By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
455,192 Members | 1,534 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 455,192 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Do I have to put assembly using COM+ transaction in GAC?

P: n/a
I am currently working on .net 1.1 and want to use COM+ Transaction. Do I
have to put assembly using COM+ transaction (specific class inheriting from
ServicedComponent) in GAC? as per my understanding NO. I can but I don't have
to put assemblies using COM+ transaction in GAC. Is my understanding right?
Apr 1 '06 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
2 Replies


P: n/a
Nope, it has to be signed (strong named) but not in the GAC.

Willy.

"Arif Khan" <Ar******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9D**********************************@microsof t.com...
|I am currently working on .net 1.1 and want to use COM+ Transaction. Do I
| have to put assembly using COM+ transaction (specific class inheriting
from
| ServicedComponent) in GAC? as per my understanding NO. I can but I don't
have
| to put assemblies using COM+ transaction in GAC. Is my understanding
right?
Apr 1 '06 #2

P: n/a
Arif,

You could use dynamic registration for your component, allowing .NET to
register in COM+ for you. However, I don't think that this is a good idea
in general. The nature of COM+ components is that they are available
system-wide (except for private components in an app) and installing your
components in the GAC would fall in line with that exposure.

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Arif Khan" <Ar******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9D**********************************@microsof t.com...
I am currently working on .net 1.1 and want to use COM+ Transaction. Do I
have to put assembly using COM+ transaction (specific class inheriting
from
ServicedComponent) in GAC? as per my understanding NO. I can but I don't
have
to put assemblies using COM+ transaction in GAC. Is my understanding
right?

Apr 1 '06 #3

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.