blank page using redirect.response

[Grant]

What is the difference between server.transfer(page.aspx) and
redirect.response(page.aspx)? Some of the users get a blank page if I use
redirect.response. I changed it to server.transfer because it works but what
is the difference?

Thanks

[Kevin Spencer]

Response.Redirect adds a header to the Response indicating that the browser
should request the URL supplied by the Response. Some very few browsers may
not support this or have it turned off. Server.Transfer transfers control of
the program flow to another URL on the server side, without asking the
browser for a second request.

--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
..Net Developer
Microsoft MVP
Big things are made up
of lots of little things.

"Grant" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OC**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

What is the difference between server.transfer(page.aspx) and
redirect.response(page.aspx)? Some of the users get a blank page if I use
redirect.response. I changed it to server.transfer because it works but what is the difference?

Thanks

[Grant]

So I would better off use server.transfer? It seems to work better but I do
not want to create problems for the users.

Thanks

"Kevin Spencer" <ke***@takempis.com> wrote in message
news:um**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

Response.Redirect adds a header to the Response indicating that the browser should request the URL supplied by the Response. Some very few browsers may not support this or have it turned off. Server.Transfer transfers control of the program flow to another URL on the server side, without asking the
browser for a second request.

--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
.Net Developer
Microsoft MVP
Big things are made up
of lots of little things.

"Grant" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OC**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

What is the difference between server.transfer(page.aspx) and
redirect.response(page.aspx)? Some of the users get a blank page if I use redirect.response. I changed it to server.transfer because it works but

what

is the difference?

Thanks

[Kevin Spencer]

> So I would better off use server.transfer? It seems to work better but I
do

I can't answer that question. Obviously, both are used in different
situations, or there wouldn't be 2 methods.

--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
..Net Developer
Microsoft MVP
Big things are made up
of lots of little things.

"Grant" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:uU**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...

So I would better off use server.transfer? It seems to work better but I do not want to create problems for the users.

Thanks

"Kevin Spencer" <ke***@takempis.com> wrote in message
news:um**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

Response.Redirect adds a header to the Response indicating that the browser

should request the URL supplied by the Response. Some very few browsers

may

not support this or have it turned off. Server.Transfer transfers control of

the program flow to another URL on the server side, without asking the
browser for a second request.

--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
.Net Developer
Microsoft MVP
Big things are made up
of lots of little things.

"Grant" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OC**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

What is the difference between server.transfer(page.aspx) and
redirect.response(page.aspx)? Some of the users get a blank page if I use redirect.response. I changed it to server.transfer because it works

but what

is the difference?

Thanks