If you would like to see this group created, please reply to this post,
making sure you leave news.groups on the newsgroups line.
"Nigel Perry" <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:10******** ******@isc.org. .. REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.std.csharp
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of
the worldwide unmoderated newsgroup comp.std.csharp . This is not
a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time. Procedural
details are below.
Newsgroup line:
comp.std.csharp Discussions on the ECMA/ISO Common Language.
RATIONALE: comp.std.csharp
There are no newsgroups to discuss the ECMA/ISO Standards for C#.
There are multiple implementations of this standard; including the
Microsoft product, Mono, Rotor and DotGNU; and a forum for the
discussion of the Standard and possible future directions would be of
benefit to the community. The ECMA Technical Groups for C# and CLI
are proposing this newsgroup and will monitor the postings.
CHARTER: comp.std.csharp
The purpose of this newsgroup shall be to establish and maintain a
forum for the open discussion of issues related to the ECMA/ISO C#
Standard. Topics may include but are not limted to matters such as the
following:
- Meaning of the Standard
- Implementation of the Standard
- Possible errors/omissions in the Standard
- Possible future directions of the Standard
ECMA and ISO have formal procedures for input to, and reporting errors in,
Standards. This group will in no way replace those procedures. The group
is intended as a forum for the community. However the ECMA Technical
Group for the Standard will monitor and take note of discussions on the
newsgroup.
END CHARTER.
PROCEDURE:
This is a request for discussion, not a call for votes. In this phase
of the process, any potential problems with the proposed newsgroups
should be raised and resolved. The discussion period will continue
for a minimum of 21 days (starting from when the first RFD for this
proposal is posted to news.announce.n ewgroups), after which a Call For
Votes (CFV) will be posted by a neutral vote taker. Please do not
attempt to vote until this happens.
All discussion of this proposal should be posted to news.groups.
This RFD attempts to comply fully with the Usenet newsgroup creation
guidelines outlined in "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup" and "How
to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal". Please refer to these
documents (available in news.announce.n ewgroups) if you have any
questions about the process.
DISTRIBUTION:
This RFD has been posted to the following newsgroups:
news.announce.n ewgroups
news.groups
and the following mailing lists:
<do**********@d i.unipi.it>
Subcribe via: do************* *****@di.unipi. it
<do**********@d iscuss.develop. com>
<do*******@disc uss.develop.com >
<do********@dis cuss.develop.co m>
Proponent: Nigel Perry <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz>
(on behalf of ECMA TC39 TG2&3)
Proponent: Rex Jaeschke <re*@rexjaeschk e.com>
(on behalf of ECMA TC39 TG2&3) 7  2275 
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:04:35 -0700, "Eric Gunnerson"
<er***********@ microsoft.nospa m.com> wrote: If you would like to see this group created, please reply to this post,
making sure you leave news.groups on the newsgroups line.
"Nigel Perry" <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:10******* *******@isc.org ... REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.std.csharp
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of
the worldwide unmoderated newsgroup comp.std.csharp . This is not
a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time. Procedural
details are below.
Newsgroup line:
comp.std.csharp Discussions on the ECMA/ISO Common Language.
RATIONALE: comp.std.csharp
There are no newsgroups to discuss the ECMA/ISO Standards for C#.
There are multiple implementations of this standard; including the
Microsoft product, Mono, Rotor and DotGNU; and a forum for the
discussion of the Standard and possible future directions would be of
benefit to the community. The ECMA Technical Groups for C# and CLI
are proposing this newsgroup and will monitor the postings.
CHARTER: comp.std.csharp
The purpose of this newsgroup shall be to establish and maintain a
forum for the open discussion of issues related to the ECMA/ISO C#
Standard. Topics may include but are not limted to matters such as the
following:
- Meaning of the Standard
- Implementation of the Standard
- Possible errors/omissions in the Standard
- Possible future directions of the Standard
ECMA and ISO have formal procedures for input to, and reporting errors in,
Standards. This group will in no way replace those procedures. The group
is intended as a forum for the community. However the ECMA Technical
Group for the Standard will monitor and take note of discussions on the
newsgroup.
