473,770 Members | 5,862 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Are All the Static/Shared Methods in .NET Thread Safe?

I was often noted by Thread Safety declarations when I was reading .NET Framework Class Library documents in MSDN.
The declaration is usually described as 'Any public static (Shared in Visual Basic) members of this type are thread safe. Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe.'
So, does this mean All the static/shared methods written in .NET compatible programming language, such as C#, VB.NET, are guaranteed to be synchronized and thread safe? Or else, we still need to implement our custom code to ensure the thread-safty for static methods?
Mar 20 '07
15 2785
Ok, tank you.:)

"Alberto Poblacion" <ea************ *************** ***@poblacion.o rgwrote
in message news:ey******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P02.phx.gbl...
"Laser Lu" <la******@163.c omwrote in message
news:OO******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...
>[...] The declaration is usually described as
'Any public static (Shared in Visual Basic) members
of this type are thread safe. Any instance members
are not guaranteed to be thread safe.'
So, does this mean All the static/shared methods written
in .NET compatible programming language, such as C#,
VB.NET, are guaranteed to be synchronized and thread
safe? Or else, we still need to implement our custom
code to ensure the thread-safty for static methods?

The programming guidelines from Microsoft recommend that you make all
your public static methods thread-safe, and indeed they have followed
those guidelines in the classes that they have provided with the
Framework.
However, this is not automatic. Just marking a method as static does
not guarantee that it will be tread-safe. you still have to examine your
code and see if there is something in it that could be affected, such as a
shared variable that could be accessed by two threads, and apply adequate
locking mechanisms to ensure its safety.

Mar 21 '07 #11
Thanks!

"William Stacey [C# MVP]" <wi************ @gmail.comwrote in message
news:Op******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP03.phx.gbl...
Any method (static or otherwise) that is called by multiple threads and
uses
any shared state must be aware of syncronization and take require action
depending on needs. Static != thread safe.

--
William Stacey [C# MVP]
"Mike Labosh" <mlabosh_at_hot mail_dot_comwro te in message
news:eD******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP06.phx.gbl...
|The declaration is usually described as 'Any public static (Shared in
| Visual Basic) members of this type are thread safe. Any instance members
are
| not guaranteed to be thread safe.'
| So, does this mean All the static/shared methods written in .NET
compatible
| programming language, such as C#, VB.NET, are guaranteed to be
synchronized
| and thread safe?
|
| Yes. I have never heard of a static (Shared) method *not* being
| thread-safe.
|
| The reason that static / Shared methods are always thread-safe is
because
| there is no instance of a class, and therefore, no member variables for
| threads to stomp on in contradictory ways.
|
| Any local variables inside a static / Shared method exist locally within
the
| particular stack frame of the calling code on the calling thread, and
| therefore, will never conflict with multiple threads simultaneously
hitting
| the same method with local variables.
| --
|
| Peace & happy computing,
|
| Mike Labosh, MCSD MCT
| Owner, vbSensei.Com
|
| "Escriba coda ergo sum." -- vbSensei
|
|


Mar 21 '07 #12
Thanks for your reply. Now, I've had a better understanding based on your
explaination.:)

"Anthony Paul" <an**********@g mail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ e65g2000hsc.goo glegroups.com.. .
Here's the deal... the only difference (that I am aware of) between
static and instance methods is that instance methods pass the "this"
pointer silently while static methods do not; that's it. I think that
the reason why static methods have been marked as "thread safe" is
that they are assuming that, since the method is static, you won't be
accessing any shared-state as you most likely would in an instance
method. Both instance methods and static methods *are* thread-safe as
long as you don't access any shared-state (eg. instance/static fields)
since each thread has its own local stack.

In short, if you have a multi-threaded application that needs to
access shared-state, you need to synchronize all access via a locking
mechanism such as lock, mutexes, monitor, etc...

Here's a link that might help : http://www.odetocode.com/Articles/313.aspx

Regards,

Anthony

On Mar 20, 4:08 am, "Laser Lu" <laser...@163.c omwrote:
>I was often noted by Thread Safety declarations when I was reading .NET
Framework Class Library documents in MSDN.
The declaration is usually described as 'Any public static (Shared in
Visual Basic) members of this type are thread safe. Any instance members
are not guaranteed to be thread safe.'
So, does this mean All the static/shared methods written in .NET
compatible programming language, such as C#, VB.NET, are guaranteed to be
synchronized and thread safe? Or else, we still need to implement our
custom code to ensure the thread-safty for static methods?


