472,992 Members | 3,348 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 472,992 software developers and data experts.

DAAB 2.0 Vs DAAB in Enterprise Application blocks

hi,

im seriously looking for right answer ....

We are developing windows application in c#.
I implemented DAAB(Data Access Application Block) 2.0 in our application.
One of the senior asked me to implement DAAB in enterprise library.

I said DAAB 2.0 having more performance(data accessing) compare to
enterprise library DAAB. And we not using the features of DAAB in enterprise
library.

Then why should I implement DAAB in Enterprise library....

thanks a lot.....

Nov 17 '05 #1
3 3882
Personally, I like the Enterprise Library. I thought that the
Enterprise Library had the latest version of the DAAB. I like the
Enterprise Library better because it is properly refactored so that things
such as configuration and the like are handled by a core set of libraries,
and the layout is just much better.

Your boss might be right (surprizingly).

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"veera sekhar kota" <ve**************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:62**********************************@microsof t.com...
hi,

im seriously looking for right answer ....

We are developing windows application in c#.
I implemented DAAB(Data Access Application Block) 2.0 in our application.
One of the senior asked me to implement DAAB in enterprise library.

I said DAAB 2.0 having more performance(data accessing) compare to
enterprise library DAAB. And we not using the features of DAAB in
enterprise
library.

Then why should I implement DAAB in Enterprise library....

thanks a lot.....

Nov 17 '05 #2
Hi Nicholas,

Im talking abt my personal experiance...
DAAB 2.0 is more data accessing speed comparitive DAAB in Enterprise
library...
and see the inside architecture of those blocks from the begginning onwards,
its getting changing....In DAAB 2.0 its very nice SqlHelper to access the
data.
For DAAB in enterprise library, is slow data access comparitive to DAAB 2.0.
and Im not using those features in DAAB in enterprise library.
I have couple of answers to tell DAAB 2.0 is good comparitive DAAB in
enterprise library,
like data accessing is fast ,
client backend is only SqlServer
Its a windows application
and im not using features having DAAB in enterprise library....

Do u have any reasons to oppose my views?

"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" wrote:
Personally, I like the Enterprise Library. I thought that the
Enterprise Library had the latest version of the DAAB. I like the
Enterprise Library better because it is properly refactored so that things
such as configuration and the like are handled by a core set of libraries,
and the layout is just much better.

Your boss might be right (surprizingly).

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"veera sekhar kota" <ve**************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:62**********************************@microsof t.com...
hi,

im seriously looking for right answer ....

We are developing windows application in c#.
I implemented DAAB(Data Access Application Block) 2.0 in our application.
One of the senior asked me to implement DAAB in enterprise library.

I said DAAB 2.0 having more performance(data accessing) compare to
enterprise library DAAB. And we not using the features of DAAB in
enterprise
library.

Then why should I implement DAAB in Enterprise library....

thanks a lot.....


Nov 17 '05 #3
If DAAB 2.0 works for you then by all means, use it. However, EL's DAAB has
abstracted away binding to a specific relational database by incorporating
the factory pattern and providers. Plus, it works very well with the rest of
the blocks and you can use the EL Configuration Tool to configure it.

I am curious where the performance falls down for you. Is it because there
is some instrumentation which causes a perf hit? Is there a specific
bottleneck somewhere? Do you have more specifics on where the perf hit
occurs? I ask b/c if its just the instrumentation, you can compile that out
(or just remove it) and then you still data access with all the benefits of
abstraction and configurabiity.

But again, if 2.0 works for you just fine, then that's great.

"veera sekhar kota" wrote:
Hi Nicholas,

Im talking abt my personal experiance...
DAAB 2.0 is more data accessing speed comparitive DAAB in Enterprise
library...
and see the inside architecture of those blocks from the begginning onwards,
its getting changing....In DAAB 2.0 its very nice SqlHelper to access the
data.
For DAAB in enterprise library, is slow data access comparitive to DAAB 2.0.
and Im not using those features in DAAB in enterprise library.
I have couple of answers to tell DAAB 2.0 is good comparitive DAAB in
enterprise library,
like data accessing is fast ,
client backend is only SqlServer
Its a windows application
and im not using features having DAAB in enterprise library....

