Sorry if this is obvious, but Ill ask...
Is there a new way of using pointer operations in C# ?
Ive got a Deitel book on C# that neither mentions the word "pointer" nor
"unsafe" in the index.
coming from a C/C++ world, pointers make perfect sense, and getting up to
speed on CS, did pointers go away?
To compile, one must inform the compiler the segment is "unsafe" ?
Thats okay, I can force unsafe/pointers, but is there a newer, better way??
mtia
17  1851 
In C++, pointers were a way of implementing things from the days of
procedural programming. You don't need them in C#. Use OO constructs
instead.
Can you give me an example of a situation where you'd think pointers are a
good thing, so I can give you some ideas of how to do this differently using
OO methods?
--- Nick
"Bradley1234" <so*****@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:oJKud.2305$Z%1.907@trnddc03... Sorry if this is obvious, but Ill ask...
Is there a new way of using pointer operations in C# ?
Ive got a Deitel book on C# that neither mentions the word "pointer" nor
"unsafe" in the index.
coming from a C/C++ world, pointers make perfect sense, and getting up to
speed on CS, did pointers go away?
To compile, one must inform the compiler the segment is "unsafe" ?
Thats okay, I can force unsafe/pointers, but is there a newer, better
way??
mtia
Hey thanks, that makes sense, but it just occured to me about pointers...
Ive got an example, where I stumbled into it
Class Ticket {
private Passenger *traveler;
}
Class Passenger {
private List<Ticket> tickets;
}
Class Seat {
private Passenger *occupant;
}
Im sure there is a buzzword for doing this, and Ill feel dumb when I hear
what it is, but when I tried to toss this into my C# code it complained and
said no, you must use "unsafe" to mark that kind of renegade code...
"Nick Malik" <ni*******@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:pQKud.484944$wV.396023@attbi_s54... In C++, pointers were a way of implementing things from the days of
procedural programming. You don't need them in C#. Use OO constructs
instead.
Can you give me an example of a situation where you'd think pointers are a
good thing, so I can give you some ideas of how to do this differently
using OO methods?
--- Nick
"Bradley1234" <so*****@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:oJKud.2305$Z%1.907@trnddc03... Sorry if this is obvious, but Ill ask...
Is there a new way of using pointer operations in C# ?
Ive got a Deitel book on C# that neither mentions the word "pointer" nor
"unsafe" in the index.
coming from a C/C++ world, pointers make perfect sense, and getting up
to speed on CS, did pointers go away?
To compile, one must inform the compiler the segment is "unsafe" ?
Thats okay, I can force unsafe/pointers, but is there a newer, better
way??
mtia
Hi Bradley,
Yes, you can use pointer operations in C# inside unsafe blocks.
I'm not sure but many books seem to skip this subject and perhaps with
good reason. Not being used to extensive use of pointers I find I rarely
need them when everything is object oriented from the ground up.
You need to specify /unsafe to compile code with unsafe blocks. An added
protection I suspect as you now are responsible for your own memory
handling.
This is the tutorial for unsafe blocks from the msdn documentations: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...detutorial.asp
In the end there isn't a 'new way' of using pointer operations in C#,
you just don't use pointer operations.
--
Happy Coding!
Morten Wennevik [C# MVP]
In this case you substitute pointers with references, sort of a pointer
that points to a memory address that holds the address to the actual
object. This memory address will be changed by the garbage collector.
class Ticket
{
private Passenger traveler; // no * needed, everything is basically a
reference
}
class Passenger
{
private Ticket[] tickets; // I may have misunderstood the List<>
}
class Seat
{
private Passenger occupant;
}
class Ticket
{
}
--
Happy Coding!
Morten Wennevik [C# MVP]
Use the .Net Framework SDK documentation. There is a tutorial on how to use
unsafe (pointers) in C#.
ms-help://MS.NETFrameworkSDKv1.1/csref/html/vcwlkUnsafeCodeTutorial.htm
Lloyd Sheen
"Morten Wennevik" <Mo************@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:opsiu9hua4klbvpo@pbn_computer... Hi Bradley,
Yes, you can use pointer operations in C# inside unsafe blocks.
I'm not sure but many books seem to skip this subject and perhaps with
good reason. Not being used to extensive use of pointers I find I rarely
need them when everything is object oriented from the ground up.
You need to specify /unsafe to compile code with unsafe blocks. An added
protection I suspect as you now are responsible for your own memory
handling.
This is the tutorial for unsafe blocks from the msdn documentations:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...detutorial.asp
In the end there isn't a 'new way' of using pointer operations in C#,
you just don't use pointer operations.
--
Happy Coding!