END CHARTER.
PROCEDURE:
This is a request for discussion, not a call for votes. In this phase
of the process, any potential problems with the proposed newsgroups
should be raised and resolved. The discussion period will continue
for a minimum of 21 days (starting from when the first RFD for this
proposal is posted to news.announce.n ewgroups), after which a Call For
Votes (CFV) will be posted by a neutral vote taker. Please do not
attempt to vote until this happens.
All discussion of this proposal should be posted to news.groups.
This RFD attempts to comply fully with the Usenet newsgroup creation
guidelines outlined in "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup" and "How
to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal". Please refer to these
documents (available in news.announce.n ewgroups) if you have any
questions about the process.
DISTRIBUTION:
This RFD has been posted to the following newsgroups:
news.announce.n ewgroups
news.groups
and the following mailing lists:
<do**********@d i.unipi.it>
Subcribe via: do************* *****@di.unipi. it
<do**********@d iscuss.develop. com>
<do*******@disc uss.develop.com >
<do********@dis cuss.develop.co m>
Proponent: Nigel Perry <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz>
(on behalf of ECMA TC39 TG2&3)
Proponent: Rex Jaeschke <re*@rexjaeschk e.com>
(on behalf of ECMA TC39 TG2&3)
--
Abderaware
Fine Components For .NET
Turn on, tune in, download.
zane a@t abderaware.com
Eric,
I think I would like to see that. =)
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- ni************* *@exisconsultin g.com
"Eric Gunnerson" <er***********@ microsoft.nospa m.com> wrote in message
news:3f******** @news.microsoft .com... If you would like to see this group created, please reply to this post,
making sure you leave news.groups on the newsgroups line.
"Nigel Perry" <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:10******** ******@isc.org. .. REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.std.csharp
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of
the worldwide unmoderated newsgroup comp.std.csharp . This is not
a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time. Procedural
details are below.
Newsgroup line:
comp.std.csharp Discussions on the ECMA/ISO Common Language.
RATIONALE: comp.std.csharp
There are no newsgroups to discuss the ECMA/ISO Standards for C#.
There are multiple implementations of this standard; including the
Microsoft product, Mono, Rotor and DotGNU; and a forum for the
discussion of the Standard and possible future directions would be of
benefit to the community. The ECMA Technical Groups for C# and CLI
are proposing this newsgroup and will monitor the postings.
CHARTER: comp.std.csharp
The purpose of this newsgroup shall be to establish and maintain a
forum for the open discussion of issues related to the ECMA/ISO C#
Standard. Topics may include but are not limted to matters such as the
following:
- Meaning of the Standard
- Implementation of the Standard
- Possible errors/omissions in the Standard
- Possible future directions of the Standard
ECMA and ISO have formal procedures for input to, and reporting errors
in, Standards. This group will in no way replace those procedures. The
group is intended as a forum for the community. However the ECMA Technical
Group for the Standard will monitor and take note of discussions on the
newsgroup.
END CHARTER.
PROCEDURE:
This is a request for discussion, not a call for votes. In this phase
of the process, any potential problems with the proposed newsgroups
should be raised and resolved. The discussion period will continue
for a minimum of 21 days (starting from when the first RFD for this
proposal is posted to news.announce.n ewgroups), after which a Call For
Votes (CFV) will be posted by a neutral vote taker. Please do not
attempt to vote until this happens.
All discussion of this proposal should be posted to news.groups.
This RFD attempts to comply fully with the Usenet newsgroup creation
guidelines outlined in "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup" and "How
to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal". Please refer to these
documents (available in news.announce.n ewgroups) if you have any
questions about the process.
