotron.net ...

ICloneable::Clone returns a new instance of the object being cloned.
However, it seems possible that the garbage collector could release this
memory before the calling function receives a reference to the memory.
If this can occur then it introduces an error that would only occur at
random times. Is this really a problem or does .NET take the necessary
steps to ensure the memory is first referenced by the calling function
before the garbage collector gets a chance to check the memory?

Thanks,

Ian

[Bruce Wood]

ib wrote:

ICloneable::Clone returns a new instance of the object being cloned.
However, it seems possible that the garbage collector could release this
memory before the calling function receives a reference to the memory. If
this can occur then it introduces an error that would only occur at random
times. Is this really a problem or does .NET take the necessary steps to
ensure the memory is first referenced by the calling function before the
garbage collector gets a chance to check the memory?

Why would the memory have to be referenced "by the calling function"?

There is a reference to the memory on the stack, either as a local
variable in the Clone method, as a return value from the Clone method,
or as a local variable in the calling method. Since the GC walks the
stack as one of its ways of determining what is currently in use, it
will find a reference to the memory throughout the cloning process.

It's no different from new-ing an object and returning it from any
other method.

[ib]

Please disregard this posting. I have posted it else where.

Thanks,

Ian