Morten Wennevik [C# MVP]
Morten Wennevik wrote: private Ticket[] tickets; // I may have misunderstood the List<>
I think he meant templates... in C# you don't have this feature. Not
until C# 2.0 when generics will be introduced... (generics in c# are
like templates in C).
Until then you have 2 options: You can create a Collection of objects of
your choice, or you can use any of the collections in System.Collections
or System.Collections.Specialized. The ArrayList class is the most
common... like:
private ArrayList tickets;
Hey thanks Nick, Morten, Lloyd and Natan, seems like there is a rare time
when pointers are needed, and yes it was a template <> thats apparently not
covered until v.2?
Im going to be using older COM objects, or try to anyway and will probably
be trying things there next.
All this nice OOP has made me sort of forget pointers, references address
of, using malloc... When the C# intellisense helps fill out the
statements? oh, what a feeling.
"Lloyd Sheen" <sq*******************@tostopspamhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qM********************@rogers.com... Use the .Net Framework SDK documentation. There is a tutorial on how to
use unsafe (pointers) in C#.
ms-help://MS.NETFrameworkSDKv1.1/csref/html/vcwlkUnsafeCodeTutorial.htm
Lloyd Sheen
"Morten Wennevik" <Mo************@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:opsiu9hua4klbvpo@pbn_computer... Hi Bradley,
Yes, you can use pointer operations in C# inside unsafe blocks.
I'm not sure but many books seem to skip this subject and perhaps with
good reason. Not being used to extensive use of pointers I find I
rarely need them when everything is object oriented from the ground up.
You need to specify /unsafe to compile code with unsafe blocks. An
added protection I suspect as you now are responsible for your own memory
handling.
This is the tutorial for unsafe blocks from the msdn documentations:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...detutorial.asp
In the end there isn't a 'new way' of using pointer operations in C#,
you just don't use pointer operations.
--
Happy Coding!
Morten Wennevik [C# MVP]
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:49:57 GMT, "Nick Malik"
<ni*******@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote: In C++, pointers were a way of implementing things from the days of
procedural programming. You don't need them in C#. Use OO constructs
instead.
Can you give me an example of a situation where you'd think pointers are a
good thing, so I can give you some ideas of how to do this differently using
OO methods?
--- Nick
OK, here's one I'm curious about. Say you have a string or an array, and
you want to send a reference to the 5th element to another function. You
don't want to slow things down by copying anything.
C++:
char * test = "This is an example test";
void AlterTenChars(char * instring) {
for (int x = 0; x < 10; x++)
instring[x] = 'x';
}
void main() {
AlterTenChars(&(test[4])); // <<< pointer to 5th element
}
-------
OK, I know you could cheat and send a ref to the string and a starting
index, but there are places where I've needed to do something like the
above. I've ended up with 'unsafe' and 'fixed'. What's the
fastest-running C# equivalent, without using 'unsafe/fixed'?
PS: I'm sure I missed something in the C++ syntax. You get the point
though.
_BNC... I have no idea if this is optimized. Remember that strings are
immutable, so I have used a stringbuilder.
using System;
using System.Text;
namespace TestChar
{
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for Class1.
/// </summary>
class Class1
{
// not optimized
static void AlterTenChar(StringBuilder inString, int index)
{
for (int i=index; i<inString.Length && i<(index+10);i++)
{
inString[i]= 'x';
}
}
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
//
// TODO: Add code to start application here
//
StringBuilder test= new StringBuilder("Hello World");
Class1.AlterTenChar(test,4);
System.Console.WriteLine(test);
System.Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
Regards,
Jeff OK, here's one I'm curious about. Say you have a string or an array,
and you want to send a reference to the 5th element to another function.
You don't want to slow things down by copying anything.<
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
Pointers can be used in unsafe code blocks from C#. The framework however
provides "safe" ways of accessing memory directly through the Marshal class
that has methods to read and write bytes and copy memory. Because VB has no
concept of pointers this is the method used by many of my graphics
demonstrations on my site.
Personally I have no fear of the unsafe keyword so I use it often in C# when
the architecture seems to require it. I also use Marshal to get around my
readers fear of the unsafe.
The following snippets of code shows the same operations performed with
unsafe code in C# and marshal in VB. They are functionally identical and if
you wished to use Marshal in C# the overheads don't seem to be excessive.