DISTRIBUTION:
This RFD has been posted to the following newsgroups:
news.announce.n ewgroups
news.groups
and the following mailing lists:
<do**********@d i.unipi.it>
Subcribe via: do************* *****@di.unipi. it
<do**********@d iscuss.develop. com>
<do*******@disc uss.develop.com >
<do********@dis cuss.develop.co m>
Proponent: Nigel Perry <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz>
(on behalf of ECMA TC39 TG2&3)
Proponent: Rex Jaeschke <re*@rexjaeschk e.com>
(on behalf of ECMA TC39 TG2&3)
"Eric Gunnerson" <er***********@ microsoft.nospa m.com> wrote in message
news:3f******** @news.microsoft .com... If you would like to see this group created, please reply to this post,
making sure you leave news.groups on the newsgroups line.
"Nigel Perry" <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:10******** ******@isc.org. .. REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.std.csharp
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of
the worldwide unmoderated newsgroup comp.std.csharp . This is not
a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time. Procedural
details are below.
Newsgroup line:
comp.std.csharp Discussions on the ECMA/ISO Common Language.
RATIONALE: comp.std.csharp
There are no newsgroups to discuss the ECMA/ISO Standards for C#.
There are multiple implementations of this standard; including the
Microsoft product, Mono, Rotor and DotGNU; and a forum for the
discussion of the Standard and possible future directions would be of
benefit to the community. The ECMA Technical Groups for C# and CLI
are proposing this newsgroup and will monitor the postings.
CHARTER: comp.std.csharp
The purpose of this newsgroup shall be to establish and maintain a
forum for the open discussion of issues related to the ECMA/ISO C#
Standard. Topics may include but are not limted to matters such as the
following:
- Meaning of the Standard
- Implementation of the Standard
- Possible errors/omissions in the Standard
- Possible future directions of the Standard
ECMA and ISO have formal procedures for input to, and reporting errors
in, Standards. This group will in no way replace those procedures. The
group is intended as a forum for the community. However the ECMA Technical
Group for the Standard will monitor and take note of discussions on the
newsgroup.
END CHARTER.
PROCEDURE:
This is a request for discussion, not a call for votes. In this phase
of the process, any potential problems with the proposed newsgroups
should be raised and resolved. The discussion period will continue
for a minimum of 21 days (starting from when the first RFD for this
proposal is posted to news.announce.n ewgroups), after which a Call For
Votes (CFV) will be posted by a neutral vote taker. Please do not
attempt to vote until this happens.
All discussion of this proposal should be posted to news.groups.
This RFD attempts to comply fully with the Usenet newsgroup creation
guidelines outlined in "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup" and "How
to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal". Please refer to these
documents (available in news.announce.n ewgroups) if you have any
questions about the process.
DISTRIBUTION:
This RFD has been posted to the following newsgroups:
news.announce.n ewgroups
news.groups
and the following mailing lists:
<do**********@d i.unipi.it>
Subcribe via: do************* *****@di.unipi. it
<do**********@d iscuss.develop. com>
<do*******@disc uss.develop.com >
<do********@dis cuss.develop.co m>
Proponent: Nigel Perry <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz>
(on behalf of ECMA TC39 TG2&3)
Proponent: Rex Jaeschke <re*@rexjaeschk e.com>
(on behalf of ECMA TC39 TG2&3)
er...no...this is a request for discussion, not a call for votes.
If you have something to SAY about it, please do so, but don't just respond
to it (with no text).
Oh, and be nice to news.groups and don't top post. They bottom post over
there, unlike here.
--
Reginald Blue
"I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my
telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my
telephone."
- Bjarne Stroustrup (originator of C++) [quoted at the 2003
International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces]
Eric Gunnerson wrote: If you would like to see this group created, please reply to this
post, making sure you leave news.groups on the newsgroups line.
"Nigel Perry" <ni***@cosc.can terbury.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:10******** ******@isc.org. .. REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.std.csharp
Eric Gunnerson <er***********@ microsoft.nospa m.com> wrote: If you would like to see this group created, please reply to this post,
making sure you leave news.groups on the newsgroups line.