Do u have any reasons to oppose my views?

"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" wrote:
Personally, I like the Enterprise Library. I thought that the
Enterprise Library had the latest version of the DAAB. I like the
Enterprise Library better because it is properly refactored so that things
such as configuration and the like are handled by a core set of libraries,
and the layout is just much better.

Your boss might be right (surprizingly).

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"veera sekhar kota" <ve**************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:62**********************************@microsof t.com...
hi,

im seriously looking for right answer ....

We are developing windows application in c#.
I implemented DAAB(Data Access Application Block) 2.0 in our application.
One of the senior asked me to implement DAAB in enterprise library.

I said DAAB 2.0 having more performance(data accessing) compare to
enterprise library DAAB. And we not using the features of DAAB in
enterprise
library.

Then why should I implement DAAB in Enterprise library....

thanks a lot.....


Nov 17 '05 #4

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

0
by: sedefo | last post by:
I ran into this Microsoft Patterns & Practices Enterprise Library while i was researching how i can write a database independent data access layer. In my company we already use Data Access...
2
by: David | last post by:
I have been developing applications with Java for quite a while but I am new to .NET development. I am trying to learn the ".NET way" of creating Strongly Typed Objects from a database. The...
0
by: veera sekhar kota | last post by:
im seriously looking for right answer .... We are developing windows application in c#. I implemented DAAB(Data Access Application Block) 2.0 in our application. One of the senior asked me to...
0
by: veera sekhar kota | last post by:
im seriously looking for right answer .... We are developing windows application in c#. I implemented DAAB(Data Access Application Block) 2.0 in our application. One of the senior asked me to...
7
by: Alec MacLean | last post by:
Hi all, I'm trying to deploy an ASP.NET (1.1) app to our production webserver, but having problems with the DAAB (from Ent Lib June 2005). As you might guess, it works just fine and dandy on my...
2
by: Pierre | last post by:
Hello, Is it possible to use the Microsoft Data Access Application Blocks with MySQL ? Thanks. Pierre.
2
by: Kausar | last post by:
Hello All, My question is in what scenerio we should use DAAB? we are going to develop a enterprise Web Application in .Net Framework 2.0 which contains approx 200 tables. Is it sensible to use...
0
by: Dharmen Patel | last post by:
I am using Enterprise Library 2006 , Data Access Application Blocks. 1. I am connecting to Oracle 9i database using DAAB. 2. I retrieve a dataset using the following code in VB.NET. ...
4
by: Cirene | last post by:
I am using ASP.NET, .NET 3.5 FW and MySQL db. I was looking at the Enterprise Library Contrib Data Access Application Block....
0
by: lllomh | last post by:
Define the method first this.state = { buttonBackgroundColor: 'green', isBlinking: false, // A new status is added to identify whether the button is blinking or not } autoStart=()=>{
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Hello everyone, I have a question and would like some advice on network connectivity. I have one computer connected to my router via WiFi, but I have two other computers that I want to be able to...
2
by: giovanniandrean | last post by:
The energy model is structured as follows and uses excel sheets to give input data: 1-Utility.py contains all the functions needed to calculate the variables and other minor things (mentions...
3
NeoPa
by: NeoPa | last post by:
Introduction For this article I'll be using a very simple database which has Form (clsForm) & Report (clsReport) classes that simply handle making the calling Form invisible until the Form, or all...
1
by: Teri B | last post by:
Hi, I have created a sub-form Roles. In my course form the user selects the roles assigned to the course. 0ne-to-many. One course many roles. Then I created a report based on the Course form and...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 1 Nov 2023 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM) Please note that the UK and Europe revert to winter time on...
0
NeoPa
by: NeoPa | last post by:
Introduction For this article I'll be focusing on the Report (clsReport) class. This simply handles making the calling Form invisible until all of the Reports opened by it have been closed, when it...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next online meeting of the Access Europe User Group will be on Wednesday 6 Dec 2023 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, Mike...
3
SueHopson
by: SueHopson | last post by:
Hi All, I'm trying to create a single code (run off a button that calls the Private Sub) for our parts list report that will allow the user to filter by either/both PartVendor and PartType. On...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.