BitmapData bmd=bm.LockBits(new Rectangle(0, 0, 10, 10),
System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageLockMode.ReadOnly, bm.PixelFormat);
int PixelSize=4;
for(int y=0; y<bmd.Height; y++)
{
byte* row=(byte *)bmd.Scan0+(y*bmd.Stride);
for(int x=0; x<bmd.Width; x++)
{
row[x*PixelSize]=255;
}
}
Dim x As Integer
Dim y As Integer
Dim PixelSize As Integer = 4
Dim bmd As BitmapData = bm.LockBits(new Rectangle(0, 0, 10, 10),
System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageLockMode.ReadOnly, bm.PixelFormat)
For y = 0 To bmd.Height - 1
For x = 0 To bmd.Width - 1
Marshal.WriteByte(bmd.Scan0, (bmd.Stride * y) + (4 * x) , 255)
Next
Next
--
Bob Powell [MVP]
Visual C#, System.Drawing
Find great Windows Forms articles in Windows Forms Tips and Tricks http://www.bobpowell.net/tipstricks.htm
Answer those GDI+ questions with the GDI+ FAQ http://www.bobpowell.net/faqmain.htm
All new articles provide code in C# and VB.NET.
Subscribe to the RSS feeds provided and never miss a new article.
"Bradley1234" <so*****@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:oJKud.2305$Z%1.907@trnddc03... Sorry if this is obvious, but Ill ask...
Is there a new way of using pointer operations in C# ?
Ive got a Deitel book on C# that neither mentions the word "pointer" nor
"unsafe" in the index.
coming from a C/C++ world, pointers make perfect sense, and getting up to
speed on CS, did pointers go away?
To compile, one must inform the compiler the segment is "unsafe" ?
Thats okay, I can force unsafe/pointers, but is there a newer, better
way??
mtia
Since arrays are reference types, you can simply pass the entire array
if you need to change more than one element. Nothing will be copied.
-------
// example uses int array instead of string, because strings are
immutable
public void AlterTenInts(int[] array)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
array[i] = 12345;
}
public void TestIt()
{
int[] myArray = new int[10];
AlterTenInts(myArray);
}
-------
And if you only need to change one element, you can use a ref parameter
(equivalent to a reference in C++ or a var parameter in Pascal):
-------
public void AlterInt(ref int x)
{
x = 12345;
}
public void TestIt()
{
// pass a reference to an array element
int[] myArray = new int[10];
AlterInt(ref myArray[0]);
// pass a reference to a local variable
// (it must be initialized first)
int foo = 123;
AlterInt(ref foo);
}
-------
Jesse
On 13 Dec 2004 21:34:01 -0800, "jm*****@gmail.com" <jm*****@gmail.com>
wrote: Since arrays are reference types, you can simply pass the entire array
if you need to change more than one element. Nothing will be copied.
// example uses int array instead of string, because strings are
immutable
public void AlterTenInts(int[] array)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
array[i] = 12345;
}
public void TestIt()
{
int[] myArray = new int[10];
AlterTenInts(myArray);
}
I had posited the original schenario with the hope that readers would
understand the extension of the concept. My fault for not explaining well
enough. I'll try again.
Assume that you are linearly parsing a loaded stream (array) of 10000000
(that's a gazillion) *variable length* data packets. The first 4 bytes of
each packet tell how long the packet is, but they're encoded. In C++,
you'd simply pass the address of the 'length' packet to the decoder() and
get the decoded number back.
Yes, you could pass the reference to the entire huge array with an index
of 5666600003 or whatever, just to get at those 4 bytes. But that's ugly,
ain'it?
I invariably see this type of thing handled by 'unsafe/*/fixed'.
It's not necessarily a 'flaw' per se, but there is a certain switch-point
where the language can start looking awkward. At that point, I start
thinking about how to get around the language syntax. C# does allow
those loopholes, fortunately, or I probably wouldn't use it.
<<snip>> I had posited the original schenario with the hope that readers would
understand the extension of the concept. My fault for not explaining well
enough. I'll try again.
Assume that you are linearly parsing a loaded stream (array) of 10000000
(that's a gazillion) *variable length* data packets. The first 4 bytes of
each packet tell how long the packet is, but they're encoded. In C++,
you'd simply pass the address of the 'length' packet to the decoder() and
get the decoded number back.
Yes, you could pass the reference to the entire huge array with an index
of 5666600003 or whatever, just to get at those 4 bytes. But that's ugly,
ain'it?
or, better yet, your array would contain a gazillion OBJECTS. You would
pass a single object to the decoder.
I invariably see this type of thing handled by 'unsafe/*/fixed'.
That's just what you are used to. Objects are just as powerful and less
error prone.
It's not necessarily a 'flaw' per se, but there is a certain switch-point
where the language can start looking awkward. At that point, I start
thinking about how to get around the language syntax. C# does allow
those loopholes, fortunately, or I probably wouldn't use it.
I suppose that a model-T looked awkward to a person used to riding around in
a very swank horse-drawn buggy. The rest, as we say, is history.
--- Nick
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:58:22 GMT, "Nick Malik"
<ni*******@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote: <<snip>> I had posited the original schenario with the hope that readers would
understand the extension of the concept. My fault for not explaining well
enough. I'll try again.
