Need tips on how to program this!

[Jeff]

IDE: VS .NET 2003
OS: XP pro sp2

I'm developing a server application, clients will connect to it over the net
and start different tasks....

When people sends a command to the program, the command is first placed into
ThreadPool for await processing...

Here is the what I'm having problem with:
I want to implement some kind of a timeout functionality, so if a task takes
too long to perform the user will be notified that a timeout occured on the
server... I'm not sure how to implement timeout, because I must time the
task from the server receive the task and put it into the threadpool and
await processing... while it is in the threadpool it's waiting to be
processed, and as far as I know, if a timeout happens while it's still in
the threadpool it will not be triggered because it isn't assgined processor
power...

Please give me some tips on how to implement this functionality

Jeff

[Garry Freemyer]

Here is one way I might do it....

When the command is recieved, the command is put into an object where the
command, the IP or other info about the sender of the command is passed into
the constructor of the object, and inside the constructor there is code to
store the time of command reception, and the other info into variables then
store it in the pool.

When its time to execute the command, get the object and check to see if it
is too old to process and if so, send a message to the sender that the
server was too busy to execute the command and to try again.

Once you are past that point, you have this command object reception time,
that you can work with to perhaps utilize some sort of user defined event
that aborts the current command and sends a message that the command has
timed out, and then dispose of the command object or whatever you wish to do
with it.

Also, on the internet, I remember something about packets already having a
built in lifetime, you might be able to utilize this functionality rather
than re-inventing the wheel.

"Jeff" <it************@hotmail.com.NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:uW**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

IDE: VS .NET 2003
OS: XP pro sp2

I'm developing a server application, clients will connect to it over the
net and start different tasks....

When people sends a command to the program, the command is first placed
into ThreadPool for await processing...

Here is the what I'm having problem with:
I want to implement some kind of a timeout functionality, so if a task
takes too long to perform the user will be notified that a timeout occured
on the server... I'm not sure how to implement timeout, because I must
time the task from the server receive the task and put it into the
threadpool and await processing... while it is in the threadpool it's
waiting to be processed, and as far as I know, if a timeout happens while
it's still in the threadpool it will not be triggered because it isn't
assgined processor power...

Please give me some tips on how to implement this functionality

Jeff

[William Stacey [MVP]]

What will be "timing out"? The job itself or timeout waiting for the job to
start (i.e. very busy). Are you saying that you want a job to only run for
max time of 10 minutes or something? Will the jobs be Batch Files or EXEs
run with the Process class or predefined Methodswith args on your server?

--
William Stacey [MVP]

"Jeff" <it************@hotmail.com.NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:uW**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

IDE: VS .NET 2003
OS: XP pro sp2

I'm developing a server application, clients will connect to it over the
net and start different tasks....

When people sends a command to the program, the command is first placed
into ThreadPool for await processing...

Here is the what I'm having problem with:
I want to implement some kind of a timeout functionality, so if a task
takes too long to perform the user will be notified that a timeout occured
on the server... I'm not sure how to implement timeout, because I must
time the task from the server receive the task and put it into the
threadpool and await processing... while it is in the threadpool it's
waiting to be processed, and as far as I know, if a timeout happens while
it's still in the threadpool it will not be triggered because it isn't
assgined processor power...

Please give me some tips on how to implement this functionality

Jeff

[Helge Jensen]

Jeff wrote:

IDE: VS .NET 2003
OS: XP pro sp2

I'm developing a server application, clients will connect to it over the net
and start different tasks....
Why would you use the ThreadPool to execute the tasks? especially if you
expect them to be long-lived you should just start a new Thread().

If it is because you wish to impose a limit on the amount of running
jobs, put them in a producer-consumer Queue and use a semaphore to limit
the amount of started threads.

How are you going to "timeout"? there really is no reliable way to stop
a Thread in .NET, both Thread.Interrupt and Thread.Abort may block
indefinatly, and they both have "issues". If your jobs are started in
separate Process'es, then you can abort them when their timeout expires
by killing the process, but that may also be unacceptable to you.

You could have something like:

- a "timeout-thread", which loops:
- waits for the closest timeout to expire
- try to kill the corresponding thread/process if it's still around
- an "enqueue-thread", which loops:
- accept jobs from network
- enqueue job
- a "dequeue-thread", which loops:
- pop from the queue
- [optional: limit running jobs] wait for a semapore
- starts a new thread
- [optional: limit running jobs] a "monitor-thread", which loops:
- waits for any of the started threads to expire
- signal the semaphore
When people sends a command to the program, the command is first placed into
ThreadPool for await processing...
Don't use the ThreadPool for running longer jobs, it's a resource which
others might use. Use a new Thread or Process, which *fails* instead of
*blocking* if that resource (Threads, Processess) is exhausted.
task from the server receive the task and put it into the threadpool and
To monitor the complete time from accept to execution, you need to
time-stamp the incoming jobs when they are received. You also need to
traverse the Queue at regular intervals, expiring jobs that are
time-out'et before they have even begun.
Please give me some tips on how to implement this functionality

Thats my $.02

--
Helge Jensen
mailto:he**********@slog.dk
sip:he**********@slog.dk
-=> Sebastian cover-music: http://ungdomshus.nu <=-

[Bonj]

When the command is recieved, the command is put into an object where the
command, the IP or other info about the sender of the command is passed
into the constructor of the object, and inside the constructor there is
code to store the time of command reception, and the other info into
variables then store it in the pool.

When its time to execute the command, get the object and check to see if
it is too old to process
But that might still be way after the timeout value has expired ... wouldn't
it be better to have the queuing object itself have a timer and when it runs
out, remove itself from the queue and return timeout failure return code to
the client? Or alternatively a 'timeout-checking' thread.

and if so, send a message to the sender that the server was too busy to
execute the command and to try again.

Once you are past that point, you have this command object reception
time, that you can work with to perhaps utilize some sort of user defined
event that aborts the current command and sends a message that the command
has timed out, and then dispose of the command object or whatever you wish
to do with it.

Also, on the internet, I remember something about packets already having a
built in lifetime, you might be able to utilize this functionality rather
than re-inventing the wheel.

"Jeff" <it************@hotmail.com.NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:uW**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

IDE: VS .NET 2003
OS: XP pro sp2

I'm developing a server application, clients will connect to it over the
net and start different tasks....

When people sends a command to the program, the command is first placed
into ThreadPool for await processing...

Here is the what I'm having problem with:
I want to implement some kind of a timeout functionality, so if a task
takes too long to perform the user will be notified that a timeout
occured on the server... I'm not sure how to implement timeout, because I
must time the task from the server receive the task and put it into the
threadpool and await processing... while it is in the threadpool it's
waiting to be processed, and as far as I know, if a timeout happens while
it's still in the threadpool it will not be triggered because it isn't
assgined processor power...

Please give me some tips on how to implement this functionality

Jeff