Mar 21 '07 #13
In my idea to the best answer
Mar 21 '07 #14
A-ha, quite agree with u. The most brief and definite answer.:)

"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <no************ @planet.nlwrote in message
news:eW******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP03.phx.gbl. ..
In my idea to the best answer


Mar 21 '07 #15
They are marked thread-safe, only when the *author (in this case MS) has
taken the time to verify they are thread safe (which is easy if they don't
touch shared data). As most statics in the framework (not sure if all are)
are documented with the thread safe attribute, it is easy to assume that is
some kind of special gaureentee all statics give - which is not the case.
You can easily make a non thread safe static method via bug or on purpose.

--
William Stacey [C# MVP]
"Anthony Paul" <an**********@g mail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ e65g2000hsc.goo glegroups.com.. .
| Here's the deal... the only difference (that I am aware of) between
| static and instance methods is that instance methods pass the "this"
| pointer silently while static methods do not; that's it. I think that
| the reason why static methods have been marked as "thread safe" is
| that they are assuming that, since the method is static, you won't be
| accessing any shared-state as you most likely would in an instance
| method. Both instance methods and static methods *are* thread-safe as
| long as you don't access any shared-state (eg. instance/static fields)
| since each thread has its own local stack.
|
| In short, if you have a multi-threaded application that needs to
| access shared-state, you need to synchronize all access via a locking
| mechanism such as lock, mutexes, monitor, etc...
|
| Here's a link that might help : http://www.odetocode.com/Articles/313.aspx
|
| Regards,
|
| Anthony
|
| On Mar 20, 4:08 am, "Laser Lu" <laser...@163.c omwrote:
| I was often noted by Thread Safety declarations when I was reading .NET
Framework Class Library documents in MSDN.
| The declaration is usually described as 'Any public static (Shared in
Visual Basic) members of this type are thread safe. Any instance members are
not guaranteed to be thread safe.'
| So, does this mean All the static/shared methods written in .NET
compatible programming language, such as C#, VB.NET, are guaranteed to be
synchronized and thread safe? Or else, we still need to implement our custom
code to ensure the thread-safty for static methods?
|
|
Mar 21 '07 #16

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
6902
by: Steve | last post by:
Is a static method that uses local variables thread safe (eg in a web service) In the following code assuming GetRandomValue() and DoSomethingElse() are thread safe, is the static method thread safe public class Cach public static int GetAValue( int x = 0 x = GetRandomValue()
9
1980
by: Simon Harvey | last post by:
Hi all, In my project I have made a number of helper methods static. As I understand it, this will create the problem that multiple threads could access the static method at the same time and interfere with one another. My question is, for each static method, do I need to lock access to only one call at a time? I've noticed that Microsofts Data Application block also uses static methods for its data access calls - for example execute...
9
4161
by: Clint | last post by:
Hey all - Excuse the cross-post ... I'm not sure what the appropriate newsgroup would be for this question. I have a question that I'm not quite sure how to ask. For all I know, I have the verbaige completely wrong, but here goes nothing ... I'm currently using the MS Data Access Block for a desktop application I'm writing. Recently, I had to add a call to a web service, which in
2
1519
by: blue | last post by:
We have an abstract class with all static methods. It makes sense to have it static because there are no member variables and the constructor is empty. Some of the methods update the SQL Server database and we were wondering if there would be a problem if two threads called that method at the same time. Would it corrupt the database? I was thinking about locking the code on entry and unlocking it on exit.
4
2052
by: Joe Fallon | last post by:
In another post Kevin Spencer stated: "one should be careful of using static fields, properties, and methods, by understanding what the implications of such are (e.g. locking static variables when changing because they are not thread-safe)." Can someone please elaborate on the pros and cons of using static methods? (In VB they are called Shared methods.) The MS DAAB uses Shared methods. This means that all Data Access calls go through...
11
2255
by: dee | last post by:
OleDbCommand class like many .NET classes has the following description in its help file: "Thread Safety Any public static (Shared in Visual Basic) members of this type are safe for multithreaded operations. Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe." I have 2 questions: 1. I thought dynamic variables are thread-safe since threads have their own
4
2592
by: =?iso-8859-1?B?Sm9oYW4gU2r2c3Ry9m0=?= | last post by:
It seems that many people experience problems with mix-ups and non-intentional sharing of sessions in ASP.NET. This is often tracked down to the use of static variables for user data, which are indeed shared and overwritten among all users. I have this problem as well in one of my applications. However, there are no static variables, but there are static methods in my (sealed) SessionStateManager class, like this one: public static...
13
12116
by: Laser Lu | last post by:
I was often noted by Thread Safety declarations when I was reading .NET Framework Class Library documents in MSDN. The declaration is usually described as 'Any public static (Shared in Visual Basic) members of this type are thread safe. Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe.' So, does this mean All the static/shared methods written in .NET compatible programming language, such as C#, VB.NET, are guaranteed to be...
0
9591
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
9425
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
8880
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
1
7415
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
6676
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
5312
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
0
5449
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
1
3969
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
3
2816
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.