Assume that you are linearly parsing a loaded stream (array) of 10000000
(that's a gazillion) *variable length* data packets. The first 4 bytes of
each packet tell how long the packet is, but they're encoded. In C++,
you'd simply pass the address of the 'length' packet to the decoder() and
get the decoded number back.
Yes, you could pass the reference to the entire huge array with an index
of 5666600003 or whatever, just to get at those 4 bytes. But that's ugly,
ain'it?
or, better yet, your array would contain a gazillion OBJECTS. You would
pass a single object to the decoder.
I invariably see this type of thing handled by 'unsafe/*/fixed'.
That's just what you are used to. Objects are just as powerful and less
error prone.
That would be ideal, but I don't have any control over the input stream's
format. The structures are of variable length, so I can't even index into
a structure in the huge byte array. I have to walk thru it C-style,
byte-by-byte, parsing the length of each of the structures as I go.
I suppose that a model-T looked awkward to a person used to riding around in
a very swank horse-drawn buggy. The rest, as we say, is history.
--- Nick
Well, if you can think of a way around it, I'd love to hear it. I'm stuck
with the 'free-form' input byte stream format: [L = length designator]
[D=data]
[L1][L2][L3][L4][D1][D2][D3]
[L1][L2][L3][L4][D1][D2][D3][D4][D5]
[L1][L2][L3][L4][D1][D2]
[L1][L2][L3][L4][D1][D2][D3][D4][D5][D6]
[L1][L2][L3][L4][D1]
[L1][L2][L3][L4][D1][D2][D3]
SeewhadameanVern? In this case (and similar), I don't think that passing
a ref to the entire array along with a big index is any more elegant than
'breaking' C# by using unsafe/fixed to pass a pointer to the current
structure.
> >> Yes, you could pass the reference to the entire huge array with an
index of 5666600003 or whatever, just to get at those 4 bytes. But that's
ugly, ain'it?
What do you think you are doing with the pointers?
You are passing a reference. The reference points to a memory location in
your case.
If you don't refactor your program (see below) then passing "the entire
array" effectively does only this... it passes a pointer to the array.
On the other hand, I see no reason that you should keep a stream in an
array. Sounds kinda silly to me.
Reality check: if any of the data packets is NOT the correct length, then
the entire rest of the stream is forfeit. In other words, if a data packet
is supposed to be 50 bytes, and it is 48 bytes instead, then the two of the
length bytes for the next packet will be consumed. THe length of the next
packet would be wrong... and the rest of the chain as well.
Therefore, you get no Advantage for bringing the entire stream into an array
in the first place. Why allocate that much memory? Seems extremely
wasteful.
Why not just set up a stream reader that reads four bytes... converts to
length... and then reads that many bytes off of the stream, returning a data
packet.
The calling app would not be aware of the encoding at all. It would see a
stream of data packets, not a stream of bytes.
Then, your entire argument about passing pointers to a huge array goes away.
--- Nick This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Susan Baker |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm just reading about smart pointers..
I have some existing C code that I would like to provide wrapper classes
for. Specifically, I would like to provide wrappers for two stucts
defined...
|
by: Stuart |
last post by:
Ok
let me explain: I am writing a c# program that calls into
an unmanaged C++ third-party DLL. I have to make a number
of calls and for simplification the protype I am calling
is:
bool fn(int...
|
by: Tiago |
last post by:
I´m doing a paper about Binary Tree with pointers, and a want to reproduce them in C# but I must use pointers .I Tried to do but failed . My piece of code (with pointers)
not Working(I can´t use...
|
by: Akhil |
last post by:
How much is Pointers different in C# compared to C++?
Do we have destructors in C#? if yes, for what do we use it?
--
Cheers,
Akhil
|
by: CodeTyro |
last post by:
My native language being C++, I've got a few questions that a couple of hours
of searching on msdn didn't answer.
First, when using unsafe code and pointers, what is the C# equivalent to the
C++...
| | |
by: Lance |
last post by:
VB.NET (v2003) does not support pointers, right? Assuming that this is true, are there any plans to support pointers in the future? Forgive my ignorance, but if C# supports pointers and C# and...
|
by: Zytan |
last post by:
I know there are no pointers in C#, but if you do:
a = b;
and a and b are both arrays, they now both point to the same memory
(changing one changes the other). So, it makes them seem like...
|
by: Randy |
last post by:
Hi,
I am a noob. I am trying to store Student objects pointers, in a
vector, within a School object.
I call a setter function to add the pointer. If I use this method it
works,
Student st =...
|
by: johanatan |
last post by:
Does anyone know the reasons for the lack of an implicit casting
operator in any greater depth than:
A. Automatic conversion is believed to be too error prone.
(from the FAQ at the bottom of:...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
| | |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated ...
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence...
| |
