One Constructor Calling Another

[Mike Labosh]

Greetings, all:

I want to invoke one constructor from another to gain code reuse.

In the snip below, I want my second constructor to pass its first argument
to the first constructor so that the first constructor can set the Provider
property and invoke the resetConnection() method first, before the second
constructor assigns the connection string to the Connection property, but I
can't seem to work out the syntax.

public class DataProcessor {

// all unrelated code omitted.

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider) {
Provider = provider;
resetConnection();
}

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider, string connectionString) {
// this.DataProcessor(provider); <-- How do I do this?
Connection.ConnectionString = connectionString;
}
}

--
Peace & happy computing,

Mike Labosh, MCSD
"I have no choice but to believe in free will."

[John M Deal]

Without the comment you are actually pretty close. What you do is call
it like:

public class DataProcessor {

// all unrelated code omitted.

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider) {
Provider = provider;
resetConnection();
}

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider, string
connectionString) : this(provider) {
Connection.ConnectionString = connectionString;
}
}

Have A Better One!

John M Deal, MCP
Necessity Software

Mike Labosh wrote:

Greetings, all:

I want to invoke one constructor from another to gain code reuse.

In the snip below, I want my second constructor to pass its first argument
to the first constructor so that the first constructor can set the Provider
property and invoke the resetConnection() method first, before the second
constructor assigns the connection string to the Connection property, but I
can't seem to work out the syntax.

public class DataProcessor {

// all unrelated code omitted.

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider) {
Provider = provider;
resetConnection();
}

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider, string connectionString) {
// this.DataProcessor(provider); <-- How do I do this?
Connection.ConnectionString = connectionString;
}
}

[SpotNet]

Hi Mike,

Constructors have their 'own special way' of calling or utilising each
other, from the same class,

public class DataProcessor {

// all unrelated code omitted. OK...
public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider)
{
Provider = provider;
resetConnection();
}

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider, string connectionString) :
this(provider)//<--Do this
{
// this.DataProcessor(provider); <-- No you don't do this?
Connection.ConnectionString = connectionString;
}
}

When doing so keep in mind how overloading works and 'this(...)' will work
for the appropriate constructor. HTH.

Regards,
SpotNet.
"Mike Labosh" <ml*****@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OK**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...

Greetings, all:

I want to invoke one constructor from another to gain code reuse.

In the snip below, I want my second constructor to pass its first argument
to the first constructor so that the first constructor can set the
Provider property and invoke the resetConnection() method first, before
the second constructor assigns the connection string to the Connection
property, but I can't seem to work out the syntax.

public class DataProcessor {

// all unrelated code omitted.

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider) {
Provider = provider;
resetConnection();
}

public DataProcessor(DataProvider provider, string connectionString) {
// this.DataProcessor(provider); <-- How do I do this?
Connection.ConnectionString = connectionString;
}
}

--
Peace & happy computing,

Mike Labosh, MCSD
"I have no choice but to believe in free will."

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Mike Labosh <ml*****@hotmail.com> wrote:

I want to invoke one constructor from another to gain code reuse.

See http://www.pobox.com/~skeet/csharp/constructors.html

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Mike Labosh]

Thanks, people!

--
Peace & happy computing,

Mike Labosh, MCSD
"I have no choice but to believe in free will."