<snip>
Just to clarify (as we've already had one content-less post) - this is
*not* the vote. Please don't reply to this thread *just* because you
want the group. The vote comes later (and isn't conducted on the group
itself).
This thread is for *discussion* of the proposal, not for head-counting.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.co m> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet/
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Zane Thomas [.NET/C# MVP] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 19:32:37 +0100, Jon Skeet <sk***@pobox.co m> wrote:
Just to clarify (as we've already had one content-less post) - this is
*not* the vote.
That was far from clear!
This is a dusccusion period, designed to improve the proposal (if any
are needed). A post saying this is a good idea means little, a formal
vote is/might be held later (at the proponent(s) choosen). Discusion
about why you consider the proposed group can be useful as well.
During the RFD period discussion certainly can include campaigning to
gather votes, dabates can be useful and indirectly also improve the
proposed group's charter, justification, chances of passing its vote.
--
news:alt.pagan FAQ at http://www.dmcom.net/bard/altpag.txt
news:alt.religi on.wicca FAQ at http://www.dmcom.net/bard/arwfaq2.txt
news:news.group s FAQ at http://www.dmcom.net/bard/ngfaq.txt
Want a new group FAQs http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nnq/ncreate.html
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 21:53:08 -0400, Dave <da******@hotma il.com> wrote: Had you actually read the entire RFD it would have been as clear as crystal.
No doubt - what I read was the "please reply" bit. If it has "please reply if
you have something to say" then I might not have replied.
--
Abderaware
Fine Components For .NET
Turn on, tune in, download.
zane a@t abderaware.com This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Gary L. Burnore |
last post by:
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.databases.mysql
This is an invitation to discuss the following proposal to create
newsgroup comp.databases.mysql. Please note that YOU CANNOT VOTE NOW;
you may be able to vote on a version of this proposal later. See the
PROCEDURE section below if you need information about how the
discussion works.
PLEASE POST ANY FOLLOWUPS TO THE NEWSGROUP NEWS.GROUPS.
|
by: Jonathan Grobe |
last post by:
From: Nigel Perry <nigel@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz>
Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups
Subject: RFD: comp.std.csharp
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 00:26:01 +0000
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.std.csharp
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of
the worldwide unmoderated newsgroup comp.std.csharp. This is not
|
by: Cara |
last post by:
LAST CALL FOR VOTES (of 2)
unmoderated group comp.databases.etl
Newsgroups line:
comp.databases.etl Extraction, transformation, loading issues.
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC, 12 Dec 2003.
This vote is being conducted by a neutral third party. Questions
about the proposed group should be directed to the proponent.
|
by: Jan Roland Eriksson |
last post by:
Archive-name: www/stylesheets/newsgroup-faq
Posting-Frequency: once a week
Last-modified: 2004-07-26
Version: 2.00
URL: <http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-mFAQ.html>
Maintainer: Jan Roland Eriksson <rex@css.nu>
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets meta-FAQ v2.00
_______________________________________________________________________
|
by: Jan Roland Eriksson |
last post by:
Archive-name: www/stylesheets/newsgroup-faq
Posting-Frequency: once a week
Last-modified: 2004-07-26
Version: 2.00
URL: <http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-mFAQ.html>
Maintainer: Jan Roland Eriksson <rex@css.nu>
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets meta-FAQ v2.00
_______________________________________________________________________
| | |
by: Jan Roland Eriksson |
last post by:
Archive-name: www/stylesheets/newsgroup-faq
Posting-Frequency: once a week
Last-modified: 2004-07-26
Version: 2.00
URL: <http://css.nu/faq/ciwas-mFAQ.html>
Maintainer: Jan Roland Eriksson <rex@css.nu>
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets meta-FAQ v2.00
_______________________________________________________________________
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
| | |
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
